Multisystemic 
Family Therapy 
Jane F. Gilgun, PhD, LICSW 
Professor 
School of Social Work 
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, USA
Topics 
• Basics 
• Theoretical Foundations 
• Implementation Procedures 
• Principles 
• Engagement
Basics 
• $30,000,000 in funding from NIH 
• Home based 
• Small caseloads of 4-6 families 
• Providers on duty 24/7 for 3-4 months 
• Intensive supervision 
• Provider engages with family members and others in the 
various settings in which clients live their lives 
• Used in 
• child protection & juvenile offending 
• Juvenile sex offender treatment 
• Drug abuse treatment 
• Ecological systems are the client
Basics 
• Similar to functional family therapy 
• But MST includes engagement in multiple 
systems (!) 
• As the name blasts out 
• Uses many other treatment models 
• SFT, medication, cognitive-behavioral, 
behavioral therapy 
• Strict Protocol/Fidelity to Model a Must 
• Individualization a Must
Theoretical Foundations 
• systems theory 
• social-ecological models of behavior 
• Specifically 
• Brofenbrenner’s ecological model 
• Structural family therapy 
• Strategic family therapy
Ecosystemic 
& Developmental 
Child 
Family 
Peer group 
Extended Family/Social Networks 
School 
Parents’Work 
Religious/Spiritual Institutions 
Community Resources 
Historical Forces, 
Culture, Values 
Social 
history
Specific Ecologies of Interest 
• Families 
• Peer Groups 
• Schools 
• Neighborhood hang outs
Reciprocal Interactions 
• Like attachment theory 
• Like family systems theory 
• Young persons influence parents 
• Parents influence young persons 
• Young persons influence sibs 
• Sibs influence young persons 
• Young person influences peers 
• Peers influence young persons 
• Young persons influence teachers 
• Teachers influence young persons
Relevance of Constructivism 
• Schemas, belief systems, and actions 
• Mutual interaction among the various systems 
• Persons construct meanings and belief systems 
from their experiences within these various 
systems 
• Meanings and belief systems are encoded in 
brains 
• Interpretations of experiences are individual 
• Individual interpretations influence 
interpretations of others 
• The above are Jane Gilgun’s additions
Relevance 
of Common Factors Model 
• Relationship with treatment providers 
rather remote 
• “Extratherapeutic” events obviously 
most powerful 
• The above are Jane Gilgun’s additions
Applications to MST 
• An ecological treatment model that 
• Takes into consideration key systems 
• Seeks to engage key people in systems
Implementation Procedures 
• (1) a set of principles that guide the formulation of clinical 
interventions, 
• (2) a family-friendly engagement process, 
• (3) a structured analytical process that is used to prioritize 
interventions, 
• (4) evidence-based treatment techniques that are integrated 
into the MST conceptual framework, 
• (5) a home-based delivery of services that enables the 
provision of intensive services, 
• (6) a highly supportive supervision process, and 
• (7) quality assurance process to promote treatment fidelity.
Principle 1 
• “The primary purpose of assessment is to understand 
the fit between the identified problems and their 
broader systemic contexts” 
• On-going assessment of key systems 
• I (Jane) suggest looking at systems of beliefs 
• Not just interactions in various ecologies 
• Looks at strengths and needs 
• Develop hypotheses about what maintains the 
problem
Principle 2 
• “Therapeutic contacts emphasize the 
positive and use systemic strengths as 
levers for change.” 
• Identify positives in each system 
• Ask how they can be used to deal with 
the problematic issues
Principle 2 
• “Therapeutic contacts emphasize the positive 
and use systemic strengths as levers for change.” 
• Identify positives in each system 
• Ask how they can be used to deal with the problematic 
issues 
• Importance of supervision 
• Identify negative views of families and other systems 
• Jane: Good place to apply solution focused & 
narrative therapy ideas 
• Expand practitioners 
• Views on solutions—expands visions of possibilities & ways to 
get there 
• Family stories—bring out stories practitioners may overlook
Principle 3 
• “Interventions are designed to 
promote responsible behavior and 
decrease irresponsible behavior 
among family members.” 
• Promote competence 
• Child 
• Parental
Principle 3 
• “Interventions are designed to promote responsible 
behavior and decrease irresponsible behavior among 
family members.” 
• How? 
• Child 
• Positive relationships with parents, sibs, peers, teachers 
• Engagement in positive activities 
• Supportive services such as tutoring, art lessons, sports clinics 
• Parents 
• Positive relations within families, work, communities 
• Increase interest in child’s activities 
• Increase supervision of child
Principle 4 
• “Interventions are present-focused and action-oriented, 
targeting specific and well-defined.” 
• Based on behavior therapy 
• Define target behavior clearly 
• How to measure behavior 
• How to measure change in the behavior 
• Use clearly-defined interventions
Principle 5 
• “Interventions target sequences of behavior 
within and between multiple systems that 
maintain the identified problems.” 
• Principles of SFT 
• Extended to patterns of interactions in systems 
other than families 
• in schools 
• Courts 
• Recreation centers 
• Public spaces in general 
• Etc.
Principle 6 
• “Interventions are developmentally appropriate 
and fit the developmental needs of the youth.” 
• Examples 
• young person doesn’t know how to use the bus 
• Parents don’t know how to find housing 
• Jane: 
• Challenge and provide supports, both 
• This is a basic developmental principle
Principle 7 
• “Interventions are designed to require 
daily or weekly effort by family.” 
• Daily tasks that build upon successes of 
previous tasks 
• Practice in sessions 
• Homework during the week
Principle 8 
• “Intervention effectiveness is evaluated continuously 
from multiple perspectives, with providers assuming 
accountability for overcoming barriers to successful 
outcomes.” 
• Me: Sounds like solution-focused therapy 
• Interact with others in ways that represent a desired change 
• Show all participants how to evaluate the changed 
interactions 
• When new interactions don’t seem to work, provider has the 
task of identifying barriers—but must work with participants 
• Also important to work out new solutions/interactions
Principle 9 
• “Interventions are designed to promote 
treatment generalization and long-term 
maintenance of therapeutic change by 
empowering caregivers to address family 
members' needs across multiple systemic 
contexts.” 
• Parents supervise/monitor children in all 
systems in which children participate 
• Parent-child relationship more important than 
provider relationships with participants
Engagement 
• Engage family members and significant others in 
the ecologies of interest 
• Engagement can be difficult for very good 
reasons 
• Identify barriers and work with them 
• Families may be comfortable in their own homes 
• An on-going process
Assessment 
• standard intake assessment 
• presenting problem, 
• a history of prior services (inpatient and 
outpatient), 
• the child's developmental history (language, 
social development, motor skills) 
• Me (Jane): should do sexual development, history 
of friendships
Assessment 
• a medical history (accidents, injuries, allergies, 
health problems), 
• a school history (grade, special services, 
expulsions/suspensions, behavioral problems), 
and 
• a trauma history (abuse or neglect, accidents, 
community or family violence). 
• mental status examination is conducted with the 
child to gain an understanding of possible 
psychiatric symptoms, and 
• A genogram
A Structured Analytic Process 
• Operationalizes the 9 treatment principles 
• Assess the referral behaviors from multiple points of 
view 
• Including court and school records 
• Interview all persons who are relevant 
• Recruit relevant persons for participation in treatment 
• Interview each of them 
• Ask them to identify strengths 
• What changes are necessary to bring about success
A Structured Analytic Process 
• Next: Prioritize 
• “Prioritize those interactions and 
relationship changes that are necessary 
by identifying the "fit" of the problem 
behaviors within the context of the 
youth's natural ecologies.” 
• Hypothesize about how the “problem” fits 
with the relevant ecologies 
• This is systems analysis—very important to 
understand and do
A Structured Analytic Process 
• Fit Factors with dysregulation showing as anger 
outbursts 
• (1) The child has low skills for managing frustration; 
• (2) the parent and child escalate each other in their 
interactions (i.e., coercive interaction sequences); 
• (3) parental management of the outbursts exacerbates 
the problem; and 
• (4) the school is frequently leaving messages for the 
parent concerning the child's difficulties at school, 
thereby precipitating conflict between the parent and 
child that escalate to
Identify Drivers & Create 
Processes 
• Drivers: factors associated with the behaviors 
• Identified by all those involved in the treatment 
• Example: how is parents’ responses related to anger 
outbursts/dysregulations? 
• If behaviors stop, may have to little else in other system 
• Often, issues persist in other setting such as schools 
• All in treatment process evaluate outcomes 
• Also identify drivers of successful outcomes 
• And drivers of less than optimal outcomes 
• Processes repeated 
• Drivers, fit, encourage new responses, evaluation, identification 
of barriers, implementation, etc.
Techniques 
• All have been evaluated and have 
some indicators of effectiveness 
• SFT, behavioral therapies, CBT, 
medication for some conditions
Service Delivery 
• Low caseloads of three to six families per 
clinician (2-15 hours per week, titrated to 
need). 
• 2. Therapists work within a team of three 
to four practitioners, though each clinician 
has his or her own caseload. 
• 3. Treatment occurs daily to several times 
a week, with sessions decreasing in 
frequency as the family progresses.
Service Delivery 
• 4. Treatment is time-limited and generally lasts 
4-6 months, depending on the seriousness of the 
problems and success of the interventions. 
• 5. Treatment is delivered in the family's natural 
environment: in their home, community, or 
other place convenient to the family. 
• 6. Treatment is delivered at times convenient to 
family; thus, therapists work a flexible schedule. 
7. Therapists are available to clients 24 hours per 
day, 7 days per week, generally through an on-call 
system.
Supervision 
•Weekly 3-hrs 
• Supervisor available 24/7 
• Can meet with family or others with 
provider 
• Supervisor is “responsible for building 
the therapists' capacity to be 
effective.”
Supervision Sessions 
• Structured 
• Goal directed 
• Group format 
• Team members do crisis calls night and weekend 
• Provider completes a weekly summary sheet for 
each family
Ian’s Resources: 
A Positive “Fit” Model 
Resources 
Pleasant, 
coopertive 
personality 
Early Secure 
Relationship 
with Mother 
Ian's 
Relationship 
with Case 
Manager 
Father's 
Relationship 
with Case 
Manager Services of 
ACE 
Mutual 
Interests with 
Father 
Good Peer 
Relationships
A Model of Neighborhood 
Collaboration 
• Neighborhood Solutions Project, actually 
implemented in North Charleston, SC 
• Initiated & funded by state 
• Money went to MST developers 
• Purpose: reduce out of home placements 
• By working with persons in settings of interest 
• They engaged police 
• Medicals services 
• MST treatment teams
A Model of Neighborhood 
Collaboration 
• Identify areas of high crime, juvenile 
arrests rates, maltreatment reports, 
and poverty, and 
• design a study to evaluate the effects 
of developing and implementing a 
collaborative project using evidence-based 
interventions to address these 
neighborhood problems
A Model of Neighborhood 
Collaboration 
• Four Groups 
• Youth at risk for placement because of 
delinquency 
• Youth at risk for school suspension or 
expulsion 
• Comparison group from another 
community similar to these youth 
• “High-functioning youth” from 
community
A Model of Neighborhood 
Collaboration 
• Identify Neighborhood Leaders 
• Multiple meetings of various 
compositions 
• Develop trust 
• Listen. 
• Never promise something you cannot 
deliver. 
• Don't do too much too soon. 
• A Thought: Don't throw money at us:, 
instead empower us and give us your time
A Model of Neighborhood 
Collaboration 
• Identify Collaborators 
• Police 
• Schools 
• (Religious Institutions) 
• (Youth Workers) 
• More on trust 
• practiced visibility, 
• accessibility, 
• persistence, and flexibility, 
• always took the time to be with people.
Reference 
• Cupit Swenson;Scott W. Henggeler;Ida S. Taylor;OliverW. 
Addison (2005). Multisystemic Therapy and Neighborhood 
Partnerships: Reducing Adolescent Violence and Substance 
Abuse. Kindle Edition.

Multisystemic Family Therapy

  • 1.
    Multisystemic Family Therapy Jane F. Gilgun, PhD, LICSW Professor School of Social Work University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, USA
  • 2.
    Topics • Basics • Theoretical Foundations • Implementation Procedures • Principles • Engagement
  • 3.
    Basics • $30,000,000in funding from NIH • Home based • Small caseloads of 4-6 families • Providers on duty 24/7 for 3-4 months • Intensive supervision • Provider engages with family members and others in the various settings in which clients live their lives • Used in • child protection & juvenile offending • Juvenile sex offender treatment • Drug abuse treatment • Ecological systems are the client
  • 4.
    Basics • Similarto functional family therapy • But MST includes engagement in multiple systems (!) • As the name blasts out • Uses many other treatment models • SFT, medication, cognitive-behavioral, behavioral therapy • Strict Protocol/Fidelity to Model a Must • Individualization a Must
  • 5.
    Theoretical Foundations •systems theory • social-ecological models of behavior • Specifically • Brofenbrenner’s ecological model • Structural family therapy • Strategic family therapy
  • 6.
    Ecosystemic & Developmental Child Family Peer group Extended Family/Social Networks School Parents’Work Religious/Spiritual Institutions Community Resources Historical Forces, Culture, Values Social history
  • 7.
    Specific Ecologies ofInterest • Families • Peer Groups • Schools • Neighborhood hang outs
  • 8.
    Reciprocal Interactions •Like attachment theory • Like family systems theory • Young persons influence parents • Parents influence young persons • Young persons influence sibs • Sibs influence young persons • Young person influences peers • Peers influence young persons • Young persons influence teachers • Teachers influence young persons
  • 9.
    Relevance of Constructivism • Schemas, belief systems, and actions • Mutual interaction among the various systems • Persons construct meanings and belief systems from their experiences within these various systems • Meanings and belief systems are encoded in brains • Interpretations of experiences are individual • Individual interpretations influence interpretations of others • The above are Jane Gilgun’s additions
  • 10.
    Relevance of CommonFactors Model • Relationship with treatment providers rather remote • “Extratherapeutic” events obviously most powerful • The above are Jane Gilgun’s additions
  • 11.
    Applications to MST • An ecological treatment model that • Takes into consideration key systems • Seeks to engage key people in systems
  • 12.
    Implementation Procedures •(1) a set of principles that guide the formulation of clinical interventions, • (2) a family-friendly engagement process, • (3) a structured analytical process that is used to prioritize interventions, • (4) evidence-based treatment techniques that are integrated into the MST conceptual framework, • (5) a home-based delivery of services that enables the provision of intensive services, • (6) a highly supportive supervision process, and • (7) quality assurance process to promote treatment fidelity.
  • 13.
    Principle 1 •“The primary purpose of assessment is to understand the fit between the identified problems and their broader systemic contexts” • On-going assessment of key systems • I (Jane) suggest looking at systems of beliefs • Not just interactions in various ecologies • Looks at strengths and needs • Develop hypotheses about what maintains the problem
  • 14.
    Principle 2 •“Therapeutic contacts emphasize the positive and use systemic strengths as levers for change.” • Identify positives in each system • Ask how they can be used to deal with the problematic issues
  • 15.
    Principle 2 •“Therapeutic contacts emphasize the positive and use systemic strengths as levers for change.” • Identify positives in each system • Ask how they can be used to deal with the problematic issues • Importance of supervision • Identify negative views of families and other systems • Jane: Good place to apply solution focused & narrative therapy ideas • Expand practitioners • Views on solutions—expands visions of possibilities & ways to get there • Family stories—bring out stories practitioners may overlook
  • 16.
    Principle 3 •“Interventions are designed to promote responsible behavior and decrease irresponsible behavior among family members.” • Promote competence • Child • Parental
  • 17.
    Principle 3 •“Interventions are designed to promote responsible behavior and decrease irresponsible behavior among family members.” • How? • Child • Positive relationships with parents, sibs, peers, teachers • Engagement in positive activities • Supportive services such as tutoring, art lessons, sports clinics • Parents • Positive relations within families, work, communities • Increase interest in child’s activities • Increase supervision of child
  • 18.
    Principle 4 •“Interventions are present-focused and action-oriented, targeting specific and well-defined.” • Based on behavior therapy • Define target behavior clearly • How to measure behavior • How to measure change in the behavior • Use clearly-defined interventions
  • 19.
    Principle 5 •“Interventions target sequences of behavior within and between multiple systems that maintain the identified problems.” • Principles of SFT • Extended to patterns of interactions in systems other than families • in schools • Courts • Recreation centers • Public spaces in general • Etc.
  • 20.
    Principle 6 •“Interventions are developmentally appropriate and fit the developmental needs of the youth.” • Examples • young person doesn’t know how to use the bus • Parents don’t know how to find housing • Jane: • Challenge and provide supports, both • This is a basic developmental principle
  • 21.
    Principle 7 •“Interventions are designed to require daily or weekly effort by family.” • Daily tasks that build upon successes of previous tasks • Practice in sessions • Homework during the week
  • 22.
    Principle 8 •“Intervention effectiveness is evaluated continuously from multiple perspectives, with providers assuming accountability for overcoming barriers to successful outcomes.” • Me: Sounds like solution-focused therapy • Interact with others in ways that represent a desired change • Show all participants how to evaluate the changed interactions • When new interactions don’t seem to work, provider has the task of identifying barriers—but must work with participants • Also important to work out new solutions/interactions
  • 23.
    Principle 9 •“Interventions are designed to promote treatment generalization and long-term maintenance of therapeutic change by empowering caregivers to address family members' needs across multiple systemic contexts.” • Parents supervise/monitor children in all systems in which children participate • Parent-child relationship more important than provider relationships with participants
  • 24.
    Engagement • Engagefamily members and significant others in the ecologies of interest • Engagement can be difficult for very good reasons • Identify barriers and work with them • Families may be comfortable in their own homes • An on-going process
  • 25.
    Assessment • standardintake assessment • presenting problem, • a history of prior services (inpatient and outpatient), • the child's developmental history (language, social development, motor skills) • Me (Jane): should do sexual development, history of friendships
  • 26.
    Assessment • amedical history (accidents, injuries, allergies, health problems), • a school history (grade, special services, expulsions/suspensions, behavioral problems), and • a trauma history (abuse or neglect, accidents, community or family violence). • mental status examination is conducted with the child to gain an understanding of possible psychiatric symptoms, and • A genogram
  • 27.
    A Structured AnalyticProcess • Operationalizes the 9 treatment principles • Assess the referral behaviors from multiple points of view • Including court and school records • Interview all persons who are relevant • Recruit relevant persons for participation in treatment • Interview each of them • Ask them to identify strengths • What changes are necessary to bring about success
  • 28.
    A Structured AnalyticProcess • Next: Prioritize • “Prioritize those interactions and relationship changes that are necessary by identifying the "fit" of the problem behaviors within the context of the youth's natural ecologies.” • Hypothesize about how the “problem” fits with the relevant ecologies • This is systems analysis—very important to understand and do
  • 29.
    A Structured AnalyticProcess • Fit Factors with dysregulation showing as anger outbursts • (1) The child has low skills for managing frustration; • (2) the parent and child escalate each other in their interactions (i.e., coercive interaction sequences); • (3) parental management of the outbursts exacerbates the problem; and • (4) the school is frequently leaving messages for the parent concerning the child's difficulties at school, thereby precipitating conflict between the parent and child that escalate to
  • 30.
    Identify Drivers &Create Processes • Drivers: factors associated with the behaviors • Identified by all those involved in the treatment • Example: how is parents’ responses related to anger outbursts/dysregulations? • If behaviors stop, may have to little else in other system • Often, issues persist in other setting such as schools • All in treatment process evaluate outcomes • Also identify drivers of successful outcomes • And drivers of less than optimal outcomes • Processes repeated • Drivers, fit, encourage new responses, evaluation, identification of barriers, implementation, etc.
  • 31.
    Techniques • Allhave been evaluated and have some indicators of effectiveness • SFT, behavioral therapies, CBT, medication for some conditions
  • 32.
    Service Delivery •Low caseloads of three to six families per clinician (2-15 hours per week, titrated to need). • 2. Therapists work within a team of three to four practitioners, though each clinician has his or her own caseload. • 3. Treatment occurs daily to several times a week, with sessions decreasing in frequency as the family progresses.
  • 33.
    Service Delivery •4. Treatment is time-limited and generally lasts 4-6 months, depending on the seriousness of the problems and success of the interventions. • 5. Treatment is delivered in the family's natural environment: in their home, community, or other place convenient to the family. • 6. Treatment is delivered at times convenient to family; thus, therapists work a flexible schedule. 7. Therapists are available to clients 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, generally through an on-call system.
  • 34.
    Supervision •Weekly 3-hrs • Supervisor available 24/7 • Can meet with family or others with provider • Supervisor is “responsible for building the therapists' capacity to be effective.”
  • 35.
    Supervision Sessions •Structured • Goal directed • Group format • Team members do crisis calls night and weekend • Provider completes a weekly summary sheet for each family
  • 36.
    Ian’s Resources: APositive “Fit” Model Resources Pleasant, coopertive personality Early Secure Relationship with Mother Ian's Relationship with Case Manager Father's Relationship with Case Manager Services of ACE Mutual Interests with Father Good Peer Relationships
  • 37.
    A Model ofNeighborhood Collaboration • Neighborhood Solutions Project, actually implemented in North Charleston, SC • Initiated & funded by state • Money went to MST developers • Purpose: reduce out of home placements • By working with persons in settings of interest • They engaged police • Medicals services • MST treatment teams
  • 38.
    A Model ofNeighborhood Collaboration • Identify areas of high crime, juvenile arrests rates, maltreatment reports, and poverty, and • design a study to evaluate the effects of developing and implementing a collaborative project using evidence-based interventions to address these neighborhood problems
  • 39.
    A Model ofNeighborhood Collaboration • Four Groups • Youth at risk for placement because of delinquency • Youth at risk for school suspension or expulsion • Comparison group from another community similar to these youth • “High-functioning youth” from community
  • 40.
    A Model ofNeighborhood Collaboration • Identify Neighborhood Leaders • Multiple meetings of various compositions • Develop trust • Listen. • Never promise something you cannot deliver. • Don't do too much too soon. • A Thought: Don't throw money at us:, instead empower us and give us your time
  • 41.
    A Model ofNeighborhood Collaboration • Identify Collaborators • Police • Schools • (Religious Institutions) • (Youth Workers) • More on trust • practiced visibility, • accessibility, • persistence, and flexibility, • always took the time to be with people.
  • 42.
    Reference • CupitSwenson;Scott W. Henggeler;Ida S. Taylor;OliverW. Addison (2005). Multisystemic Therapy and Neighborhood Partnerships: Reducing Adolescent Violence and Substance Abuse. Kindle Edition.