Successes and Lessons Learned From An
Innovative Youth-Centered Initiative
the youth + tech + health conference (May 6-7, 2018)
yth live
Ythlive.org
Melisa Price (UCSF), Mariela Uribe (YTH), and Emma Schalmm
The views expressed in written training materials,
publications, or presentations by speakers and
moderators do not necessarily reflect the official policies
of the Department of Health and Human Services; nor
does mention of trade names, commercial practices, or
organizations imply endorsement by the U.S.
Government.
Funded by Department of Health and Human Services,
Family and Youth Services Bureau, under grant
#90AP2688
2
• 5-year randomized-control trial in
Fresno, California
• In-person, group-based,
comprehensive sexual health
education + phone app
• Homeless and unstably housed youth,
youth of color, LGBTQ youth, and
Native American youth
• Ages 13-19
What is In the Know?
4
WH
6
BACKGROUND
Adolescent Birth Rates: US, California
70.9
46.7
31.6
17.6
61.8
47.7
22.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
CA
US
34.2
BirthRate(per1,000femalesage15-19)
Sources: California Department of Public Health and Office of Adolescent Health (2017)
7
Fresno County
Sources: (Map) California Adolescent Sexual Health Needs Index. California Department of
Public Health, Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program; 2016. 2016 STD
Surveillance Report. STD Control Branch.
Adolescent birth rate
• Fresno: 32.6
• CA: 17.6
• Chlamydia rate (females 15-24)
• Fresno: 3637 (#1)
• CA: 2747
• Gonorrhea rate (females 15-24)
• Fresno: 605 (#3)
• CA: 355
8
Lessons learned
• SRH education often limited
• Lacking connections to local services
• Curricula out-of-date, not designed by youth
• Often missing youth who most need the information
10
WH
WHAT TO
DO?
11
Objectives
1. Increase use of condoms and contraceptives among those who are
sexually active.
2. Improve awareness about healthy relationships and decrease the
incidence of sexual, physical, and emotional violence among youth.
3. Improve educational and career skill development and attainment.
4. Develop healthy life skills including goal setting and stress
management.
5. Increase access to healthcare and other services through referrals
and information.
12
positive youth development
positive youth
development
human-centered
design
We involve & engage youth as
partners & respect their knowledge,
strength, & leadership.
We design, iterate, & share
solutions that meet the needs of
youth & reflect their experiences.
13
Youth-Centered Health Design
Inspiration
During this phase, we conduct
interviews, research, and learn as
much about the issue as possible.
15
Youth Centered Health Design in Fresno
Photo: Decker, 2017
16
Youth-Centered Health Design
Ideation
During this phase, we brainstorm
solutions to make prototypes.
18
Youth-Centered Health Design: Ideation
19
Photo: YTH, 2017
Youth-Centered Health Design
Rapid Prototyping
Before implementation…
We start to rapid prototype. This means we are bringing
one of the ideas to life, using creative materials.
20
22
Youth-Centered Health Design: Prototyping
Photo: Decker, 2017
23
Youth-Centered Health Design
Inspiration
Ideation
Implementation
25
27
29
30
32
WHAT DOES IT
LOOK LIKE IN
PRACTICE?
Setting
• Alternative schools
• Foster care
• Reservations
• Genders & Sexualities Alliance
• Boys and Girls Clubs
• Fresno Housing Authority
34
What Has Worked Well
• Implementation after school or evening
• Referring to “In the Know” as an adolescent development
program
• Incentives for completing all the modules
• Food and drinks
• Flexibility with schedule
• Success with other implementation sites
40
Challenges
• Intervention vs control group
• Difficult to schedule with site
• In school implementation because of comprehensive
sex education
• Not all youth have cell phones
• Data, space, battery, share with siblings
• Retention of youth
• Too many days? Length? Priorities?
41
43
DOES IT MAKE A
DIFFERENCE?
Sample and Research Question
• Groups of 10-20 students (cohorts)
• Estimated 136 cohorts/1360 participants
• Enrolled over 2 years
• To what extent does In the Know impact short
term and long term outcomes?
• What sociodemographic variables moderate the
impact of In the Know?
46
Sexual and reproductive health (n=133)
48.1
11.0
59.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Ever had vaginal sex Ever pregnancy Know of SRH clinic
Source: Preliminary PREIS baseline results March, 2018
%
51
Baseline use of tech for health (n=133)
To look for sexual
health info: 21%
To find or schedule
health services: 23%
53Source: Preliminary PREIS baseline results March, 2018
Focus group quotes
It explained a
lot…things like you
actually need.
I thought it was
going to be boring.
It was good
actually.
56
Favorite parts
Budgets
Healthy relationships
and communicating
without fighting
The first day
– it was funny
Interviewing
The jobs because
it’s going to
prepare us for
our future
57
Least favorite parts
The time
seemed short
[Youth] would rather
just go home and
sleep. Go smoke and
drink.
They didn’t go
over other
jobs
I was tired
58
Acknowledgements
• Mara Decker, our PI
• The talented teams at
YTH, Fresno EOC, and
IHPS/UCSF
• All the youth who helped
to develop In the Know
and continue to offer their
insights
60
Photo: Sullivan, 2017
References Resources
• YTH.org – Youth-centered tech solutions
• Healthpolicy.ucsf.edu – Evaluation resources
• Kahoot.com – Game-based learning
• Amaze.org – Sexual and reproductive health
educational videos
61
• California Department of Public Health. 2017.
Adolescent Births in California 2000-2015.
Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public
Health.
• (Map) California Adolescent Sexual Health Needs
Index. 2016.California Department of Public
Health, Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health
Program.
• 2016 STD Surveillance Report. 2016. STD
Control Branch.
Melisa Price
University of California, San Francisco
melisa.price@ucsf.edu
Mariela Uribe
YTH
mariela.uribe21@gmail.com
Emma Schlamm
YTH
emmas@gmail.com

In the Know: Comprehensive sexual health education with wraparound digital technologies

  • 2.
    Successes and LessonsLearned From An Innovative Youth-Centered Initiative the youth + tech + health conference (May 6-7, 2018) yth live Ythlive.org Melisa Price (UCSF), Mariela Uribe (YTH), and Emma Schalmm
  • 3.
    The views expressedin written training materials, publications, or presentations by speakers and moderators do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the Department of Health and Human Services; nor does mention of trade names, commercial practices, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Funded by Department of Health and Human Services, Family and Youth Services Bureau, under grant #90AP2688 2
  • 4.
    • 5-year randomized-controltrial in Fresno, California • In-person, group-based, comprehensive sexual health education + phone app • Homeless and unstably housed youth, youth of color, LGBTQ youth, and Native American youth • Ages 13-19 What is In the Know? 4
  • 5.
  • 6.
    Adolescent Birth Rates:US, California 70.9 46.7 31.6 17.6 61.8 47.7 22.3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 CA US 34.2 BirthRate(per1,000femalesage15-19) Sources: California Department of Public Health and Office of Adolescent Health (2017) 7
  • 7.
    Fresno County Sources: (Map)California Adolescent Sexual Health Needs Index. California Department of Public Health, Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program; 2016. 2016 STD Surveillance Report. STD Control Branch. Adolescent birth rate • Fresno: 32.6 • CA: 17.6 • Chlamydia rate (females 15-24) • Fresno: 3637 (#1) • CA: 2747 • Gonorrhea rate (females 15-24) • Fresno: 605 (#3) • CA: 355 8
  • 8.
    Lessons learned • SRHeducation often limited • Lacking connections to local services • Curricula out-of-date, not designed by youth • Often missing youth who most need the information 10
  • 9.
  • 10.
    Objectives 1. Increase useof condoms and contraceptives among those who are sexually active. 2. Improve awareness about healthy relationships and decrease the incidence of sexual, physical, and emotional violence among youth. 3. Improve educational and career skill development and attainment. 4. Develop healthy life skills including goal setting and stress management. 5. Increase access to healthcare and other services through referrals and information. 12
  • 11.
    positive youth development positiveyouth development human-centered design We involve & engage youth as partners & respect their knowledge, strength, & leadership. We design, iterate, & share solutions that meet the needs of youth & reflect their experiences. 13
  • 12.
    Youth-Centered Health Design Inspiration Duringthis phase, we conduct interviews, research, and learn as much about the issue as possible. 15
  • 13.
    Youth Centered HealthDesign in Fresno Photo: Decker, 2017 16
  • 14.
    Youth-Centered Health Design Ideation Duringthis phase, we brainstorm solutions to make prototypes. 18
  • 15.
    Youth-Centered Health Design:Ideation 19 Photo: YTH, 2017
  • 16.
    Youth-Centered Health Design RapidPrototyping Before implementation… We start to rapid prototype. This means we are bringing one of the ideas to life, using creative materials. 20
  • 17.
  • 18.
    Youth-Centered Health Design:Prototyping Photo: Decker, 2017 23
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
    32 WHAT DOES IT LOOKLIKE IN PRACTICE?
  • 24.
    Setting • Alternative schools •Foster care • Reservations • Genders & Sexualities Alliance • Boys and Girls Clubs • Fresno Housing Authority 34
  • 25.
    What Has WorkedWell • Implementation after school or evening • Referring to “In the Know” as an adolescent development program • Incentives for completing all the modules • Food and drinks • Flexibility with schedule • Success with other implementation sites 40
  • 26.
    Challenges • Intervention vscontrol group • Difficult to schedule with site • In school implementation because of comprehensive sex education • Not all youth have cell phones • Data, space, battery, share with siblings • Retention of youth • Too many days? Length? Priorities? 41
  • 27.
    43 DOES IT MAKEA DIFFERENCE?
  • 28.
    Sample and ResearchQuestion • Groups of 10-20 students (cohorts) • Estimated 136 cohorts/1360 participants • Enrolled over 2 years • To what extent does In the Know impact short term and long term outcomes? • What sociodemographic variables moderate the impact of In the Know? 46
  • 29.
    Sexual and reproductivehealth (n=133) 48.1 11.0 59.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Ever had vaginal sex Ever pregnancy Know of SRH clinic Source: Preliminary PREIS baseline results March, 2018 % 51
  • 30.
    Baseline use oftech for health (n=133) To look for sexual health info: 21% To find or schedule health services: 23% 53Source: Preliminary PREIS baseline results March, 2018
  • 31.
    Focus group quotes Itexplained a lot…things like you actually need. I thought it was going to be boring. It was good actually. 56
  • 32.
    Favorite parts Budgets Healthy relationships andcommunicating without fighting The first day – it was funny Interviewing The jobs because it’s going to prepare us for our future 57
  • 33.
    Least favorite parts Thetime seemed short [Youth] would rather just go home and sleep. Go smoke and drink. They didn’t go over other jobs I was tired 58
  • 34.
    Acknowledgements • Mara Decker,our PI • The talented teams at YTH, Fresno EOC, and IHPS/UCSF • All the youth who helped to develop In the Know and continue to offer their insights 60 Photo: Sullivan, 2017
  • 35.
    References Resources • YTH.org– Youth-centered tech solutions • Healthpolicy.ucsf.edu – Evaluation resources • Kahoot.com – Game-based learning • Amaze.org – Sexual and reproductive health educational videos 61 • California Department of Public Health. 2017. Adolescent Births in California 2000-2015. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health. • (Map) California Adolescent Sexual Health Needs Index. 2016.California Department of Public Health, Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program. • 2016 STD Surveillance Report. 2016. STD Control Branch.
  • 36.
    Melisa Price University ofCalifornia, San Francisco [email protected] Mariela Uribe YTH [email protected] Emma Schlamm YTH [email protected]