Equipping U. S. Climate Alliance States for Natural and
Working Lands Mitigation: Agriculture Support
ThayerTomlinson, Coalition on Agricultural GreenhouseGases; JimmyDaukas, American Farmland Trust; JenniferMoore-
Kucera, AmericanFarmlandTrust; AnnaHarmon, Coalition on Agricultural GreenhouseGases; RyanSmith, DeltaInstitute
Presentation
Overview
Introduction to the U.S. Climate
Alliance
Natural and Working Lands
Challenge
Opportunities for GHG Reductions
in Natural and Working Lands
The Role of Agriculture
Agriculture Support to U.S. Climate
Alliance States:
◦ Agricultural Practices
◦ Agriculture Policy Toolkit
The U.S. Climate Alliance
The U.S. Climate Alliance is a bipartisan coalition of 25 governors committed to
reducing greenhouse gas emissions consistent with the goals of the Paris
Agreement.
The Alliance is led by state governments and is focused on state-to-state
cooperation to accelerate the deployment of climate solutions needed to help
each achieve their climate goals.
The U.S. Climate Alliance represents 55 percent of U.S. population and 60
percent of national GDP
The U.S. Climate Alliance
U.S. Climate Alliance states are committed to taking real, on the ground action
that urgently addresses the climate challenge. In becoming an Alliance member,
states commit to:
◦ Implement policies that advance the goals of the Paris Agreement, aiming to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions by at least 26 – 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025.
◦ Track and report progress to the global community in appropriate settings, including when
the world convenes to take stock of the Paris Agreement, and
◦ Accelerate new and existing policies to reduce carbon pollution and promote clean energy
deployment at the state and federal level.
More information: https://www.usclimatealliance.org
State Targets for Emissions Reductions
Implement policies that advance the goals of the Paris Agreement, aiming to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions by at least 26 – 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025.
Some states have set goals for net zero emissions (HI by 2045 and NY by 2050); some have also
made a clear commitment to including aspects of NWL in their statewide targets.
Natural and Working
Lands (NWL) Initiative
The Natural and Working Lands initiative of the U.S. Climate
Alliance identifies best practices for land conservation,
management and restoration to develop a carbon storage
policy framework for implementation.
The U.S. Climate Alliance has identified enhancing carbon
sequestration on natural and working lands as a key near-
term opportunity for achieving its climate goals.
Focusing on forests, farmland, ranchland, grasslands,
wetlands, and urban land to mitigate the harmful effects of
climate change.
Natural and Working
Lands Challenge
• Improve inventory methods for land-based carbon
flux;
• Identify best practices to reduce GHG emissions
and increase resilient carbon sequestration;
• Advance programs, policies, and incentives to
reduce GHG emissions and enhance resilient
carbon sequestration;
• Undertake actions that will support a collective,
Alliance-wide goal to maintain natural and working
lands as a net sink of carbon and protect and
increase carbon storage capacity, while balancing
near- and long-term sequestration objectives; and
• Integrate priority actions and pathways into state
GHG mitigation plans by 2020.
Impact Partners
Group of six NGOs that are providing technical
support to Alliance states to achieve the goals of
the NWL Challenge.
Support includes providing NWL inventory
development/refinement assistance, technical
support on agriculture and forests, providing
information exchange opportunities (such as
Learning Labs).
Agricultural
Support
Initial Work by AFT
and C-AGG is
Focusing on
Agriculture Practices
and Policies
Agriculture’s Importance
to USCA State Economies
◦ Top 10 agriculture states (cash receipts): California, Iowa,
Texas, Nebraska, Minnesota, Illinois, Kansas, North
Carolina, Wisconsin, Indiana
◦ Top 3 US milk states (production): California, Wisconsin,
New York
◦ Top 3 US soybean states (production): Illinois, Iowa,
Minnesota
◦ Top 4 US corn states (production): Iowa, Illinois, Nebraska,
Minnesota
◦ Top 3 US hog/pig states (sales): Iowa, North Carolina,
Minnesota
◦ Top 6 US fruit states (production): California, Florida,
Washington, Michigan, Oregon, New York
◦ California accounts for 48% of all fresh vegetable
production in the US
Potential for GHG
Reductions and
Carbon
Sequestration on
Agricultural Lands
Alliance states have
requested more information
on additional potential
agriculture practices, what
policies other states are
considering, and approaches
to estimate agriculture offset
potential in their states.
Fargione et al, Science Adv 2018
Agricultural Systems Management for
Climate Mitigation & Resiliency
Carbon
Sequestration
Reduced
Nitrogen Inputs
Improved
Water Quality
Increased
Biodiversity
Reduced
Pesticides
Reduced Energy
Drought
Resilience
Improved Air
Quality
Reduced N2O
Recapture &
Recycling of N
Yield Stability
Soil Stores 2 – 3x More CO2 than Atmosphere
2 – 5x More than Vegetation
Actions for Climate Mitigation & Resiliency
Photo source: Jennifer Moore-Kucera; Soil Health Image from: USDA –NRCS-Principles for High Functioning Soils Factsheet
Promote regenerative/ climate-
smart agricultural practices
Failure to prevent soil loss and
soils losing carbon may
outweigh actions to increase
levels in other soil types.
Cover crops
No till/reduced till/conservation till
Improved Nutrient Management
Integrating perennials with crops
Silvo-pasture
Riparian buffers
Filter strips
Windbreaks
Examples of Practices
Considerations
Create an Agriculture
Policy Toolkit
Agricultural Solutions for Mitigating Climate Change: A Policy
Toolkit for State Governments
Tools include:
◦ policies and programs driving adoption of agriculture pathways
that reduce GHG emissions and increase carbon sequestration
at the state, regional, and federal level
◦ private sector efforts such as corporate sustainability and
environmental markets.
Catalog programs and policies that support C sequestration and/or
reduce GHG emissions in agriculture at state and regional levels to
create individual state policy summaries. Also include those federal
programs most utilized by states.
Agriculture Policy Toolkit
will Include:
State profile with policies at the state level as well as state-
specific labor/income/farm size statistics
Feedback from interview process
Best practices and lessons learned
Policy development case studies
Regional programs
Use of federal conservation practices and programs
Financing opportunities—state, regional, federal and private
sector
State Agriculture and Climate Policies
Policies studied include:
◦ Healthy Soils
◦ Water Quality
◦ Water Efficiency
◦ Climate Resiliency
◦ Methane Reduction
◦ Nutrient Management
◦ On-Farm renewable energy/energy efficiency
◦ Farmland Conservation Preservation
Contact Information
Thayer Tomlinson, C-AGG, thayer@c-agg.org
Anna Harmon, C-AGG, anna@c-agg.org
Jimmy Daukas, AFT, jdaukas@farmland.org
Jen Moore-Kucera, AFT, jmoorekucera@farmland.org
Ryan Smith, C-AGG, rsmith@delta-institute.org

July 29-130-Thayer Tomlinson

  • 1.
    Equipping U. S.Climate Alliance States for Natural and Working Lands Mitigation: Agriculture Support ThayerTomlinson, Coalition on Agricultural GreenhouseGases; JimmyDaukas, American Farmland Trust; JenniferMoore- Kucera, AmericanFarmlandTrust; AnnaHarmon, Coalition on Agricultural GreenhouseGases; RyanSmith, DeltaInstitute
  • 2.
    Presentation Overview Introduction to theU.S. Climate Alliance Natural and Working Lands Challenge Opportunities for GHG Reductions in Natural and Working Lands The Role of Agriculture Agriculture Support to U.S. Climate Alliance States: ◦ Agricultural Practices ◦ Agriculture Policy Toolkit
  • 3.
    The U.S. ClimateAlliance The U.S. Climate Alliance is a bipartisan coalition of 25 governors committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions consistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement. The Alliance is led by state governments and is focused on state-to-state cooperation to accelerate the deployment of climate solutions needed to help each achieve their climate goals. The U.S. Climate Alliance represents 55 percent of U.S. population and 60 percent of national GDP
  • 4.
    The U.S. ClimateAlliance U.S. Climate Alliance states are committed to taking real, on the ground action that urgently addresses the climate challenge. In becoming an Alliance member, states commit to: ◦ Implement policies that advance the goals of the Paris Agreement, aiming to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 26 – 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025. ◦ Track and report progress to the global community in appropriate settings, including when the world convenes to take stock of the Paris Agreement, and ◦ Accelerate new and existing policies to reduce carbon pollution and promote clean energy deployment at the state and federal level. More information: https://www.usclimatealliance.org
  • 6.
    State Targets forEmissions Reductions Implement policies that advance the goals of the Paris Agreement, aiming to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 26 – 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025. Some states have set goals for net zero emissions (HI by 2045 and NY by 2050); some have also made a clear commitment to including aspects of NWL in their statewide targets.
  • 7.
    Natural and Working Lands(NWL) Initiative The Natural and Working Lands initiative of the U.S. Climate Alliance identifies best practices for land conservation, management and restoration to develop a carbon storage policy framework for implementation. The U.S. Climate Alliance has identified enhancing carbon sequestration on natural and working lands as a key near- term opportunity for achieving its climate goals. Focusing on forests, farmland, ranchland, grasslands, wetlands, and urban land to mitigate the harmful effects of climate change.
  • 8.
    Natural and Working LandsChallenge • Improve inventory methods for land-based carbon flux; • Identify best practices to reduce GHG emissions and increase resilient carbon sequestration; • Advance programs, policies, and incentives to reduce GHG emissions and enhance resilient carbon sequestration; • Undertake actions that will support a collective, Alliance-wide goal to maintain natural and working lands as a net sink of carbon and protect and increase carbon storage capacity, while balancing near- and long-term sequestration objectives; and • Integrate priority actions and pathways into state GHG mitigation plans by 2020.
  • 9.
    Impact Partners Group ofsix NGOs that are providing technical support to Alliance states to achieve the goals of the NWL Challenge. Support includes providing NWL inventory development/refinement assistance, technical support on agriculture and forests, providing information exchange opportunities (such as Learning Labs).
  • 10.
    Agricultural Support Initial Work byAFT and C-AGG is Focusing on Agriculture Practices and Policies
  • 12.
    Agriculture’s Importance to USCAState Economies ◦ Top 10 agriculture states (cash receipts): California, Iowa, Texas, Nebraska, Minnesota, Illinois, Kansas, North Carolina, Wisconsin, Indiana ◦ Top 3 US milk states (production): California, Wisconsin, New York ◦ Top 3 US soybean states (production): Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota ◦ Top 4 US corn states (production): Iowa, Illinois, Nebraska, Minnesota ◦ Top 3 US hog/pig states (sales): Iowa, North Carolina, Minnesota ◦ Top 6 US fruit states (production): California, Florida, Washington, Michigan, Oregon, New York ◦ California accounts for 48% of all fresh vegetable production in the US
  • 13.
    Potential for GHG Reductionsand Carbon Sequestration on Agricultural Lands Alliance states have requested more information on additional potential agriculture practices, what policies other states are considering, and approaches to estimate agriculture offset potential in their states. Fargione et al, Science Adv 2018
  • 14.
    Agricultural Systems Managementfor Climate Mitigation & Resiliency Carbon Sequestration Reduced Nitrogen Inputs Improved Water Quality Increased Biodiversity Reduced Pesticides Reduced Energy Drought Resilience Improved Air Quality Reduced N2O Recapture & Recycling of N Yield Stability
  • 15.
    Soil Stores 2– 3x More CO2 than Atmosphere 2 – 5x More than Vegetation
  • 16.
    Actions for ClimateMitigation & Resiliency Photo source: Jennifer Moore-Kucera; Soil Health Image from: USDA –NRCS-Principles for High Functioning Soils Factsheet Promote regenerative/ climate- smart agricultural practices Failure to prevent soil loss and soils losing carbon may outweigh actions to increase levels in other soil types.
  • 17.
    Cover crops No till/reducedtill/conservation till Improved Nutrient Management Integrating perennials with crops Silvo-pasture Riparian buffers Filter strips Windbreaks Examples of Practices Considerations
  • 18.
    Create an Agriculture PolicyToolkit Agricultural Solutions for Mitigating Climate Change: A Policy Toolkit for State Governments Tools include: ◦ policies and programs driving adoption of agriculture pathways that reduce GHG emissions and increase carbon sequestration at the state, regional, and federal level ◦ private sector efforts such as corporate sustainability and environmental markets. Catalog programs and policies that support C sequestration and/or reduce GHG emissions in agriculture at state and regional levels to create individual state policy summaries. Also include those federal programs most utilized by states.
  • 19.
    Agriculture Policy Toolkit willInclude: State profile with policies at the state level as well as state- specific labor/income/farm size statistics Feedback from interview process Best practices and lessons learned Policy development case studies Regional programs Use of federal conservation practices and programs Financing opportunities—state, regional, federal and private sector
  • 20.
    State Agriculture andClimate Policies Policies studied include: ◦ Healthy Soils ◦ Water Quality ◦ Water Efficiency ◦ Climate Resiliency ◦ Methane Reduction ◦ Nutrient Management ◦ On-Farm renewable energy/energy efficiency ◦ Farmland Conservation Preservation
  • 21.
    Contact Information Thayer Tomlinson,C-AGG, [email protected] Anna Harmon, C-AGG, [email protected] Jimmy Daukas, AFT, [email protected] Jen Moore-Kucera, AFT, [email protected] Ryan Smith, C-AGG, [email protected]

Editor's Notes

  • #6 25 governors in the Alliance. 24 states and 1 territory
  • #9 Challenge to USCA states to undertake these activities
  • #10 This includes AFT and C-AGG as well as WRI, TNC, American Forests, and the Trust for Public Land
  • #12 Looking at the USCA in the context of agriculture, can see very different ag systems, climates, WQ issues, water availability challenges, markets, threats to ag land conversion, etc.
  • #13 Statistics from USDA NASS (National Agricultural Statistics Service); 2014 data for hogs; 2017 data for soy and corn; and USDA ERS
  • #14 Graphic is Climate mitigation potential of 21 NCS in the United States from the paper Natural climate solutions for the United States by Joseph E. Fargione et al. Sci Adv 2018;4:eaat1869. Good way to highlight what practices have been included to date. On ag, these include avoided grassland conversion, cover crops, cropland nutrient management….. 3 messages: Ag lands are often overshadowed by forest potential—look at costs and feasibility of agriculture No other climate solution comes with as many co-benefits for a sustainable future in terms of food production Many of the ag practices are quite practical—esp. cover crops, nutrient management—and have many co-benefits
  • #16 Jerry Glover, a soil scientist, shows off a perennial wheatgrass plant's long roots, which grow deeper than annual plants' roots, improving soil structure and reducing erosion.  Jim Richardson/National Geographic Creative
  • #17 Most agricultural soils are still losing rather than gaining carbon. Failure to apply measures to prevent soils losing carbon may well outweigh actions to increase carbon levels in other soil types. The importance of food security must be a factor in any climate action plan. Numerous indirect GHG reductions and secondary ecosystem services currently not adequately addressed for agriculture.
  • #18 Much of the practices work is based on NRCS conservation practices that tie agricultural practices to reduced GHG emissions. All states know the NRCS conservation practices; some have policies and programs to incentivize them—others are looking at how to do so on a wider scale. Many states interested in using the COMET tools to help them understand what may be happening (Farm) and the potential for additional reductions based on practice considerations (COMET). Our team is working with states to produce clearer practices estimates (outside of the opportunity assessment) at a state and county level.
  • #19 What we are doing is technical support for states to build out their ag land policies – here is how we are doing it through the toolkit.
  • #20 At this point, open for discussion