INTRAOCULAR LENSES
BY
J.BHANU PRATHAP
ROLL NO: 57
HISTORICAL ASPECTS
 PRESENT DAY IOLs
 Classification
 Design
 Material
 PREMIUM IOLS
 PHAKIC AND ASPHERIC IOLS
 COMPLICATIONS RELATED TO IOLs
 RECENT ADVANCES AND THE FUTURE
 K
WHAT IS INTRAOCULAR LENS?
• An artificial lens implanted in the eyes
• Replaces the crystalline lens
• Tocorrect the optical power of the eyes following:-
Lens being
clouded by
cataract
Refractive surgery
PARTS OF AN IOL
• OPTIC
Part of the lens that focuses
light on the retina.
• HAPTIC
Small filaments connected to the optic
that hold the lens in place in the eye
HAPTEN
OPTIC
PARTS OF AN IOL
• OPTIC
Part of the lens that focuses
light on the retina.
• HAPTIC
Small filaments connected to the optic
that hold the lens in place in the eye
HAPTEN
OPTIC
PARTS OF AN IOL
• OPTIC
Part of the lens that focuses
light on the retina.
• HAPTIC
Small filaments connected to the optic
that hold the lens in place in the eye
HAPTEN
OPTIC
CLASSIFICATION
 FIRST GENERATION IOLS
SECOND GENERATION IOLS
 Rigid and semi-rigid anterior chamber IOLs
 the anterior chamber, with fixation of the lens in the angle recess
 Baron, in France, is generally credited as being the first designer and implanter of
an anterior chamber lens
ADVANTAGES
• Less decenteration
• Decreased reaction
DISADVANTAGES
• Corneal decompensation
• Pseudophakic Bullous
keratopathy
• Uveitis
• Secondary glaucoma
THIRD GENERATION IOLS
 Iris suppoted lens
 Cornelius Binkhorst, Iris clip lens; four-loop (1957)
 Iridocapsular fixation; two loop (1965)
ADVANTAGES
• Away from angle structures
• Rate of dislocation was less
• Less contact with corneal endothelium
DISADVANTAGES
• Iris chaffing
• Pupillary distortion
• Transillumination defects
• Chronic inflammation
• CME
• Distortion on pupillary dilatation
• Endothelial decompensation
FOURTH GENERATION IOLS
 Intermediate ACIOL
 Flexible loops with multiple point of fixation
 More stable
 Advantages – more stable, better design, less complications
 Disadvantages – anterior chamber is not the physiological site for IOL
FIFTH GENERATION IOLS
PMMA lenses Rigid posterior chamber IOL
Sixth generation IOLs
Foldable IOL
Seventh generation IOLs
Multifocal IOL
Eighth generation IOLs
Accomodative IOL
Phakic refractive IOL
COMPLICATIONS OF
CATARACT SURGEY
CLASSIFICATION
 Complications of anesthesia
General anesthesia
Regional / Local anesthesia
 Intraoperative
 Early postoperative
 Late postoperative
ANESTHESIA
COMPLICATIONS
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA
PERIBULBAR / RETROBULBAR ANESTHESIA
 Lids trauma (ecchymosis)
 Ptosis
 s/conj hemorrhage
 Muscles damage
 Globe penetration & its related complications
 Retrobulbar hemorrhage
 Optic nerve damage
 Putscher-type retinopathy *
 Brainstem anesthesia
RETROBULBAR HEMORRHAGE
 Common complication
 Causes proptosis & raised IOP
 Incidence of severe RBH = 0-3%
 Reported case of CRAO *
 Management
 Continue with surgery if minimal
 Lateral canthotomy for severe cases
Intraocular lens

Intraocular lens

  • 1.
  • 2.
    HISTORICAL ASPECTS  PRESENTDAY IOLs  Classification  Design  Material  PREMIUM IOLS  PHAKIC AND ASPHERIC IOLS  COMPLICATIONS RELATED TO IOLs  RECENT ADVANCES AND THE FUTURE
  • 3.
  • 4.
    WHAT IS INTRAOCULARLENS? • An artificial lens implanted in the eyes • Replaces the crystalline lens • Tocorrect the optical power of the eyes following:- Lens being clouded by cataract Refractive surgery
  • 5.
    PARTS OF ANIOL • OPTIC Part of the lens that focuses light on the retina. • HAPTIC Small filaments connected to the optic that hold the lens in place in the eye HAPTEN OPTIC
  • 6.
    PARTS OF ANIOL • OPTIC Part of the lens that focuses light on the retina. • HAPTIC Small filaments connected to the optic that hold the lens in place in the eye HAPTEN OPTIC
  • 7.
    PARTS OF ANIOL • OPTIC Part of the lens that focuses light on the retina. • HAPTIC Small filaments connected to the optic that hold the lens in place in the eye HAPTEN OPTIC
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
    SECOND GENERATION IOLS Rigid and semi-rigid anterior chamber IOLs  the anterior chamber, with fixation of the lens in the angle recess  Baron, in France, is generally credited as being the first designer and implanter of an anterior chamber lens ADVANTAGES • Less decenteration • Decreased reaction DISADVANTAGES • Corneal decompensation • Pseudophakic Bullous keratopathy • Uveitis • Secondary glaucoma
  • 11.
    THIRD GENERATION IOLS Iris suppoted lens  Cornelius Binkhorst, Iris clip lens; four-loop (1957)  Iridocapsular fixation; two loop (1965) ADVANTAGES • Away from angle structures • Rate of dislocation was less • Less contact with corneal endothelium DISADVANTAGES • Iris chaffing • Pupillary distortion • Transillumination defects • Chronic inflammation • CME • Distortion on pupillary dilatation • Endothelial decompensation
  • 12.
    FOURTH GENERATION IOLS Intermediate ACIOL  Flexible loops with multiple point of fixation  More stable  Advantages – more stable, better design, less complications  Disadvantages – anterior chamber is not the physiological site for IOL
  • 13.
    FIFTH GENERATION IOLS PMMAlenses Rigid posterior chamber IOL Sixth generation IOLs Foldable IOL Seventh generation IOLs Multifocal IOL Eighth generation IOLs Accomodative IOL Phakic refractive IOL
  • 14.
  • 15.
    CLASSIFICATION  Complications ofanesthesia General anesthesia Regional / Local anesthesia  Intraoperative  Early postoperative  Late postoperative
  • 16.
  • 17.
    PERIBULBAR / RETROBULBARANESTHESIA  Lids trauma (ecchymosis)  Ptosis  s/conj hemorrhage  Muscles damage  Globe penetration & its related complications  Retrobulbar hemorrhage  Optic nerve damage  Putscher-type retinopathy *  Brainstem anesthesia
  • 18.
    RETROBULBAR HEMORRHAGE  Commoncomplication  Causes proptosis & raised IOP  Incidence of severe RBH = 0-3%  Reported case of CRAO *  Management  Continue with surgery if minimal  Lateral canthotomy for severe cases