Download to read offline
More Related Content
Similar to Planning Aid England - The experiences of local groups
Planning Aid England - The experiences of local groups
- 1. The experiences oflocal groups Bob Keith Planning Aid England
- 2. Contents • What hasPlanning Aid been doing with groups • How groups have coped with the different stages of plan preparation • What research amongst groups has indicated • What are the lessons to be learnt going forward 2
- 3. Planning Aid England •Part of the Royal Town Planning Institute • Provide free web based resource called Planning Aid Direct • Operate an advice service – offer limited amount of free, professional, general planning advice • Casework undertaken by volunteers for eligible groups • Further support and community engagement in planning – training for parish councils in Warwickshire on how to comment more effectively on planning applications • Support communities to deliver neighbourhood planning – part of Locality consortium funded by DCLG 3
- 4. Supporting Communities inNeighbourhood Planning 2013-2015 4 • DCLG funded programme launched in April 2013 • Two main aspects to support: grants and direct support • Also a shared learning element • There is one consortium delivering the programme comprising Locality, Planning Aid, Community Development Foundation, Eden Project and URS • New DCLG funded programme from April 2015 • £22.5 million over three years to provide groups with expert advice, grants and technical assistance • Planning Aid won DCLG contract to develop suite of materials
- 5. Supporting Communities inNeighbourhood Planning Examples of groups receiving direct support include: • Welford-upon-Avon, Wootton Wawen and Stratford Town (Stratford-on-Avon District) • Austrey and Fillongley (North Warwickshire District) • Longdon and Burntwood (Lichfield District) • Market Bosworth (Hinckley and Bosworth District) • Braunston, Brixworth and Kilsby (Daventry District) • Marchington (East Staffordshire District) 5
- 6. What has PlanningAid been doing with groups? 6
- 7. Support from PlanningAid takes many forms! 7
- 8. Direct support forcommunities This might include: • Clarifying statutory process and preparing a project plan • Working with key partners, especially local planning authority • Evidence gathering including community engagement • Identifying key issues, creating a vision and objectives • Meeting the basic conditions e.g. conforming with local plan • Assessing sites for development • Drafting the plan and writing policies • Preparing a sustainability appraisal/SEA • Drafting engagement and basic condition statements 8
- 9. Project Planning • Groupshave problems with this because they don’t understand the statutory process • They don’t know what they don’t know! • Not sure of time required for different tasks • A simple key tasks list with indicative dates should be drawn up early in process • Recommend PAS spreadsheet 9
- 10. Community engagement • Groupssometimes believe that the only evidence needed is local opinion, which is their understanding of localism • Have to explain that whilst important, community views may be anecdotal evidence that prompts further research • How representative are the Parish Council and Steering Group? Are the respondents representative? • Have to highlight need to be open minded and address issues arising over the entire plan period 10
- 11. Key principles ofcommunity engagement Have to remind groups that consultation should: • be front loaded with an open mind • raise confidence and skills of the community • raise awareness of what the plan can and cannot do • manage expectations • be inclusive and accessible to all • adopt a systematic approach • consider a community engagement strategy • construct a profile of the community and key stakeholders • adopt creative techniques! 11
- 12. Understanding the needfor evidence A group will: • Need signposting to existing sources of information • Need help with bespoke surveys e.g. housing need • Often provide good information for context but don’t always apply it to policy justification e.g. local history • Sometimes worth undertaking an evidence review for groups 12
- 13. Assessing sites ina neighbourhood plan • Groups need to understand the implications of the adopted Local Plan and have regard to any housing requirement in emerging Local Plan • SHLAA often misunderstood – seen as allocations • Approach to allocating sites varies around country • Some groups have identified sites but need to understand they need a robust methodology dealing with suitability, availability, deliverability and viability • Others adopted criteria based policies • Need to agree housing requirement and approach with LPA • Could trigger need for SEA 13
- 14. 14 Evidence gathering Community engagement Research and fact finding Identifyissues and options Create vision Objective Objective Objective Policies and proposals Policies and proposals Reasoned justification Reasoned justification Reasoned justification Policies and proposals
- 15. Key rules forwriting policies Explain to groups that policies should be: • appropriate for a neighbourhood planning document and relate to development and the use of land • consistent with the Framework and the local plan • positively written • viable • clear and unambiguous in plain English • capable of having the desired impact within the timescale covered by the neighbourhood plan • based on a robust evidence base
- 16. Policy Stance SuitabilityIs it in broad conformity? Does it replicate what is elsewhere? Does it achieve sustainable development? Does it have a robust evidence base? What is the policy or proposal trying to achieve? Appropriate for a neighbourhood development plan or aspirational project? Positively written? Clear and unambiguous? Capable of having the desired impact within the plan period? National Planning Policy Framework? Planning Practice Guidance? Adopted Local Plan? Emerging Local Plan? Does it have a positive or negative impact on economic factors? Does it have a positive or negative impact on social factors? Does it have a positive or negative impact on environmental factors? What is the supporting justification? Source of evidence or research? Comments from community engagement?
- 17. Case studies • Holbeck:neighbourhood planning as tool for regeneration • Lawrence Weston: neighbourhood planning and community engagement • Friends of Fishwick and St Matthew's (FOFS): dealing with non-planning issues • Leeds: a case study about a local authority's role in neighbourhood planning • Peakirk: a case study about communicating your neighbourhood plan • Balsall Heath: a case study about the process and demands of consultation • Whitchurch: using traffic studies as part of the evidence base • Birdham: a case study about policy writing • Kirdford: a case study about neighbourhood planning examination • Ashurst Wood: a case study about site assessment • Headcorn: gathering evidence for your neighbourhood plan using surveys • Woodcote: how robust project management can help deliver a neighbourhood plan • Cringleford: a case study about neighbourhood planning in a growth area • Queen Camel: a case study of involving volunteers 17
- 18. What research amongstgroups has indicated? 18
- 19. User Experience ofNeighbourhood Planning Research (June 2014) Drivers and motivations for preparing plans: • Reinvigorating the local area • Protecting the desirable characteristics of the area • Help shape a future vision for the neighbourhood • Greater say in planning and development in their area • Statutory weight a neighbourhood plan provides • Control over the process 19
- 20. User Experience ofNeighbourhood Planning Research (June 2014) Overall experience of neighbourhood planning: • 55% thought process was what they expected • Over 90% felt it had gone well or okay • Majority had overcome difficulties, often with consultant or local authority support • Overall it was regarded as initiative with merit and further potential, although not without difficulties and opportunities 20
- 21. User Experience ofNeighbourhood Planning Research (June 2014) What would make it more attractive to communities? • Half wanted a better explanation of the process • 44% wanted more face to face advice • 39% felt faster process would make more attractive • Evidence strongly suggests that neighbourhood planning can be undertaken by most communities if effectively supported, especially by local authority 21
- 22. What are thelessons to be learnt? 22
- 23. Communities preparing neighbourhoodplans • Groups engaged in neighbourhood planning include inner city areas, market towns and settlements in National Parks • Mix of Forum, Town Councils and Parish Councils • Most interest amongst rural communities, especially those with development pressures • Less interest in urban areas, especially deprived areas • The size, characteristics, issues and motivations vary • Rural areas often motivated because of development pressures – but then consider wider issues such as ageing population, affordable housing, loss of facilities • Urban areas more interested in regeneration 23
- 24. Local planning authorityrole • A key partner! • Agree neighbourhood area, organise examination, and arrange referendum • The duty to support might also include: – technical advice and support on neighbourhood planning – provide or direct group to background data/evidence – identify key stakeholders and addresses – advice on adopted and emerging Local Plan policies – comment on initial drafts of neighbourhood plan – screen for Strategic Environmental Assessment 24
- 25. What else canlocal authorities do to help? 25 • Understanding difference between strategic policy and what can be developed at neighbourhood level • Determining patterns/extent of growth that the plan will need to respond to • Providing comments on early ideas for policy areas • Committing to attend number of group meetings • Keeping groups aware/enabling access to emerging new evidence if local plan is being reviewed. • Providing consistency and clarity throughout the process • Encourage Development Management Team to comment on emerging policy
- 26. We are allstill learning! • Judicial Reviews • Some inconsistencies • What is proportionate evidence? • Implications of out of date Local Plan • Delays at Local Plan examination • Timing of submission 26
- 27. Some Lessons Learned • It’snot for everyone! • It’s not an easy or short process! • Raised understanding of planning system and empathy with LPA • Has made a tangible difference to decision making – Planning applications – Appeals • People are interested! – Turnout often in excess of local elections – Overwhelming YES votes 27
- 28. 20 Contact Details [email protected] PAE AdviceLine: 0330 123 9244 E-mail: [email protected] www.rtpi.org.uk/planningaid To volunteer: http://www.rtpi.org.uk/planning-aid/volunteering/how- to-apply/