Submitted to :
Prof.Dr.Mahr Muhammad Saeed
Akhtar
Submitted by:
Umme-Rubab
MP/2015-s-16
Policy evaluation Process
Philosophical foundations of education
Policy Evaluation
It is a mean of determining the effectiveness
and efficiency of government policies and
identifies areas need change and
improvement
Stages of policy process
Agenda setting
Policy
formulation
Policy adoption
Policy
implementation
Policy
Evaluation
Standards for conducting policy
evaluation
There are four main standards for conducting policy
evaluation.
 Utility
 Feasibility
 Propriety
 accuracy
Types of evaluation
There are two main types of evaluation
Formative evaluation.
Summative evaluation.
Formative Evaluation
It is generally any evaluation that takes place
before or during a project's implementation
with the aim of improving the project's
design and performance.
Summative Evaluation
Summative evaluation refers to the
assessment of participants where the focus is
on the outcome of a program. This contrasts
with formative assessment, which
summarizes the participants development at
a particular time.
Steps in policy evaluation process
 Define purpose and scope.
 Specify evaluation design.
 Create a data collection plan.
 Collect data.
 Analyze data.
 Drawing conclusion.
 Feedback to improvement.
Define purpose and scope
Why are u doing the evaluation it defines
the purpose of it.
It also provides information about
program improvement and evaluation.
Specify evaluation design
Here the evaluation design is focused that which type of
design we will use such as:
 Status.
 Comparison.
 Change.
 Longitudinal.
Create a data collection plan
Here it is decided that hoe we will collect data
we can use the following techniques to
collect data:
Survey.
Focus group.
Observation.
Published instruments.
Collect data
Here we will see that how much data do we need.
100% population is ideal but it is too much
expensive and time consuming to collect data from
whole population.
We can use the following sampling techniques to
collect data:
Random sampling
Stratified sampling
Convenience sampling
Analyze data
Data collected during policy evaluation is compiled and
analyzed.
Area Frequency
Number of students getting 5 males
Non-traditional education 6 females
Drawing conclusions
Results are examined carefully and
objectively
Conclusion is drawn based on our data.
Results should signify the program
Feedback to program improvement
Evaluation findings are used to make
improvements.
Consider adjustments
Revise program strategies
Change methodologies
Increase time with program
Conclusion
Evaluation helps to:
Determine the effect of program on
recipients.
Know if u have reach your objectives.
Improve your program.
Philosophical foundations of education

Philosophical foundations of education

  • 2.
    Submitted to : Prof.Dr.MahrMuhammad Saeed Akhtar Submitted by: Umme-Rubab MP/2015-s-16
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Policy Evaluation It isa mean of determining the effectiveness and efficiency of government policies and identifies areas need change and improvement
  • 5.
    Stages of policyprocess Agenda setting Policy formulation Policy adoption Policy implementation Policy Evaluation
  • 6.
    Standards for conductingpolicy evaluation There are four main standards for conducting policy evaluation.  Utility  Feasibility  Propriety  accuracy
  • 7.
    Types of evaluation Thereare two main types of evaluation Formative evaluation. Summative evaluation.
  • 8.
    Formative Evaluation It isgenerally any evaluation that takes place before or during a project's implementation with the aim of improving the project's design and performance.
  • 9.
    Summative Evaluation Summative evaluationrefers to the assessment of participants where the focus is on the outcome of a program. This contrasts with formative assessment, which summarizes the participants development at a particular time.
  • 10.
    Steps in policyevaluation process  Define purpose and scope.  Specify evaluation design.  Create a data collection plan.  Collect data.  Analyze data.  Drawing conclusion.  Feedback to improvement.
  • 11.
    Define purpose andscope Why are u doing the evaluation it defines the purpose of it. It also provides information about program improvement and evaluation.
  • 12.
    Specify evaluation design Herethe evaluation design is focused that which type of design we will use such as:  Status.  Comparison.  Change.  Longitudinal.
  • 13.
    Create a datacollection plan Here it is decided that hoe we will collect data we can use the following techniques to collect data: Survey. Focus group. Observation. Published instruments.
  • 14.
    Collect data Here wewill see that how much data do we need. 100% population is ideal but it is too much expensive and time consuming to collect data from whole population. We can use the following sampling techniques to collect data: Random sampling Stratified sampling Convenience sampling
  • 15.
    Analyze data Data collectedduring policy evaluation is compiled and analyzed. Area Frequency Number of students getting 5 males Non-traditional education 6 females
  • 16.
    Drawing conclusions Results areexamined carefully and objectively Conclusion is drawn based on our data. Results should signify the program
  • 17.
    Feedback to programimprovement Evaluation findings are used to make improvements. Consider adjustments Revise program strategies Change methodologies Increase time with program
  • 18.
    Conclusion Evaluation helps to: Determinethe effect of program on recipients. Know if u have reach your objectives. Improve your program.