BY:
•Noor Munirah bt Awang Abu Bakar
•Optometrist (Moc No: O-869)
CASE STUDY :KERATOCONUS
58 years old /Male
Occupation: Office worker
Nature of work: Extended use of Visual Display Unit (VDU) equipment in
air-conditioned environment.
Chief complaint:
 BE irritation and dry eyes since 4 months ago with previous and newly replaced
RGP lenses wear .
 Wear RGP for bilateral keratoconus.
 Irritation immediately upon lens insertion.
 The sensation aggravates under air-conditioned environment.
 Frequent use of tear supplement but no improvement.
 Vision is not stable.
HISTORY –1ST
CONSULTATION
Ocular history:
 Start wearing RGP since age 33 years old for bilateral keratoconus.
 Presented to this optometry clinic since 2 years ago.
Health history:
 Has hypertension and on Manopril medication.
 Has depression and currently on Paxtine and Valpro medication.
 Also has asthma and on Q-Var medication.
Family ocular and health history: Unremarkable.
HISTORY - 1ST
CONSULTATION
NO EXAMINATION RE LE
1 VA (aided with RXD lens) 6/12 6/12
2 Slit lamp (without lens)
•Cornea:
•Limbal &Bulbar conj:
•Lid Margin:
-Scattered punctate
staining
-Neovascularization
-Nasal dellen
-Hyperemia
-Mild MGD
-Scattered punctate
staining
-Neovascularization
-Nasal dellen
-Hyperemia
-Mild MGD
ASSESSMENT
NO EXAMINATION RE LE
3 Slit lamp (with lens)
•Upon blinking:
•Lens diameter:
-No movement
-Cones bearing
-Low riding
-Small diameter lens
-No movement
-Cones bearing
-Low riding
-Small diameter lens
4 IOP Within Normal Limit Within Normal Limit
5 Fundus examination -Healthy optic nerve head
-Flat retina
-Clear macula
-Healthy optic nerve head
-Flat retina
-Clear macula
6 Corneal topo Keratoconus with inferior
cone
Keratoconus with inferior
cone
ASSESSMENT
 Patient was instructed to remove lenses over weekend and return for corneal
topography and lens fitting.
 Came back after 3 days.
 Assessment and result as follows;
 Topography: Increased amount of corneal steepening compared to initial maps
 CL fitting:
 Capricornia KBA/ 10.2 mm/ Boston XO material
 Fitting:
 Both cones clearance
 Good centration and movement
 Pt was advised to come for after care in 1 week.
FOLLOW UP: 2ND
CONSULTATION
NO Topography RE LE
1 Corneal astigmatism 3.4D 2.6D
2 Sim K •6.61mm @ 155
•9.95mm @ 95
•6.46mm @ 13
•6.83mm @ 103
Chief complaints:
 Came with complaints of discomfort , dryness and itchiness of wearing new
RGP lenses.
 Only can wear for few hours each day, both in air-conditioned environment and
outdoor.
 No difference in comfort between KBA and RXD lenses.
 Instill preservative-free lubricant hourly but no improvement, causes
frustration.
 Try to change care & maintenance technique & did warm compression, but the
discomfort remain.
Assessment:
 External ocular health normal.
 No signs of inflammatory reactions
 No dryness or SPK
FOLLOW UP: 3RD
CONSULTATION
 Q: What are the causes for discomfort during contact lens
wear for keratoconus patients?
In this case, 2 main causes:
 Dryness
 Age: 58 years old
 Medication: Monopril, Paxtine, Valpro and Q-Var
 Environment: Air-conditioned environment
 Nature of work: VDU
 Mild MGD: Fasten tear evaporation
 Tight fitting CL
 Immobile lens: No tear exchange
 Low riding lens: Mechanical pressure
 Cones bearing
QUESTION 1
Lead to:
•Corneal NV
•Dellen
 Q: What other options should you consider for the patient and
why?
1. Change lens parameter
 Increase lens diameter
 Flatten lens BOZR
 Reduce lens central thickness
 Change to High Dk lens
2. Change to other lens type:
 Scleral Lens-
 Scleral lens has larger diameter
 The central optical zone wont touch the cornea and preserve the tear reservoir
beneath lenses, landing on the sclera part, thus can improve patient’s comfort.
 Patient might not have problem to adapt because he is a RGP wearer for
long time.
QUESTION 2
 Q: What other options should you consider for the patient
and why?
3. Consultation on visual hygiene
 Change to non air-conditioned environment
 Apply good visual hygiene:
 Frequent blinking while using VDU
4. Advice on lid hygiene and warm compression
 Teach and demonstrate the proper way of cleaning lid using diluted
baby shampoo and cotton bud.
 Advice to perform warm compression.
QUESTION 2 CONT.
 Q: What other clinical investigation should you do for this patient?
1. Determination of near addition:
-The RGP fitting in keratoconus mainly to treat distance vision. Thus, near
addition must be determined to help patient (>40 years old) to see at near.
2. Fundus examination:
-Since patient is 58 years old and on medication, fundus must be examined
to see any changes.
3. Slit lamp examination
-Examine external ocular health before and after lens insertion.
-Examine lens fitting : To determine optimum or acceptable fitting.
4. Corneal topography
-To examine corneal status and curvature.
QUESTION 3
Thank you

Contact lens for Keratoconus case study

  • 1.
    BY: •Noor Munirah btAwang Abu Bakar •Optometrist (Moc No: O-869) CASE STUDY :KERATOCONUS
  • 2.
    58 years old/Male Occupation: Office worker Nature of work: Extended use of Visual Display Unit (VDU) equipment in air-conditioned environment. Chief complaint:  BE irritation and dry eyes since 4 months ago with previous and newly replaced RGP lenses wear .  Wear RGP for bilateral keratoconus.  Irritation immediately upon lens insertion.  The sensation aggravates under air-conditioned environment.  Frequent use of tear supplement but no improvement.  Vision is not stable. HISTORY –1ST CONSULTATION
  • 3.
    Ocular history:  Startwearing RGP since age 33 years old for bilateral keratoconus.  Presented to this optometry clinic since 2 years ago. Health history:  Has hypertension and on Manopril medication.  Has depression and currently on Paxtine and Valpro medication.  Also has asthma and on Q-Var medication. Family ocular and health history: Unremarkable. HISTORY - 1ST CONSULTATION
  • 4.
    NO EXAMINATION RELE 1 VA (aided with RXD lens) 6/12 6/12 2 Slit lamp (without lens) •Cornea: •Limbal &Bulbar conj: •Lid Margin: -Scattered punctate staining -Neovascularization -Nasal dellen -Hyperemia -Mild MGD -Scattered punctate staining -Neovascularization -Nasal dellen -Hyperemia -Mild MGD ASSESSMENT
  • 5.
    NO EXAMINATION RELE 3 Slit lamp (with lens) •Upon blinking: •Lens diameter: -No movement -Cones bearing -Low riding -Small diameter lens -No movement -Cones bearing -Low riding -Small diameter lens 4 IOP Within Normal Limit Within Normal Limit 5 Fundus examination -Healthy optic nerve head -Flat retina -Clear macula -Healthy optic nerve head -Flat retina -Clear macula 6 Corneal topo Keratoconus with inferior cone Keratoconus with inferior cone ASSESSMENT
  • 6.
     Patient wasinstructed to remove lenses over weekend and return for corneal topography and lens fitting.  Came back after 3 days.  Assessment and result as follows;  Topography: Increased amount of corneal steepening compared to initial maps  CL fitting:  Capricornia KBA/ 10.2 mm/ Boston XO material  Fitting:  Both cones clearance  Good centration and movement  Pt was advised to come for after care in 1 week. FOLLOW UP: 2ND CONSULTATION NO Topography RE LE 1 Corneal astigmatism 3.4D 2.6D 2 Sim K •6.61mm @ 155 •9.95mm @ 95 •6.46mm @ 13 •6.83mm @ 103
  • 7.
    Chief complaints:  Camewith complaints of discomfort , dryness and itchiness of wearing new RGP lenses.  Only can wear for few hours each day, both in air-conditioned environment and outdoor.  No difference in comfort between KBA and RXD lenses.  Instill preservative-free lubricant hourly but no improvement, causes frustration.  Try to change care & maintenance technique & did warm compression, but the discomfort remain. Assessment:  External ocular health normal.  No signs of inflammatory reactions  No dryness or SPK FOLLOW UP: 3RD CONSULTATION
  • 8.
     Q: Whatare the causes for discomfort during contact lens wear for keratoconus patients? In this case, 2 main causes:  Dryness  Age: 58 years old  Medication: Monopril, Paxtine, Valpro and Q-Var  Environment: Air-conditioned environment  Nature of work: VDU  Mild MGD: Fasten tear evaporation  Tight fitting CL  Immobile lens: No tear exchange  Low riding lens: Mechanical pressure  Cones bearing QUESTION 1 Lead to: •Corneal NV •Dellen
  • 9.
     Q: Whatother options should you consider for the patient and why? 1. Change lens parameter  Increase lens diameter  Flatten lens BOZR  Reduce lens central thickness  Change to High Dk lens 2. Change to other lens type:  Scleral Lens-  Scleral lens has larger diameter  The central optical zone wont touch the cornea and preserve the tear reservoir beneath lenses, landing on the sclera part, thus can improve patient’s comfort.  Patient might not have problem to adapt because he is a RGP wearer for long time. QUESTION 2
  • 10.
     Q: Whatother options should you consider for the patient and why? 3. Consultation on visual hygiene  Change to non air-conditioned environment  Apply good visual hygiene:  Frequent blinking while using VDU 4. Advice on lid hygiene and warm compression  Teach and demonstrate the proper way of cleaning lid using diluted baby shampoo and cotton bud.  Advice to perform warm compression. QUESTION 2 CONT.
  • 11.
     Q: Whatother clinical investigation should you do for this patient? 1. Determination of near addition: -The RGP fitting in keratoconus mainly to treat distance vision. Thus, near addition must be determined to help patient (>40 years old) to see at near. 2. Fundus examination: -Since patient is 58 years old and on medication, fundus must be examined to see any changes. 3. Slit lamp examination -Examine external ocular health before and after lens insertion. -Examine lens fitting : To determine optimum or acceptable fitting. 4. Corneal topography -To examine corneal status and curvature. QUESTION 3
  • 12.