IRJET-A Brief Study of Leach based Routing Protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 05 Issue: 01 | Jan-2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2018, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 6.171 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 957
A BRIEF STUDY OF LEACH BASED ROUTING PROTOCOL IN WIRELESS
SENSOR NETWORKS
Ragiba Qari 1, Abhishek Bhardwaj 2, Varsha Saini3
1Student , Dept. of computer science engineering, CT Institute of Engineering, Management and Technology
Jalandhar, Punjab, India
2,3 Professor, Dept. of computer science engineering, CT Institute of Engineering, Management and Technology
Jalandhar, Punjab, India
---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract- The most essential objective of the remote sensor
arranges directing convention execution is adjusting system
vitality utilization and expanding the whole system lifetime.
Micro sensor nodes in wireless sensor networks have confined
energy. Verbal exchange stops when these nodes lose their
vigour absolutely. Remote sensor systems are made out of
minimal effort and to a great degree control obliged sensor
hub. In numerous applications of remote sensor organizes, a
sensor hub detects the condition to get information and
conveys them to the sink by means of a solitary bounce or
multi-jump way. In remote sensor systems, due to constrained
battery energy of sensor hubs, one of the key test is to
accomplish least vitality utilization with a specificend goal to
expand arrange lifetime. Low Energy Adaptive Clustering
Hierarchy (LEACH) is an outstanding routingprotocolinWSN.
It is a Grouping based convention which helps in enhancing
the lifetime of remote sensor network. This paper surveys
various routing protocols and concluded that theround robin
schedule can be used to improve the clustering in routing
protocols in WSN.
Key Words: LEACH, Remote Sensor Systems, WSN,
Routing,
1.INTRODUCTION
In the field of wireless communications and miniature
electronics have allowed the development of low-power,
low-cost, multifunctional and tinysensornodes. Thesenodes
are composed of equipment’s that are responsible for
sensing, data-processing and communicating. A collectionof
such sensor nodes, when scattered in one area, gathers data
from their proximate environments and coordinate it to
execute a certain task. Thus, this collection of sensor nodes
can be referred to as a wireless sensor network (WSN) [1]
[2].
1.1 The basic goals of a WSN are:
 To determine the values of physical variables at a given
location like temperature of storage room.
 To detect the occurrence of events like how many time
temperatures drops below 30 degrees.
 To estimate parameters of the detected event or events
what’s the current temperature
 To classify a detected object
 To track an object.
Sensor nodes are used in a wide variety of applications
which requires constant surveillance of particular events.
Smart sensor nodes can be built into daily use appliances
such asovens, microwaves, refrigeratorswhich enablethem
to interact with each and be remote controlled [6]. This type
of WSN application proved us a smart environment which
adapt according to the user preferences. Military
applications include 24 hours’ surveillance,guidancesystem
for missiles and provide security assistance from mass
destruction. A patient can be monitored remotely by a
doctor using WSN [7]. This is more convenient for the
patient; it allows the doctor to have better understanding
about the patient’s current condition. Sensor networks can
also be used for detecting foreign chemical agents in the air
and the water. They help in identifying the type of object,
concentration and location of pollutants.Thewirelesssensor
networks will provide the end user with intelligence and a
better understanding of the environment [8].
Routing techniques in WSNs have to deal with different
challengesand design issues. Despite advancementinfieldof
information technology, limited battery power, bandwidth
limitation, inadequate processing power and limited
memory are some restrictions faced by networks having
wirelesssensors. [9] Due to these reasons, routingprotocols
should be highly adaptive and more aware about resources.
This paper aimsto provide effectiveprotocoltominimizethe
energy consumption in the network and increase the
network stability.
1.2 Applications of WirelessSensorNetworksareas
follows:
 Military operations: Error tolerant, self-configuration
and brisk exploitation asset fallout in major use of
wireless sensor networks in applications used for
military purposes. Sensor networks can be used for
battle field surveillance, trailing and supervising
gracious strength, exposure of biological, chemical and

nuclear hits. Consequently wirelesssensornetworksare
occupied in military guidelines, manage, figuring,
communication, intellect and surveillance.
 Surveillance: Imagine that multiple networkedsensors
(e.g., audio, seismic and video) are likely to spread all
through in a region such asa combat zone.Asurveillance
interface can be projected on the above of this sensor
network to provide data to an end-user about the
environment. In such a network, if data is computed
locally, traffic marks can vary from unprocessed sensor
data to a lofty level representation of what is rousing in
the background. The application will have several
Qualities of service (QoS) supplies from the sensor
network, such as obliging a slightest proportion sensor.
 Home Applications:-Wireless sensor networks are
used in home automation systems. Sensor nodes can be
established in home appliances such as microwave
ovens, refrigerators and vacuum cleaners. Using
wireless interface, devices can correspond with each
other and sensor network permits the consumer to
handle home devices distantly and locally.
 Health Applications: Wireless sensor networks are
budding in utilizing health applications for patient
examining, remedy organization and tele-screening.
 Environmental Applications: Wireless sensor
networks can be worn to sense forest fires and floods,
tracking and supervising of animals, earth supervising
and terrestrial discovery.
 Other Commercial Applications: Wireless sensor
networks can be recognized for observing product
superiority, monitoring material exhaustion, creating
smart office places, vehicle tracking and exposure,robot
control, managing inventory, factory course organizing
and automation. To execute vehicle tracking thousands
of energy-controlled elements are speckled over a
present section [6]. Seeing as communication outlay
more than such outsized distance is energy-draining,
transmission to the base station need to be steer clearof
except enormously crucial.
2. RELATED WORK
Wireless Sensor networks have arisen as an effective
solution for a wide range of applications. Wireless sensor
network consists of large number of nodes positioned
randomly or deterministically in the area of interesttosense
the event. Various clustering algorithm have been proposed
in the literature to increase the lifetime of the WSN. Some of
them have been examined and presented here:
O. Younis and S. Fahmy proposed Hybrid Energy Efficient
Distributed Clustering Protocol (HEED) [3][4] protocol in
2004. It extends the basic scheme of LEACH by using
residual energy as primary parameterandnetworktopology
features (e.g. node degree, distances to neighbors) are only
used as secondary parameters to break tie between
candidate cluster heads, as a metric for cluster selection to
achieve power balancing.
S. Lindsey and C. Raghavendra introduced Power
Efficient Gathering in SensorInformationSystems(PEGASIS)
[5] protocol. It is an improved version of LEACH. Instead of
forming clusters, it is based on forming chains of sensor
nodes. One node is responsible for routing the aggregated
data to the sink. Each node aggregates the collected data
with itsown data, and then passesthe aggregateddatatothe
next ring. The difference from LEACH is to employ multihop
transmission and selecting only one node to transmit to the
sink or base station. Since the overhead caused by dynamic
cluster formation is eliminated, multi hop transmission and
data aggregation is employed, PEGASIS outperforms the
LEACH.
S Kumar et.al [11] introduced a protocol that is efficient
for saving energy in networks where nodes are having
dissimilar nature i.e. heterogeneousWSNs.Paperproposesa
distributed protocol which uses heterogeneous WSN to
improve the network lifespan. The technique proposed in
this paper includes a flowchart based on various clustering
equations that proves that the work achieves prolonged
lifespan with enhanced QOS measures. End-Users use
statistics and figures for making accurate and optimum
decisions or for healthy business using internet.
Femi A. et.al. [14] utilizes a simplified approach which
minimizescomputational overhead-cost to self-organizethe
sensor network. Our simulation result shows a better
performance with respect to energy consumption. which is
reflected in the network lifetime in both homogeneous and
heterogeneous settings when compared with the existing
protocols. It is worthy of note that our approach
approximates an ideal solution for balanced energy
consumption in hierarchical wireless sensor networks.
Amrira Ruperee et.al [15], proposed in this paper
decreases the packet length by processing the data using
Delta Modulation technique at the node itself.Inthismethod,
output is dependent on the comparison between thepresent
and previous values of data. If current value is greater than
previous one, then output will be HIGH else LOW. It
minimizes the length of packet and therefore the power
dissipation. This technique is used for both clusters having
even and uneven sizes. The system stability in thismethodis
less thus reducing the network throughput.
F. A. Aderohunmu et.al [16], discloses a probabilistic
model to handle use of vitality in WSNs. Principle objective
of this convention is to utilize worldwide dataandactualities
to amplify the without taking the nearby information into
the record i.e. the remaining force of every hub. Thenegative
part of such methodsis (i) no confirmation that the required

amount of bunch heads (CHs) will be chosen (ii) the chose
group head will have adequate energy to go about as a
pioneer and performs its operations.
A.B Samer et.al [17], clarifies a versatile TDMA planning
and bunch based directing convention which depends on
round free groups. In this convention information is gotten
by CH in given timeslot and different hubs that simply enter
the group when it has an available time period. This
convention controls booking as per the progressions
happened in movement and portability circumstancesinthe
system. It can significantly decrease the loss of parcels
contrasted with the LEACH-versatile convention. Both
systems concentrate on expanding the most extremebundle
conveyance rate yet confront overhead because of the
transmission of control messages.
D.S Kim et.al [18] proposed the low-vitality versatile
bunching chain of command portable (LEACH-versatile)
convention that backings the portability of a sensor hub. It
includes the partner announcement that approves the
passage of new hub in a group amid unfaltering state stage.
On the off chance that a hub does not get a solicitation from
its CH in two continuous edges, it implies that it has moved
out of the group. It will then join another group by sending a
bunch joint solicitation. Hence, at the expense of more
noteworthy overhead, this convention enhances the parcel
conveyance rate.
D. Kumar et.al [19] projected the protocol that work
efficiently in dissimilar kind of in which leaders of clusters
are selected using criteria of weighted probability of energy
a node is having at the origin. All the nodes in the cluster
directly interact with the leader of the cluster and Base
Station. Therefore, during routing operation when data is
routed towards different paths to reach the cluster head, a
great amount of energy is wasted.
SK Singh et.al [20] introduced the important issues in
WSN in the inherent limited battery power with in network
sensor’s nodes. The battery power is crucial parameter in
the algorithm design to increase life span of nodes in the
network. The main objective of the algorithm tomaximizing
lifespan of sensor’s nodes and the overall network
performance
3. BACKGROUND STUDY
The existing work [21] aims at improving the lifetime of
the wireless sensor network by using the clustering scheme.
The scheme is a modification to the LEACH clustering
protocol. Likewise, LEACH this is also divided into set up
phase and steady phase. However, the authorshavethesleep
awake approach. In each round the cluster heads decide
which of the cluster membershave lesserenergies,andupon
finding them those nodesmust be put to sleep mode. Sothey
won’t consume much of the energies and thus can work for
duration of time. The formula for the threshold value that
decides whether the node would be elected as cluster head
or not, is also modified by considering the residual energyof
the nodes into the account.
Nonetheless, the network does not make any changes in the
clustering phase or set up phase. This phase involves a lot of
messages that are required to be broadcasted to form the
clusters. For instance, first the cluster heads send the
advertisement messagesto all the nodesasking them to join
their cluster. Then, each non-cluster head sends join
message to the cluster head and again a third-time cluster
heads sends the message to the members informing which
nodes must be out to the sleep node. So, every time, the
round changesthis processgetsrepeated leadingtosomany
messages being broadcasted thus leading to higher energy
consumption. This method can be replaced by the round
robin schedule where the cluster heads for the subsequent
rounds are decided in the initial phase itself.
Fig. 1 Architecture of WSN
4. CONCLUSIONS
The key goal of this paper is to fabricate an arrangement of
principles that can give a superior and solid remote sensors
organize administrations utilizing stablesystemhavinghubs
with delayed lifetime. In the past approach Ineachroundthe
cluster heads decide which of the cluster members have
lesser energies, and upon finding them those nodes must be
put to sleep mode. So they won’t consume much of the
energies and thus can work for duration of time Here, every
time, the round changesthis processgetsrepeatedleadingto
so many messages being broadcasted thus leading to higher
energy consumption. In future this work can be extended
using round robin schedule where the cluster headsforeach
round is decided initially i.e. in the initial phase. The main
focus of the protocol should be to minimize the usage of
energy within the WSN and increase the lifespan of the
network. Moreover, it is also expected thatthethroughputof
the WSN will increase due to fall in energy consumption in
network. This results in greater network stability and
prolonged network lifetime.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The paper has been composed with the kind assistance,
guidance and support of my department who have helped

me in this work. I would like to thank all the people whose
encouragement and support has made the fulfilment of this
work conceivable.
REFERENCES
[1] I.F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam and E.
Cayirci, “Wireless sensor networks: a survey”, Computer
Networks, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 393-422, 2002.
[2] Ann Holms and Ethan Culler-Mayeno, “A Technical
Report: Wireless Sensor Networks and How They Work”
University of California Santa Barbara, April 4th, 2006.
[4] Bult K., “Low Power Systemsfor WirelessMicro-sensors”,
International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and
Design, pages 17-21, August 1996.
[5] Daniele Puccinelli and Martin Haenggi,” Wireless Sensor
Networks: Applications and Challenges of Ubiquitous
Sensing”IEEE CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, Third
quarter 2005.
[6] Debnath Bhattacharyya, Tai-hoon Kim and Subhajit Pal,
”A Comparative Study of Wireless Sensor Networks and
Their Routing Protocols”Sensors, 2010.
[7] SatyajayantMisra and GuoliangXue,” SAS: A Simple
Anonymity Scheme for Clustered WirelessSensorNetworks”
open resource.
[8] K. Ramesh and Dr. K. Somasundaram “A Comparative
Study of cluster head selection algorithm in wireless sensor
network” International Journal of Computer Science &
Engineering Survey (IJCSES)vol. 2 no. 4.2011.
[9] Dutt Suniti,“Cluster based Hierarchical Routing in
wireless sensor networks” International journal of
Engineering and innovative technology (IJEIT)vol.2, issue6,
Dec 2012.
[10] Z.W. Siew, A. Kiring, H.T. Yew, P. Neelakantan and K.T.K.
Teo “Energy Efficient Clustering Algorithm in Wireless
Sensor Networks using Fuzzy Logic Control” IEEE
Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering
Research (CHUSER 2011),Dec 5-6 2011, Penang.
[11] Kumar, S.; Ranjan, P.; Radhakrishnan, R.: EMEEDP:
“Enhanced Multi-hop Energy Efficient Distributed Protocol
for Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Network”,
Communication Systemsand Network Technologies(CSNT),
2015 Fifth International Conference.
[12] Suniti Dutt,“Cluster based Hierarchical Routing in
wireless sensor networks” International journal of
Engineering and innovative technology (IJEIT) vol.2, issue6,
Dec 2012.
[13] K. Akkaya and M. Younis, “A Survey on Routing
Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks, “Ad Hoc Network
Journal, Vol. 3/3, pp. 325-349, 2005.
[14] Femi A. Aderohunmu , Jeremiah D. Deng , Martin K.
Purvis proposed DEC(Deterministic Energy-Efficient
Clustering Protocol)” IEEE,2011
[15] Amrita Ruperee, Shikha, Pawar Sanjay: “Achieving
Energy Efficiency and Increasing Network Life in Wireless
Sensor Network”, IEEE International Advance Computing
Conference (IACC), 2014
[16] F. A. Aderohunmu, J. D. Deng, and M. K. Purvis:”
Enhancing Clustering in Wireless Sensor Networks with
Energy Heterogeneity”, International Journal of Business
Data Communications and Networking-(Accepted,toappear
in the forthcoming issue, 2011.
[17] Samer, A.B., CheeK, N.K., Mohd, F.R., et al.: ‘Clusterbased
routing protocol for mobile nodes in wireless sensor
network’. Proc. Third Int. Conf. on Quality of Service in
Heterogeneous Wired/Wireless Networks, Waterloo,
Ontario, Canada, August 2006, pp. 233–241
[18] Kim, D.S., Chung, Y.J.: ‘Self-organizationroutingprotocol
supporting mobile nodes for wireless sensor network’.
Proc.First Int. Multi-Symp. on Computer and Computational
Sciences, Hangzhou, China, June 2006, pp. 622–626
[19] Kumar, D., Aseri, T.C., Patel, and R.B.: ‘EEHC: energy
efficient heterogeneousclusteredschemeforwirelesssensor
networks’, Elsevier Computer Commun., 2009, 32, (4), pp.
662–667
[20] Kumar, G. Santhosh, Vinu Paul, and K. Poulose Jacob.
"Mobility metric-based leach-mobile protocol”, In Advanced
Computing and Communications,ADCOM,16thInternational
Conference, pp. 248-253. IEEE, 2008.
[21] Wang Ke, Ou Yangrui, Ji Hong, Zhang Heli, Li Xi, “Energy
aware hierarchical cluster-basedroutingprotocolforWSNs”,
The Journal of China Universities of Posts and
Telecommunications, August 2016
[3] Waltengus Dargie and Christian Poellabauer,
“Fundamentals of wireless Sensor network” Wiley series on
Wireless Communications and mobile computing.

IRJET-A Brief Study of Leach based Routing Protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to IRJET-A Brief Study of Leach based Routing Protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks (20)

More from IRJET Journal (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

IRJET-A Brief Study of Leach based Routing Protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks