JOB EVALUATION
• INTRODUCTION
• MERITS AND DEMERITS
• PROCESS
• METHODS
• A job evaluation is a systematic way of determining the value/worth of a job in
relation to other jobs in an organization.
• It tries to make a systematic comparison between jobs to access their relative worth
for the purpose of establishing a rational pay structure.
FEATURES OF J/E
• Standards of J/E are relative, not absolute.
• Tries to access jobs, not people.
• Basis of J/E is Job Analysis.
• Carried on by groups, not individuals.
MERITS OF J/E
• Harmonious relationship between employees and
manager.
• Standardization
• Relevance of new jobs
• Specialization
• Helps in selection of employees
DEMERITS OF J/E
• Problem of adjustment
• Unrealistic
• Organisational Limitations
• Opposition by workers
• Subjective
JOB EVALUATION HELPS FOLLOWING
PURPOSES:
IT HELPS IN DEVISING AN ACCEPTABLE WAGE.
IT HELPS IN THE PROPER PLACEMENT OF WORKERS IN JOB.
IT HELPS THE PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT TO RECRUIT THE RIGHT
PERSON FOR A JOB SINCE REQUIREMENT OF EACH JOB ARE CLEARLY
INDICATED.
IT HELPS IN FORMULATING THE INTERNAL TRAINING PLAN.
IT HELPS TO AVOID WAGE AND OTHER DISCRIMINATION FOR
SIMILAR JOBS IN SAME ORGANISATION OR A GROUP OF
ORGANISATIONS UNDER THE SAME MANAGEMENT.
METHODS OF J/E
• Qualitative Method
• Ranking or Job Comparison
• Grading or Job Classification
• Quantitative Method
• Point Rating
• Factor Comparison
1. RANKING METHOD
• Simplest form
• Each job as a whole is compared with other
and this comparison of jobs goes on until
all the jobs have been evaluated and
ranked.
• All jobs are ranked in the order of their
importance from the simplest to the hardest
or from the highest to the lowest.
2. GRADING METHOD
• Also known as classification method
• A job grade is defined as a group of
different jobs of similar difficulty or
requiring similar skills to perform them.
• Job grades are determined on the basis of
information derived from job analysis.
• The grades or classes are created by
identifying some common denominator
such as skills, knowledge and
responsibilities.
3. POINT RATING
• Jobs are broke down based on various
identifiable factors such as skill, effort,
training, knowledge, hazards, responsibility,
etc. Thereafter, points are allocated to each
of these factors.
• Weights are given to factors depending on
their importance to perform the job.
• The sum of points gives an index of the
relative significance of the jobs that are
rated.
4. FACTOR COMPARISON
• Instead of ranking complete jobs, each job
is ranked according to a series of factors.
These factors include mental effort, skill
needed, responsibility, working conditions,
etc.
• Pay will be assigned in this method by comparing
the weights of factors required for each job.
• Wages are assigned to the job in comparison to its
ranking on each job factor.
GAINING ACCEPTANCE
 TOP MANAGEMENT MUST
EXPLAIN THE AIM AND USES
OF THE PROGRAMME TO THE
EMPLOYEES AND UNIONS
CREATINGJOBEVALUATIONCOMMITTEE
EXPERIENCED
EMPLOYEES
HR EXPERTS
UNION
REPRESENTATIVES
As it is not possible
for a single person
to evaluate all key
jobs
FINDING THE JOB TO BE EVALUATED
EVERY JOB NEED NOT BE EVALUATED.THIS MAY BE TOO
TAXING AND COSTLY.CERTAIN KEY JOBS IN EACH DEPARTMENT
MAY BE IDENTIFIED.WHILE PICKING UP THE JOB CARE MUST
BE TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT THEY REPRESENT THE TYPE OF
WORK PERFORMED IN THAT DEPARTMENT…..
ANALYSING AND PREPARING JOB DESCRIPTION
THIS REQUIRES THE PREPARATION OF A JOB DESCRIPITION
AND ALSO AN ANALYSIS OF A JOB THAT NEEDS FOR
SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE….
A JOB DESCRIPTION SUMMARIZES THE DUTIES OF A POSITION
AND STAES THE ESSENTIAL RESPONSIBILITIES…..
BENEFITS OF JOB DESCRIPTION
SELECTINGTHEMETHODOFEVALUATION
FOUR METHODS OF JOB
EVALUATION
THE MOST IMPORTANT
METHOD OF EVALUATING THE
JOBS MUST BE IDENTIFIED
NOW,KEEPING THE JOB
FACTORS AS WELL AS
ORGANISATIONAL DEMANDS
IN MIND
EXAMPLE OF SELECTING EVALUATION METHOD
CLASSIFYING JOBS
THE RELATIVE WORTH OF VARIOUS JOBS IN AN ORGANISATION MAY BE FOUND OUT AFTER
ARRANGING JOBS IN ORDER OF IMPORTANCE USING CRITERIA SUCH AS:
5
5
3
4
Skill Requirements
Experience Needed
Condition Under Job Performed
Type Of Responsibility To Be Shouldered
Degree Of Supervision Needed
5 Amount Of Stress Caused By Job
3
Weights can be assigned
to each such factor.
When we finally add all
the weights, the worth
of a job is determined.
The point may then be
converted into monetary
ones.
REVIEWING PERIODICALLY
IN THE LIGHT OF CHANGES IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL
CONDITIONS(TECHNOLOGY,PRODUCTS,SERVICES,ETC.) JOBS NEED TO BE
EXAMINED CLOSELY.
 THE TRADITIONAL CLERICAL FUNCTIONS HAVE UNDERGONE A RAPID CHANGE IN
THE SECTORS LIKE BANKING,INSURANCE,AND RAILWAYS,AFTER
COUMPUTERISATION.
NEW JOB DESCRIPTION NEED TO BE WRITTEN AND THE SKILLS NEEDS OF NEW JOBS
NEED TO BE DULY INCORPORATED IN THE EVALUATION PROCESS.
EMPLOYEES MAY FEEL THAT ALL THE RELEVANT JOB FACTORS-BASED ON WHICH
THEIR PAY HAS BEEN DETERMINED-HAVE NOT BEEN EVALUATED PROPERLY.
NEED FOR JOB
EVALUATION
Presented By,
Nidhi Tayal
Bargave Silvaraju
Swati Raj
Avinash Kumar
Pranav Shyam

Job Evaluation PPT

  • 1.
    JOB EVALUATION • INTRODUCTION •MERITS AND DEMERITS • PROCESS • METHODS
  • 2.
    • A jobevaluation is a systematic way of determining the value/worth of a job in relation to other jobs in an organization. • It tries to make a systematic comparison between jobs to access their relative worth for the purpose of establishing a rational pay structure.
  • 3.
    FEATURES OF J/E •Standards of J/E are relative, not absolute. • Tries to access jobs, not people. • Basis of J/E is Job Analysis. • Carried on by groups, not individuals.
  • 4.
    MERITS OF J/E •Harmonious relationship between employees and manager. • Standardization • Relevance of new jobs • Specialization • Helps in selection of employees
  • 5.
    DEMERITS OF J/E •Problem of adjustment • Unrealistic • Organisational Limitations • Opposition by workers • Subjective
  • 6.
    JOB EVALUATION HELPSFOLLOWING PURPOSES: IT HELPS IN DEVISING AN ACCEPTABLE WAGE. IT HELPS IN THE PROPER PLACEMENT OF WORKERS IN JOB. IT HELPS THE PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT TO RECRUIT THE RIGHT PERSON FOR A JOB SINCE REQUIREMENT OF EACH JOB ARE CLEARLY INDICATED. IT HELPS IN FORMULATING THE INTERNAL TRAINING PLAN. IT HELPS TO AVOID WAGE AND OTHER DISCRIMINATION FOR SIMILAR JOBS IN SAME ORGANISATION OR A GROUP OF ORGANISATIONS UNDER THE SAME MANAGEMENT.
  • 7.
    METHODS OF J/E •Qualitative Method • Ranking or Job Comparison • Grading or Job Classification • Quantitative Method • Point Rating • Factor Comparison
  • 8.
    1. RANKING METHOD •Simplest form • Each job as a whole is compared with other and this comparison of jobs goes on until all the jobs have been evaluated and ranked. • All jobs are ranked in the order of their importance from the simplest to the hardest or from the highest to the lowest.
  • 10.
    2. GRADING METHOD •Also known as classification method • A job grade is defined as a group of different jobs of similar difficulty or requiring similar skills to perform them. • Job grades are determined on the basis of information derived from job analysis. • The grades or classes are created by identifying some common denominator such as skills, knowledge and responsibilities.
  • 12.
    3. POINT RATING •Jobs are broke down based on various identifiable factors such as skill, effort, training, knowledge, hazards, responsibility, etc. Thereafter, points are allocated to each of these factors. • Weights are given to factors depending on their importance to perform the job. • The sum of points gives an index of the relative significance of the jobs that are rated.
  • 14.
    4. FACTOR COMPARISON •Instead of ranking complete jobs, each job is ranked according to a series of factors. These factors include mental effort, skill needed, responsibility, working conditions, etc. • Pay will be assigned in this method by comparing the weights of factors required for each job. • Wages are assigned to the job in comparison to its ranking on each job factor.
  • 17.
    GAINING ACCEPTANCE  TOPMANAGEMENT MUST EXPLAIN THE AIM AND USES OF THE PROGRAMME TO THE EMPLOYEES AND UNIONS
  • 18.
    CREATINGJOBEVALUATIONCOMMITTEE EXPERIENCED EMPLOYEES HR EXPERTS UNION REPRESENTATIVES As itis not possible for a single person to evaluate all key jobs
  • 19.
    FINDING THE JOBTO BE EVALUATED EVERY JOB NEED NOT BE EVALUATED.THIS MAY BE TOO TAXING AND COSTLY.CERTAIN KEY JOBS IN EACH DEPARTMENT MAY BE IDENTIFIED.WHILE PICKING UP THE JOB CARE MUST BE TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT THEY REPRESENT THE TYPE OF WORK PERFORMED IN THAT DEPARTMENT…..
  • 20.
    ANALYSING AND PREPARINGJOB DESCRIPTION THIS REQUIRES THE PREPARATION OF A JOB DESCRIPITION AND ALSO AN ANALYSIS OF A JOB THAT NEEDS FOR SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE…. A JOB DESCRIPTION SUMMARIZES THE DUTIES OF A POSITION AND STAES THE ESSENTIAL RESPONSIBILITIES…..
  • 22.
    BENEFITS OF JOBDESCRIPTION
  • 23.
    SELECTINGTHEMETHODOFEVALUATION FOUR METHODS OFJOB EVALUATION THE MOST IMPORTANT METHOD OF EVALUATING THE JOBS MUST BE IDENTIFIED NOW,KEEPING THE JOB FACTORS AS WELL AS ORGANISATIONAL DEMANDS IN MIND
  • 24.
    EXAMPLE OF SELECTINGEVALUATION METHOD
  • 25.
    CLASSIFYING JOBS THE RELATIVEWORTH OF VARIOUS JOBS IN AN ORGANISATION MAY BE FOUND OUT AFTER ARRANGING JOBS IN ORDER OF IMPORTANCE USING CRITERIA SUCH AS: 5 5 3 4 Skill Requirements Experience Needed Condition Under Job Performed Type Of Responsibility To Be Shouldered Degree Of Supervision Needed 5 Amount Of Stress Caused By Job 3 Weights can be assigned to each such factor. When we finally add all the weights, the worth of a job is determined. The point may then be converted into monetary ones.
  • 26.
    REVIEWING PERIODICALLY IN THELIGHT OF CHANGES IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS(TECHNOLOGY,PRODUCTS,SERVICES,ETC.) JOBS NEED TO BE EXAMINED CLOSELY.  THE TRADITIONAL CLERICAL FUNCTIONS HAVE UNDERGONE A RAPID CHANGE IN THE SECTORS LIKE BANKING,INSURANCE,AND RAILWAYS,AFTER COUMPUTERISATION. NEW JOB DESCRIPTION NEED TO BE WRITTEN AND THE SKILLS NEEDS OF NEW JOBS NEED TO BE DULY INCORPORATED IN THE EVALUATION PROCESS. EMPLOYEES MAY FEEL THAT ALL THE RELEVANT JOB FACTORS-BASED ON WHICH THEIR PAY HAS BEEN DETERMINED-HAVE NOT BEEN EVALUATED PROPERLY.
  • 27.
  • 28.
    Presented By, Nidhi Tayal BargaveSilvaraju Swati Raj Avinash Kumar Pranav Shyam