 Incidence   varies from 2% to >30% in newborns

 depends on the gestational age (GA) at birth and
 the type of ICH

 Diagnosis   typically depends on clinical suspicion

 The presence and severity of parenchymal injury
 is the best predictor of outcome
 Rupture   of the draining veins and sinuses of the
 brain

 molding, fronto-occipital elongation, and
 torsional forces acting on the head during
 delivery

 provoke  laceration of dural leaflets of tentorium
 cerebelli or falx cerebri
 Often   results from trauma in the full-term infant

 SDH in the supratentorial space results from
 rupture of the bridging veins
 large head size,
 rigid pelvis (e.g., in a primiparous or older
  multiparous mother),
 nonvertex presentation (breech, face, etc.),
 very rapid or prolonged labor or delivery,
 difficult instrumental delivery,
 or rarely, a bleeding diathesis
 Large
      collection especially in infratentorial
 SDH results in rapid deterioration.

 Systemic   signs like hypovolemia and
 anemia

 Seizures
         may occur in up to half of
 neonates with SDH, particularly with SDH
 over the cerebral convexity
 suspected  on the basis of history and
 clinical signs and confirmed with a
 computed tomography (CT) scan.

 ultrasonic
          imaging subdural space is
 inadequate

 MRI- timing of the lesion and for detecting
 other lesions

 Lumbar   puncture after CT
 Most infants with do not require surgical
 intervention

 prompt stabilization with volume
 replacement

 Open  surgical evacuation of the clot in case
 of large SDH

 The
    outcome for infants with nonsurgical
 SDH is usually good
 Primary  SAH is probably frequent but clinically
 insignificant.

 normal    “trauma” associated with the birth
 process.

 sourceof bleeding is usually ruptured bridging
 veins of the subarachnoid space or ruptured small
 leptomeningeal vessels
Usual scenar i o i s a w l el
   appear i ng t er m i nf ant
devel opi ng SAH on day 2 or
          3 of l i f e
 Clinical   presentation is similar to other forms of ICH

 Thediagnosis is best established with a CT scan or
  MRI, or by LP to confirm or diagnose small SAH

 Ultrasonography     is not sensitive for the detection of
  small SAH

 Management   of SAH usually requires only
  symptomatic therapy, such as anticonvulsant therapy
  for seizures
 Rare


 Intracerebral   or intracerebellar variety

 More   commonly a secondary event

 Hypoxic  ischemic brain injury, venous
 infarction or thrombosis, ECMO therapy, large
 ICH in another compartment
 Presentation   and management similar to SDH

 MRI – extent and age of hemorrhage and
 other associated parenchymal lesions

 LP   to rule out meningitis

 Symptomatic    management

 Treatany coexisting pathology or predisposing
 factors

 Monitoring    for hydrocephalus
 15-20%    at <32 weeks gestation

 Venous  (or sinus)thrombosis and thalamic
 infarction in term infants

 Relatedto birth trauma or perinatal
 asphyxia

 No   identifiable risk factors in 25%
Intravascular factors            • Ischemia/Reperfusion
                                 • Fluctuating or increase
(Pressure passive circulation)     CBF
                                 • Increase in cerebral venous
                                   pressure
                                 • Platelet dysfunction
                                 • Coagulation disturbances
Vascular factors                 • Fragile, involuting
                                   capillaries with large
                                   diameter lumen

Extravascular factors            • Deficient vascular support
                                 • Excess fibrinolytic activity
 Usually
        a clinically silent syndrome in
 preterms

 Term  newborns – seizures, apnea,
 irritability, lethargy, vomiting, full
 fontanelle

 Catastrophic   presentation less likely

 Complications
 Routine
        CUS in all infants born at <32
 weeks and in older infants at risk for IVH

 Days   3,7,30 and 60 days

 Monitoring   for complications

 Gradingof GMH/IVH is important for
 determining management and prognosis
Grading     Severity                  Description
Papile (CT)       I      Isolated GMH (no IVH)
                 II      IVH without ventricular dilatation
                III      IVH with ventricular dilatation
                IV       IVH with parenchymal hemorrhage
Volpe            I       GMH with no or minimal IVH (<10%
(CUS)                    ventricular volume)
                 II      IVH occupying 10-50% of ventricular
                         area on parasagittal view
                 III     IVH occupying >50% of ventricular area,
                         usually distending lateral ventricle

              Separate   Periventricular echodensity
              notation
 Antenatal   steroids

 Slow infusion of colloid or hyperosmolar
 solutions

 Avoidrapid fluctuations in CBF and
 hypotension

 Sedativeor paralytic medication in
 ventilated babies
 Supportivecare and watch for
 complications

 Maintaining    Normal BP electrolytes and
                          ,
 blood gases

 Transfusions   as necessary

 Correctthrombocytopenia and coagulation
 disturbances
 Supportive    care and treatment of seizures

 Serial   LPs and eventual VP shunts

 Prognosis   relates to factors other than IVH
  alone
Monitor OFC and fontanelle daily, Serial CUS q2-7
             days to assess ventricle size, shape and RI


No PVD                      Slowly Progressive                     Rapidly progressive
                            Ventricular dilation                   ventricular dilatation
                            (over weeks)                           (over days)

No further
                            Close surveillance for 2-4 wk
treatment


                        Dilatation stops              Continued dilatation



 No therapy, close                                                   Serial LP Every 1-3 d,
 observation for 1 yr                                                depending on rate of
                                                                     ventricular dilatation
Intracranial hemorrhage newborn

Intracranial hemorrhage newborn

  • 3.
     Incidence varies from 2% to >30% in newborns  depends on the gestational age (GA) at birth and the type of ICH  Diagnosis typically depends on clinical suspicion  The presence and severity of parenchymal injury is the best predictor of outcome
  • 4.
     Rupture of the draining veins and sinuses of the brain  molding, fronto-occipital elongation, and torsional forces acting on the head during delivery  provoke laceration of dural leaflets of tentorium cerebelli or falx cerebri
  • 5.
     Often results from trauma in the full-term infant  SDH in the supratentorial space results from rupture of the bridging veins
  • 6.
     large headsize,  rigid pelvis (e.g., in a primiparous or older multiparous mother),  nonvertex presentation (breech, face, etc.),  very rapid or prolonged labor or delivery,  difficult instrumental delivery,  or rarely, a bleeding diathesis
  • 7.
     Large collection especially in infratentorial SDH results in rapid deterioration.  Systemic signs like hypovolemia and anemia  Seizures may occur in up to half of neonates with SDH, particularly with SDH over the cerebral convexity
  • 8.
     suspected on the basis of history and clinical signs and confirmed with a computed tomography (CT) scan.  ultrasonic imaging subdural space is inadequate  MRI- timing of the lesion and for detecting other lesions  Lumbar puncture after CT
  • 9.
     Most infantswith do not require surgical intervention  prompt stabilization with volume replacement  Open surgical evacuation of the clot in case of large SDH  The outcome for infants with nonsurgical SDH is usually good
  • 10.
     Primary SAH is probably frequent but clinically insignificant.  normal “trauma” associated with the birth process.  sourceof bleeding is usually ruptured bridging veins of the subarachnoid space or ruptured small leptomeningeal vessels
  • 11.
    Usual scenar io i s a w l el appear i ng t er m i nf ant devel opi ng SAH on day 2 or 3 of l i f e
  • 12.
     Clinical presentation is similar to other forms of ICH  Thediagnosis is best established with a CT scan or MRI, or by LP to confirm or diagnose small SAH  Ultrasonography is not sensitive for the detection of small SAH  Management of SAH usually requires only symptomatic therapy, such as anticonvulsant therapy for seizures
  • 13.
     Rare  Intracerebral or intracerebellar variety  More commonly a secondary event  Hypoxic ischemic brain injury, venous infarction or thrombosis, ECMO therapy, large ICH in another compartment
  • 14.
     Presentation and management similar to SDH  MRI – extent and age of hemorrhage and other associated parenchymal lesions  LP to rule out meningitis  Symptomatic management  Treatany coexisting pathology or predisposing factors  Monitoring for hydrocephalus
  • 15.
     15-20% at <32 weeks gestation  Venous (or sinus)thrombosis and thalamic infarction in term infants  Relatedto birth trauma or perinatal asphyxia  No identifiable risk factors in 25%
  • 16.
    Intravascular factors • Ischemia/Reperfusion • Fluctuating or increase (Pressure passive circulation) CBF • Increase in cerebral venous pressure • Platelet dysfunction • Coagulation disturbances Vascular factors • Fragile, involuting capillaries with large diameter lumen Extravascular factors • Deficient vascular support • Excess fibrinolytic activity
  • 17.
     Usually a clinically silent syndrome in preterms  Term newborns – seizures, apnea, irritability, lethargy, vomiting, full fontanelle  Catastrophic presentation less likely  Complications
  • 18.
     Routine CUS in all infants born at <32 weeks and in older infants at risk for IVH  Days 3,7,30 and 60 days  Monitoring for complications  Gradingof GMH/IVH is important for determining management and prognosis
  • 19.
    Grading Severity Description Papile (CT) I Isolated GMH (no IVH) II IVH without ventricular dilatation III IVH with ventricular dilatation IV IVH with parenchymal hemorrhage Volpe I GMH with no or minimal IVH (<10% (CUS) ventricular volume) II IVH occupying 10-50% of ventricular area on parasagittal view III IVH occupying >50% of ventricular area, usually distending lateral ventricle Separate Periventricular echodensity notation
  • 20.
     Antenatal steroids  Slow infusion of colloid or hyperosmolar solutions  Avoidrapid fluctuations in CBF and hypotension  Sedativeor paralytic medication in ventilated babies
  • 21.
     Supportivecare andwatch for complications  Maintaining Normal BP electrolytes and , blood gases  Transfusions as necessary  Correctthrombocytopenia and coagulation disturbances
  • 22.
     Supportive care and treatment of seizures  Serial LPs and eventual VP shunts  Prognosis relates to factors other than IVH alone
  • 23.
    Monitor OFC andfontanelle daily, Serial CUS q2-7 days to assess ventricle size, shape and RI No PVD Slowly Progressive Rapidly progressive Ventricular dilation ventricular dilatation (over weeks) (over days) No further Close surveillance for 2-4 wk treatment Dilatation stops Continued dilatation No therapy, close Serial LP Every 1-3 d, observation for 1 yr depending on rate of ventricular dilatation