Path Spss Amos (1)

Path Spss Amos (1)

• 1.
  Conducting a PathAnalysis With SPSS/AMOS Download the PATH-INGRAM.sps data file from my SPSS data page (http://core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/SPSS/SPSS-Data.htm) and then bring it into SPSS. The data are those from the research that led to this publication: Ingram, K. L., Cope, J. G., Harju, B. L., & Wuensch, K. L. (2000). Applying to graduate school: A test of the theory of planned behavior (http://core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/ Articles/JSB&P2000.pdf). Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15, 215-226. Obtain the simple correlations among the variables: Correlations Attitude SubNorm PBC Intent Behavior Attitude Pearson Correlation 1.000 .472 .665 .767 .525 SubNorm Pearson Correlation .472 1.000 .505 .411 .379 PBC Pearson Correlation .665 .505 1.000 .458 .496 Intent Pearson Correlation .767 .411 .458 1.000 .503 Behavior Pearson Correlation .525 .379 .496 .503 1.000 One can conduct a path analysis with a series of multiple regression analyses. We shall test a model corresponding to Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behavior – look at the model presented in the article cited above, which is available online. Notice that the final variable, Behavior, has paths to it only from Intention and PBC. To find the coefficients for those paths we simply conduct a multiple regression to predict Behavior from Intention and PBC. Here is the output. Model Summary Adjusted R Std. Error of the Model R R Square Square Estimate 1 .585a .343 .319 13.74634 a. Predictors: (Constant), PBC, Intent ANOVAb Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 5611.752 2 2805.876 14.849 .000a Residual 10770.831 57 188.962 Total 16382.583 59 a. Predictors: (Constant), PBC, Intent b. Dependent Variable: Behavior Path-SPSS-AMOS.doc
• 2.
  2 Coefficientsa Standardized Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. 1 (Constant) -11.346 10.420 -1.089 .281 Intent 1.520 .525 .350 2.894 .005 PBC .734 .264 .336 2.781 .007 a. Dependent Variable: Behavior The Beta weights are the path coefficients leading to Behavior: .336 from PBC and .350 from Intention. In the model Intention has paths to it from Attitude, Subjective Norm, and Perceived Behavioral Control, so we predict Intention from Attitude, Subjective Norm, and Perceived Behavioral Control. Here is the output: Model Summary Adjusted R Std. Error of the Model R R Square Square Estimate 1 .774a .600 .578 2.48849 a. Predictors: (Constant), PBC, SubNorm, Attitude ANOVAb Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 519.799 3 173.266 27.980 .000a Residual 346.784 56 6.193 Total 866.583 59 a. Predictors: (Constant), PBC, SubNorm, Attitude b. Dependent Variable: Intent
• 3.
  3 Coefficientsa Standardized Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. 1 (Constant) 3.906 1.828 2.137 .037 Attitude .444 .064 .807 6.966 .000 SubNorm .029 .031 .095 .946 .348 PBC -.064 .059 -.126 -1.069 .290 a. Dependent Variable: Intent The path coefficients leading to Intention are: .807 from Attitude, .095 from Subjective Norms, and −.126 from Perceived Behavioral Control. AMOS Now let us use AMOS. The data file is already open in SPSS. Click Analyze, AMOS 16. In the AMOS window which will open click File, New: Click on the “Draw observed variables” icon which I have circled on the image above. Move the cursor over into the drawing space on the right. Hold down the left mouse button while you move the cursor to draw a rectangle. Release the mouse button and move the cursor to another location and draw another rectangle. Annoyed that you can’t draw five rectangles of the same dimensions. Do it this way instead: Draw one rectangle. Now click the Duplicate Objects icon, boxed in black in the image below, point at that rectangle, hold down the left mouse button while you move to the desired location for the second rectangle, and release the mouse button.
• 4.
  4 Draw five rectanglesarranged something like this: You can change the shape of the rectangles later, using the “Change the shape of objects” tool (boxed in green in the image above), and you can move the rectangles later using the “Move objects” tool (boxed in blue in the image above). Click on the “List variables in data set” icon (boxed in orange in the image above). From the window that results, drag and drop variable names to the boxes. A more cumbersome way to do this is: Right-click the rectangle, select Object Properties, then enter in the Object Properties window the name of the observed variable. Close the widow and enter variable names in the remaining rectangles in the same way. Click on the “Draw paths” icon (the single- headed arrow boxed in purple in the image below) and then draw a path from Attitude to Intent (hold down the left mouse button at the point you wish to start the path and then drag it to the ending point and release the mouse button). Also draw paths from SubNorm to Intent, PBC to Intent, PBC to Behavior, and Intent to Behavior.
• 5.
  5 Click on the “Draw Covariances” icon (the double-headed arrow boxed in purple in the image above) and draw a path from SubNorm to Attitude. Draw another from PBC to SubNorm and one from PBC to Attitude. You can use the “Change the shape of objects” tool (boxed in green in the image above) to increase or decrease the arc of these paths – just select that tool, put the cursor on the path to be changed, hold down the left mouse button, and move the mouse. Click on the “Add a unique variable to an existing variable” icon (boxed in red in the image above) and then move the cursor over the Intent variable and click the left mouse button to add the error variable. Do the same to add an error variable to the Behavior variable. Right-click the error circle leading to Intent, Select Object Properties, and name the variable “e1.” Name the other error circle “e2.” Click the “Analysis properties” icon -- to display the Analysis Properties window. Select the Output tab and ask for the output shown below.
• 6.
  6
• 7.
  7 Click on the “Calculate estimates” icon . In the “Save As” window browse to the desired folder and give the file a name. Click Save. Change the “Parameter Formats” setting (boxed in red in the image below) to “Standardized estimates” if it is not already set that way. Click the “View the output path diagram” icon (boxed in red in the image below) and zap, you get the path analysis diagram.
• 8.
  8 Click the “Viewtext” icon to see extensive text output from the analysis.
• 9.
  9 The Copy to Clipboard icon (in green, above) can be used to copy the output to another document via the clipboard. Click the Options icon (in red, above) to select whether you want to view/copy just part of the output or all of the output. Here are some parts of the output with my comments in green: Variable Summary (Group number 1) Your model contains the following variables (Group number 1) Observed, endogenous variables Intent Behavior Observed, exogenous variables Attitude PBC SubNorm Unobserved, exogenous variables e1 e2 Variable counts (Group number 1) Number of variables in your model: 7 Number of observed variables: 5 Number of unobserved variables: 2 Number of exogenous variables: 5 Number of endogenous variables: 2
• 10.
  10 Parameter summary (Groupnumber 1) Weights Covariances Variances Means Intercepts Total Fixed 2 0 0 0 0 2 Labeled 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unlabeled 5 3 5 0 0 13 Total 7 3 5 0 0 15 Models Default model (Default model) Notes for Model (Default model) Computation of degrees of freedom (Default model) Number of distinct sample moments: 15 Number of distinct parameters to be estimated: 13 Degrees of freedom (15 - 13): 2 Result (Default model) Minimum was achieved Chi-square = .847 Degrees of freedom = 2 Probability level = .655 This Chi-square tests the null hypothesis that the overidentified (reduced) model fits the data as well as does a just-identified (full, saturated) model. In a just-identified model there is a direct path (not through an intervening variable) from each variable to each other variable. When you delete one or more of the paths you obtain an overidentified model. The nonsignificant Chi-square here indicated that the fit between our overidentified model and the data is not significantly worse than the fit between the just-identified model and the data. You can see the just-identified model here. While one might argue that nonsignificance of this Chi-square indicates that the reduced model fits the data well, even a well-fitting reduced model will be significantly different from the full model if sample size is sufficiently large. A good fitting model is one that can reproduce the original variance-covariance matrix (or correlation matrix) from the path coefficients, in much the same way that a good factor analytic solution can reproduce the original correlation matrix with little error. Maximum Likelihood Estimates Do note that the parameters are estimated by maximum likelihood (ML) methods rather than by ordinary least squares (OLS) methods. OLS methods minimize the squared
• 11.
  11 deviations betweenvalues of the criterion variable and those predicted by the model. ML (an iterative procedure) attempts to maximize the likelihood that obtained values of the criterion variable will be correctly predicted. Standardized Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model) Estimate Intent ← SubNorm .095 Intent ← PBC -.126 Intent ← Attitude .807 Behavior ← Intent .350 Behavior ← PBC .336 The path coefficients above match those we obtained earlier by multiple regression. Correlations: (Group number 1 - Default model) Estimate Attitude <--> PBC .665 Attitude <--> SubNorm .472 PBC <--> SubNorm .505 Above are the simple correlations between exogenous variables. Squared Multiple Correlations: (Group number 1 - Default model) Estimate Intent .600 Behavior .343 Above are the squared multiple correlation coefficients we saw in the two multiple regressions. The total effect of one variable on another can be divided into direct effects (no intervening variables involved) and indirect effects (through one or more intervening variables). Consider the effect of PBC on Behavior. The direct effect is .336 (the path coefficient from PBC to Behavior). The indirect effect, through Intention is computed as the product of the path coefficient from PBC to Intention and the path coefficient from Intention to Behavior, (−.126)(.350) = −.044. The total effect is the sum of direct and indirect effects, .336 + (−.126) = .292.
• 12.
  12 Standardized Total Effects(Group number 1 - Default model) SubNorm PBC Attitude Intent Intent .095 -.126 .807 .000 Behavior .033 .292 .282 .350 Standardized Direct Effects (Group number 1 - Default model) SubNorm PBC Attitude Intent Intent .095 -.126 .807 .000 Behavior .000 .336 .000 .350 Standardized Indirect Effects (Group number 1 - Default model) SubNorm PBC Attitude Intent Intent .000 .000 .000 .000 Behavior .033 -.044 .282 .000 Model Fit Summary CMIN Model NPAR CMIN DF P CMIN/DF Default model 13 .847 2 .655 .424 Saturated model 15 .000 0 Independence model 5 134.142 10 .000 13.414 NPAR is the number of parameters in the model. In the saturated (just-identified) model there are 15 parameters – 5 variances (one for each variable) and 10 path coefficients. For our tested (default) model there are 13 parameters – we dropped two paths. For the independence model (one where all of the paths have been deleted) there are five parameters (the variances of the five variables). CMIN is a Chi-square statistic comparing the tested model and the independence model with the saturated model. We saw the former a bit earlier. CMIN/DF, the relative chi- square, is an index of how much the fit of data to model has been reduced by dropping one or more paths. One rule of thumb is to decide you have dropped too many paths if this index exceeds 2 or 3.
• 13.
  13 RMR, GFI Model RMR GFI AGFI PGFI Default model 3.564 .994 .957 .133 Saturated model .000 1.000 Independence model 36.681 .471 .207 .314 RMR, the root mean square residual, is an index of the amount by which the estimated (by your model) variances and covariances differ from the observed variances and covariances. Smaller is better, of course. GFI, the goodness of fit index, tells you what proportion of the variance in the sample variance-covariance matrix is accounted for by the model. This should exceed .9 for a good model. For the full model it will be a perfect 1. AGFI (adjusted GFI) is an alternate GFI index in which the value of the index is adjusted for the number of parameters in the model. The fewer the number of parameters in the model relative to the number of data points (variances and covariances in the sample variance- covariance matrix), the closer the AGFI will be to the GFI. The PGFI (P is for parsimony), the index is adjusted to reward simple models and penalize models in which few paths have been deleted. Note that for our data the PGFI is larger for the independence model than for our tested model. Baseline Comparisons NFI RFI IFI TLI Model CFI Delta1 rho1 Delta2 rho2 Default model .994 .968 1.009 1.046 1.000 Saturated model 1.000 1.000 1.000 Independence model .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 These goodness of fit indices compare your model to the independence model rather than to the saturated model. The Normed Fit Index (NFI) is simply the difference between the two models’ chi-squares divided by the chi-square for the independence model. For our data, that is (134.142)-.847)/134.142 = .994. Values of .9 or higher (some say .95 or higher) indicate good fit. The Comparative Fit Index (CFI) uses a similar approach (with a noncentral chi-square) and is said to be a good index for use even with small samples. It ranges from 0 to 1, like the NFI, and .95 (or .9 or higher) indicates good fit.
• 14.
  14 Parsimony-Adjusted Measures Model PRATIO PNFI PCFI Default model .200 .199 .200 Saturated model .000 .000 .000 Independence model 1.000 .000 .000 PRATIO is the ratio of how many paths you dropped to how many you could have dropped (all of them). The Parsimony Normed Fit Index (PNFI), is the product of NFI and PRATIO, and PCFI is the product of the CFI and PRATIO. The PNFI and PCFI are intended to reward those whose models are parsimonious (contain few paths). RMSEA Model RMSEA LO 90 HI 90 PCLOSE Default model .000 .000 .200 .693 Independence model .459 .391 .529 .000 The Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) estimates lack of fit compared to the saturated model. RMSEA of .05 or less indicates good fit, and .08 or less adequate fit. LO 90 and HI 90 are the lower and upper ends of a 90% confidence interval on this estimate. PCLOSE is the p value testing the null that RMSEA is no greater than .05. HOELTER HOELTER HOELTER Model .05 .01 Default model 418 642 Independence model 9 11 If your sample were larger than this you would reject the null hypothesis that your model fit the data just as well as does the saturated model.
• 15.
  15 The Just-Identified Model OurReduced Model
• 16.
  16 Matrix Input AMOS will accept as input a correlation matrix (accompanied by standard deviations and sample sizes) or a variance/covariance matrix. The SPSS syntax below would input such a matrix: MATRIX DATA VARIABLES=ROWTYPE_ Attitude SubNorm PBC Intent Behavior. BEGIN DATA N 60 60 60 60 60 SD 6.96 12.32 7.62 3.83 16.66 CORR 1 CORR .472 1 CORR .665 .505 1 CORR .767 .411 .458 1 CORR .525 .379 .496 .503 1 END DATA. After running the syntax you would just click Analyze, AMOS, and proceed as before. If you had the correlations but not the standard deviations, you could just specify a value of 1 for each standard deviation. You would not be able to get the unstandardized coefficients, but they are generally not of interest anyhow. AMOS Files Amos creates several files during the course of conducting a path analysis. Here is what I have learned about them, mostly by trial and error. • ∗.amw = a path diagram, with coefficients etc. • ∗.amp = table output – all the statistical output details. Open it with the AMOS file manager. • ∗.AmosOutput – looks the same as ∗.amp, but takes up more space on drive. • ∗.AmosTN = thumbnail image of path diagram • *.bk# -- probably a backup file Notes To bring a path diagram into Word, just Edit, Copy to Clipboard, and then paste it into Word. If you pull up an ∗.amw path diagram but have not specified an input data file, you cannot alter the diagram and re-analyze the data. The ∗.amw file includes the coefficients etc., but not the input data. If you input an altered data file and then call up the original ∗.amw, you can Calculate Estimates again and get a new set of coefficients etc. WARNING – when you exit you will find that the old ∗.amp and ∗.AmosOutput have been updated with the results of the analysis on the modified data. The original ∗.amw file remains unaltered.
• 17.
  17 Links • Lesson by Garson at NCSU • Introduction to Path Analysis – maybe more than you want to know. • Wuensch’s Stats Lessons Page Karl L. Wuensch Dept. of Psychology East Carolina University Greenville, NC 27858-4353 October, 2008