Evaluating Indigenous Outreach
Programs in Five Steps
Maria Raciti
Kalkadoon-Thaniquith/Bwgcolman
Professor of Marketing, University of the Sunshine Coast
Director of the Indigenous and Transcultural Research Centre
Adjunct Fellow, National Centre For Student Equity in Higher Education
Why evaluation
matters
Demonstrates success and provides evidence to
support ongoing funding
Provides an ongoing check that the chosen
strategies are working as anticipated
Improves program design, implementation and
impact
Indigenous outreach
success is defined
differently by different
stakeholders
Figuring out what,
where, when and
how to evaluate is
not always easy
Five steps to evaluation
Step 1: Visualise the big picture
Step 2: Conduct a self-evaluation
Step 3: Plan
Step 4: Implement and analyse
Step 5: Share
Step 1: Visualise the big picture
Adaptation of : Http://www/cdc.gov./framework; https://www3.epa.gov/evaluate/lm-training/
• We used these
resources
Inputs
• For these
activities
Activities
• To produce
these outputs
Outputs
• To encourage
participants to change
their behaviour
Outcomes
• Leading to long
term results
(change in the
condition or
situation)
Impact
The ‘logic model’ is a simple picture of the Indigenous outreach program that
illustrates the relationship between the inputs and its intended results.
Example
Adaptation of : Http://www/cdc.gov./framework; https://www3.epa.gov/evaluate/lm-training/
•$  staff, catering,
accommodation,
travel and
incidentals
Camp Inputs
•Camp activities: #1
Welcome; #2
Academic activity;
#3 Cultural activity
etc.
Camp Activities
•Participant
numbers,
confidence, clarity,
engagement,
satisfaction etc.
Camp Outputs
•Intention to attend
your university;
positive word-of-
mouth
University
Outcomes •Intention to attend
any university
WP Impact
Indigenous Outreach Camp
Step 2: Conduct a self-evaluation
Do we fully
understand the
expectations of our
camp participants
and their families?
01
Do we fully
understand how
‘going to university’
is situated within
the lives of our
targets?
02
Do we fully
understand the
barriers and
enablers facing
our camp
participants?
03
What did we learn
from the last
camp and have
made changes to
address these?
04
Step 3: Plan
Evaluation occurs across all phases of an outreach program
Evaluation includes outreach program participants and partners
Compare to previous outreach programs to show change over time
There is no one ‘best’ method of collecting data
Plan using an evaluation table
Phase
What you are
evaluating?
Who is the sample?
When will you
evaluate?
How will you evaluate?
Pre-camp
Confidence in academic
ability and in cultural
identity
Participants
Confirmation of
attendance
Brief online survey
Day #1:
Welcome
Settling in and making
connections
Ambassadors and staff End of day #1 Observation notes
Day #2:
Academic activities
Engagement with
academic activities
Academics End of day #2 Brief phone interview
Day #3:
Cultural activities
Enrichment of cultural
identity
Participants End of activity Survey via mobile phones
Day #4:
Farewell
Satisfaction and
intentions
Participants Beginning of day #4 Survey via mobile phones
Day #8:
Follow-up
Experience and impact Parents and school Week following camp
Brief online survey
Brief phone interview
Example
questions for
participants
•Did the camp meet your expectations?
•Will you stay in contact with the other students you met at the camp?
•What aspect of the camp did you find most useful?
What did you learn that surprised you?
•Did the camp help you to clarify what you want to do when you finish school?
How likely is it that you will go to university when you finish school?
•How likely is it that you will come to our university when you finish school?
•How likely are you to recommend the camp to others?
•If you could change just one thing about our camp, what would it be?
Example
questions for
internal
partners:
Ambassadors
and
academics
What worked well?
How engaged were participants during your time with them?
What were the top three questions you were asked by participants?
Were the resources or training that we provided for you helpful?
What could we do better next time?
Example
questions
for external
partners:
Parents and
schools
How satisfied were you with our communication about the camp?
Was the camp a good experience for your child/student?
•Do you feel the camp helped your child/students to decide what they want to
do when they finish school?
• Do you feel the camp helped enrich your child/students cultural identity?
•How likely is it that your child will attend university after they finish school?
•How likely is it that you child will attend our university after they finish school?
• What did we do well?
• If you could change just one thing about our camp, what would it be?
Step 4: Implement and analyse
Step 5: Share
Maria Raciti: Evaluating Indigenous outreach programs in five steps

Maria Raciti: Evaluating Indigenous outreach programs in five steps

  • 1.
    Evaluating Indigenous Outreach Programsin Five Steps Maria Raciti Kalkadoon-Thaniquith/Bwgcolman Professor of Marketing, University of the Sunshine Coast Director of the Indigenous and Transcultural Research Centre Adjunct Fellow, National Centre For Student Equity in Higher Education
  • 2.
    Why evaluation matters Demonstrates successand provides evidence to support ongoing funding Provides an ongoing check that the chosen strategies are working as anticipated Improves program design, implementation and impact
  • 3.
    Indigenous outreach success isdefined differently by different stakeholders
  • 4.
    Figuring out what, where,when and how to evaluate is not always easy
  • 5.
    Five steps toevaluation Step 1: Visualise the big picture Step 2: Conduct a self-evaluation Step 3: Plan Step 4: Implement and analyse Step 5: Share
  • 6.
    Step 1: Visualisethe big picture Adaptation of : Http://www/cdc.gov./framework; https://www3.epa.gov/evaluate/lm-training/ • We used these resources Inputs • For these activities Activities • To produce these outputs Outputs • To encourage participants to change their behaviour Outcomes • Leading to long term results (change in the condition or situation) Impact The ‘logic model’ is a simple picture of the Indigenous outreach program that illustrates the relationship between the inputs and its intended results.
  • 7.
    Example Adaptation of :Http://www/cdc.gov./framework; https://www3.epa.gov/evaluate/lm-training/ •$  staff, catering, accommodation, travel and incidentals Camp Inputs •Camp activities: #1 Welcome; #2 Academic activity; #3 Cultural activity etc. Camp Activities •Participant numbers, confidence, clarity, engagement, satisfaction etc. Camp Outputs •Intention to attend your university; positive word-of- mouth University Outcomes •Intention to attend any university WP Impact Indigenous Outreach Camp
  • 8.
    Step 2: Conducta self-evaluation Do we fully understand the expectations of our camp participants and their families? 01 Do we fully understand how ‘going to university’ is situated within the lives of our targets? 02 Do we fully understand the barriers and enablers facing our camp participants? 03 What did we learn from the last camp and have made changes to address these? 04
  • 9.
    Step 3: Plan Evaluationoccurs across all phases of an outreach program Evaluation includes outreach program participants and partners Compare to previous outreach programs to show change over time There is no one ‘best’ method of collecting data
  • 10.
    Plan using anevaluation table Phase What you are evaluating? Who is the sample? When will you evaluate? How will you evaluate? Pre-camp Confidence in academic ability and in cultural identity Participants Confirmation of attendance Brief online survey Day #1: Welcome Settling in and making connections Ambassadors and staff End of day #1 Observation notes Day #2: Academic activities Engagement with academic activities Academics End of day #2 Brief phone interview Day #3: Cultural activities Enrichment of cultural identity Participants End of activity Survey via mobile phones Day #4: Farewell Satisfaction and intentions Participants Beginning of day #4 Survey via mobile phones Day #8: Follow-up Experience and impact Parents and school Week following camp Brief online survey Brief phone interview
  • 11.
    Example questions for participants •Did thecamp meet your expectations? •Will you stay in contact with the other students you met at the camp? •What aspect of the camp did you find most useful? What did you learn that surprised you? •Did the camp help you to clarify what you want to do when you finish school? How likely is it that you will go to university when you finish school? •How likely is it that you will come to our university when you finish school? •How likely are you to recommend the camp to others? •If you could change just one thing about our camp, what would it be?
  • 12.
    Example questions for internal partners: Ambassadors and academics What workedwell? How engaged were participants during your time with them? What were the top three questions you were asked by participants? Were the resources or training that we provided for you helpful? What could we do better next time?
  • 13.
    Example questions for external partners: Parents and schools Howsatisfied were you with our communication about the camp? Was the camp a good experience for your child/student? •Do you feel the camp helped your child/students to decide what they want to do when they finish school? • Do you feel the camp helped enrich your child/students cultural identity? •How likely is it that your child will attend university after they finish school? •How likely is it that you child will attend our university after they finish school? • What did we do well? • If you could change just one thing about our camp, what would it be?
  • 14.
    Step 4: Implementand analyse
  • 15.