Out of the
Lab and
Into the Wild
TAKING USER EXPERIENCE RESEARCH TO THE USER
IN THEIR ENVIRONMENT JAY ZALTZMAN
BUREAU WEST
ABBY LEAFE
NEW LEAFE RESEARCH
Jay Zaltzman jay@bureauwest.comAbby Leafe abby@newleaferesearch.com
Part 1
WHY GET OUT OF THE LAB?
What’s in your
queue?
Cable customers tend to recall
this stuff…
…but not this stuff
Why?
Fear of judgment is only part of it
It’s hard to remember off the top of your head
Multi-viewer households
There’s lots that lab research is
good at
Usability
Nomenclature
Taxonomy
Task completion
Eye tracking
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dumfstar/8553474140
But there’s more to user
experience than usability
Decision-
making:
in the lab
vs real life
https://www.flickr.com/photos/vaxzine/2278300537
Case Study
Objective: A company was
developing a new navigation
app and wanted the best user
experience possible.
Approach: During an initial interview, participants discussed their
current navigation app and how they use it. Then they were shown the
new app. Then the (brave) researcher and a client got into the
participant’s car with the participant and drove to several locations using
the new app.
Case Study
Objective: Identify unmet needs
and potential products for dog
owners around the world.
Approach: Phase 1: week-long mobile diary during which participants
recorded their dogs’ activities, answered questions, and uploaded
photos and videos. Phase 2: online bulletin board discussion to uncover
unmet needs. Information from the diary served as stimulus and
catalyst for ideas.
Case Study
Objective: To understand how a
beta version of a new set-top box
operating system was functioning in
the real world.
Approach: One-on-one in-home interviews, using a task-based
approach to have participants walk through likely tasks (set up recording,
find On Demand programming, etc.). Respondents also kept a diary the
week prior to the interview to note any problems or pain points.
Case Study
Objective: Valpak had just launched
a responsive version of their website
and wanted to understand how its
mobile coupons performed in the
real world.
Approach: In part 1, respondents participated in a traditional one-on-
one usability interview in a lab setting. In part 2, they had 1 week to use
a Valpak mobile coupon in a store of their choice, and then report back
on the experience with photos and video via a mobile research app.
Part 2
QUESTIONS TO ASK YOURSELF
Is this study right for
ethnography?
 Look for experiences that you can’t recreate in
the lab
 Mobile apps are ripe for ethnography
because they are often designed for
use on-the-go
Should I attend?
There are plenty of good
reasons to be present…
or not
Pros & cons of in-person
ethnography
* Get to see things first hand
* Easier rapport
* See the whole environment
* Time consuming
* Can cost more
* Potential for observer bias
Pros & cons of remote
ethnography
* Privacy can create intimacy
* Can reach larger samples
* Less time and money
* See only what they show
* Don’t see body language
* Need to herd the kittens
What else should I be asking?
Do I go it alone?
(Consider partnering -- especially the first time)
What will the deliverable look like?
(Allocate resources)
Part 3
BLUEPRINT FOR CONDUCTING THE RESEARCH
Start with your target
Who do you really want?
May be similar to lab research
Consider screening for articulation,
openness, etc.
Make your expectations clear
In preparation for this study, please plan to clean
out your car so that two passengers beside
yourself can sit in it. This means you may have to
remove child car seats or other items from the
front and back seats of your car.
Also, please email us photos of your driver’s
license, car registration and proof of insurance.
Trust, but verify
Have respondents take a picture of
something that confirms their
qualification and send it to you (cable
bill, prescription medicine, etc.)
Consider pre-interviewing them on the
phone so you don’t waste time
Remote research options
Mobile screen capture
Diary (video, photos, voice, text)
Webcam
Many great providers to choose from
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FP_Satellite_icon.svg
In-home research
considerations
Safety and security -
for both research team
and respondents
Respect their space
Video
Make your expectations clear
Consumers:
 Don’t clean your house
 Don’t make snacks
 You will be recorded
 Expect 2-4 people
Observers:
 Cell phones off
 Dress professionally but no
company logos
 Don’t educate
 Poker face
Writing the guide
In-person:
◦ Allow time for set-up and getting comfortable
Remote:
◦ Be explicit
◦ Give examples if possible
◦ Give staggered timelines
(i.e. Complete X by Y)
All:
◦ Make it fun!
Keeping them engaged
Positive reinforcement – both privately and publicly
Question of the Day – so diaries don’t get repetitive
Bonus payments for certain activities
Other logistics
Have a dedicated videographer
Two hours and 3 observers is comfortable
What kind of release do you need?
Wear good socks
Don’t underestimate
the amount of data
you’ll get
Thoughts on reporting
Consider using a Livescribe pen
Think visually
Include photos and video when possible
Jay Zaltzman
jay@bureauwest.com
Abby Leafe
abby@newleaferesearch.com

Out of the Lab and Into the Wild! Mobile Ethnography for Richer UX Insights - Abby Leafe and Jay Zaltzman

  • 1.
    Out of the Laband Into the Wild TAKING USER EXPERIENCE RESEARCH TO THE USER IN THEIR ENVIRONMENT JAY ZALTZMAN BUREAU WEST ABBY LEAFE NEW LEAFE RESEARCH Jay Zaltzman [email protected] Leafe [email protected]
  • 2.
    Part 1 WHY GETOUT OF THE LAB?
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Cable customers tendto recall this stuff…
  • 5.
  • 6.
    Why? Fear of judgmentis only part of it It’s hard to remember off the top of your head Multi-viewer households
  • 7.
    There’s lots thatlab research is good at Usability Nomenclature Taxonomy Task completion Eye tracking https://www.flickr.com/photos/dumfstar/8553474140
  • 8.
    But there’s moreto user experience than usability
  • 9.
    Decision- making: in the lab vsreal life https://www.flickr.com/photos/vaxzine/2278300537
  • 10.
    Case Study Objective: Acompany was developing a new navigation app and wanted the best user experience possible. Approach: During an initial interview, participants discussed their current navigation app and how they use it. Then they were shown the new app. Then the (brave) researcher and a client got into the participant’s car with the participant and drove to several locations using the new app.
  • 11.
    Case Study Objective: Identifyunmet needs and potential products for dog owners around the world. Approach: Phase 1: week-long mobile diary during which participants recorded their dogs’ activities, answered questions, and uploaded photos and videos. Phase 2: online bulletin board discussion to uncover unmet needs. Information from the diary served as stimulus and catalyst for ideas.
  • 12.
    Case Study Objective: Tounderstand how a beta version of a new set-top box operating system was functioning in the real world. Approach: One-on-one in-home interviews, using a task-based approach to have participants walk through likely tasks (set up recording, find On Demand programming, etc.). Respondents also kept a diary the week prior to the interview to note any problems or pain points.
  • 13.
    Case Study Objective: Valpakhad just launched a responsive version of their website and wanted to understand how its mobile coupons performed in the real world. Approach: In part 1, respondents participated in a traditional one-on- one usability interview in a lab setting. In part 2, they had 1 week to use a Valpak mobile coupon in a store of their choice, and then report back on the experience with photos and video via a mobile research app.
  • 14.
    Part 2 QUESTIONS TOASK YOURSELF
  • 15.
    Is this studyright for ethnography?  Look for experiences that you can’t recreate in the lab  Mobile apps are ripe for ethnography because they are often designed for use on-the-go
  • 16.
    Should I attend? Thereare plenty of good reasons to be present… or not
  • 17.
    Pros & consof in-person ethnography * Get to see things first hand * Easier rapport * See the whole environment * Time consuming * Can cost more * Potential for observer bias
  • 18.
    Pros & consof remote ethnography * Privacy can create intimacy * Can reach larger samples * Less time and money * See only what they show * Don’t see body language * Need to herd the kittens
  • 19.
    What else shouldI be asking? Do I go it alone? (Consider partnering -- especially the first time) What will the deliverable look like? (Allocate resources)
  • 20.
    Part 3 BLUEPRINT FORCONDUCTING THE RESEARCH
  • 21.
    Start with yourtarget Who do you really want? May be similar to lab research Consider screening for articulation, openness, etc.
  • 22.
    Make your expectationsclear In preparation for this study, please plan to clean out your car so that two passengers beside yourself can sit in it. This means you may have to remove child car seats or other items from the front and back seats of your car. Also, please email us photos of your driver’s license, car registration and proof of insurance.
  • 23.
    Trust, but verify Haverespondents take a picture of something that confirms their qualification and send it to you (cable bill, prescription medicine, etc.) Consider pre-interviewing them on the phone so you don’t waste time
  • 24.
    Remote research options Mobilescreen capture Diary (video, photos, voice, text) Webcam Many great providers to choose from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FP_Satellite_icon.svg
  • 25.
    In-home research considerations Safety andsecurity - for both research team and respondents Respect their space Video
  • 26.
    Make your expectationsclear Consumers:  Don’t clean your house  Don’t make snacks  You will be recorded  Expect 2-4 people Observers:  Cell phones off  Dress professionally but no company logos  Don’t educate  Poker face
  • 27.
    Writing the guide In-person: ◦Allow time for set-up and getting comfortable Remote: ◦ Be explicit ◦ Give examples if possible ◦ Give staggered timelines (i.e. Complete X by Y) All: ◦ Make it fun!
  • 28.
    Keeping them engaged Positivereinforcement – both privately and publicly Question of the Day – so diaries don’t get repetitive Bonus payments for certain activities
  • 29.
    Other logistics Have adedicated videographer Two hours and 3 observers is comfortable What kind of release do you need? Wear good socks
  • 30.
  • 31.
    Thoughts on reporting Considerusing a Livescribe pen Think visually Include photos and video when possible
  • 33.