Nandan Kenkeremath
                          President
Leading Edge Policy & Strategy, LLC
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Public Law No: 111-148 Signed March 23,
2010
Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act
Cleared for President March 25, 2010
Bills reduce the number of uninsured (about
32 million) in 2019
Guarantees access
Certain employers could allow all of their
workers to choose among the plans available
in the exchanges
•   Too Complex – an Unstable Collection of
    Massive Government, Trillions in Spending,
    Taxes, and Confusion

•   over 2,700 pages of complex and confusing
    provisions. Substantial new authorities are
    handed to bureaucracies that will launch
    more complexity and confusion. No one can
    follow or predict the disruptions, distortions,
    unintended consequences that flow from the
    proposals.
•   Financial Help is Not Generally Available to
    Employees of Companies that Provide Qualified
    Health Insurance
•   Trillions of dollars of subsidies and entitlements
    are generally not available to help workers who
    get qualified insurance from their employers.
    This means rising health care cost continue to
    keep wages down.
•   In response to the incentives of the bill, large
    employers may reduce certain lower come, in-
    house positions in favor of outsourcing or
    contracting out.
•   The Bill is Inconsistent with the President’s
    Promise that Employees can Keep Health
    Plans They Have Due to Government
    Micromanagement

•   The Federal government would take a more
    substantial role in the design of health
    insurance through dozens of new
    requirements.
•   The Bill is Inconsistent with the President’s
    Promise that Employees can Keep Health
    Plans They Have Due to Punitive Taxes
•   Starting in 2018, the bill imposes a 40% tax
    on certain high cost plans which employees
    would ultimately pay for in either fewer
    increases in salary changing plans.
•   The tax will force many employers to change
    their current plans in favor of cheaper plans –
    plans that may carry fewer benefits and,
    possibly, higher cost-sharing.
•   The Bill will add to the Instability for Our
    Economic Future
•   Over an operating ten year window they are
    $2. 5 trillion dollars (2014-2023) in new
    spending. And that is based on estimates
    that may or may not be reliable over time.
•   The Congressional Budget Office, the
    Medicare Actuaries, and many others do not
    appear skeptical over the political
    sustainability of hundreds of billions of
    dollars of cuts to Medicare.
•   Mandates, Penalties and Liabilities will Harm
    Employers Who have Been Doing Their Part to
    Provide Health Insurance
•   The bill contains dozens of confusing,
    conflicting, and burdensome provisions with new
    bureaucrats and new penalties. These provisions
    will create conflicting interpretation and pose
    substantial new threats and liabilities for
    employers. Employers may get out of the role of
    providing health insurance.
•   The employer mandates are punitive, create
    needless bureaucracy, and may threaten jobs.
Self-Funded
Department of
                 Employer
   Labor
                   Plan
Small
  State
             Group
Regulators
             Market
State Insurance Regulators Licensure, Accreditation

EXISTING REQUIREMENTS    •Prompt pay
•Guaranteed renewal      •Appeals and grievances
•Rating                  •Privacy/Confidentiality
•Preexisting conditions  •Licensure/Accreditation
•Non‐discrimination      •Antitrust
•Quality improvement and •Benefit plan 
reporting                material/information
•Benefit mandates        •Consumer protection
•Solvency and financial  •Fraud and abuse
requirements
•Market conduct
Department of Labor                Internal Revenue Service
EXISTING PROGRAMS                  EXISTING AUTHORITIES 
•ERISA                             •Enforcement for HIPAA, 
                                   Mental Health Parity, 
•COBRA
                                   Genetic nondiscrimination
•Health care portability           •Tax provisions
•Privacy, Mental Health Parity, 
Genetic Non Discrimination
•Benefit Requirements               Health and Human Services
•Claims Processing                  EXISTING REQUIREMENTS/PROVISIONS
Requirements
                                    •HIPAA Benefit Mandates
•Enforcement Authorities
                                    •HIPAA Privacy/ARRA Privacy
                                    •Mental Health Parity
                                    •Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act
                                    •Medicaid/CHIP
                                    •Medicare 
•   Large Employers (Above 50)
•   Auto Enroll (1511)
•   Inform about coverage option (1512)
•   Minimum essential coverage (1513)
•   Eligible employer-sponsored plan
•   Full time employees (and their dependents)
•   Penalty if fails to provide opportunity and on
    full time employee enrolls in a QHP involving
    premium tax credit or cost-sharing
    reduction. $2000 per employee cap.
Maintain Essential Coverage after 2013 for
individual and dependents
Penalty of $695 in 2016 with phase in
$2,250 for entire family
States to establish Exchanges by 2014
Certify Qualified Health Benefit Plans
Essential Health Benefit Requirements
Refundable tax credit for coverage under a
qualified health plan
Reduced cost-sharing for individuals
enrolling in qualified health plans
In 2010 through 2013, eligible employers can
receive a small business tax credit for up to 35
percent of their contribution toward the
employee’s health insurance premium. Tax-
exempt small businesses meeting the above
requirements are eligible for tax credits of up to
25 percent of their contribution. In 2014 and
beyond, eligible employers who purchase
coverage through the State Exchange can receive
a tax credit for two years of up to 50 percent of
their contribution. Tax-exempt small businesses
meeting the above requirements are eligible for
tax credits of up to 35 percent of their
contribution.
Excise Tax on High Cost Employer Plans in
2018 (9001)
Annual Fee on Health Insurance Providers
9010
Elimination of Deduction of Expenses
allocable to Medicare Part D Subsidy 9012
•   No Lifetime or Annual Limit (PHSA 2711)
•   Prohibiting rescissions (PHSA 2712)
•   Coverage of preventive services (PHSA 2713)
•   Extension of dependent coverage (PHSA
    2714)
•   Development and utilization of uniform
    explanation of coverage documents and
    standardized definitions (PHSA 2715)
•   Prohibition of discrimination based on salary
    (exception self-insured) (PHSA 2716)
•   Ensuring quality of care (PHSA 2717)
•   Accounting for Costs value (PHSA 2718)
•   Appeals process (PHSA 2719)
•   Administrative simplification (1104)
•   Prohibition of preexisting condition (PHSA
    2704)
•   Guaranteed availability of coverage (2702)
•   Non-discrimination in health care (2706)
•   Comprehensive health insurance coverage
    (2707)
•   Guaranteed availability 2702
•   Guaranteed renewability 2703
•   Prohibiting discrimination based on health
    status 2705
•   Wellness program 2705
•   Provider participation 2706
•   Prohibition on excessive waiting periods
•   Development of coverage documents and
    standardized definitions (2715)
Between 6 million and 7 million people would
be covered by an employment-based plan
under the bill who would not be covered by
one under current law (largely because the
mandate for individuals to be insured would
increase workers’ demand for coverage
through their employers).
Between 8 million and 9 million other people
who would be covered by an employment-
based plan under current law would not have
an offer of such coverage under the proposal.
Firms that would choose not to offer
coverage as a result of the proposal would
tend to be smaller employers and employers
that predominantly employ lower wage
workers.
Under the legislation, workers with an offer of
employment-based coverage would generally
be ineligible for exchange subsidies, but that
“firewall” would be enforced imperfectly and
an explicit exception to it would be made for
workers whose offer was deemed
unaffordable.
Current Employer
                 Providing Insurance




Smaller Companies not            Bigger Companies
Providing Insurance but         Willing to Pay Penalty
  Employees Receive            But Employees Receive
        Subsidy                        Subsidy
Small Business Tax Credit
 Eliminating Pre-Existing Condition
Exclusions for Children
 Prohibiting Rescissions
  Eliminating Lifetime Limits
  Regulating Use of Annual Limits
 Covering Preventive Health Services
Extending Coverage for Young Adults
Standardizing the Definition of Qualified
Medical Expenses
Increased Additional Tax for Withdrawals
from Health Savings Accounts and Archer
Medical Savings Account Funds for Non-
Qualified Medical Expenses
Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Fee
Administrative Simplification
Limiting Health Flexible Savings Account
Contributions
Eliminating Deduction for Employer Part D
Subsidy
Increased Threshold for Claiming Itemized
Deduction for Medical Expenses
Additional Hospital Insurance Tax for High
Wage Workers
Medical Device Excise Tax
Reforming Health Insurance Regulations
Eliminating Annual Limits
Ensuring Coverage for Individuals
Participating in Clinical Trials
Establishing Health Insurance Exchanges for
Individual and Small Group Market
Providing Health Care Tax Credits
Individual Mandate
Employer Mandate
Health Insurance Provider Fee
High Cost Plan Excise Tax
Increasing the subsidies for premiums and
cost sharing that would be offered through
the new insurance exchanges;
Increasing the penalties for employers that do
not offer health insurance and modifying the
penalties for individuals who do not obtain
insurance;
Increasing the federal share of spending for
certain Medicaid beneficiaries;
Changing eligibility for Medicaid in a way that
effectively increases the income threshold
from 133 percent of the federal poverty level
to 138 percent for certain individuals;
Reducing overall payments to insurance plans
under the Medicare Advantage program;
Expanding Medicare’s drug benefit by
phasing out the “doughnut hole” in that
benefit;
Modifying the design and delaying the
implementation of the excise tax on
insurance plans with relatively high
premiums; and
Increasing the rate and expanding the scope
of a tax that would be charged to higher-
income households.
•   Adding Problems and Instability for Our
    Economic Future
•   Relies on Cuts in Medicare that Are Not
    Politically Sustainable Over Time
•   Breaking the Promise to Allow Employees to
    Keep Current Plans
•   Failing to Address the Rising Cost of Health
    Care
•   Government Regulation of the Health Care
    Quality of Hospitals and Doctors
Extensive Requirements to Provide
Information to the Government
Unfairly treating low and moderate income
workers
Pressure for outsourcing
Nandan Kenkeremath
President
Leading Edge Policy & Strategy, LLC
nandank@comcast.net
703-407-9407

Health Care reform and employers

  • 1.
    Nandan Kenkeremath President Leading Edge Policy & Strategy, LLC
  • 2.
    Patient Protection andAffordable Care Act Public Law No: 111-148 Signed March 23, 2010 Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act Cleared for President March 25, 2010
  • 3.
    Bills reduce thenumber of uninsured (about 32 million) in 2019 Guarantees access Certain employers could allow all of their workers to choose among the plans available in the exchanges
  • 4.
    Too Complex – an Unstable Collection of Massive Government, Trillions in Spending, Taxes, and Confusion • over 2,700 pages of complex and confusing provisions. Substantial new authorities are handed to bureaucracies that will launch more complexity and confusion. No one can follow or predict the disruptions, distortions, unintended consequences that flow from the proposals.
  • 5.
    Financial Help is Not Generally Available to Employees of Companies that Provide Qualified Health Insurance • Trillions of dollars of subsidies and entitlements are generally not available to help workers who get qualified insurance from their employers. This means rising health care cost continue to keep wages down. • In response to the incentives of the bill, large employers may reduce certain lower come, in- house positions in favor of outsourcing or contracting out.
  • 6.
    The Bill is Inconsistent with the President’s Promise that Employees can Keep Health Plans They Have Due to Government Micromanagement • The Federal government would take a more substantial role in the design of health insurance through dozens of new requirements.
  • 7.
    The Bill is Inconsistent with the President’s Promise that Employees can Keep Health Plans They Have Due to Punitive Taxes • Starting in 2018, the bill imposes a 40% tax on certain high cost plans which employees would ultimately pay for in either fewer increases in salary changing plans. • The tax will force many employers to change their current plans in favor of cheaper plans – plans that may carry fewer benefits and, possibly, higher cost-sharing.
  • 8.
    The Bill will add to the Instability for Our Economic Future • Over an operating ten year window they are $2. 5 trillion dollars (2014-2023) in new spending. And that is based on estimates that may or may not be reliable over time. • The Congressional Budget Office, the Medicare Actuaries, and many others do not appear skeptical over the political sustainability of hundreds of billions of dollars of cuts to Medicare.
  • 9.
    Mandates, Penalties and Liabilities will Harm Employers Who have Been Doing Their Part to Provide Health Insurance • The bill contains dozens of confusing, conflicting, and burdensome provisions with new bureaucrats and new penalties. These provisions will create conflicting interpretation and pose substantial new threats and liabilities for employers. Employers may get out of the role of providing health insurance. • The employer mandates are punitive, create needless bureaucracy, and may threaten jobs.
  • 11.
    Self-Funded Department of Employer Labor Plan
  • 12.
    Small State Group Regulators Market
  • 13.
    State Insurance Regulators Licensure, Accreditation EXISTING REQUIREMENTS •Prompt pay •Guaranteed renewal •Appeals and grievances •Rating  •Privacy/Confidentiality •Preexisting conditions •Licensure/Accreditation •Non‐discrimination •Antitrust •Quality improvement and •Benefit plan  reporting material/information •Benefit mandates •Consumer protection •Solvency and financial  •Fraud and abuse requirements •Market conduct
  • 14.
    Department of Labor Internal Revenue Service EXISTING PROGRAMS EXISTING AUTHORITIES  •ERISA  •Enforcement for HIPAA,  Mental Health Parity,  •COBRA Genetic nondiscrimination •Health care portability •Tax provisions •Privacy, Mental Health Parity,  Genetic Non Discrimination •Benefit Requirements Health and Human Services •Claims Processing  EXISTING REQUIREMENTS/PROVISIONS Requirements •HIPAA Benefit Mandates •Enforcement Authorities •HIPAA Privacy/ARRA Privacy •Mental Health Parity •Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act •Medicaid/CHIP •Medicare 
  • 16.
    Large Employers (Above 50) • Auto Enroll (1511) • Inform about coverage option (1512) • Minimum essential coverage (1513) • Eligible employer-sponsored plan • Full time employees (and their dependents) • Penalty if fails to provide opportunity and on full time employee enrolls in a QHP involving premium tax credit or cost-sharing reduction. $2000 per employee cap.
  • 17.
    Maintain Essential Coverageafter 2013 for individual and dependents Penalty of $695 in 2016 with phase in $2,250 for entire family
  • 18.
    States to establishExchanges by 2014 Certify Qualified Health Benefit Plans Essential Health Benefit Requirements Refundable tax credit for coverage under a qualified health plan Reduced cost-sharing for individuals enrolling in qualified health plans
  • 19.
    In 2010 through2013, eligible employers can receive a small business tax credit for up to 35 percent of their contribution toward the employee’s health insurance premium. Tax- exempt small businesses meeting the above requirements are eligible for tax credits of up to 25 percent of their contribution. In 2014 and beyond, eligible employers who purchase coverage through the State Exchange can receive a tax credit for two years of up to 50 percent of their contribution. Tax-exempt small businesses meeting the above requirements are eligible for tax credits of up to 35 percent of their contribution.
  • 20.
    Excise Tax onHigh Cost Employer Plans in 2018 (9001) Annual Fee on Health Insurance Providers 9010 Elimination of Deduction of Expenses allocable to Medicare Part D Subsidy 9012
  • 21.
    No Lifetime or Annual Limit (PHSA 2711) • Prohibiting rescissions (PHSA 2712) • Coverage of preventive services (PHSA 2713) • Extension of dependent coverage (PHSA 2714) • Development and utilization of uniform explanation of coverage documents and standardized definitions (PHSA 2715) • Prohibition of discrimination based on salary (exception self-insured) (PHSA 2716)
  • 22.
    Ensuring quality of care (PHSA 2717) • Accounting for Costs value (PHSA 2718) • Appeals process (PHSA 2719) • Administrative simplification (1104) • Prohibition of preexisting condition (PHSA 2704) • Guaranteed availability of coverage (2702) • Non-discrimination in health care (2706) • Comprehensive health insurance coverage (2707)
  • 23.
    Guaranteed availability 2702 • Guaranteed renewability 2703 • Prohibiting discrimination based on health status 2705 • Wellness program 2705 • Provider participation 2706 • Prohibition on excessive waiting periods • Development of coverage documents and standardized definitions (2715)
  • 24.
    Between 6 millionand 7 million people would be covered by an employment-based plan under the bill who would not be covered by one under current law (largely because the mandate for individuals to be insured would increase workers’ demand for coverage through their employers).
  • 25.
    Between 8 millionand 9 million other people who would be covered by an employment- based plan under current law would not have an offer of such coverage under the proposal. Firms that would choose not to offer coverage as a result of the proposal would tend to be smaller employers and employers that predominantly employ lower wage workers.
  • 26.
    Under the legislation,workers with an offer of employment-based coverage would generally be ineligible for exchange subsidies, but that “firewall” would be enforced imperfectly and an explicit exception to it would be made for workers whose offer was deemed unaffordable.
  • 27.
    Current Employer Providing Insurance Smaller Companies not Bigger Companies Providing Insurance but Willing to Pay Penalty Employees Receive But Employees Receive Subsidy Subsidy
  • 28.
    Small Business TaxCredit Eliminating Pre-Existing Condition Exclusions for Children Prohibiting Rescissions Eliminating Lifetime Limits Regulating Use of Annual Limits Covering Preventive Health Services Extending Coverage for Young Adults
  • 29.
    Standardizing the Definitionof Qualified Medical Expenses Increased Additional Tax for Withdrawals from Health Savings Accounts and Archer Medical Savings Account Funds for Non- Qualified Medical Expenses Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Fee
  • 30.
    Administrative Simplification Limiting HealthFlexible Savings Account Contributions Eliminating Deduction for Employer Part D Subsidy Increased Threshold for Claiming Itemized Deduction for Medical Expenses Additional Hospital Insurance Tax for High Wage Workers Medical Device Excise Tax
  • 31.
    Reforming Health InsuranceRegulations Eliminating Annual Limits Ensuring Coverage for Individuals Participating in Clinical Trials Establishing Health Insurance Exchanges for Individual and Small Group Market Providing Health Care Tax Credits Individual Mandate Employer Mandate Health Insurance Provider Fee
  • 32.
    High Cost PlanExcise Tax
  • 33.
    Increasing the subsidiesfor premiums and cost sharing that would be offered through the new insurance exchanges; Increasing the penalties for employers that do not offer health insurance and modifying the penalties for individuals who do not obtain insurance; Increasing the federal share of spending for certain Medicaid beneficiaries;
  • 34.
    Changing eligibility forMedicaid in a way that effectively increases the income threshold from 133 percent of the federal poverty level to 138 percent for certain individuals; Reducing overall payments to insurance plans under the Medicare Advantage program; Expanding Medicare’s drug benefit by phasing out the “doughnut hole” in that benefit;
  • 35.
    Modifying the designand delaying the implementation of the excise tax on insurance plans with relatively high premiums; and Increasing the rate and expanding the scope of a tax that would be charged to higher- income households.
  • 36.
    Adding Problems and Instability for Our Economic Future • Relies on Cuts in Medicare that Are Not Politically Sustainable Over Time • Breaking the Promise to Allow Employees to Keep Current Plans • Failing to Address the Rising Cost of Health Care • Government Regulation of the Health Care Quality of Hospitals and Doctors
  • 37.
    Extensive Requirements toProvide Information to the Government Unfairly treating low and moderate income workers Pressure for outsourcing
  • 38.