CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
• Identifythe boundaries of the conflict, the areas of agreement and
disagreement, and the extent of each person's aims.
• Understand the factors that limit the possibilities of managing the
conflict constructively.
• Be aware of whether more than one issue is involved.
Be open to the ideas, feelings, and attitudes expressed by the people
involved.
•Be willing to accept outside help to mediate the conflict.
3.
HANDLING CONFLICT SITUATIONS
Determinethe person or group with whom there is a conflict
Analyze the causes of the conflict
Consider alternative strategies for conflict management
Choose the strategy/strategies that will produce the best results..
Implement the decision.
Evaluate the decision
4.
CONFLICT-MANAGEMENT
STRATEGIES
It is importantto take action as soon as a conflict
surfaces so that bad feelings will not linger and grow..
Three over-all frameworks for conflict management are
0 Defensive
0 Compromise
0 Creative problem-solving modes.
5.
DEFENSIVE MODE
The defensivemode produces feelings of winning in some and
loss in others.
The following ways to defensively solve a problem:
•Separate the contending parties.
•Suppress the conflict.
Restrict or isolate the conflict
•Smooth it over or finesse it through an organizational
change
•Avoid the conflict to diminish the destructive effects.
67%
6.
COMPROMISE
With a compromiseeach party wins something
and loses something.."
Use of a creative problem-solving mode
produces feelings of gain and no feelings of
loss for all conflict participants.
Seri 1 Seri 2 Seri 3
em 1 Item 2 Item 3 Item 4 Item 5
CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING
7.
CONTINUE As partof the creative problem-solving process, the
following five steps for conflict management can be
identified:
•Initiate a discussion, timed sensitively and held in an
environment conducive to private discussion.
•Respect individual differences.
•Be empathic with all involved parties.
•Agree on a solution that balances the power and satisfies
all parties, so that a consensus on a win-win solution is
reached
8.
ETHICAL DECISION MAKING
Ethicaldecision-making is the process in which the business aims
to make its decisions in line with a code of ethics. To do so, the
business must seek out resources such as professional guidelines
and organizational policies and rule out any unethical solutions to
its problem. Making ethical decisions is easier said than done.
Good decisions are both effective and ethical. In professional
relationships, good decisions build respect, trust, and are
generally consistent with good citizenship. Effective decisions are
effective when they achieve what they were made for.
ETHICAL ISSUE INTENSITY
Ethicalissue intensity can be defined as the
relevance or importance of an ethical issue in
the eyes of the individual, work group, and/or
organization.
• Ethical issue intensity reflects the ethical
sensitivity of the individual or work group that
faces the ethical decision making process.
11.
INDIVIDUAL FACTORS
• Gender-womenare generally "more ethical" than men.•
• Education or work experience-the more education or work experience that one has,
the better he or she is at ethical decision making.
• Nationality-cultural appears to be significant in affect of ethical decision making.
• Age-the older you are, the more ethical you are.
• Locus of control- external control vs. Internal control.
•External control, see themselves as going with the flow because that's all they can
do.
•Internal control, believe that they control the events in their lives by their own
effort and skill
12.
ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS
• Theorganization's values often have greater
influence on decisions than a person's own
values.
• The more ethical employees perceive an
organization's culture to be, the less likely
they are to make unethical decisions.
Seri 1 Seri 2 Seri 3
em 1 Item 2 Item 3 Item 4 Item 5
13.
OPPORTUNITY
Opportunity describes theconditions in an organization that
limit or permit ethical or unethical behavior.
Opportunity results from conditions that either provide
rewards, whether internal or external, or fail to erect
barriers against unethical behavior.
01 IDENTIFY THEETHICAL PROBLEM
if there is a possible violation of an important
ethical principle, societal law, or organizational
standard or policy
• if there are potential consequences that should be
sought or avoided that emanate from an action
being considered to resolve the problem.
16.
02 COLLECT RELEVANTINFORMATION
• The decision maker should seek to gather as much
information as possible about which rights are being forsaken
and to what degree.
• A consequential focus would prompt the decision maker to
attempt to measure the type, degree, and amount of harm
being inflicted or that will be inflicted on others.
17.
03 EVALUATE THEINFORMATION
• Once the information has been collected, the
decision maker must apply some type of
standard or assessment criterion to evaluate
the situation.
• The decision maker might use one of the
predominant ethics theories-utilitarianism,
rights, or justice.
Seri 1 Seri 2 Seri 3
em 1 Item 2 Item 3 Item 4 Item 5
18.
04 CONSIDER ALTERNATIVES
Thedecision maker needs to generate a set of possible
action alternatives, such as:
-confronting another person's actions,
-seeking a higher authority, or
-stepping in and changing the direction of what is
happening.
19.
05 MAKE ADECISION
• The decision maker should seek the action alternative
that is supported by the evaluation criteria used in Step 3.
• A decision maker selects a course of action that is
supported by all the ethics theories or other evaluation
criteria used in the decision-making process.
20.
06 ACT ORIMPLEMENT
• The decision maker, if truly seeking to
resolve the problem being considered, must
take action.
•Once the action alternatives have been
identified in Step 4 and the optimal response is
selected in Step 5, the action is taken in Step 6.
21.
07 REVIEW THEACTION
•Once the action has been taken and the results are known,
the decision maker should review the consequences of the
action.
• If the optimal resolution to the problem is not achieved,
the decision maker may need to modify the actions being
taken or return to the beginning of the decision-making
process
22.
THREE ETHICS THEORY
Theethical decision-making process tha applies
three predominant ethics theories:
1. Utilitarian perspective
2. Rights perspective
3. Justice perspective
23.
UTILITARIAN PERSPECTIVE
Where thedecision maker considers the
consequences or out-comes of an action and
seeks to maximize the greatest good for the
greatest number of those affected by the
decision.
24.
RIGHT PERSPECTIVE
A decisionmaker who considers a rights perspective would
consider the entitlements of those affected by the decision.
JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE
A justice perspective may focus on either the equitable
distribution of the benefits and costs resulting from the plant
closing and employee layoffs (distributive justice) or the
maintenance of rules and standards (procedural justice).