Evaluation of resistance in wheat against
Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) (Homoptera: Aphididae)
Noreen Moin
05-arid-345
PMAS-Arid Agriculture
University Rawalpindi
CONTENTS
Introduction
Materials and methods
Seedling bulk test
Antibiosis test
Tolerance test
Results
Seedling bulk test
Antibiosis test
Tolerance test
Conclusion
Recommendation
INTRODUCTION
Aphids are consider as serious pests
of crops (Wheat, Barely, Maize etc)
Transmit virus (MMSV, BYDV)
Persist through out the wheat season
Reproduce
Sexually
Asexually
INTRODUCTION continue…
Some important species of aphids in
Pakistan
Bird cherry oat aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi (L))
Wheat grain aphid (Sitobion avenae)
Grain aphid (Sitobion miscanthi)
Corn leaf aphid (Rhopalosiphum maidis)
Control strategies
Insect pest management
Benefits of IPM
Environmentally sound method
Economic
OBJECTIVES
Evaluation of resistant varieties of
National Uniform Wheat Yeild Trials
(NUWYT) Rain Fed (RF) against Bird
cherry oat aphid by applying following
tests
Seedling bulk test
Antibiosis test
Tolerance test
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Host was wheat
11 varieties of (NUWYT) Rain Fed (R.F) of year 2004-05.
Experiments were conducted under controlled
environment
28+2 oC, 40-70% RH and photoperiod of 16:8h
Mass rearing was done in NARC by establishing the
culture of Rhopalosiphum padi (L)
Resistance was evaluated by
Seedling bulk test
Antibiosis test
Tolerance test
SEEDLING BULK TEST
Metal trays
measuring(51x35x9 cm)
Eight rows of one cm
depth
25 seeds per genotype
was sown
Ten aphids were
released at seedling
height of 5-6 cm
Damage rating was
recorded after 10-15
days
ANTIBIOSIS TEST
Two seeds were sown in 7 cm
diameter pot
At height of 5-6 cm, each
variety was thinned to one
One adult aphid was released
Covered with plastic cage
having two side ventilation
holes, 6 cm diameter and 30
cm height
One nymph was allowed to
grow until it becomes sexually
mature
Nymphs reproduced daily were
removed and counted for each
seedling
TOELRANCE TEST
Seeds were
sown as
described in
antibiosis test
Seedlings were
infested by
aphids at the
height of 5-6
cm
Ten adults
were
maintained
RESULTS
Seedling bulk test
Varieties NUWYT (RF) No. of seedlings Damage
rating (DR)
Nature of
resistance
PR-87 21 4 MR
NR-241 17 4 MR
SN-128 20 5 MR
V-00BT004 16 5 MR
V-00055 18 6 MR
V-5 20 3 R
NRL-2017 22 7 S
NR-234 15 5 MR
RESULTS
Seedling bulk test CONTI….
Varieties NUWYT
(RF)
No. of seedlings Damage rating (DR) Nature of resistance
V-002467 15 4 MR
DN-44 18 4 MR
PR-83 25 5 MR
Chakwal-97 14 7 S
R = Resistant varieties with damage rating = 3
MR = Moderately Resistant varieties with damage rating = 4-6
S = Susceptible varieties with damage rating =7-9
RESULTS
ANTIBIOSIS TEST
Varieties NUWYT (RF) Average no. of nymphs Remarks
PR-87 1.3 MF
NR-241 1.3 MF
SN-128 1.5 HF
V-00BT004 1.3 MF
V-00055 1.2 MF
V-5 1.0 MF
NRL-2017 0.9 MF
NR-234 1.1 MF
Varieties NUWYT (RF) Average no. of nymphs Remarks
V-002467 0.5 LF
DN-44 1.2 MF
PR-83 0.7 LF
Chakwal-97 1.6 HF
Wafaq-2001 1.3 MF
RESULTS
ANTIBIOSIS TEST CONTI..
LF = Least Fecund
MF = Moderately Fecund
HF = Highly Fecund
RESULTS
TOLERANCE TEST
Varieties NUWYT (RF) Average DR Remarks
PR-87 3.8 MT
NR-241 3.6 HT
SN-128 3.6 HT
V-00BT004 6.2 LT
V-00055 4.4 MT
V-5 3.6 HT
NRL-2017 4.4 MT
NR-234 5.4 MT
RESULTS
TOLERANCE TEST CONTI..
Varieties NUWYT (RF) Average DR Remarks
V-002467 5.2 MT
DN-44 4.6 MT
PR-83 3.6 HT
Chakwal-97 4.2 MT
Wafaq-2001 4.6 MT
HT = Highly Tolerant
MT = Moderately Tolerant
LT = Least Tolerant
3.8
3.6 3.6
6.2
4.4
3.6
4.4
5.4
5.2
4.6
3.6
4.2
4.6
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Wheat varieties NUWYT (RF) 2004-05 along
with Wafaq 2001
AvgDamageRating
PR-87
NR-241
SN-128
V-00BT004
V-00055
V-5
NRL-2017
NR-234
V-002467
DN-44
PR-83
Chakwal-97
Wafaq-2001
RECOMANDATIONS
The use of resistant varieties will remain
the most logical and economical way of
reducing damage of pests in wheat
germplasm
CONCLUSIONS
In seedling bulk test V-5 was highly resistant
In antibiosis test least fecund line was PR-83
In tolerance test four lines NR-241, SN-128, V-5
and PR-83 was found to be tolerant to aphid R.padi
Noreen moin

Noreen moin

  • 1.
    Evaluation of resistancein wheat against Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) (Homoptera: Aphididae) Noreen Moin 05-arid-345 PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi
  • 2.
    CONTENTS Introduction Materials and methods Seedlingbulk test Antibiosis test Tolerance test Results Seedling bulk test Antibiosis test Tolerance test Conclusion Recommendation
  • 3.
    INTRODUCTION Aphids are consideras serious pests of crops (Wheat, Barely, Maize etc) Transmit virus (MMSV, BYDV) Persist through out the wheat season Reproduce Sexually Asexually
  • 4.
    INTRODUCTION continue… Some importantspecies of aphids in Pakistan Bird cherry oat aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi (L)) Wheat grain aphid (Sitobion avenae) Grain aphid (Sitobion miscanthi) Corn leaf aphid (Rhopalosiphum maidis) Control strategies Insect pest management Benefits of IPM Environmentally sound method Economic
  • 5.
    OBJECTIVES Evaluation of resistantvarieties of National Uniform Wheat Yeild Trials (NUWYT) Rain Fed (RF) against Bird cherry oat aphid by applying following tests Seedling bulk test Antibiosis test Tolerance test
  • 6.
    MATERIALS AND METHODS Hostwas wheat 11 varieties of (NUWYT) Rain Fed (R.F) of year 2004-05. Experiments were conducted under controlled environment 28+2 oC, 40-70% RH and photoperiod of 16:8h Mass rearing was done in NARC by establishing the culture of Rhopalosiphum padi (L) Resistance was evaluated by Seedling bulk test Antibiosis test Tolerance test
  • 7.
    SEEDLING BULK TEST Metaltrays measuring(51x35x9 cm) Eight rows of one cm depth 25 seeds per genotype was sown Ten aphids were released at seedling height of 5-6 cm Damage rating was recorded after 10-15 days
  • 8.
    ANTIBIOSIS TEST Two seedswere sown in 7 cm diameter pot At height of 5-6 cm, each variety was thinned to one One adult aphid was released Covered with plastic cage having two side ventilation holes, 6 cm diameter and 30 cm height One nymph was allowed to grow until it becomes sexually mature Nymphs reproduced daily were removed and counted for each seedling
  • 9.
    TOELRANCE TEST Seeds were sownas described in antibiosis test Seedlings were infested by aphids at the height of 5-6 cm Ten adults were maintained
  • 10.
    RESULTS Seedling bulk test VarietiesNUWYT (RF) No. of seedlings Damage rating (DR) Nature of resistance PR-87 21 4 MR NR-241 17 4 MR SN-128 20 5 MR V-00BT004 16 5 MR V-00055 18 6 MR V-5 20 3 R NRL-2017 22 7 S NR-234 15 5 MR
  • 11.
    RESULTS Seedling bulk testCONTI…. Varieties NUWYT (RF) No. of seedlings Damage rating (DR) Nature of resistance V-002467 15 4 MR DN-44 18 4 MR PR-83 25 5 MR Chakwal-97 14 7 S R = Resistant varieties with damage rating = 3 MR = Moderately Resistant varieties with damage rating = 4-6 S = Susceptible varieties with damage rating =7-9
  • 12.
    RESULTS ANTIBIOSIS TEST Varieties NUWYT(RF) Average no. of nymphs Remarks PR-87 1.3 MF NR-241 1.3 MF SN-128 1.5 HF V-00BT004 1.3 MF V-00055 1.2 MF V-5 1.0 MF NRL-2017 0.9 MF NR-234 1.1 MF
  • 13.
    Varieties NUWYT (RF)Average no. of nymphs Remarks V-002467 0.5 LF DN-44 1.2 MF PR-83 0.7 LF Chakwal-97 1.6 HF Wafaq-2001 1.3 MF RESULTS ANTIBIOSIS TEST CONTI.. LF = Least Fecund MF = Moderately Fecund HF = Highly Fecund
  • 14.
    RESULTS TOLERANCE TEST Varieties NUWYT(RF) Average DR Remarks PR-87 3.8 MT NR-241 3.6 HT SN-128 3.6 HT V-00BT004 6.2 LT V-00055 4.4 MT V-5 3.6 HT NRL-2017 4.4 MT NR-234 5.4 MT
  • 15.
    RESULTS TOLERANCE TEST CONTI.. VarietiesNUWYT (RF) Average DR Remarks V-002467 5.2 MT DN-44 4.6 MT PR-83 3.6 HT Chakwal-97 4.2 MT Wafaq-2001 4.6 MT HT = Highly Tolerant MT = Moderately Tolerant LT = Least Tolerant
  • 16.
    3.8 3.6 3.6 6.2 4.4 3.6 4.4 5.4 5.2 4.6 3.6 4.2 4.6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Wheat varietiesNUWYT (RF) 2004-05 along with Wafaq 2001 AvgDamageRating PR-87 NR-241 SN-128 V-00BT004 V-00055 V-5 NRL-2017 NR-234 V-002467 DN-44 PR-83 Chakwal-97 Wafaq-2001
  • 17.
    RECOMANDATIONS The use ofresistant varieties will remain the most logical and economical way of reducing damage of pests in wheat germplasm CONCLUSIONS In seedling bulk test V-5 was highly resistant In antibiosis test least fecund line was PR-83 In tolerance test four lines NR-241, SN-128, V-5 and PR-83 was found to be tolerant to aphid R.padi