Manure Application Method and
Timing Effects on Emission of
Ammonia and Nitrous Oxide
Bill Jokela, Carrie Laboski, and Todd Andraski
  USDA-ARS, Dairy Forage Research Center, Marshfield, WI
Soil Science Dept., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Waste to Worth Conference
April 2-5, 2013. Denver, CO
Situation
• Ammonia losses from surface-applied manure can
be large, reducing manure N availability/economic
value and contributing to environmental problems
• Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a potent greenhouse gas
that can be released from manure
• Injection or quick tillage incorporation can reduce
NH3 loss but effect on N2O emissions is less clear.
• How do manure management variables (timing,
method, incorporation time) affect
– NH3 and N2O losses?
– N availability/fertilizer value for corn?
• Can sidedressed manure be a viable N source?
Sidedress Manure?
Ontario (Ball-Coehlo)
Quebec
Vermont (Jokela)
Objective
• Evaluate the effect of liquid dairy
manure application method and timing,
and time of incorporation on:
– Ammonia losses
– Nitrous oxide emissions
– Corn yield and manure N
availability/fertilizer N value
Field Site
• Marshfield, WI, Ag Research Station
• Withee silt loam
– Aquic Glossudalf
– Somewhat poorly drained, 0-2% slope
• Previous crop = corn
– New site each year
Treatments
• Pre-plant manure (mid- late May)
– Surface application with disk
incorporation
• Immediate (<1 h)
• 1-day
• 3-day (surface)
– Injection
• S-tine (Kongsgilde Vibro-flex)
• 15-inch spacing
• 2-3-inch diam. band , 4-6 in. deep
– All plots chisel plowed 3-5 days
after manure application
Treatments
• Sidedress manure (5-6 lf stage)
– Injection
• S-tine (Kongsgilde Vibro-flex)
with shields
• 30-inch spacing
• 4-6 inches deep
– Surface (Yr 2, 3, and 4)
• Fertilizer N
– 6 pre-plant rates
• 0 to 200 lb/acre
– Not evaluated for NH3 or N2O
Injected Manure Placement
Manure Source
• Liquid dairy manure
– 6500 gal/acre (target rate)
– Solids content: 14% (avg.)
– Sand bedding
– N application rate (avg.)
• 158 lb total N/acre
• Variable
NH3 emission measurement
– Dynamic chamber/equilibrium
concentration
• Svensson, 1994; Misselbrook and
Hansen, 2001
• 2 chambers, 1 ambient meter/plot
• 4 passive diffusion samplers (2 types)
in each chamber
– Started immediately after manure
application; continued through Day 3
– 6 measurement periods
• Approx. 0-1, 1-2.5, 2.5-6, 6-20, 20-30,
and 44-54 h after manure application
N2O flux measurement
– Static, vented chamber
– GRACEnet protocol
• Parkin and Venterea, 2010
– 2 chambers/plot
– Sampled approx. weekly May-Oct
• More frequently after manure or rain
• Less frequently late in season
– 3 samples/time (0, 30, 60 min.)
– Flux calculated by linear regression
NH3
N2O
N2O
Experimental Design
• Randomized complete block
design
• 4 replicates (3 for NH3 and
N2O emission)
• Plot size: 15 x 50-ft
– 50-75-ft alleys for
equipment turning
Results
Ammonia Emission
2009-2011 Avg.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
CumulativeNH3Loss(lbN/acre)
Hoursafter Manure Application
CumulativeNH3 Loss
2009-2011 Average
PP-Inject
PP-Disk1 hr
PP-Disk3 day
SD-Inj
a
bc
b
c
B
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
NH3Emission(lbN/acreh)
Hoursafter Manure Application
NH3 Emission Rates
2009-2011 Average
PP-Inject
PP-Disk 1 hr
PP-Disk 3 day
SD-Inj
A
Ammonia Emission
• Most loss in first 6-12 hours after
application
• Total 3-day losses (3-yr average)
highest for surface application
• NH3 loss reduced by injection (>90%) or
immediate disk incorporation (75%)
N2O Flux
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
28-May 11-Jun 25-Jun 9-Jul 23-Jul 6-Aug 20-Aug 3-Sep 17-Sep 1-Oct 15-Oct
ugN2O-Nm-2h-1
N2O Flux 2011
PP-Inj
PP-1 hr
PP-3-day
SD-Inj
SD-Sur
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
28-May 4-Jun 11-Jun 18-Jun 25-Jun 2-Jul
ugN2O-Nm-2h-1
5 in.
rain
Cumulative N2O Emission
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
2010 2011
lb/N2O-N/acre
AnnualN2O Loss PP-Inj
PP-1 h
PP-3-d
SD-Inj
SD-Surf
N2O Emission
• Increase in N2O flux after manure
application at PP and/or SD
– Injection most pronounced
– 6 to 12-day lag time
• Low levels of N2O late July to Oct.
• Magnitude and timing (PP vs. SD) varied
by year
– May be explained by combination of rain
events/soil moisture, soil temperature, and
manure characteristics and N content
Grain response to preplant incorporated urea
N Fertilizer Equivalence Value (NFEV) of Manure
% N Fert Equiv = NFEV ÷ total N applied x 100
Fertilizer N Equivalence
• Varied by year
– Weather, soil conditions, actual manure
N rate
• General trend (4-year avg.) related to
time of incorporation
– Inject (52%) >> 1-hr or 1-day (37%) > 3-
day (34%) > None (sidedress, 32%)
Summary
• Highest NH3 loss from surface
application
– Greatly reduced by injection (>90%) or
immediate disk incorporation (75%)
• Most NH3 loss in first 6-12 hours
after application
– Quick incorporation important
• Fertilizer N equivalence varied but
highest for injection, less for delayed
incorporation
Summary
• Injection of manure most effective
at reducing NH3 losses… but also
increased N2O emissions
– N2O-N << NH3-N, so not economically
important; but environmentally important
as a greenhouse gas
– But a portion of NH3 emitted eventually
converted to N2O (1 %; IPCC, 2006), so
trade-off may be minimized
• Alternatives to S-tine injection
– Tillage incorporation, but consider
residue management and erosion/water
quality concerns
– Different injection techniques (injector
type, depth, etc.)
Summary
• Sidedress application of manure is a viable N
source for corn
– Another window of time for manure application
– Can use PSNT to determine rate
– Practical limitations
• Equipment: Injection or direct incorporation preferred
• Field issues: equipment turning, plant damage
• Data support recent changes to UWEX
manure N availability (N Fertilizer
Equivalence)
– 50% injected or broadcast incorporated <1 hr
– 40% broadcast incorporated 1 to 72 hr
– 30% broadcast incorporated >72 hr or not incorporated
Thank You
• Research sponsored by:
– USDA-ARS
– WI Corn Growers Assoc.
• Thanks to all the staff & students
that helped with field and lab work

Manure Application Method and Timing Effects on Emission of Ammonia and Nitrous Oxide

  • 1.
    Manure Application Methodand Timing Effects on Emission of Ammonia and Nitrous Oxide Bill Jokela, Carrie Laboski, and Todd Andraski   USDA-ARS, Dairy Forage Research Center, Marshfield, WI Soil Science Dept., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI Waste to Worth Conference April 2-5, 2013. Denver, CO
  • 2.
    Situation • Ammonia lossesfrom surface-applied manure can be large, reducing manure N availability/economic value and contributing to environmental problems • Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a potent greenhouse gas that can be released from manure • Injection or quick tillage incorporation can reduce NH3 loss but effect on N2O emissions is less clear. • How do manure management variables (timing, method, incorporation time) affect – NH3 and N2O losses? – N availability/fertilizer value for corn? • Can sidedressed manure be a viable N source?
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Objective • Evaluate theeffect of liquid dairy manure application method and timing, and time of incorporation on: – Ammonia losses – Nitrous oxide emissions – Corn yield and manure N availability/fertilizer N value
  • 5.
    Field Site • Marshfield,WI, Ag Research Station • Withee silt loam – Aquic Glossudalf – Somewhat poorly drained, 0-2% slope • Previous crop = corn – New site each year
  • 6.
    Treatments • Pre-plant manure(mid- late May) – Surface application with disk incorporation • Immediate (<1 h) • 1-day • 3-day (surface) – Injection • S-tine (Kongsgilde Vibro-flex) • 15-inch spacing • 2-3-inch diam. band , 4-6 in. deep – All plots chisel plowed 3-5 days after manure application
  • 7.
    Treatments • Sidedress manure(5-6 lf stage) – Injection • S-tine (Kongsgilde Vibro-flex) with shields • 30-inch spacing • 4-6 inches deep – Surface (Yr 2, 3, and 4) • Fertilizer N – 6 pre-plant rates • 0 to 200 lb/acre – Not evaluated for NH3 or N2O
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Manure Source • Liquiddairy manure – 6500 gal/acre (target rate) – Solids content: 14% (avg.) – Sand bedding – N application rate (avg.) • 158 lb total N/acre • Variable
  • 10.
    NH3 emission measurement –Dynamic chamber/equilibrium concentration • Svensson, 1994; Misselbrook and Hansen, 2001 • 2 chambers, 1 ambient meter/plot • 4 passive diffusion samplers (2 types) in each chamber – Started immediately after manure application; continued through Day 3 – 6 measurement periods • Approx. 0-1, 1-2.5, 2.5-6, 6-20, 20-30, and 44-54 h after manure application
  • 11.
    N2O flux measurement –Static, vented chamber – GRACEnet protocol • Parkin and Venterea, 2010 – 2 chambers/plot – Sampled approx. weekly May-Oct • More frequently after manure or rain • Less frequently late in season – 3 samples/time (0, 30, 60 min.) – Flux calculated by linear regression
  • 12.
  • 13.
    Experimental Design • Randomizedcomplete block design • 4 replicates (3 for NH3 and N2O emission) • Plot size: 15 x 50-ft – 50-75-ft alleys for equipment turning
  • 14.
  • 15.
    Ammonia Emission 2009-2011 Avg. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 010 20 30 40 50 60 CumulativeNH3Loss(lbN/acre) Hoursafter Manure Application CumulativeNH3 Loss 2009-2011 Average PP-Inject PP-Disk1 hr PP-Disk3 day SD-Inj a bc b c B 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 NH3Emission(lbN/acreh) Hoursafter Manure Application NH3 Emission Rates 2009-2011 Average PP-Inject PP-Disk 1 hr PP-Disk 3 day SD-Inj A
  • 16.
    Ammonia Emission • Mostloss in first 6-12 hours after application • Total 3-day losses (3-yr average) highest for surface application • NH3 loss reduced by injection (>90%) or immediate disk incorporation (75%)
  • 17.
    N2O Flux -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 28-May 11-Jun25-Jun 9-Jul 23-Jul 6-Aug 20-Aug 3-Sep 17-Sep 1-Oct 15-Oct ugN2O-Nm-2h-1 N2O Flux 2011 PP-Inj PP-1 hr PP-3-day SD-Inj SD-Sur 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 28-May 4-Jun 11-Jun 18-Jun 25-Jun 2-Jul ugN2O-Nm-2h-1 5 in. rain
  • 18.
    Cumulative N2O Emission 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 20102011 lb/N2O-N/acre AnnualN2O Loss PP-Inj PP-1 h PP-3-d SD-Inj SD-Surf
  • 19.
    N2O Emission • Increasein N2O flux after manure application at PP and/or SD – Injection most pronounced – 6 to 12-day lag time • Low levels of N2O late July to Oct. • Magnitude and timing (PP vs. SD) varied by year – May be explained by combination of rain events/soil moisture, soil temperature, and manure characteristics and N content
  • 20.
    Grain response topreplant incorporated urea
  • 21.
    N Fertilizer EquivalenceValue (NFEV) of Manure % N Fert Equiv = NFEV ÷ total N applied x 100
  • 22.
    Fertilizer N Equivalence •Varied by year – Weather, soil conditions, actual manure N rate • General trend (4-year avg.) related to time of incorporation – Inject (52%) >> 1-hr or 1-day (37%) > 3- day (34%) > None (sidedress, 32%)
  • 23.
    Summary • Highest NH3loss from surface application – Greatly reduced by injection (>90%) or immediate disk incorporation (75%) • Most NH3 loss in first 6-12 hours after application – Quick incorporation important • Fertilizer N equivalence varied but highest for injection, less for delayed incorporation
  • 24.
    Summary • Injection ofmanure most effective at reducing NH3 losses… but also increased N2O emissions – N2O-N << NH3-N, so not economically important; but environmentally important as a greenhouse gas – But a portion of NH3 emitted eventually converted to N2O (1 %; IPCC, 2006), so trade-off may be minimized
  • 25.
    • Alternatives toS-tine injection – Tillage incorporation, but consider residue management and erosion/water quality concerns – Different injection techniques (injector type, depth, etc.)
  • 26.
    Summary • Sidedress applicationof manure is a viable N source for corn – Another window of time for manure application – Can use PSNT to determine rate – Practical limitations • Equipment: Injection or direct incorporation preferred • Field issues: equipment turning, plant damage • Data support recent changes to UWEX manure N availability (N Fertilizer Equivalence) – 50% injected or broadcast incorporated <1 hr – 40% broadcast incorporated 1 to 72 hr – 30% broadcast incorporated >72 hr or not incorporated
  • 27.
    Thank You • Researchsponsored by: – USDA-ARS – WI Corn Growers Assoc. • Thanks to all the staff & students that helped with field and lab work