Heavy Mineral Analysis and Provenance Studies of Surma Sediments in and Around Nungba, Tamenlong District, Manipur, Northeast India

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS)|Volume II, Issue III, March 2017|ISSN 2454-6194
www.ijrias.org Page 1
Heavy Mineral Analysis and Provenance Studies of
Surma Sediments in and Around Nungba, Tamenlong
District, Manipur, Northeast India
A. Sangeeta*
N. Pandey
Department of Earth Science, Assam University, Silchar – 788011
*Corresponding Author: A. Sangeeta
Abstract: -A thick sedimentary succession belonging to Surma
Group (Miocene) is well exposed along the road section (NH-37)
in and around Nungba, Tamenglong district, Western Manipur.
The Surma sediments have been analyzed for their heavy
mineral suite following heavy liquid separation technique. The
research result reveals the dominance of transparent varieties
over the opaques. The diagnostic non-opaque variety includes
Zircon, Tourmaline, Rutile, Garnet, Phlogopite, Sphene,
Scapolite, Humite, Glauconite, Glaucophane, Wollastonite,
Sillimanite, Staurolite, Chlorite, Chloritoid, Chondrodite and
Hedenbergite. The heavy minerals suite is characterised by the
presence Euhedral, Anhedral as well as Rounded to Sub-rounded
varieties indicating a mixed provenance for the Surma
sedimentation. Among the opaque variety iron-oxide is most
abundant. The value for ZTR Index has been calculated to be
40.4 indicating a mineralogically an overall submature for
Surma sediments.
Keywords: Heavy minerals, Provenance, Surma Group,
Tamenlong district, Manipur, Northeast India.
I. INTRODUCTION
he understanding of sediment provenance is a key
element in establishing the lithological variability,
palaeoclimatic conditions, tectonic activities and exhumation
history of the source terrain. Determination of sediment
provenance is mostly done through heavy mineral studies as
heavy mineral suits provide important information on the
mineralogical composition of source areas (Morton,A.C.
1987). Nevertheless, heavy minerals have proved to be an
effective tool in classifying the sedimentary sequences into
different litho-stratigraphic units, especially when the rock
column is.devoid of body fossils, as in the case of so called
geosynclinal facies of Assam Tertiary(Evans, 1932), a part of
which forms the present area of investigation occupying the
hill tracts in and around Nungba, Tamenlong District,
Manipur. The pioneering works of Mallet (1876), Oldham
(1883), Evans (1932, 1964) and Mathur & Evans(1964) are
the only basis for any type of geological studies in the region.
No detail published works are available concerning the
subject matter in the Manipur region, except for Soibam
(1998), Kushwaha. et al., (2008) and Singh et al., (2010) who
have provided some information on the structure and tectonics
of the region besides trace fossils.In addition, Srivastava et
al., (1973), Nandy (1983), Sengupta(1990), Srivastava and
Pandey (1973), Srivastava (2004) provided valuable
information on the regional geological frameworks including
lithostratigraphic and sediment logical aspects of the
neighbouring areas.
II. GEOLOGY OF THE STUDY AREA
Among the Cenozoic orogenic belts of Indian sub-continent,
Himalaya is the one where stratigraphic record of collision has
been studied in some detail following plate tectonic
paradigm, relatively few hard data on the subject have been
reported from the Assam – Arakan Orogenic Belt (also known
as IBR) a collision orogen that links E–W Himalaya to the N–
S Andaman-Nicobar island arc. The northern part of the IBR
that extends for about 200 km along the eastern margin of
Northeast Indian craton is popularly known as Naga Hills in
Nagaland and the Manipur.Hills in Manipur. The Naga -
Manipur Hills sector of IBR has been divided into three
morphotectonic units; namely from west to east (1) Belt of
Schuppen, (2) Inner Fold Belt, and (3) the Ophiolite Belt
(Mathur and Evans, 1964). Further, Manipur Hills has been
locally divided into three broad physiographic divisions, i.e.
Manipur Eastern Hills, Manipur Western Hill and Central
Manipur Valley. The structural and tectonic pattern of
Manipur Hills is transitional between the NE-SW trending
pattern of Naga-Patkai Hills and N-S trend of Mizoram and
Chin Hills (Soibam, 1998). The general structural and
lithological trend of the rock formations of the state is NNE-
SSW. It frequently varies between N-S and NE-SW although
sometimes NNW-SSE trends are locally
common(Brunnschweiler 1974). The study area constitutes a
part of the inner fold belt of the Assam-Arakan basin located
south of Kohima Synclinorium in and around Nungba,
western Manipur. It comprises spectacularly developed rock
sequences belonging to Barail (Oligocene) and
Surma(Miocene) Groups. It is bounded between latitudes
24°45′- 63.24°50′ N and the longitudes 93°20′- 93° 30′ E of
the topographic sheet Nos. 83H/5,83H/6 & 83H/9 and covers
nearly 60sq km. The NH-37 passes through the middle of the
study area connecting Silchar (Cachar district, Assam), the
nearest railhead and airport, to the SW and Imphal, the capital
T

town of Manipur, to the SE (Fig.1). A simplified
lithostratigraphic succession of the study area is given in
Table. 1.
Figure.1. Location and geological map of the study area.

Table.1. A simplified lithostratigraphic succession of the study area (Modified afer Singh et al., 2010).
Group
Formation Member Lithology Age
Tipam Gp.
Girujan Fm. -
Molted clay, Sandy mottled clay and minor
mottled sandstone
Miocene-
Pliocene
Tipam Fm. -
False bedded medium to coarse-grained
feldspathic ferruginous sandstone with
occasional clayey layers
Surma Gp.
BokaBil Fm. -
Mainly argillaceous sediments with
ferruginous sandstones, Siltstones, and shale.
Miocene
Bhuban Fm.
Upper Bhuban
Medium bedded ferruginous sandstone and
siltstone with minor sandy shale and
occasional pebbly horizons
Middle Bhuban Sandy shale, lenticular sandstone and
occasional conglomeratic beds
Lower Bhuban
Light grey cross-bedded sandstone and
lensoidal fossiliferous Khaki shale with
conglomeratic horizon at the base and
occasional intraformational clasts and coaly
streaks
Barail Gp.
Renji Fm. -
Alternations of minor shale, Carbonaceous
shale and ferruginous sandstones
Oligocene
Jenam Fm. -
Shale, sandy shale and carbonaceous shale.
Base not exposed
III. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Heavy minerals are high-density components of siliciclastic
sediments. They comprise minerals that have specific
gravities greater than the two main framework components of
sands and sandstones, quartz (Sp. Gr. = 2.65) and feldspar(Sp.
Gr. = 2.54 – 2.76). In practice, minerals with specific gravities
greater than 2.8-2.9 are considered as heavy minerals, the
limit of specific gravities being dependent on the density of
the liquid used to separate them from the volumetrically more
abundant light minerals. A total of 14 (forteen) fresh
representative samples from Surma Group were analysed for
the heavy minerals following the density separation method
suggested by Folk (1980) and Middleton et al (2003). The
following steps were employed:
1. Samples were cleaned, gently crushed and soaked with
H2O2 for overnight and then boiled for about 5 minutes to
complete disintegration and remove organic matter, if any.
2. Samples thus processed were then thoroughly washed with
water and treated with N/10 HCl. After adding a pinch of
SnCl2, all the samples were boiled for 10-15 minutes so as to
remove iron coatings, if any.
3. After cooling all the samples were thoroughly washed with
water to remove the acid and then dried in the oven.
4. Nearly 2 to 2.5 gm of processed samples was poured in
separating funnel containing bromoform and allowed to
stand for about 10- 15 minutes so that heavy fraction of the
sample could settle at the bottom of the separating funnel, i.e.
just above the stopper.In order to release heavy minerals from
the separating funnels the stopper was opened and closed
intermittently for two to three times having a time interval of
nearly 5 minutes in between. 5. Heavy minerals thus released
were retained on a filter paper placed along with a funnel
above the beaker which was lying just below the separating
funnel to store the filtered bromoform for reuse.
6. Heavy minerals retained on filter papers were removed
from the funnel, numbered and kept for drying overnight.
7. In order to prepare the grain mount, a pinch of heavy
mineral residue was taken out of each dried filter paper with
the help of non-sticking paper and then uniformly spread over
the glass slide containing cooked Canada balsam.
8. Glass cover slips were then placed above the grain area
while gently heating the glass slide so as to remove the air
bubble, if any, and allow the cover slip to set properly.
9. Grain mounts thus prepared were studied under the Leica
Research Microscope at the Department of Earth Science,
Assam 99.University, Silchar, Assam.
IV. RESULTS
The heavy mineral suite in the Surma sediments depicts a
cosmopolitan nature. It comprises dominantly of non-opaque
variety that includes Zircon, Tourmaline, Rutile, Staurolite,
Garnet, Phologphite, Glauconite, Glaucophane, Chloritoid,

Chlorite, Sphene, Wollastonite, Scapolite and Humite. A brief description of the heavy minerals is as follows:

.
Zircon: Zircons are represented by prismatic, elongated, oval,
rounded to sub rounded grains with or without inclusions
Plate.I (a to e). Colourless variety dominate over the pinkish
to yellowish brown variety. Zircon is the most common heavy
minerals present in almost all the samples analyzed. Most of
the zircon grains are colorless or slightly greyish in color
under plane polarized light. High refractive index, parallel
extinction, absence of cleavage, high order interference color
and zoning are some of the prominent optical properties
observed under the microscope. It occurs as prismatic
euhedral Plate.I(a) as well as sub-angular to sub-rounded
Plate.I (c to e) grains.
Tourmaline: Tourmaline grains show an intense pleochroism
from pale green to dark green and pale brown to brownish
color. Moderately higher relief, parallel extinction and high
order birefringence are some of the common features. It
exhibits a variety of color ranging from pale green, greenish
yellow to pale brown. It is also one of the most abundant
grains found in almost all the samples. Prismatic euhedral
Plate.I(f) and sub-rounded Plate.I(h to j) grains are common.
Rutile: Rutile is characterized by blood red and pale to dark
brownish yellow colors with high relief, faint pleochrosim and
lack of cleavage. The polymorph Anatase possesses typical
yellowish to orange color with prominent growth bandings
that appears as step like under the microscope. Both euhedral
Plate.II (a) as well as sub-hedral Plate.II (b and c) varieties are
present.
Garnet: Garnets are easily identifiable because of their high
relief and isotropic nature. These occur as colourless to pink
euhedral, rounded to subrounded or irregular grains with
uneven / conchoidal fractures Plate.III (a to c).
Phlogopite: Phlogopite shows pale brown to colourless nature
in plane polarized light with slight pleochroism and a slight
inclined extinction Plate.II (d).
Hedenbergite: Hedenbergite appear as pale green with non
non-pleochroic or weak pleochroic. It exhibits 2 sets of
perfect cleavage and display inclined extinction Plate.II(f).
Chlorite: Chlorites exhibit various shades of green color and
first order to second order interference colours. Pleochroism is
not always visible and extinction almost parallel to cleavage
traces or to fibers Plate.II(j).
Sillimanite: The alumino-silicates are represented by
sillimanite. It occur as long, slender, elongated, prismatic or
irregular shaped grains. These show distinct cleavage, parallel
extinction, second and third orders interference colours with
shades of yellow, green and pink Plate.II(e)..
Staurolite: Staurolite, a significant metamorphic mineral,
makes its presence felt in the Surma sediments. It exhibits
yellowish to brawnish color with strong trichroism from light

yellow-pale yellow to golden yellow. It has moderately high
relief with straight extinction and relatively low birefringence
Plate.II (i).
Kyanite: Kyanite occurs as colourless, moderately rounded
elliptical grains. Step like variations in the interference
colours and inclined extinction are diagnostic.
Glauconite: Glauconite is dark green in color and almost
translucent with parallel extinction, and moderate to strong
birefringence Plate.III (d) .
Glaucophane: Glaucophane displays vivid shades of blue
color with gentle inclined extinction and moderate to high
birefringence Plate.III (e).
Sphene: Sphene exhibits colorless or light brown color with
weak pleochroism. It has high dispersion and nearly fourth
order interference color with symmetrical extinctionPlate.III
(f).
Chloritoid: It exhibits variety of colours from green to
greenish, grey to colourless. Chloritoid grains are identified
by its moderate birefringence colours, parallel extinction with
biaxial(+) orientation Plate.III(h).
Wollastonite: Wollastonite displays colorless to bluish shades
with moderately high relief. It exhibits 2 sets of perfect and
one set of imperfect cleavage with lower birefringence and
parallel extinction Plate.III(g).
Scapolite: Scapolite exhibits colorless with non-pleochroic. It
has low relief and parallel extinction Plate.II(h).
Humite group: Humite and clino-humite appear as colorless to
pale brown colour, humite display parallel extinction whereas
clino-humite being incline. Weak pleochroism with low
refractive index Plate.II(g).
Chondrodite: Chondrodite occurs as lumps of anhedral tabular
to sub-rounded grains. It displays shades of brown,reddish
brown, pale green and brownish yellow with low pleochroism
and inclined extinction Plate. III(i).
Opaque minerals: The only opaque minerals that can be
identified in the present study is magnetite.It does not transmit
light Plate.III(j).
The percentages of the heavy minerals present in the studied
Surma Sediments have been presented in Table 2 and 3 and
shown graphically in Fig.2,3 and 4.
Table.2. Heavy minerals percentage of the study area.
Sr. no .Sample no. Zircon% Tourmaline% Rutile% Garnet% Sphene% Phlogopite% Glauconite% Glaucophane% Staurolite%
1 RS2 24 9 4 54 2 6 0 0 0
2 RS3 23 23 0 31 0 0 8 0 0
3 RS4 18 36 0 9 0 9 9 0 0
4 RS5 9 24 0 30 0 3 0 0 0
5 RS6 15 24 3 46 0 9 0 0 0
6 RS23 39 16 3 6 0 6 3 3 3
7 RS26 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 RS31 22 3 11 3 5 8 0 0 0
9 RS33 5 7 7 55 5 1 0 1 1
10 RS34 6 13 7 41 1 4 0 0 1
11 RS35 22 11 22 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 RS38 29 7 12 23 5 4 0 2 0
13 RS42 16 15 6 53 0 4 0 0 0
14 RS51 46 11 14 0 8 8 0 0 0
Table.3. Heavy minerals percentage of the study area.

Sr. no. Sample no. Sillimanite% Scapolite% Humite% Chloritoid% Chlorite% Chondrodite% Kyanite% Hedenbergite% Wollastonite%Opague % ZTR
%
1 RS2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 37
2 RS3 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 0 46
3 RS4 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 54
4 RS5 0 6 9 0 0 15 3 0 0 0 33
5 RS6 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 42
6 RS23 0 16 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58
7 RS26 0 75 10 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 10
8 RS31 0 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 38 36
9 RS33 0 4 3 1 0 5 1 0 0 9 19
10 RS34 0.5 7 7 0 0 12 0 0 0 1 26
11 RS35 0 22 0 0 0 11 0 11 0 0 56
12 RS38 0 4 2 1 0 4 0 1 0 9 51
13 RS42 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 27
14 RS51 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 0 4 0 71
Figure.2. Distribution of various Non-opaque heavy minerals in the Miocene sediments of the study area.
Garnet
Zircon
Tourmaline
Rutile
Scapolite
Phlogopite
Humite
Chondrodite
Sphene
Staurolite
Chloritoid
Sillimanite
Kyanite

Figure.3. Pie diagram showing the percentage of Opaque and Non-opaque minerals of the studied Surma rocks.
Figure.4. Distribution based on the shape of the Non-opaque heavy minerals in the Miocene sediments of the study area
IV. ZTR INDEX
The ZTR maturity index can be calculated by using the
formula:
ZTR maturity index = (Zircon +Tourmaline + Rutile) X 100
Σ non-opaque minerals
The mineralogical "maturity" of heavy mineral assemblages is
quantitatively defined by zircon-tourmaline-rutile (ZTR,
Hubert, J.F. 1962) index. The ZTR index is the percentage of
the combined zircon, tourmaline, and rutile grains among the
transparent, nonmicaceous,detrital heavy minerals. Because of
their high mechanical and chemical stability, zircon,
tourmaline, and rutile are concentrated with quartz plus chert
Non-opaque minerals
Opaque minerals
Recycled
Euhedral

and metaquartzite rock fragments as sandstones become
progressively more quartzose. As the ZTR index increases,
concentration of the varieties of zircon, tourmaline, and rutile
occurs, together with a decrease in the number of species of
transparent heavy minerals. The ZTR index in respect of
Surma sediments has been found to be 40.40% suggesting
miner logically an overall sub mature nature.
V. DISCUSSIONS
The Surma sediments of the study area possess a diversified
group of heavy minerals(Plate.I to III). Such diversifications
have been attributed to contributions and mixing of different
types of grains from different source rocks as well as supply
of same kinds of grains from different rocks (Pettijohn et.al,
1987). The initial sediment. source characteristics are further
modified especially when dispersal pathways are complex and
involve recycling of previously deposited sediments (Weltje
and Eynatten, 2004). The complexity of these interdependent
modifications, including post-depositional diagenetic changes,
imposes certain limits on the capability of oneself to infer
characteristics of source area from the properties of their
products (Siever, 1988). Among the common heavy minerals
found in the sediments of the study area, four distinct suites
could be identified, namely (1) Chondrodite – Phlogopite –
Scapolite – Wollastonite – Sphene –Hedenbergite- Iron oxide,
characterizing a contact dolomitic marble and skarn source
rock, (2) Zircon– Tourmaline (Schorlite) –– Rutile(Anatase) –
Garnet (inclusion free), indicative of granitic and mafic
igneous rocks, (3) Staurolite –Sillimanite-Kyanite-Fluorite-
Chlorite – Glaucophane – Garnet (with inclusion) –
Mica,signifying a regionally metamorphosed source terrain,
and (4) Recycled grains of Zircon- Tourmaline - Rutile –
Glauconite - Garnet etc. pointing towards a sedimentary
source terrain. Based on the above observation it may be
concluded that the Surma sediments received their detritus
from a mixed source terrain comprising igneous, metamorphic
and sedimentary rocks. Further, the absence of hacksaw
terminations in the heavy minerals point towards a low grade
diagenetic environment.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The first author is grateful to the DST, New Delhi for funding
the research program through Inspire Fellowship. Authors are
also thankful to the Department of Earth Science, Assam
University, Silchar for providing laboratory facilities and
other necessary supports for carrying out the research.
REFERENCES
[1]. Brunnschweiler, R.O (1974) . Indo -burman ranges. Geol Soc
Lond Spl Pub 4, 279–299.
[2]. Evans, P (1932) . Tertiary Succession in Assam. Trans. Min. Geol.
Inst. India, v.27.
[3]. Evans, P (1986) . Tertiary succession in Assam. Trans. Min. Geol.
Inst. India, 37, 155-188.
[4]. Evans, P (1964). The tectonic framework of Assam. Jour. Geol.
Soc. India Vol.5, 80-96.
[5]. Eynatten, H (2004). Statistical modelling of compositional trends
in sediments. Sedimentary Geology 171, 79-89.
[6]. Folk, R.L (1980) . Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. Hamphill’s,
Austin, Texas, pp. 182.
[7]. Hubert, J.F (1962) . A zircon-tourmaline-rutile maturity index and
independence of composition of heavy mineral assemblages with
gross composition and texture of sandstone. Journal of
Sedimentary Petrology, v. 32, 440-450.
[8]. Chandra M, Kundal P & Kushwaha R.A.S (2010). Ichnology of
Bhuban and Boka Bil Formations,Oligocene-Miocene Deposits of
Manipur Western Hill,Northeast India.GSI.Vol.76, 573-586.
[9]. Mathur, L.P. and Evans, P (1964). Oil in India Proc. 2nd
International Geol.Congress, New Delhi, India,pp. 1-85.
[10]. Middleton et al. (2003). Encyclopedia of Sediments and
Sedimentary rocks. Springer, pp. 821.
[11]. Morton, A.C (1987) . Stability of detrital heavy minerals in
Tertiary sandstone from North sea basin. Clay Minerals, v.19,
287-308.
[12]. Nandy, D.R (1983) . The Eastern Himalaya and the Indo-Burman
Orogen in relation to the India plate movement. Geol. Surv. Ind.
Misc. Pub. No 41(3). 153-159.
[13]. Oldham, R. D (1883) . Report on the Geology of Manipur State
and Naga Hills. Men. Geol Survey of India. Vol. XIX part IV.
[14]. Pettijohn F. J, Potter P. E & Siever R (1987). Sand And
Sandstones, second version. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp.
553.
[15]. Kushwaha R. A. S. & Chandra M (2008). Ichnofossils from the
Eocene – Oligocene Deposits between Bijang and Tupul, Manipur,
India, Jour. Indian Association of Sedimentologists, Vol. 27, No.1.
35-44.
[16]. Sengupta S, Ray K.K, Acharyya S.K & De- smith, J.B (1990) .
Nature of Ophiolite occurrence along the eastern margin of Indian
plate and their tectonic significance. Geology, Vol. 18, 439-442.
[17]. Siever R (1988) . Sand Scientific American Library, New York,
pp 237.
[18]. Soibam I (1998). On the geology of Manipur. In: Proceedings of
9th Manipur science congress, Imphal, pp 12–19
[19]. Weltje G.J (2004) . A quantitative approach to capturing the
compositional variability of modern sands. Sedimentary Geology
171, 59-77

Heavy Mineral Analysis and Provenance Studies of Surma Sediments in and Around Nungba, Tamenlong District, Manipur, Northeast India

More Related Content

What's hot

Similar to Heavy Mineral Analysis and Provenance Studies of Surma Sediments in and Around Nungba, Tamenlong District, Manipur, Northeast India

More from RSIS International

Recently uploaded

Heavy Mineral Analysis and Provenance Studies of Surma Sediments in and Around Nungba, Tamenlong District, Manipur, Northeast India