This document summarizes research on malignant mesothelioma conducted in Egypt between 1996-2003. Some key findings include:
- Mesothelioma primarily affects the pleura and is strongly linked to asbestos exposure, especially from industries like mining and shipbuilding.
- The study analyzed 747 Egyptian patients with mesothelioma and found the highest rates in industrial areas, affecting younger groups than other countries.
- The majority of cases were epithelial type with symptoms like dyspnea and chest pain. Diagnosis was usually by biopsy and prognosis was poor even with treatment.
- Recommendations included preventive measures to reduce asbestos pollution and relocating factories using asbestos away from residential areas.
Introduction to the topic and presenter, Prof. Ahmed Abu-Naglah, with a focus on mesothelioma.
Malignant mesothelioma involves malignancies of mesothelial cells in body cavities.
Primary sites include pleura (87%), peritoneum (5.1%), the right thorax more than the left.
Introduction to potential causative factors for mesothelioma.
Asbestos, particularly crocidolite, is the principal carcinogen; exposure leads to increased risk.
Industries associated with asbestos include mining and shipbuilding; environmental exposure also a risk.
Alcohol, diet, and tobacco do not impact pleural mesothelioma incidence.
Latency period between asbestos exposure and mesothelioma is 35-40 years.
Therapeutic radiation and certain viruses also linked to mesothelioma.
Loss of one copy of chromosome 22 is common genetic alteration in mesothelioma.
Exploration of clinical presentations associated with malignant mesothelioma.
Symptoms include ascites, omental caking, and mesenteric thickening.
Thoracoscopic biopsy is highly diagnostic for mesothelioma in 98% of cases.
Distinguishing features between malignant mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma.
Serum mesothelin-related protein (SMRP) and megakaryocyte potentiating factor (MPF) as biomarkers.
Detailed staging system of mesothelioma from Stage I to Stage IV.
Without treatment, prognosis is poor; factors affecting survival duration are discussed.Data from Al-Azhar University Hospitals; patient demographics and distribution.
Statistics on job-related asbestos exposure among patients.
Primary presenting symptoms include dyspnea and chest pain, with prevalence statistics.
Yield of various diagnostic methods employed for mesothelioma.
Breakdown of pathological types such as epithelial, sarcomatous, and mixed.
Sidedness of lesions during presentation; right-sided lesions are predominant.
Average survival range reported for patients after diagnosis.
Overview of treatment options and patients’ response statistics.
Conclusions drawn from the study; Need for preventive measures against asbestos exposure.
• Malignancies involvingmesothelial cells that
normally line the body cavities, including the
pleura , peritoneum, pericardium, and testis,
are known as malignant mesothelioma.
4.
Primary sites formalignant
mesothelioma
• pleura (87%)
• peritoneum (5.1%)
• pericardium (0.4%)
• the right side of the thorax (more so than the
left side, by a right-to-left ratio of 1.6:1)
Asbestos
• Amphibole asbestosknown as crocidolite and
amosite asbestos, is the principal carcinogen
implicated in the pathogenesis of malignant
pleural mesothelioma
7.
Asbestos
• Wagner etal connected asbestos to
mesothelioma in a classic 1960 study of 33
patients with mesothelioma who were
exposed to asbestos in a mining area in South
Africa's North Western Cape Province.
• Of the 33 patients, 32 had been exposed to
crocidolite, the most carcinogenic type of
asbestos.
8.
• Exposure tochrysotile asbestos is also
associated malignant mesothelioma, but at a
lower incidence than occurs with the other
types.
• (The rod-shaped amphiboles are more
carcinogenic than the chrysotile.)
9.
industries associated withasbestos exposure
• Mining
• Ship building involving the use of asbestos
• Asbestos cement manufacture
• Ceramics
• Paper milling
• Auto parts (asbestos brake lining)
• Railroad repair
• Insulation
10.
• Environmental exposureto asbestos in areas
polluted by the substance may also increase
the incidence of mesothelioma.
11.
• Alcohol, dietaryfactors, and tobacco smoke
have no effect on the incidence of pleural
mesothelioma.
12.
• The clinicallatency period between asbestos
exposure and mesothelioma development is
35-40 years, and as a result, the number of
mesothelioma patients has continued to rise
despite decreased asbestos production
13.
Other sources ofmesothelioma
• Malignant mesothelioma has also been linked
to therapeutic radiation using thorium dioxide
and zeolite, a silicate in the soil.
• An etiologic role for simian virus 40 in
malignant mesothelioma has been suggested.
14.
Genetics
• Loss of1 copy of chromosome 22 is the single
most common karyotypic change in malignant
mesothelioma.
Malignant mesothelioma versus
adenocarcinoma
•Negative test results for periodic acid-Schiff
stain, mucicarmine stain, carcinoembryonic
antigen, and Leu M1
• positive test results for calretinin, vimentin,
and cytokeratin.
26.
Electron microscopy
• Cellshave long microvilli, in contrast to
adenocarcinomas, which have short microvilli
27.
SMRP
• One ofthe new most intriguing markers is
serum mesothelin-related protein (SMRP),
measured in fluid or serum.
• The circulating SMRP level has been reported
to be elevated in 84% of patients with
malignant mesothelioma and in 2% of patients
with lung cancer.
28.
Characteristics of newcell lines
• Four new mesothelioma cell lines have been
characterized based on ultrastructural and
immunophenotypic analysis.
• These cell lines express vimentin, cytokeratins
8 and 18, and mesothelial antigen recognized
by HBME-1 monoclonal antibody.
29.
• All ofthe lines possess surface human
leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and
intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1).
30.
• Hollevoet etal found that megakaryocyte
potentiating factor (MPF) can be used as a
serum biomarker of malignant mesothelioma.
• MPF originates from the same precursor
protein as soluble mesothelin (SM)
Nodal metastasis
• Thepattern of nodal metastasis is different
from that of lung cancer.
• The mechanism of spread of the disease to
the hilar nodes may be through lung invasion
and not due to spread directly from the
pleura.
33.
Stage I
• Completelyresected within the capsule of the
parietal pleura without adenopathy (ie,
ipsilateral pleura, lung, pericardium,
diaphragm, or chest wall disease limited to
previous biopsy sites)
34.
Stage II
• Allstage I characteristics, with positive
resection margins, intrapleural adenopathy, or
a combination
35.
Stage III
• Localextension of disease into the chest wall
or mediastinum, into the heart, through the
diaphragm or peritoneum, or extrapleurally to
involve the lymph nodes
Prognosis
• Without treatment,malignant mesothelioma
is fatal within 4-8 months. With trimodality
treatment, some patients have survived 16-19
months.
38.
• A fewhave survived as long as 5 years, with
rates of 14% for all types and 46% for the
epithelial type. However, numbers are small.
• The tumor recurrence rate is 50% for patients
treated with surgery.
39.
Prognostic factors
• Performancestatus of 2 or greater
• Nonepithelial histology
• Chest pain
• Age older than 75 years
• Male sex
• High platelet count
• Lactate dehydrogenase greater than 500 IU/L
• Low hemoglobin
• High white count
• Weight loss
40.
Retrospective study ofmalignant pleural
mesothelioma in Al-Azhar University Hospitals
and El-Abassia Chest Hospital
(1996-2003)
Ahmed Ali Abu-Naglah, Sohair Soliman, Nagwa Fahmy and Hala Abdalla
Chest and General Medicine
Departments, Al-Azhar University
Site of thelesion at presentation
Number of patients %
RT. Sided
Left . sided
448
299
60 %
40 %
53.
Durations of surviveafter presentation
(In 380 patients)
Duration
Range
Mean
2 months – 3 years
12 months
54.
Treatment
Number of
patients
%
- Surgery
-Chemotherapy with or
without pleurodesis
- Radiotherapy
- Pleurodesis alone
- Combined
- Refuse treatment or undetected
57
239
89
97
82
203
4.9 %
31.7 %
11.8 %
12.6 %
10.8 %
27.2 %
55.
Conclusion and Recommendations
•Malignant pleural mesothelioma is increasing
progressively in Egypt specially in industrial
areas.
• It affects younger age groups. About 45% of
patients below 50 years while in other
countries the median age of affection is 60
years
56.
• The malesto females ratio is 1.3 : 1 while in
united states mesothelioma is approximately
three fold more in men than in women. This
because most of the affected Egyptian women
are living at the industrial polluted areas.
57.
• This diseaseis fatal within few months and
maximally few years even in younger patients.
58.
• Preventive measuresthat attempt to eliminate or
at least reduce asbestos pollution are mandatory,
with the use of safer and alternative materials for
construction, insulation, and other consumer
and industrial applications and by dust control
and personal protection.
• The factories which use any type of asbestos
materials must be transferred to distinct areas
away from houses and populations.