The Community Workshops on the Affordable and
Sustainable Human Exploration of Mars
Joe Cassady
Executive Director, Space
Aerojet Rocketdyne
The Goddard Memorial Symposium
12 March 2015 1
Why Do Mars Plans Gather Dust?
• Sticker shock!!! (dates back to the 1960’s)
• Attempt to extend Earth-dependent
architectures to Mars
• Reliance on technology breakthroughs
• Assumption of reduced launch costs
• Inability to sustain over multi-decade
execution
Why “Affording Mars” Workshops?
• Many critics like to casually cite very large numbers:
“trillion dollar Mars mission”
– US policy has shied away from Mars in part because of the
perception of very high cost
– Multiple independent design studies – albeit preliminary –
support the affordability of initial human missions to Mars
• Significant involvement by broad community of
stakeholders will be critical for successful Mars
exploration
– Significant background reading, planning, and briefings
– Participants intended to be representative of stakeholder
communities
3
“Affording Mars” Workshops (AM I & II)
4
Formal reports available at http://www.exploremars.org/
2013 at the George Washington University
2014 at Caltech
Consensus Architecture Elements from
Scenario and Architecture Group
“Split Mission” Concept Enabled by SLS-class
Heavy Lift, Orion MPCV, Atmospheric
Decelerator, and High-Power SEP
(Graphics: Boeing, Lockheed-Martin, NASA,
Aerojet Rocketdyne)
Priority Consensus Recommendations
For the 2020s: A Habitation Facility “Bridge” Between ISS and the
Capability to Travel to Mars
Deep-space habitation facilities for the 2020s using ISS-based designs and components.
(Courtesy: Lockheed Martin (left image), The Boeing Corporation (right image))
6
Priority Consensus Recommendations
A Heavy Robotic Lander as an EDL Precursor
7
Mars Sample Return as a Heavy Lander to Demonstrate EDL and ISRU Technologies.
(Courtesy: ESA (top left image), NASA and JPL (lower left and right image)
Priority Consensus Recommendations
Closer Collaboration Between Scientists, Engineers, and Architects
8
Scientific discovery will be a major element of human Mars exploration, which
will require active participation by scientists from the start.
(Courtesy: NASA and JPL; H. Thronson)
Priority Consensus Recommendations
Summary Additional Recommendations
9
• Initial human missions to the surface of Mars should include elements
necessary for eventual establishment of sustainable surface outposts broadly
analogous to the initial phases of science-guided Antarctic exploration on
Earth.
• The workshop concluded that a robotic sample return mission may be required
to learn how to protect against forward and backward contamination before
humans land on Mars
• Human missions to Mars orbit or the martian moons may be essential for risk
reduction as immediate precursors to surface missions
• Human operations on the lunar surface, including landing, mobility, power, and
environmental control and life support systems (ECLSS), are not required in
advance of initial human Mars missions
Most Important: Tell The Story
10
11

Goddard 2015: Joe Cassady, Aerojet Rocketdyne

  • 1.
    The Community Workshopson the Affordable and Sustainable Human Exploration of Mars Joe Cassady Executive Director, Space Aerojet Rocketdyne The Goddard Memorial Symposium 12 March 2015 1
  • 2.
    Why Do MarsPlans Gather Dust? • Sticker shock!!! (dates back to the 1960’s) • Attempt to extend Earth-dependent architectures to Mars • Reliance on technology breakthroughs • Assumption of reduced launch costs • Inability to sustain over multi-decade execution
  • 3.
    Why “Affording Mars”Workshops? • Many critics like to casually cite very large numbers: “trillion dollar Mars mission” – US policy has shied away from Mars in part because of the perception of very high cost – Multiple independent design studies – albeit preliminary – support the affordability of initial human missions to Mars • Significant involvement by broad community of stakeholders will be critical for successful Mars exploration – Significant background reading, planning, and briefings – Participants intended to be representative of stakeholder communities 3
  • 4.
    “Affording Mars” Workshops(AM I & II) 4 Formal reports available at http://www.exploremars.org/ 2013 at the George Washington University 2014 at Caltech
  • 5.
    Consensus Architecture Elementsfrom Scenario and Architecture Group “Split Mission” Concept Enabled by SLS-class Heavy Lift, Orion MPCV, Atmospheric Decelerator, and High-Power SEP (Graphics: Boeing, Lockheed-Martin, NASA, Aerojet Rocketdyne)
  • 6.
    Priority Consensus Recommendations Forthe 2020s: A Habitation Facility “Bridge” Between ISS and the Capability to Travel to Mars Deep-space habitation facilities for the 2020s using ISS-based designs and components. (Courtesy: Lockheed Martin (left image), The Boeing Corporation (right image)) 6
  • 7.
    Priority Consensus Recommendations AHeavy Robotic Lander as an EDL Precursor 7 Mars Sample Return as a Heavy Lander to Demonstrate EDL and ISRU Technologies. (Courtesy: ESA (top left image), NASA and JPL (lower left and right image)
  • 8.
    Priority Consensus Recommendations CloserCollaboration Between Scientists, Engineers, and Architects 8 Scientific discovery will be a major element of human Mars exploration, which will require active participation by scientists from the start. (Courtesy: NASA and JPL; H. Thronson)
  • 9.
    Priority Consensus Recommendations SummaryAdditional Recommendations 9 • Initial human missions to the surface of Mars should include elements necessary for eventual establishment of sustainable surface outposts broadly analogous to the initial phases of science-guided Antarctic exploration on Earth. • The workshop concluded that a robotic sample return mission may be required to learn how to protect against forward and backward contamination before humans land on Mars • Human missions to Mars orbit or the martian moons may be essential for risk reduction as immediate precursors to surface missions • Human operations on the lunar surface, including landing, mobility, power, and environmental control and life support systems (ECLSS), are not required in advance of initial human Mars missions
  • 10.
  • 11.

Editor's Notes

  • #4 Workshop Definition of Affordability: An affordable mission is an activity that people are willing to pay for. A Level 0 requirement for Mars human exploration architectures is identification of the sustained source of funding.
  • #5 Co-sponsored by Explore Mars, Inc. and the American Astronautical Society 60 participants from about 20 institutions and agencies
  • #6 Solar electric propulsion (SEP) should be an element of the mission architecture, likely as part of a pre-emplacement strategy with chemical propulsion for crew transportation. A minority view was expressed that an all-chemical architecture may be superior, if aerocapture is feasible. Conjunction-class missions appear to be preferable to opposition-class missions, as the former offers much more time in the vicinity of Mars along with lower total Δv and entry velocities. An SLS-class heavy lift vehicle is required. An all-robotic sample return could demonstrate high-mass entry, descent, and landing capabilities scalable to human-scale landers.
  • #7 An international human mission to the surface of Mars in the 2030s such a mission will require sufficient and stable long-term funding (starting now!) a critical series of risk-reduction activities in the 2020s. A key example is a long-duration crew habitation system in cis-lunar space. Initial human missions to the surface of Mars should include elements necessary for eventual establishment of sustainable surface outposts Our workshop did not endorse one-way missions to Mars, where the humans on the first mission are settlers. Significant public support and inspiration derives from the national pride of having astronauts from participating countries return to Earth to be celebrated.  Could be at EML2 or in DRO
  • #11 The “story” of human space exploration must be comprehensive and coherent with each activity on the way to the surface of Mars readily understandable by the general public. We must continue to develop together and effectively communicate the motivation and quantifiable goals for the future of human space exploration. Public appreciates risk and does not shrink from it