HISTORY IGCSE CONTENT - 20TH CENTURY OPTION - FAIRNESS OF THE TREATIES 1919-1923: THE IMPACT OF THE TREATY ON GERMANY UP TO 1923

HISTORY IGCSE CONTENT - 20TH CENTURY OPTION - FAIRNESS OF THE TREATIES 1919-1923: THE IMPACT OF THE TREATY ON GERMANY UP TO 1923

• 1.
  WHAT WAS THEIMPACT OF THE PEACE TREATY ON GERMANY UP TO 1923? IGCSE HISTORY
• 2.
  TOO HARSH Germany’s generalobjection to the treaty was that it was too harsh. Many Germans felt that their country was being punished twice over. They had to pay reparations. They were deprived of the very sources (coal, iron ore) that were needed to pay these reparations. But Germany imposed an equally harsh treaty on Soviet Russia at Brest- Litovsk in March 1918.
• 4.
  DIKTAT Germany objected thatthe treaty was a DIKTAT (dictated peace). German officials were excluded from the negotiations. They were handed a draft copy and invited to express comments and criticism in writing. That led to minor changes, including the holding of a plebiscite in Upper Silesia. The Germans had little choice but to sign. If they had refused then the Allies would have continued the naval blockade and restart the war.
• 6.
  WAR GUILT CLAUSE Article231 was included in the treaty at the insistence of the Allied lawyers. They wanted to establish a legal basis for reparations. The Germans felt that this clause rubbed salt into their wounds. They were not convinced that they were totally responsible for starting the war. It could be argued that the first military action in the immediate lead-up to the conflict was the Russian mobilisation of July 1914.
• 8.
  POLITICAL IMPACT OFTOV On 23 of June 1919, two representatives of the new German government (Weimar) signed the treaty. Later, they were called traitors. The people who signed the Armistice on 11/11/198, 11am, were called November criminals and the entire story of forcing Germany to pay for everything and admit guilt for the war was the “Stab in the Back” theory. The treaty was the symbol of Germany’s dishonour and humiliation. As a result, the authority of the Weimar Republic was seriously undermined.
• 9.
  POLITICAL IMPACT OFTOV cont. - Right-wing politicians and activists expressed their disapproval by supporting attempts to overthrow the government, such as the Munich Putsch of November 1923. - Right-wing extremists carried out a number of assassinations of high- ranking government ministers, eg. Walther Rathenau (foreign minister) and Matthias Erzberger (finance minister). - Left-wing extremists groups exploited the unpopularity of the Weimar government by promoting rebellions, such as Ruhr of March 1920.
• 10.
  POLITICAL IMPACT OFTOV cont. Many members of the army carried were furious on the Government for agreeing the disarmament clauses so they joined Freikorps. Freikorps = an unofficial anti-communist vigilante group. When the government tried to disband this group in March 1923 following pressure from the Allies, Freikorps units under the command of Wolfgang Kapp staged a coup in Berlin and declared a new national government (hence the name Kapp Putsch). Coup = a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government. The army refused to intervene and the Weimar Government was on the point of collapse.
• 11.
  ECONOMIC IMPACT OFTOV The Germans claimed that in signing the treaty they were also signing a blank cheque. When the figure of 6.6 billion pounds was announced by the Reparations Commission in 1921. Germany claimed that this amount was more than it could afford to pay. TOV caused major economic problems for Germany and the Weimar Republic. Post-war Germany lost valuable economic resources and German economy was characterised by inflation, rising unemployment, poverty and homelessness.
• 12.
  1923 CRISIS WASTRIGGERED BY THE REPARATIONS Germany had paid its first instalment of reparations in 1921. They claimed that it was unable to make the 1922 payment. The French felt that Germany was simply trying to escape from its Treaty obligations and together with Belgium decided to take direct action. In January 1923 French and Belgian troops occupied the Ruhr, Germany’s most valuable industrial area. The intention was to seize coal and other resources to the value of the missed payments. Germany was not in position to order armed resistance and instead ordered the German population of the Ruhr to offer PASSIVE RESISTANCE or PEACEFUL STRIKE ACTION.
• 14.
  PRINTING MONEY =HYPERINFLATION To make up for the lost revenue the German Government began to print money. This transformed the existing high inflation into hyperinflation. The German mark became worthless and middle class savings lost their value. Bartering was increasingly popular: eggs, cigarettes, sugar used as currency.
• 15.
  GUSTAV STRESEMANN In August1923 Stresemann became chancellor and he took the unpopular decision to end the passive resistance in the Ruhr. In October he introduced a temporary new currency called Rentenmark (think renting plus mark). Soon, he agreed to resume reparation payments. Germany’s finances had been stabilised. The reparations problem was partly solved by the DAWES PLAN of April 1924, introducing a more flexible repayments schedule. Five years later, the YOUNG PLAN reduced the outstanding amount to 2 billion pounds.
• 16.
  DISARMAMENT Germany’s dislike ofthe disarmament clauses was partly to do with status and prestige but there were also practical objections. Germany claimed that 100.000 men was insufficient for border defence. It would also be difficult to deal with revolts and uprising.
• 17.
  WILSON’S FOURTEEN POINTS Germanyalways maintained that the armistice was signed on the understanding that the peace settlement would be based upon Wilson’s Fourteen Points. TOV was seen by the German people as a betrayal of this promise in a number of ways. There is no mention in the 14 Points of war guilt or reparations. The 14 Points proposed disarmament for all and a general assembly of nations. In the treaty, Germany was required to disarm but there was no equivalent requirement for the victorious countries.
• 18.
  The wreckage of Germanwarplanes in a Munich scrap yard following the disarmament clauses of TOV
• 19.
  WILSON’S FOURTEEN POINTScont. The 14 Points stressed the idea of self-determination yet in the TOV it was clear that this was not to apply to Austria, Alsace-Lorraine or the Saar Basin. AREA YEAR RESULT SCHLESWIG 1920 Partitioned between Germany and Denmark EAST PRUSSIA: ALLENSTEIN AND MARIENWERDER 1920 Remained part of Germany UPPER SILESIA 1921 Partitioned between Germany and Poland SAAR BASIN 1935 Returned to Germany