Integration of Princely
        States
 British India was divided into what
    were called the British Indian
  Provinces and the Princely States
BRITISH INDIA
 BRITISH INDIAN PROVINCES          PRINCELY STATES
• The British Indian        • Several large and small
                              states ruled by
  Provinces were directly     princes, called the Princely
  under the control of        States, enjoyed some form
  the British government      of control over their
                              internal affairs as long as
                              they accepted British
                              supremacy.
                            • Princely States covered
                              one-third of the land area
                              of the British Indian Empire
The problem
• It was announced by the British that with the
  end of their rule over India, supremacy of the
  British crown over Princely States would also
  lapse. This meant that all these states, as many
  as 565 in all, would become legally independent.
  The British government took the view that all
  these states were free to join either India or
  Pakistan or remain independent if they so
  wished. This decision was left not to the people
  but to the princely rulers of these states. This
  was a very serious problem and could threaten
  the very existence of a united India.
THE PROBLEM
First of all, the ruler of Travancore
announced that the state had decided on
Independence.

The Nizam of Hyderabad made a similar announcement
the next day

Rulers like the Nawab of Bhopal were averse to join the
Constituent Assembly
Government’s approach
The interim government took a firm stance against
the possible division of India into small principalities
of different sizes.


Sardar Patel was India’s Deputy Prime Minister and the
Home Minister during the crucial period immediately
following Independence. He played a historic role in
negotiating with the rulers of princely states firmly but
diplomatically and bringing most of them into the
Indian Union.
IRON MAN OF INDIA
Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel
PATEL AND GANDHIJI
NEHRU, GANDHIJI AND PATEL
The government’s approach was
     guided by three considerations
• Firstly the people of most of the princely states
  clearly wanted to become part of the Indian
  union
• Secondly, the government was prepared to be
  flexible in giving autonomy to some regions
• Thirdly, in the backdrop of Partition which
  brought into focus the contest over demarcation
  of territory, the integration and consolidation of
  the territorial boundaries of the nation had
  assumed supreme importance.
Problems solved ?
• Before 15 August               • Accession of the Princely
  1947, peaceful negotiations      States of
  had brought almost all           Junagadh, Hyderabad, Kash
  states whose territories         mir and Manipur proved
  were contiguous to the           more difficult than the rest.
  new boundaries of              • The issue of Junagarh was
  India, into the Indian Union     resolved after a plebiscite
• The rulers of most of the        confirmed people’s desire
  states signed a document         to join India
  called the ‘Instrument of      • The issue of Kashmir is part
  Accession’ which meant           of modern Indian history
  that their state agreed to     • The cases of Hyderabad
  become a part of the Union       and Manipur are discussed
  of India                         in detail
Hyderabad
Manipur
LOCATION OF HYDERABAD
Hyderabad
• Hyderabad, the largest of the Princely States
  was surrounded entirely by Indian territory.
• Some parts of the old Hyderabad state are
  today parts of Maharashtra, Karnataka and
  Andhra Pradesh.
• Its ruler carried the title,‘Nizam’, and he was one
  of the world’s richest men.
• The Nizam wanted an independent status for
  Hyderabad. He entered into what was called the
  Standstill Agreement with India in November
  1947
PEOPLE’S MOVEMENT AGAINST
              NIZAM
• In the meantime, a movement of the people of
  Hyderabad State against the Nizam’s rule gathered
  force.
• The peasantry in the Telangana region in
  particular, was the victim of Nizam’s oppressive rule
  and rose against him.
• Women who had seen the worst of this oppression
  joined the movement in large numbers.
• Hyderabad town was the nerve centre of this
  movement.
• The Communists and the Hyderabad Congress were
  in the forefront of the movement
Hyderabad’s accession to India.

• The Nizam responded by unleashing a para-
  military force known as the Razakars
• They murdered, maimed, raped and looted,
  targeting particularly the non-Muslims.
• The central government had to order the army
  to tackle the situation. In September 1948,
  Indian army moved in to control the Nizam’s
  forces.
• After a few days of intermittent fighting, the
  Nizam surrendered. This led to Hyderabad’s
  accession to India.
NIZAM-Osman Ali Khan
Chowmahalla palace
Purani Haveli palace located in
         Hyderabad
Kingkoti palace
Sardar Patel with the Nizam of
         Hyderabad
MANIPUR LOCATION IN INDIA
MANIPUR
• A few days before Independence, the Maharaja
  of Manipur, Bodhachandra Singh, signed the
  Instrument of Accession with the Indian
  government on the assurance that the internal
  autonomy of Manipur would be maintained.
• Under the pressure of public opinion,the
  Maharaja held elections in Manipur in June 1948
  and the state became a constitutional monarchy.
  Thus Manipur was the first part of India to hold
  an election based on universal adult franchise
Anger and resentment in
       Manipur, are still being felt.
• In the Legislative Assembly of Manipur there were
  sharp differences over the question of merger of
  Manipur with India. While the state Congress wanted
  the merger, other political parties were opposed to
  this.
• The Government of India succeeded in pressurising
  the Maharaja into signing a Merger Agreement in
  September 1949, without consulting the popularly
  elected Legislative Assembly of Manipur.
• This caused a lot of anger and resentment in
  Manipur, the repercussions of which are still being
  felt.
Anger and resentment in
Manipur, are still being felt.
ECONOMIC BLOCKADE IN MANIPUR
THE END
A POWER POINT PRESENTATION BASED
     ON N.C.E.R.T TEXT BOOK

Integration of princely states

  • 1.
    Integration of Princely States British India was divided into what were called the British Indian Provinces and the Princely States
  • 2.
    BRITISH INDIA BRITISHINDIAN PROVINCES PRINCELY STATES • The British Indian • Several large and small states ruled by Provinces were directly princes, called the Princely under the control of States, enjoyed some form the British government of control over their internal affairs as long as they accepted British supremacy. • Princely States covered one-third of the land area of the British Indian Empire
  • 4.
    The problem • Itwas announced by the British that with the end of their rule over India, supremacy of the British crown over Princely States would also lapse. This meant that all these states, as many as 565 in all, would become legally independent. The British government took the view that all these states were free to join either India or Pakistan or remain independent if they so wished. This decision was left not to the people but to the princely rulers of these states. This was a very serious problem and could threaten the very existence of a united India.
  • 5.
    THE PROBLEM First ofall, the ruler of Travancore announced that the state had decided on Independence. The Nizam of Hyderabad made a similar announcement the next day Rulers like the Nawab of Bhopal were averse to join the Constituent Assembly
  • 6.
    Government’s approach The interimgovernment took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes. Sardar Patel was India’s Deputy Prime Minister and the Home Minister during the crucial period immediately following Independence. He played a historic role in negotiating with the rulers of princely states firmly but diplomatically and bringing most of them into the Indian Union.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
    The government’s approachwas guided by three considerations • Firstly the people of most of the princely states clearly wanted to become part of the Indian union • Secondly, the government was prepared to be flexible in giving autonomy to some regions • Thirdly, in the backdrop of Partition which brought into focus the contest over demarcation of territory, the integration and consolidation of the territorial boundaries of the nation had assumed supreme importance.
  • 12.
    Problems solved ? •Before 15 August • Accession of the Princely 1947, peaceful negotiations States of had brought almost all Junagadh, Hyderabad, Kash states whose territories mir and Manipur proved were contiguous to the more difficult than the rest. new boundaries of • The issue of Junagarh was India, into the Indian Union resolved after a plebiscite • The rulers of most of the confirmed people’s desire states signed a document to join India called the ‘Instrument of • The issue of Kashmir is part Accession’ which meant of modern Indian history that their state agreed to • The cases of Hyderabad become a part of the Union and Manipur are discussed of India in detail
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
    Hyderabad • Hyderabad, thelargest of the Princely States was surrounded entirely by Indian territory. • Some parts of the old Hyderabad state are today parts of Maharashtra, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh. • Its ruler carried the title,‘Nizam’, and he was one of the world’s richest men. • The Nizam wanted an independent status for Hyderabad. He entered into what was called the Standstill Agreement with India in November 1947
  • 16.
    PEOPLE’S MOVEMENT AGAINST NIZAM • In the meantime, a movement of the people of Hyderabad State against the Nizam’s rule gathered force. • The peasantry in the Telangana region in particular, was the victim of Nizam’s oppressive rule and rose against him. • Women who had seen the worst of this oppression joined the movement in large numbers. • Hyderabad town was the nerve centre of this movement. • The Communists and the Hyderabad Congress were in the forefront of the movement
  • 17.
    Hyderabad’s accession toIndia. • The Nizam responded by unleashing a para- military force known as the Razakars • They murdered, maimed, raped and looted, targeting particularly the non-Muslims. • The central government had to order the army to tackle the situation. In September 1948, Indian army moved in to control the Nizam’s forces. • After a few days of intermittent fighting, the Nizam surrendered. This led to Hyderabad’s accession to India.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
    Purani Haveli palacelocated in Hyderabad
  • 21.
  • 22.
    Sardar Patel withthe Nizam of Hyderabad
  • 23.
  • 24.
    MANIPUR • A fewdays before Independence, the Maharaja of Manipur, Bodhachandra Singh, signed the Instrument of Accession with the Indian government on the assurance that the internal autonomy of Manipur would be maintained. • Under the pressure of public opinion,the Maharaja held elections in Manipur in June 1948 and the state became a constitutional monarchy. Thus Manipur was the first part of India to hold an election based on universal adult franchise
  • 25.
    Anger and resentmentin Manipur, are still being felt. • In the Legislative Assembly of Manipur there were sharp differences over the question of merger of Manipur with India. While the state Congress wanted the merger, other political parties were opposed to this. • The Government of India succeeded in pressurising the Maharaja into signing a Merger Agreement in September 1949, without consulting the popularly elected Legislative Assembly of Manipur. • This caused a lot of anger and resentment in Manipur, the repercussions of which are still being felt.
  • 26.
    Anger and resentmentin Manipur, are still being felt.
  • 27.
  • 28.
    THE END A POWERPOINT PRESENTATION BASED ON N.C.E.R.T TEXT BOOK