Download as PDF, PPTX
netflix culture book useful for reference of how a company culture can be
- 1. Reference Guide onour Freedom & Responsibility Culture These slides are meant for reading, rather than presen<ng 1
- 2. Freedom & Responsibility Appliesto our Salaried Employees Our hourly employees are important, but have more structured job roles 2
- 3. Culture: what givesNeGlix the best chance of con<nuous success for many genera<ons of technology and people? 3
- 4. Seven Aspects ofour Culture • Values are what we Value • High Performance • Freedom & Responsibility • Context, not Control • Highly Aligned, Loosely Coupled • Pay Top of Market • Promo<ons & Development 4
- 5. Lots of companieshave nice sounding value statements 5
- 6. Enron Had ANice‐Sounding Value Statement with 4 Values • Integrity • Communica/on • Respect • Excellence Enron headquarters 6 Their 4 values were chiseled in marble in the main lobby, but had liXle to do with the real values of the organiza<on
- 7. The real companyvalues, as opposed to the nice‐sounding values, are shown by who gets rewarded, promoted, or let go 7
- 8. Real company valuesare the behaviors and skills that we par<cularly value in fellow employees 8
- 9. We Par<cularly Value inour Colleagues these Nine Behaviors and Skills… 9
- 10. You make wisedecisions (people, technical, business, and crea<ve) despite ambiguity You iden<fy root causes, and get beyond trea<ng symptoms You think strategically, and can ar<culate what you are, and are not, trying to do You smartly separate what must be done well now, and what can be improved later 10 Judgment
- 11. 11 Communica<on You listen well,instead of reac<ng fast, so you can beXer understand You are concise and ar<culate in speech and wri<ng You treat people with respect independent of their status or disagreement with you You maintain calm poise in stressful situa<ons
- 12. 12 Impact You accomplish amazing amountsof important work You demonstrate consistently strong performance so colleagues can rely upon you You focus on great results rather than on process You exhibit bias‐to‐ac<on, and avoid analysis‐paralysis
- 13. 13 Curiosity You learn rapidlyand eagerly You seek to understand our strategy, market, subscribers, and suppliers You are broadly knowledgeable about business, technology and entertainment You contribute effec<vely outside of your specialty
- 14. 14 Innova<on You re‐conceptualize issuesto discover prac<cal solu<ons to hard problems You challenge prevailing assump<ons when warranted, and suggest beXer approaches You create new ideas that prove useful You keep us nimble by minimizing complexity and finding <me to simplify
- 15. 15 Courage You say whatyou think even if it is controversial You make tough decisions without excessive agonizing You take smart risks You ques<on ac<ons inconsistent with our values
- 16. 16 Passion You inspire otherswith your thirst for excellence You care intensely about NeGlix' success You celebrate wins You are tenacious
- 17. 17 Honesty You are knownfor candor and directness You are non‐poli<cal when you disagree with others You only say things about fellow employees you will say to their face You are quick to admit mistakes
- 18. 18 Selflessness You seek whatis best for NeGlix, rather than best for yourself or your group You are ego‐less when searching for the best ideas You make <me to help colleagues You share informa<on openly and proac<vely
- 19. Judgment You make wisedecisions (people, technical, business, and crea<ve) despite ambiguity You iden<fy root causes, and get beyond trea<ng symptoms You think strategically, and can ar<culate what you are, and are not, trying to do You smartly separate what must be done well now, and what can be improved later Innova/on You re‐conceptualize issues to discover prac<cal solu<ons to hard problems You challenge prevailing assump<ons when warranted, and suggest beXer approaches You create new ideas that prove useful You keep us nimble by minimizing complexity and finding <me to simplify Impact You accomplish amazing amounts of important work You demonstrate consistently strong performance so colleagues can rely upon you You focus on great results rather than on process You exhibit bias‐to‐ac<on, and avoid analysis‐ paralysis Curiosity You learn rapidly and eagerly You seek to understand our strategy, market, subscribers, and suppliers You are broadly knowledgeable about business, technology and entertainment You contribute effec<vely outside of your specialty Communica/on You listen well, instead of reac<ng fast, so you can beXer understand You are concise and ar<culate in speech and wri<ng You treat people with respect independent of their status or disagreement with you You maintain calm poise in stressful situa<ons Courage You say what you think even if it is controversial You make tough decisions without excessive agonizing You take smart risks You ques<on ac<ons inconsistent with our values Honesty You are known for candor and directness You are non‐poli<cal when you disagree with others You only say things about fellow employees you will say to their face You are quick to admit mistakes Selflessness You seek what is best for NeGlix, rather than best for yourself or your group You are ego‐less when searching for the best ideas You make <me to help colleagues You share informa<on openly and proac<vely Passion You inspire others with your thirst for excellence You care intensely about NeGlix' success You celebrate wins You are tenacious We Want to Work with People Who Embody These Nine Values 19
- 20. “You ques<on ac<ons inconsistentwith our values” Part of the Courage value Akin to the honor code pledge: “I will not lie, nor cheat, nor steal, nor tolerate those who do” All of us are responsible for value consistency 20
- 21. Values reinforced inhiring, in 360 reviews, at comp review, in exits, and in promo<ons 21
- 22. Seven Aspects ofour Culture • Values are what we Value • High Performance • Freedom & Responsibility • Context, not Control • Highly Aligned, Loosely Coupled • Pay Top of Market • Promo<ons & Development 22
- 23. Imagine if everyperson at NeGlix is someone you respect and learn from… 23
- 24. Great Workplace is StunningColleagues Great workplace is not day‐care, espresso, health benefits, sushi lunches, nice offices, or big compensa<on, and we only do those that are efficient at aXrac<ng stunning colleagues 24
- 25. Like every company, wetry to hire well 25
- 26. But, unlike manycompanies, we prac<ce “adequate performance gets a generous severance package.” 26
- 27. We’re a team,not a family We’re like a pro sports team, not a kid’s recrea<onal team Coaches’ job at every level of NeGlix to hire, develop and cut smartly, so we have stars in every posi<on 27
- 28. The Keeper TestManagers Use: “Which of my people, if they told me they were leaving in two months for a similar job at a peer company, would I fight hard to keep at NeGlix? 28
- 29. The Keeper TestManagers Use: “Which of my people, if they told me they were leaving in two months for a similar job at a peer company, would I fight hard to keep at NeGlix? 29 The other people should get a generous severance now, so we can open a slot to try to find a star for that role
- 30. Honesty Always To avoidsurprises, you should periodically ask your manager: “If I told you I were leaving, how hard would you work to change my mind to stay at NeGlix?” 30
- 31. Isn’t Loyalty Good? WhatAbout Hard Workers? What about Brilliant Jerks? 31
- 32. Loyalty is Good •Loyalty is good as a stabilizer • People who have been stars for us, and hit a bad patch, get a near term pass because we think they are likely to become stars for us again • We want the same: if NeGlix hits a temporary bad patch, we want people to s<ck with us • But unlimited loyalty to a shrinking firm, or to an ineffec<ve employee, is not what we are about 32
- 33. Hard Work –Not Directly Relevant • It’s about effec<veness – not effort – even though effec<veness is harder to assess than effort • We don’t measure people by how many evenings or weekends they are in their cube • We do try to measure people by how much, how quickly and how well they get work done – especially under deadline 33
- 34. Brilliant Jerks • Somecompanies tolerate them • For us, the cost to teamwork is too high • Diverse styles are fine – as long as person embodies the 9 values 34
- 35. Why are weso manic on high performance? In procedural work, the best are 2x beXer than the average. In crea<ve work, the best are 10x beXer than the average, so huge premium on crea<ng effec<ve teams of the best 35
- 36. Why are weso manic on high performance? Great Workplace is Stunning Colleagues 36
- 37. Seven Aspects ofour Culture • Values are what we Value • High Performance • Freedom & Responsibility • Context, not Control • Highly Aligned, Loosely Coupled • Pay Top of Market • Promo<ons & Development 37
- 38. The Rare ResponsiblePerson • Self mo<va<ng • Self aware • Self disciplined • Self improving • Acts like a leader • Doesn’t wait to be told what to do • Never feels “that’s not my job” • Picks up the trash lying on the floor • Behaves like an owner 38
- 39. Responsible People Thrive onFreedom, and are Worthy of Freedom 39
- 40. Our model isto increase employee freedom as we grow, rather than limit it, to con<nue to aXract and nourish innova<ve people, so we have beXer chance of long‐term con<nued success 40
- 41. Most Companies Curtail Freedomas they get Bigger Bigger Employee Freedom 41
- 42. Most Companies CurtailFreedom As They Grow to Avoid Errors (sounds preXy good to avoid errors) 42
- 43. Desire for BiggerPosi<ve Impact Creates Growth Growth 43
- 44.
- 45. Growth Shrinks TalentDensity in Most Firms % High Performance Employees Complexity 45
- 46. Chaos Emerges % HighPerformance Employees Chaos and errors spikes here – business has become too complex to run informally with this talent level Complexity 46
- 47. Process Emerges toStop the Chaos Procedures No one loves process, but feels good compared to the pain of chaos 47
- 48. Process‐focus Drives MoreTalent Out % High Performance Employees 48
- 49. Strong Near‐Term Outcome •A highly‐successful process‐driven company – With leading share in its market – Minimal thinking required – Few mistakes made – very efficient – Few curious innovator‐mavericks remain – Very op<mized processes for its exis<ng market 49
- 50. Then the MarketShirs… • Market shirs due to new technology or new compe<tors or new business models • Company is unable to adapt quickly, because the employees are extremely good at following the exis<ng processes, and process adherence is the value system • Company generally grinds painfully into irrelevance, due to inability to respond to the market shir 50
- 51. Seems Like ThreeBad Op<ons 1. Stay crea<ve by staying small 2. Try to avoid rules as you grow, suffer chaos 3. Use process as you grow to drive efficient execu<on of current model, but cripple crea<vity, innova<on, flexibility, and ability to thrive when market inevitably shirs 51
- 52. A Fourth Op<on •Avoid Chaos as you grow with Ever More High Performance People – not with Rules • Then you can con<nue to run informally with self‐discipline and avoid chaos • The run informally part is what enables and aXracts crea<vity 52
- 53. The Key: IncreaseTalent Density faster than Complexity Grows Business Complexity 53
- 54. Increase Talent Density •Top of market compensa<on • AXract hi‐value people through freedom to make impact • Be demanding about high performance culture 54
- 55. Minimize Complexity Growth BusinessComplexity • Few big products vs many small ones • Eliminate distrac<ng complexity (barnacles) • Value simplicity 55
- 56. With the RightPeople, Instead of a Culture of Process Adherence, Culture of Freedom and Responsibility, Innova<on and Self‐Discipline 56
- 57. Is Freedom Absolute? Areall rules & processes bad? 57
- 58. Freedom is notabsolute. Like “free speech” there are some limited excep<ons to “freedom at work” 58
- 59. Two Types ofNecessary Rules 1. Prevent irrevocable disaster – E.g. Financials produced are wrong – E.g. Hackers steal our customers’ credit card info 2. Moral, ethical, legal issues – E.g. Dishonesty, harassment are intolerable 59
- 60. Mostly, Though, RapidRecovery is the Right Model • Just fix problems quickly – High performers make very few errors • We’re in a crea<ve‐inven<ve market, not a safety‐cri<cal market like medicine or nuclear power • You may have heard preven<ng error is cheaper than fixing it – Yes, in manufacturing or medicine, but… – Not so in crea/ve environments 60
- 61. “Good” vs “Bad”Processes • “Good” processes help talented people get more done – Web site push every two weeks rather than random – Spend within budget each quarter so don’t have to coordinate every spending decision across departments – Regularly scheduled strategy and context mee<ngs • “Bad” processes try to prevent recoverable mistakes – Get pre‐approvals for $5k spending – 3 people to sign off on banner ad crea<ve – Permission needed to hang a poster on a wall – Mul<‐level approval process for projects – Get 10 people to interview each candidate 61
- 62. Rule Creep • “Bad”processes tend to creep in – Preven<ng errors just sounds so good • We try to get rid of rules when we can, to reinforce the point 62
- 63. Example: NeGlix Vaca<onPolicy and Tracking Un<l 2004 we had the standard model of N days per year 63
- 64. Meanwhile… We’re all workingonline some nights and weekends, responding to emails at odd hours, and taking an arernoon now and then for personal <me. 64
- 65. An employee pointedout… We don’t track hours worked per day or per week, so why are we tracking days of vaca<on per year? 65
- 66. We realized… We shouldfocus on what people get done, not how many hours or days worked. Just as we don’t have an 9‐5 day policy, we don’t need a vaca<on policy. 66
- 67. NeGlix Vaca<on Policy andTracking “there is no policy or tracking” 67
- 68. NeGlix Vaca<on Policy andTracking “there is no policy or tracking” “There is also no clothing policy at NeGlix, but no one has come to work naked lately.” – PaXy McCord, 2004 Lesson: you don’t need detailed policies for everything. 68
- 69. Another Example ofFreedom and Responsibility… 69
- 70. Most companies havecomplex policies around what you can expense, how you travel, what girs you can accept, etc. Plus they have whole departments to verify compliance with these policies. 70
- 71. NeGlix Policies for Expensing,Entertainment, Girs & Travel: “Act in NeLlix’s Best Interests” (5 words long) 71
- 72. “Act in NeGlix’sBest Interests” Generally Means… 1. Expense only what you would otherwise not spend, and is worthwhile for work. 2. Travel as you would if it were your own money. 3. Disclose non‐trivial vendor girs. 4. Take from NeGlix only when it is inefficient to not take, and inconsequen<al. – “taking” means, for example, prin<ng personal documents at work or making personal calls on work phone: inconsequen<al and inefficient to avoid 72
- 73. Freedom and Responsibility •Many people say one can’t do it at scale • But since going public in 2002, which is tradi<onally the beginning of the end for freedom, we’ve increased talent density and employee freedom substan<ally. 73
- 74. Summary of Freedom &Responsibility: As We Grow, Minimize Rules. Inhibit Chaos with Ever More High Performance People. Flexibility is More Important than Efficiency in the Long Term 74
- 75. Seven Aspects ofour Culture • Values are what we Value • High Performance • Freedom & Responsibility • Context, not Control • Highly Aligned, Loosely Coupled • Pay Top of Market • Promo<ons & Development 75
- 76. "If you wantto build a ship, don't drum up the people to gather wood, divide the work, and give orders. Instead, teach them to yearn for the vast and endless sea." ‐Antoine De Saint‐Exupery, Author of The LiXle Prince 76 *transla<on uses ‘people’ instead of ‘men’ to modernize
- 77. The best managersfigure out how to get great outcomes by sewng the appropriate context, rather than by trying to control their people 77
- 78. Context, not Control Context •Strategy • Metrics • Assump<ons • Objec<ves • Clearly‐defined roles • Knowledge of the stakes • Transparency around decision‐making Control • Top‐down decision‐making • Management approval • CommiXees • Planning and process valued more than results Provide the insight and understanding to enable sound decisions 78
- 79. Excep<ons • Control canbe important in emergency – No <me to take long‐term capacity‐building view • Control can be important when someone is s<ll learning their area – Takes <me to pick up the necessary context • Control can be important when you have the wrong person in a role – Temporarily, no doubt 79
- 80. Managers: When oneof your talented people does something dumb, don’t blame them. Instead, ask yourself what context you failed to set. 80
- 81. Managers: When youare tempted to “control” your people, ask yourself what context you could set instead Are you ar<culate and inspiring enough about goals and strategies? 81
- 82. Good Context • Linkto company/func<onal goals • Rela<ve priority (how important/how <me sensi<ve) – Cri<cal (needs to happen now), or… – Nice to have (when you can get to it) • Level of precision & refinement – No errors (credit cards handling, etc…), or… – PreXy good / can correct errors (website), or… – Rough (experimental) • Key stakeholders • Key metrics / defini<on of success 82
- 83. Why Managing ThroughContext? High performance people will do beXer work if they understand the context 83
- 84. Inves<ng in Context Thisis why we do new employee college, and why we are so open internally about strategies and results 84
- 85. Seven Aspects ofour Culture • Values are what we Value • High Performance • Freedom & Responsibility • Context, not Control • Highly Aligned, Loosely Coupled • Pay Top of Market • Promo<ons & Development 85
- 86. Three Models ofCorporate Teamwork 1. Tightly‐Coupled Monolith 2. Independent Silos 3. Highly Aligned, Loosely Coupled 86
- 87. Tightly‐Coupled Monolith • Seniormanagement reviews and approves nearly all tac<cs • Lots of x‐departmental buy‐in mee<ngs • Keeping other groups in agreement has equal precedence with pleasing customers • Mavericks get exhausted trying to innovate • Highly coordinated through centraliza<on, but very slow, and slowness increases with size 87
- 88. Independent Silos • Eachgroup executes on their objec<ves with liXle coordina<on • Work that requires coordina<on suffers • Aliena<on and suspicion between departments • Only works well when areas are independent – e.g. GE: aircrar engines and Universal Studios 88
- 89. The NeGlix Choice 1.Tightly‐Coupled Monolith 2. Independent Silos 3. Highly Aligned, Loosely Coupled 89
- 90. Highly Aligned, LooselyCoupled • Highly Aligned – Strategy and goals are clear, specific, broadly understood – Team interac<ons are on strategy and goals rather than tac<cs – Requires large investment in management <me to be transparent and ar<culate and percep<ve and open • Loosely Coupled – Minimal cross‐func<onal mee<ngs except to get aligned on goals and strategy – Trust between groups on tac<cs without previewing/approving each one – groups can move fast – Leaders reaching out proac<vely for ad‐hoc coordina<on and perspec<ve as appropriate – Occasional post‐mortems on tac<cs necessary to increase alignment 90
- 91. Highly‐Aligned Loosely‐Coupled teamwork effec<veness isdependent on high performance people and good context Goal is to be Big and Fast and Flexible 91
- 92. Seven Aspects ofour Culture • Values are what we Value • High Performance • Freedom & Responsibility • Context, not Control • Highly Aligned, Loosely Coupled • Pay Top of Market • Promo<ons & Development 92
- 93. Pay Top ofMarket is Core to High Performance Culture One outstanding employee gets more done and costs less than two adequate employees We endeavor to have only outstanding employees 93
- 94. Three Tests forTop of Market for a Person 1. What could person get elsewhere? 2. What would we pay for replacement? 3. What would we pay to keep person? – If they had a bigger offer elsewhere 94 Confiden<al
- 95. Takes Great Judgment •Goal is to keep each employee at top of market for that person – Pay them more than anyone else likely would – Pay them as much as a replacement would cost – Pay them as much as we would pay to keep them if they had higher offer from elsewhere 95
- 96. Titles Not VeryHelpful • Lots of people have the <tle “Major League Pitcher” but they are not all equally effec<ve • Similarly, all people with the <tle “Senior Marke<ng Manager” or “Director of Engineering” are not equally effec<ve • So the art of compensa<on is answering the Three Tests for each employee 96
- 97. Annual Comp Review •Hiring is market‐based at many firms, but at NeGlix we also make the annual comp review market‐based – Applies same lens as hiring • Essen<ally, rehiring each employee each year, for purposes of comp – At annual comp review, manager has to answer the Three Tests for the personal market for each of their employees 97 Confiden<al
- 98. No Fixed Budgets •There are no centrally administered “raise pools” each year • Instead, each manager aligns their people to market each year – the market will be different in different areas 98
- 99. Annual Comp Review •Some people will move up in comp very quickly because their value in the marketplace is moving up quickly, driven by increasing skills and/or great demand for their area • Some people will move down or stay flat because their value in the marketplace has moved down or stayed flat – Depends in part on infla<on and economy – S<ll top of market, though, for that person 99
- 100. Compensa<on Not Dependent onNeGlix Success • Whether NeGlix is prospering or floundering, we pay at the top of the market – i.e., sports teams with losing records s<ll pay talent the market rate • Employees can choose how much they want to link their economic des<ny to NeGlix success or failure by deciding how much NeGlix stock or stock op<ons they want to own 100
- 101. Bad Ideas • Managersets pay at Nth percen<le of <tle‐ linked compensa<on data – The “Major League Pitcher” problem • Manager cares about internal parity instead of external market value – Fairness in comp is being true to the market • Manager gives everyone a 4% raise – Very unlikely to reflect the market 101
- 102. When Top ofMarket Comp Done Right... • Nearly all ex‐employees will take a step down in comp for their next job • We will rarely counter with higher comp when someone is voluntarily leaving because we have already moved comp to our max for that person • Employees will feel they are gewng paid well rela<ve to their other op<ons in the market 102
- 103. Versus Tradi<onal Model •Tradi<onal model is good prior year earns a raise, independent of market – Problem is employees can get materially under‐ or over‐paid rela<ve to the market, over <me – When materially under‐paid, employees switch firms to take advantage of market‐based pay on hiring – When materially over‐paid, employees are trapped in current firm • Consistent market‐based pay is beXer model 103
- 104. Employee Success • It’spreXy ingrained in our society that the size of one’s raise is the indicator of how well one did the prior year – but at NeGlix there are other factors too – namely, the outside market • In our model, employee success is big factor in comp because it influences market value – In par<cular, how much we would pay to keep the person – But employee success is not the only factor in comp, so the linkage of prior year performance to raise size is weak 104
- 105. Good For EachEmployee to Understand Their Market Value • It a healthy idea, not a traitorous idea, to understand what other firms would pay you, by interviewing and talking to peers at other companies – Talk with your manager about what you find – Minor excep<on: interviewing with groups that directly compete with NeGlix, because their mo<ve is in part confiden<al informa<on 105
- 106. Efficiency • Big salaryis the most efficient form of comp – Most mo<va<ng for any given expense level – No bonuses – just include in salary – so much simpler – No free stock op<ons – just big salary – Great health plan op<ons, but high employee co‐pay – No philanthropic match – Instead, put all that expense into big salaries – Give people big salaries, and the freedom to spend as they think best 106
- 107. Op<onal Op<ons • Employeescan request to trade salary for stock op<ons, if they wish • The op<ons are fully vested, granted monthly, and cost employees in pre‐tax salary approximately half of what such an op<on would cost in the open market • Op<ons ul<mately valuable only if NeGlix stock climbs over the next 10 years • Inves<ng in NeGlix stock or stock op<ons lets one par<cipate in NeGlix success or failure at whatever level is comfortable for employee 107
- 108. Seven Aspects ofour Culture • High Performance • Values are what we Value • Freedom & Responsibility • Context, not Control • Highly Aligned, Loosely Coupled • Pay Top of Market • Promo<ons & Development 108
- 109. In some <meperiods, in some groups, there will be lots of opportunity and growth at NeGlix Some people, through both luck and talent, will have extraordinary career growth 109
- 110. Baseball Analogy: Minorsto Majors • Very talented people usually get to move up, but only true for the very talented • Some luck in terms of what posi<ons open up and what the compe<<on is • Some people move to other teams to get the opportunity they want • Great teams keep their best talent • Some minor league players keep playing even though they don’t move up because they love the game 110
- 111. NeGlix Doesn’t Haveto be for Life • In some <mes, in some groups, there may not be enough growth opportunity for everyone • In which case we should celebrate someone leaving for a bigger job that we didn’t have available to offer them • If that is what the person prefers 111
- 112. Two Necessary Condi<ons forPromo<on • Job has to be big enough – We might have an incredible manager of something, but we don’t need a director of it because job isn’t big enough • If the incredible manager ler, we would replace with manager, not with director • Person has to be a superstar in current role – Could get the next level job here if applying from outside and we knew their talents well – Could get the next level job at peer firm that knew their talents well 112
- 113. Timing • If managerwould promote employee to keep them if employee were thinking of leaving, manager should promote now, and not wait • Both tests s<ll have to be passed – Job big enough – Superstar in current role 113
- 114. Development • We developpeople by giving them the opportunity to develop themselves, by surrounding them with stunning colleagues and giving them big challenges to work on – Mediocre colleagues or unchallenging work is what kills progress of a person’s skills 114
- 115. Development • Formalized developmentis rarely effec<ve, and we don’t try to do it – E.g. Courses, mentor assignment, rota<on around a firm, mul<‐year career paths, etc. • High performance people are generally self‐ improving through experience, observa<on, introspec<on, reading and discussion – As long as they have stunning colleagues and big challenges 115
- 116. Individuals should managetheir own career paths, and not rely on a corpora<on for planning their careers Like re<rement planning – safer as individual responsibility 116
- 117. Individual’s economic securityis based upon their skills and reputa<on We try hard to consistently provide opportunity to grow both 117
- 118. Seven Aspects ofour Culture • Values are what we Value • High Performance • Freedom & Responsibility • Context, not Control • Highly Aligned, Loosely Coupled • Pay Top of Market • Promo<ons & Development 118
- 119. Why is cultureimportant? What is our culture trying to support? 119
- 120. Culture is Howa Firm Operates What prac<ces give NeGlix the best chance of con<nuous success for many genera<ons of technology and people? 120
- 121. Con<nuous Success = Con<nuousgrowth in revenue, profits & reputa<on 121
- 122. Need a culturethat supports rapid innova/on and excellent execu/on 122
- 123. Need a culturethat supports rapid innova/on and excellent execu/on 123 Both are required for con/nuous growth There is tension between these two goals; between crea/vity and discipline
- 124. Need a culturethat supports effec/ve teamwork of high‐performance people 124
- 125. Need a culturethat supports effec/ve teamwork of high‐performance people 125 High performance people and effec/ve teamwork can be in tension also – stars have strong opinions
- 126. Need a culturethat avoids the rigidity, poli<cs, mediocrity, and complacency that infects most organiza<ons as they grow 126
- 127. This slide deckis our current best thinking about maximizing our likelihood of con<nuous success 127
- 128. Our culture isa work in progress Every year we try to refine our culture further as we learn more 128