DISCUSSION
PIGGYBACK IOL
 1st described in 1993 by Gayton & Sanders in a case
of cataract & microphthalmos, in which the
calculated IOL power was +46 Diopters.
 Later on, it is used to correct post operative refractive
errors.
WHAT IS PIGGYBACK IOL?
 An IOL that ”piggybacks” onto an existing IOL or two
IOLs implanted simultaneously.
 1st
IOL is placed in the capsular bag
 2nd
IOL (piggyback) is placed in the bag or sulcus.
PRE REQUISITES
 a stable PCIOL within an intact capsular bag,
 a normal or deep anterior chamber,
 a normal corneal endothelium, and
 no evidence of pigment dispersion syndrome.
CONSIDERATION
The relevant considerations for piggyback IOL procedures
are:
the IOL power, material, edge design, and position.
IOLs with low negative or low positive dioptric power are
required.
The material should be different from that of the existing IOL in the
eye (i.e., acrylic vs. silicone) to minimize the risk of an intra
lenticular membrane formation.
 The piggyback lens is
 placed in the ciliary sulcus and
 should have a rounded (not square) edge,
 a posterior angulation, and
 a 3-piece design with sufficient overall length (to prevent
pigment dispersion and iris damage from chafing the
posterior iris surface.)
INDICATION
 patients with a hyperopic postoperative refractive error.
 Patients with a history of RK, because they are prone to
hyperopic surprises after cataract surgery.
CONTRAINDICATION
 loose zonules from trauma or pseudoexfoliation
 Posterior synechiae to the capsular bag
 significantly reduced corneal endothelial cell count
ADVANTAGE
 Easier to place 2nd
IOL than to explant IOL & replace it
 Better image quality
 Increased depth of focus
COMPLICATIONS
 Intralenticular opacification (interpseudophakos Elshnig’s
pearls) -- RED ROCK SYNDROME
 Postoperative pigment dispersion, which occurs when
the piggyback lens rubs against the posterior surface of
the iris.
 Iris chafing,
 Chronic iridocyclitis,
 Glaucoma (secondary angle closure glaucoma)
 Hyphema, and
 Corneal decompensation.
OPTIONS FOR PIGGYBACK IOL
 For placement in the capsular bag, an IOL with a negative
shape factor such as the three-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL
is an excellent choice.
 single-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOLs should not be placed
into the sulcus because they may induce uveitis- glaucoma-
hyphema syndrome.
 For the ciliary sulcus lens, a large diameter, low profile,
round edge, biconvex newer generation silicone IOL is
recommended.
 Secondary piggyback IOLs are available as monofocal,
multifocal, toric & multifocal toric models.
 There are three IOLs specially designed for secondary
implantation in the ciliary sulcus to correct pseudophakic
ametropias or pseudophakic presbyopia: the Sulcoflex, the
Add- on & the 1st
Add- on.
TYPES OF PIGGYBACK IOL IMPLANTATION
 Primary Polypseudophakia:
High hyperopia or myopia (mostly both in the bag)
 Secondary Polypseudophakia:
To manage postoperative refractive surprise (mostly lower
power IOL in sulcus), done after 6 weeks of the first surgery.
PIGGYBACK IOL POWER
CALCULATION
Easily calculated utilizing the Holladay
IOL Consultant (R Formula)
No holladay consultation
Piggyback IOL
(Gills Nomogram)
 Underpowered pseudophakes (hyperopes):
1. Small eye (<21 mm): power = (1.5 X SE) + 1
2. Average eye (22 – 26 mm): power = (1.4 X SE) + 1
3. Long eye (>27 mm): power = (1.3 X SE) + 1
 Overpowered pseudophakes (myopes):
1. Small eye (<21 mm): power = (1.5 X SE) - 1
2. Average eye (22 – 26 mm): power = (1.4 X SE) - 1
3. Long eye (>27 mm): power = (1.3 X SE) - 1
Thank you…

Piggyback iol

  • 1.
  • 2.
     1st describedin 1993 by Gayton & Sanders in a case of cataract & microphthalmos, in which the calculated IOL power was +46 Diopters.  Later on, it is used to correct post operative refractive errors.
  • 3.
    WHAT IS PIGGYBACKIOL?  An IOL that ”piggybacks” onto an existing IOL or two IOLs implanted simultaneously.  1st IOL is placed in the capsular bag  2nd IOL (piggyback) is placed in the bag or sulcus.
  • 4.
    PRE REQUISITES  astable PCIOL within an intact capsular bag,  a normal or deep anterior chamber,  a normal corneal endothelium, and  no evidence of pigment dispersion syndrome.
  • 5.
    CONSIDERATION The relevant considerationsfor piggyback IOL procedures are: the IOL power, material, edge design, and position. IOLs with low negative or low positive dioptric power are required. The material should be different from that of the existing IOL in the eye (i.e., acrylic vs. silicone) to minimize the risk of an intra lenticular membrane formation.
  • 6.
     The piggybacklens is  placed in the ciliary sulcus and  should have a rounded (not square) edge,  a posterior angulation, and  a 3-piece design with sufficient overall length (to prevent pigment dispersion and iris damage from chafing the posterior iris surface.)
  • 7.
    INDICATION  patients witha hyperopic postoperative refractive error.  Patients with a history of RK, because they are prone to hyperopic surprises after cataract surgery.
  • 8.
    CONTRAINDICATION  loose zonulesfrom trauma or pseudoexfoliation  Posterior synechiae to the capsular bag  significantly reduced corneal endothelial cell count
  • 9.
    ADVANTAGE  Easier toplace 2nd IOL than to explant IOL & replace it  Better image quality  Increased depth of focus
  • 10.
    COMPLICATIONS  Intralenticular opacification(interpseudophakos Elshnig’s pearls) -- RED ROCK SYNDROME  Postoperative pigment dispersion, which occurs when the piggyback lens rubs against the posterior surface of the iris.  Iris chafing,  Chronic iridocyclitis,  Glaucoma (secondary angle closure glaucoma)  Hyphema, and  Corneal decompensation.
  • 11.
    OPTIONS FOR PIGGYBACKIOL  For placement in the capsular bag, an IOL with a negative shape factor such as the three-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL is an excellent choice.  single-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOLs should not be placed into the sulcus because they may induce uveitis- glaucoma- hyphema syndrome.  For the ciliary sulcus lens, a large diameter, low profile, round edge, biconvex newer generation silicone IOL is recommended.
  • 12.
     Secondary piggybackIOLs are available as monofocal, multifocal, toric & multifocal toric models.  There are three IOLs specially designed for secondary implantation in the ciliary sulcus to correct pseudophakic ametropias or pseudophakic presbyopia: the Sulcoflex, the Add- on & the 1st Add- on.
  • 13.
    TYPES OF PIGGYBACKIOL IMPLANTATION  Primary Polypseudophakia: High hyperopia or myopia (mostly both in the bag)  Secondary Polypseudophakia: To manage postoperative refractive surprise (mostly lower power IOL in sulcus), done after 6 weeks of the first surgery.
  • 14.
    PIGGYBACK IOL POWER CALCULATION Easilycalculated utilizing the Holladay IOL Consultant (R Formula)
  • 15.
  • 16.
    Piggyback IOL (Gills Nomogram) Underpowered pseudophakes (hyperopes): 1. Small eye (<21 mm): power = (1.5 X SE) + 1 2. Average eye (22 – 26 mm): power = (1.4 X SE) + 1 3. Long eye (>27 mm): power = (1.3 X SE) + 1
  • 17.
     Overpowered pseudophakes(myopes): 1. Small eye (<21 mm): power = (1.5 X SE) - 1 2. Average eye (22 – 26 mm): power = (1.4 X SE) - 1 3. Long eye (>27 mm): power = (1.3 X SE) - 1
  • 18.