Downloaded 479 times
Uploaded byDr Muireann O'Keeffe
Introducing action research
This document provides an overview of action research, including its history, key characteristics, types, design process, and role of reflection. Action research began with Kurt Lewin in the 1940s and aims to solve practical problems through participatory and cyclical research. It positions itself within the critical theoretical research paradigm as research done "with" rather than "on" or "for" people. The presentation reviews action research methodology, emphasizing its practical and collaborative nature. It also addresses validity, ethics, and the importance of reflection in the action research process.
More Related Content
Similar to Introducing action research
Introducing action research
- 1.
- 2. This presentation exploresthe following: Research Paradigms History of action research Practitioner as researcher Types of action research – collaborative, participatory Design: cycles Data collection/analysis Validity, rigour Role of reflection
- 3. Kurt Lewin KurtLewin (1890-1947) German social psychologist Involved in combating of anti-Semitism Joined Psychological Institute, University of Berlin Moved to USA Generally credited as the person who coined the term „action research‟
- 4. Action research andits position within the research paradigms: EMPIRICAL RESEARCH (Quantitative) INTERPRETIVE RESEARCH (Qualitative) CRITICAL THEORETICAL RESEARCH ACTION RESEARCH Interpretive approaches Living theory approaches Critical theoretic approaches (McNiff & Whitehead 2002)
- 5. Action research is: Not research ‘on’ people (Quantitative paradigm) Not research ‘for’ people (Qualitative paradigm) BUT Research ‘with’ people (Critical Social theory paradigm)
- 6. Critical Research Paradigm Emancipatory interest (Freire) Advocates Change Political, ideological factors, power and interests shaping behaviour Feminism Small scale research Participant researchers Understanding, interrogating, critiquing, transforming actions and interests Critical theorists, action researchers, practitioner researchers
- 7. 4 Defining Characteristicsof Action Research Practical nature – real world problems Change – integral part of research Cyclical process – feedback loop Participation is active not passive
- 8. Action Research Itrecognises that practitioners can and should contribute to research - initiated, directed and controlled by practitioner Research in action rather than about action It puts the „I‟ at the centre of the research process
- 9. Key Features ofAction Research It is research in action rather than about action It is participative Starts small It has a sequence of events (cycle) Compiles evidence – keeps records (logs, journals) Aims to manage change and/or solve problems in an analytical, reflective series of actions, evaluations and further actions.
- 10. Key Features ofAction Research CTD It takes place in situ It is self consciously analytical It is generally grounded in a theoretical framework and through its activities generates emergent theory It is informed by an overt ethical framework
- 11. Practitioner Action Research (ineducation/health) Aims to improve education/health practices by changing practice and learning from the consequences of change It is participatory and collaborative Establishes self critical communities keen to „enlighten‟ themselves and thus „emancipate‟ themselves from rigid practices
- 12. Cycles of actionresearch Plan Act Observe Reflect (Lewin 1946)
- 13. Action Research Map 2.Imagine a possible solution 1. Identify a problematic issue 3. Try it out 4. Evaluate it 5. Change your practice in the light of the evaluation (McNiff 2002)
- 14. Simple 5 stepprocess (ITDEM) 1 • Identifying a problem/issue 2 • Thinking of ways to solve the problem 3 • Doing it 4 • Evaluating it (research findings) 5 • Modifying future practice (Norton, 2009)
- 15. Criticisms of actionresearch Not valid research as seen from positivist/scientific perspective Largely un-theorised descriptions of practice Need to be aware of major criticisms, and have confidence in that approach to action research is well thought out and systematic Findings not generalisable How can we combat this?
- 16. Establishing reliability &validity Critical friends (Whitehead, McNiff) Recording of events (journaling) Validation of focus groups/interviews Triangulation Reflection: Helps to acknowledge individual bias
- 17. Role of reflection Whatis reflective practice? “The ability to reflect to learn from and make sense of experience” Jackson (2006) …the process of stepping back from experience to process what the experience means, with a view to planning further (Kolb 1984) “we might find ourselves driving somewhere we go every day when we actually intended going somewhere different” (Somekh 2006)
- 18. Triangulation Checking datafrom multiple sources for consistency Member-checking, is the data consistent? Redundancy, ask the question in various ways Effort to assure that right information and interpretation obtained? Does phenomenon remain the same at other times?
- 19. Action Research andEthics Action research is „insider research‟ If our journals remain private and our videotapes aren‟t played, we can inquire with equanimity……..however we rarely work in isolation (Zeni, 1998) What at first seemed a rather straightforward exercise in translation proved a formidable task…………informed consent can be sought but the journey of research often changes as action progresses (Malone, 2010)
- 20. Checklist for actionresearch Cycle structure Timescales Ethical approval How will you insure quality and validity
- 21. My Action ResearchStudy Problem: students not engaging with ePortfolio, lack of reflective practice Question: How can I support postgraduate students developing ePortfolios? Cycle of 2 years Change of teaching practices, change design of curriculum implementation of new supports for students Analysis: Currently investigating if the activities/strategies put in place during the academic year 2012-13 been effective in supporting the development of ePortfolios Data Collection: Interviews, focus groups, student ePortfolios, my reflections.
- 22. What action researchmeans for my practice as a teacher: How do I improve what I am doing? Applied research carried out on an identified need for improvement An enquiry carried out to understand , evaluate and then change, in order to improve some educational practice Process of systematic reflection ..........
- 23. References & Resources Costello, Patrick (2011) effective action research: developing reflective thinking and practice. London, New York: Continuum International Pub. Group. Denscombe, M (2010) The Good research guide: for small-scale research projects (4th Ed) Open University Press Farren & Crotty Educational action research http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qg83f72_6Gw&feature=player_embedded Freire, P. (1972) Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Harmondsworth: Penguin Malone(2010) Ethics at home: informed consent in your own backyard, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16:6, 797-815 Mcniff, J., Lomax, P. Whitehead, J ( 2003) You and your research project (2nd ed) Norton, L., (2009) Action research in teaching and learning: A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. Routledge Whitehead, J (2011) All you need to know about action research. London: Sage Publications Zeni (1998) A guide to ethical issues and action research, Educational Action Research, 6:1, 9-19
- 24. Action Research Journals Action research http://arj.sagepub.com/ Educational journal of living theories EJOLTS http://ejolts.net/ Educational Action Research http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/reac20/current