International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD)
Volume 8 Issue 2, March-April 2024 Available Online: www.ijtsrd.com e-ISSN: 2456 – 6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD64640 | Volume – 8 | Issue – 2 | Mar-Apr 2024 Page 423
Pre-extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Common-Bean
Technology in Low Land of East Hararghe Zone, Oromia
Abdulaziz Teha, Oromia Megersa, Bedasso Urgessa
Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Fedis Agricultural Research Centre, Harar, Ethiopia
ABSTRACT
Pre-extension demonstration of common bean technologies was
conducted at Fedis and Babile districts of the East Hararghe zone.
One FRG from kebele was established and 10 trial farmers. Both
varieties were sown on 10m*10m plot size with full package
technology. Farmers were trained by researchers. After the provision
of training, farmers were sown on their farms, and regular follow-ups
were undertaken by researchers. The yield performance of the
improved varieties (Awash-2 and serie-125) were 18.26, 23.64 qt/ha
at Ifadin and 20.46, 23.64 qt/ha at Riski kebele respectively. The
result showed that there is a statistically significant difference at 5%
probability level between Awash-2 and serie-125 variety and also
serie-125 has 22.5% yield advantage over Aawash-2. Therefore, it is
better to pre-scale up Awash-2 for the study area and similar
agroecologies because of its color, market demand, and market price
though its yield is lower than serie-125.
KEYWORDS: Demonstration, Common bean, FRG, Evaluation,
Technology
How to cite this paper: Abdulaziz Teha |
Oromia Megersa | Bedasso Urgessa
"Pre-extension Demonstration and
Evaluation of Common-Bean
Technology in Low Land of East
Hararghe Zone,
Oromia" Published
in International
Journal of Trend in
Scientific Research
and Development
(ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-
6470, Volume-8 |
Issue-2, April 2024, pp.423-426, URL:
www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd64640.pdf
Copyright © 2024 by author (s) and
International Journal of Trend in
Scientific Research and Development
Journal. This is an
Open Access article
distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (CC BY 4.0)
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
INTRODUCTION
Ethiopia is one of the top twelve producers of total
pulse in the world, the third-largest producer of
haricot bean in COMESA member countries, and the
leading exporter in Africa (Agitu, 2014). However,
despite their importance from a community
perspective, caloric intake from consumption of
pulses and oilseeds combined was reported at 9% for
rural and 14% for urban communities (Kebebu, et al.,
2013; Roba, et al., 2015). Of a total of 12.4 million
hectares of farmland in Ethiopia, the majority is used
for the production of cereals (9.16 million hectares); a
relatively small area is seeded to pulses 1.41 million
hectares (FAO, 2019). The current national average
productivity of haricot bean in Ethiopia is 1.48 tons
per hectare which is below average research
demonstrated productivity potential (3.4 tons per
hectare) in the country (Mulugeta et al., 2015). This is
attributed to the combined effects of edaphic,
climatic, disease, and pest problems and the lack of
improved varieties is one of the top problems for low
yield (Gurmu, 2013).
Haricot bean is one of the pulse crops considered the
main cash crop and protein source of many lowlands
and mid-altitude zones of Ethiopia and the crop has a
high nutritional value with important protein contents
(22%), minerals (calcium, copper, iron, magnesium,
manganese, zinc), and vitamins necessary to warrant
the food security of people (Wondimu et al., 2017
and Kabata et al., 2017). The crop is widely grown in
areas between 1400-2000 m.a.s.l. The main
production areas include East Hararghe, West
Wollega, East Shewa, West Arsi, Sidama, Wolayita,
Wollo, and East Gojam (EIAR, 2014).In East
Hararghe haricot-bean is the most important pulse
crop that farmers cultivate as intercropping with
sorghum, maize, and even in some areas in sole.
However, the lack of improved varieties which can
stand with variable climate conditions is the challenge
farmers face. Therefore, this proposal is initiated to
curtail the challenges farmers face in lacking
improved Haricot bean varieties with the
recommended packages.
IJTSRD64640
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD64640 | Volume – 8 | Issue – 2 | Mar-Apr 2024 Page 424
Objectives
 To evaluate the productivity and profitability of
common bean Technology under farmers’
conditions.
 To create awareness among farmers,
developmental agents, and subject matter
specialists on improved common bean production
technology.
 To collect farmers' and stakeholders' feedback
regarding the technologies
Materials and Methods
This pre-extension demonstration of common bean
was conducted in the Fedis and Babile districts of
East Hararghe Zone.
Description of the study area
Fedis district has a latitude between 8°22’ and 9°14’
North and a longitude between 42°02’ and 42°19’
East, in middle and low land areas: altitude range is
from 1200 – 1600m.a.s.l, with a prevalence of low
lands. The area receives an average annual rainfall of
400 - 804 mm. The minimum and maximum
temperature of the area is 20 – 25o
C and 30 – 35o
C,
respectively. The population’s livelihood mainly
consists of agriculture, husbandry, and small-scale
trade. The farm units are small family holdings with
an average agricultural land area of less than one
hectare. Agriculture is mainly rain-fed. The cropping
system is classified as intensive with cereal mono-
cropping mainly sorghum and maize.
Babile is located at a distance of 31 km from Harar in
the direction of the country’s Eastern part. It is
bordered by Gursum in the Northern, Fedis in the
South, Sumale region in the eastern, Harari region
and Fedis in the western, and Jarso in the
Northwestern. Erer Ibada located on distance of 33
km from Harar and Erer Ibada is located at 09̊ 10̍ 41.5̋̍
North of latitude, 042̊ 15̍ 27.3̋ East of longitude and
elevation of 1274m a.s.l. The physical property of the
soil in the study area is sandy loam (the majority of
the soil in the study area is sandy and an equal
proportion of silt and clay is known as sandy loam).
The climatic condition of this area is almost dry land.
It has a bimodal nature of rainfall. The socio-
economic characteristic of the population in the study
area depends on subsistence agriculture. These study
areas have the potential for the production of
horticultural crops both during the main (rainy)
season and off-season (Belg).
Site and Farmers Selection
Fedis and Babile districts were purposively selected
based on their potential in pulse and oil production.
Ifadin and Riski were selected purposively based on
the potentiality, and appropriateness of the area by
considering lodging, slop’s land escape, access to
road, and suit for repeatable monitoring and
evaluation in the progress of sowing to harvesting.
The selected farmers were grouped in the form of
Farmers Research Group (FRG) with members of 15
(3 male trial farmers and 2 female trial farmers) and
10 farmers working with trial farmers.
Table 1: Selected site and farmers with area
coverage of the experiment
District Kebele
No. of trial
farmers
Area
covered
Fedis
Babile
Riski
Ifadin
5
5
10mx 10m
for each plot
Total 10
Technology evaluation and demonstration
methods/technique
The evaluation and demonstration of the trials were
conducted on farmers’ fields to create awareness
about common bean production. The evaluation and
demonstration of the trials followed process
demonstration approach by involving FRGs,
development agents, and experts at different growth
stages of the crop. The activity was jointly monitored
by FRGs, researchers, experts, and development
agents.
Experimental design
Two improved treatments (Awash-2 & Serie-125)
were replicated across five trial farmers per kebele.
Two improved varieties were sown on 10 trial
farmers' land. 10m*10m plot size of land used from
individual trial farmers for each variety. Each variety
is planted at a spacing of 40cm between rows and 10
cm between plants. Fertilizer rate of 100 kg NPS/ha
and seed rate of 100kg/ha.
Data Collection
Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected
through personal field observation, individual
interviews, and Focus Group discussions using a
checklist and datasheet. The number of farmers who
participated in FRG, yield performance, economic
data, and number of stakeholders who participated in
the training were quantitative data collected while
farmers’ perceptions towards the new technology
were qualitative data collected.
Data analysis
Quantitative data was summarized using simple
descriptive statistics (mean, frequency, and
percentage) while the qualitative data collected using
group discussion, field observation, and individual
interviews was analyzed using narrative explanation
and argument. Data from different sources were
triangulated to get reliable information.
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD64640 | Volume – 8 | Issue – 2 | Mar-Apr 2024 Page 425
Results and Discussion
Agronomic and yield performance
The following table describes the yield performances of the demonstratedAwash-2 and Serie-125 common bean
varieties across the study sites. The yield performance of the improved Awash-2 variety and serie-125 were
18.26, 23.64, 20.46, and 23.64 qt/ha at Ifadin and Riski kebeles respectively.
Table 2: Yield performance of improved varieties across Districts
Kebele Varieties N Std. Deviation Mean (qt/ha) Maximum Minimum
Ifadin
Awash-2 5 1.39 18.26 20.00 16.40
Serie-125 5 2.40 23.64 27.00 20.80
Riski
Awash-2 5 2.25 20.46 23.00 18.00
Serie-125 5 2.40 23.64 27.00 20.80
Total 10 2.86 21.06 27.00 16.40
The average yield performance of Serie-125 is higher than Awash-2 at Ifadin and Riski.
Independent sample t-test
Table 3: Sample t-test
Test for equal variances t-test for equality of means
F Sig. t df
Sig.
(2tailed)
Mean
difference
Std. Error
Differences
Equal variances assumed 6.94 .030 2.76 8 .025 3.64 1.31
Statistically significant difference at 5% probability level
Yield Advantage
The yield advantage of the demonstrated varieties was calculated using the following formula.
Yield advantage % = Yield advantage of new variety – Yield advantage of st; check X 100
Yield advantage of standard check
Table 4: Yield Advantage
Varieties Average yield qt/ha Yield difference qt/ha Yield advantage over the standard check (%)
Awash-2 19.45 4.2 21.5
Serie-125 23.64
Economic Analysis
Table 5: Financial analysis for Common bean varieties across the districts
Financial analysis
Location: Babile Location: Fedis
Parameters
Varieties Varieties
Awash-2 Serie-125 Awash-2 Serie-125
Yield qt/ha(Y) 18.26 23.64 20.46 23.64
Price(P) per quintal 6000 4000 6000 4000
Total Revenue (TR)=TR=Y*P 109,560 94,560 122,760 94,560
Variable costs
Seed cost 5,500 4,000 5,500 4,000
Fertilizer cost 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800
Labor cost 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000
Total Variable costs(TVC) 24,300 22,800 24,300 22,800
Fixed costs
Cost of land 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000
Total fixed costs (TFC) 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000
Total cost (TC) =TVC+TFC
Gross Margin (GM) = TR - TVC 85,000 71,760 98,460 71,760
Profit=GM-TFC 79,000 65,760 92,460 65,760
Farmers’ Perception
Farmers in the study area selected the best-performing common bean varieties by using their criteria. Farmers set
these criteria after having know-how about the variety and using those criteria they could select the varieties at
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD64640 | Volume – 8 | Issue – 2 | Mar-Apr 2024 Page 426
harvest time. The opinion of those farmers on varietal preference was collected from participants during the
varieties demonstration. The major criteria used by farmers were maturity, yield, disease tolerance, seed/grain
color, market demand, and market price
Table 6 Ranks of the varieties based on farmers’ selection criteria
Varieties Farmers rank Reasons
Awash-2 1st Medium maturity, high yield, better disease tolerance, white in
seed/grain color, high market demand, high market price
Serie-125 2nd Medium maturity, high yield, better disease tolerance, Red in
seed/grain color, medium market demand, medium market price
Conclusion and Recommendation
The yield of the improved varieties (Aawash-2 and
serie-125) was 18.26, 23.64 20.46, and 23.64 qt/ha at
Ifadin and Riski Kebeles respectively. The average
yield performance of Serie-125 and Awash-2 at both
locations statistically significant differences at 5%
significance level. It is better to disseminate the
variety that has market demand, better market price,
and good color variety for scaling up to enhance
dissemination. Therefore, the agricultural research
center and agriculture office should work in
collaboration on the Awash-2 variety in the study area
and similar agroecology for further promotion.
References
[1] Agete J. 2014. Analysis of factors influencing
participation of smallholder farmers in red bean
marketing in Halaba special district, Ethiopia.
MSc Thesis. University of Nairobi, Kenya, p:
109.
[2] FAO (2019).Special Report Fao/Wfp Crop and
Food Security Assessment Mission to Ethiopia.
FAO/WFP.
[3] Gurmu F (2013) Assessment of farmers’
criteria for common bean variety selection: The
case of Umbullo watershed in Sidama zone of
the southern region of Ethiopia. Ethiopian e-
journal for Research and Innovation Foresight
5: 4-13.
[4] Kabata A, Henry C, Moges D, Kebebu A,
Whiting S, et al. (2017) Determinants and
constraints of pulse production and
consumption among farming households of
Ethiopia. Journal of Food Research 6: 41-49.
[5] Kebebu, A., Whiting, S. J., Dahl, W. J., Henry,
C. J., & Kebede, A. (2013). Formulation and
acceptability testing of a complementary food
with added broad bean (Viciafaba) in southern
Ethiopia. African Journal of Food Agriculture
Nutrition and Development, 13(3).
[6] Kebede B, Korji D, Amare G (2018)
Participatory Evaluation and Selection of
Improved Haricot bean Varieties at Liben
District, Lowland Agro Ecology of Guji Zone,
Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Adv Crop Sci
Tech 6: 332. doi:10.4172/2329-8863.1000332
[7] Mulugeta A, Tesfaye K, Dagne K (2015). The
importance of legumes in the Ethiopian farming
system and overall economy: An overview.
American Journal of Experimental Agriculture
7: 347-358.
[8] Roba, A. C., Gebremichael, K., Zello, G.A.,
Whiting, S.J.,& Henry, C.J. (2015). Nutritional
status and dietary intakes of rural adolescent
girls in southern Ethiopia. Ecology of Food and
Nutrition, 54(3),240 54.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.2014.974593
Burman, R., Singh, S.K., Singh, L., & Singh,
A.
[9] Wondimu W, Bogale A (2017) Genetic
Variability, Heritability and Genetic Advance
of Some: Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris
L.)Varieties at Bench-Maji Zone, Southwest
Ethiopia: Asian Journal of Crop Science 9: 133-
140.

Pre extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Common Bean Technology in Low Land of East Hararghe Zone, Oromia

  • 1.
    International Journal ofTrend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) Volume 8 Issue 2, March-April 2024 Available Online: www.ijtsrd.com e-ISSN: 2456 – 6470 @ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD64640 | Volume – 8 | Issue – 2 | Mar-Apr 2024 Page 423 Pre-extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Common-Bean Technology in Low Land of East Hararghe Zone, Oromia Abdulaziz Teha, Oromia Megersa, Bedasso Urgessa Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Fedis Agricultural Research Centre, Harar, Ethiopia ABSTRACT Pre-extension demonstration of common bean technologies was conducted at Fedis and Babile districts of the East Hararghe zone. One FRG from kebele was established and 10 trial farmers. Both varieties were sown on 10m*10m plot size with full package technology. Farmers were trained by researchers. After the provision of training, farmers were sown on their farms, and regular follow-ups were undertaken by researchers. The yield performance of the improved varieties (Awash-2 and serie-125) were 18.26, 23.64 qt/ha at Ifadin and 20.46, 23.64 qt/ha at Riski kebele respectively. The result showed that there is a statistically significant difference at 5% probability level between Awash-2 and serie-125 variety and also serie-125 has 22.5% yield advantage over Aawash-2. Therefore, it is better to pre-scale up Awash-2 for the study area and similar agroecologies because of its color, market demand, and market price though its yield is lower than serie-125. KEYWORDS: Demonstration, Common bean, FRG, Evaluation, Technology How to cite this paper: Abdulaziz Teha | Oromia Megersa | Bedasso Urgessa "Pre-extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Common-Bean Technology in Low Land of East Hararghe Zone, Oromia" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456- 6470, Volume-8 | Issue-2, April 2024, pp.423-426, URL: www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd64640.pdf Copyright © 2024 by author (s) and International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development Journal. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) INTRODUCTION Ethiopia is one of the top twelve producers of total pulse in the world, the third-largest producer of haricot bean in COMESA member countries, and the leading exporter in Africa (Agitu, 2014). However, despite their importance from a community perspective, caloric intake from consumption of pulses and oilseeds combined was reported at 9% for rural and 14% for urban communities (Kebebu, et al., 2013; Roba, et al., 2015). Of a total of 12.4 million hectares of farmland in Ethiopia, the majority is used for the production of cereals (9.16 million hectares); a relatively small area is seeded to pulses 1.41 million hectares (FAO, 2019). The current national average productivity of haricot bean in Ethiopia is 1.48 tons per hectare which is below average research demonstrated productivity potential (3.4 tons per hectare) in the country (Mulugeta et al., 2015). This is attributed to the combined effects of edaphic, climatic, disease, and pest problems and the lack of improved varieties is one of the top problems for low yield (Gurmu, 2013). Haricot bean is one of the pulse crops considered the main cash crop and protein source of many lowlands and mid-altitude zones of Ethiopia and the crop has a high nutritional value with important protein contents (22%), minerals (calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, zinc), and vitamins necessary to warrant the food security of people (Wondimu et al., 2017 and Kabata et al., 2017). The crop is widely grown in areas between 1400-2000 m.a.s.l. The main production areas include East Hararghe, West Wollega, East Shewa, West Arsi, Sidama, Wolayita, Wollo, and East Gojam (EIAR, 2014).In East Hararghe haricot-bean is the most important pulse crop that farmers cultivate as intercropping with sorghum, maize, and even in some areas in sole. However, the lack of improved varieties which can stand with variable climate conditions is the challenge farmers face. Therefore, this proposal is initiated to curtail the challenges farmers face in lacking improved Haricot bean varieties with the recommended packages. IJTSRD64640
  • 2.
    International Journal ofTrend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470 @ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD64640 | Volume – 8 | Issue – 2 | Mar-Apr 2024 Page 424 Objectives  To evaluate the productivity and profitability of common bean Technology under farmers’ conditions.  To create awareness among farmers, developmental agents, and subject matter specialists on improved common bean production technology.  To collect farmers' and stakeholders' feedback regarding the technologies Materials and Methods This pre-extension demonstration of common bean was conducted in the Fedis and Babile districts of East Hararghe Zone. Description of the study area Fedis district has a latitude between 8°22’ and 9°14’ North and a longitude between 42°02’ and 42°19’ East, in middle and low land areas: altitude range is from 1200 – 1600m.a.s.l, with a prevalence of low lands. The area receives an average annual rainfall of 400 - 804 mm. The minimum and maximum temperature of the area is 20 – 25o C and 30 – 35o C, respectively. The population’s livelihood mainly consists of agriculture, husbandry, and small-scale trade. The farm units are small family holdings with an average agricultural land area of less than one hectare. Agriculture is mainly rain-fed. The cropping system is classified as intensive with cereal mono- cropping mainly sorghum and maize. Babile is located at a distance of 31 km from Harar in the direction of the country’s Eastern part. It is bordered by Gursum in the Northern, Fedis in the South, Sumale region in the eastern, Harari region and Fedis in the western, and Jarso in the Northwestern. Erer Ibada located on distance of 33 km from Harar and Erer Ibada is located at 09̊ 10̍ 41.5̋̍ North of latitude, 042̊ 15̍ 27.3̋ East of longitude and elevation of 1274m a.s.l. The physical property of the soil in the study area is sandy loam (the majority of the soil in the study area is sandy and an equal proportion of silt and clay is known as sandy loam). The climatic condition of this area is almost dry land. It has a bimodal nature of rainfall. The socio- economic characteristic of the population in the study area depends on subsistence agriculture. These study areas have the potential for the production of horticultural crops both during the main (rainy) season and off-season (Belg). Site and Farmers Selection Fedis and Babile districts were purposively selected based on their potential in pulse and oil production. Ifadin and Riski were selected purposively based on the potentiality, and appropriateness of the area by considering lodging, slop’s land escape, access to road, and suit for repeatable monitoring and evaluation in the progress of sowing to harvesting. The selected farmers were grouped in the form of Farmers Research Group (FRG) with members of 15 (3 male trial farmers and 2 female trial farmers) and 10 farmers working with trial farmers. Table 1: Selected site and farmers with area coverage of the experiment District Kebele No. of trial farmers Area covered Fedis Babile Riski Ifadin 5 5 10mx 10m for each plot Total 10 Technology evaluation and demonstration methods/technique The evaluation and demonstration of the trials were conducted on farmers’ fields to create awareness about common bean production. The evaluation and demonstration of the trials followed process demonstration approach by involving FRGs, development agents, and experts at different growth stages of the crop. The activity was jointly monitored by FRGs, researchers, experts, and development agents. Experimental design Two improved treatments (Awash-2 & Serie-125) were replicated across five trial farmers per kebele. Two improved varieties were sown on 10 trial farmers' land. 10m*10m plot size of land used from individual trial farmers for each variety. Each variety is planted at a spacing of 40cm between rows and 10 cm between plants. Fertilizer rate of 100 kg NPS/ha and seed rate of 100kg/ha. Data Collection Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected through personal field observation, individual interviews, and Focus Group discussions using a checklist and datasheet. The number of farmers who participated in FRG, yield performance, economic data, and number of stakeholders who participated in the training were quantitative data collected while farmers’ perceptions towards the new technology were qualitative data collected. Data analysis Quantitative data was summarized using simple descriptive statistics (mean, frequency, and percentage) while the qualitative data collected using group discussion, field observation, and individual interviews was analyzed using narrative explanation and argument. Data from different sources were triangulated to get reliable information.
  • 3.
    International Journal ofTrend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470 @ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD64640 | Volume – 8 | Issue – 2 | Mar-Apr 2024 Page 425 Results and Discussion Agronomic and yield performance The following table describes the yield performances of the demonstratedAwash-2 and Serie-125 common bean varieties across the study sites. The yield performance of the improved Awash-2 variety and serie-125 were 18.26, 23.64, 20.46, and 23.64 qt/ha at Ifadin and Riski kebeles respectively. Table 2: Yield performance of improved varieties across Districts Kebele Varieties N Std. Deviation Mean (qt/ha) Maximum Minimum Ifadin Awash-2 5 1.39 18.26 20.00 16.40 Serie-125 5 2.40 23.64 27.00 20.80 Riski Awash-2 5 2.25 20.46 23.00 18.00 Serie-125 5 2.40 23.64 27.00 20.80 Total 10 2.86 21.06 27.00 16.40 The average yield performance of Serie-125 is higher than Awash-2 at Ifadin and Riski. Independent sample t-test Table 3: Sample t-test Test for equal variances t-test for equality of means F Sig. t df Sig. (2tailed) Mean difference Std. Error Differences Equal variances assumed 6.94 .030 2.76 8 .025 3.64 1.31 Statistically significant difference at 5% probability level Yield Advantage The yield advantage of the demonstrated varieties was calculated using the following formula. Yield advantage % = Yield advantage of new variety – Yield advantage of st; check X 100 Yield advantage of standard check Table 4: Yield Advantage Varieties Average yield qt/ha Yield difference qt/ha Yield advantage over the standard check (%) Awash-2 19.45 4.2 21.5 Serie-125 23.64 Economic Analysis Table 5: Financial analysis for Common bean varieties across the districts Financial analysis Location: Babile Location: Fedis Parameters Varieties Varieties Awash-2 Serie-125 Awash-2 Serie-125 Yield qt/ha(Y) 18.26 23.64 20.46 23.64 Price(P) per quintal 6000 4000 6000 4000 Total Revenue (TR)=TR=Y*P 109,560 94,560 122,760 94,560 Variable costs Seed cost 5,500 4,000 5,500 4,000 Fertilizer cost 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 Labor cost 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Total Variable costs(TVC) 24,300 22,800 24,300 22,800 Fixed costs Cost of land 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Total fixed costs (TFC) 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Total cost (TC) =TVC+TFC Gross Margin (GM) = TR - TVC 85,000 71,760 98,460 71,760 Profit=GM-TFC 79,000 65,760 92,460 65,760 Farmers’ Perception Farmers in the study area selected the best-performing common bean varieties by using their criteria. Farmers set these criteria after having know-how about the variety and using those criteria they could select the varieties at
  • 4.
    International Journal ofTrend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470 @ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD64640 | Volume – 8 | Issue – 2 | Mar-Apr 2024 Page 426 harvest time. The opinion of those farmers on varietal preference was collected from participants during the varieties demonstration. The major criteria used by farmers were maturity, yield, disease tolerance, seed/grain color, market demand, and market price Table 6 Ranks of the varieties based on farmers’ selection criteria Varieties Farmers rank Reasons Awash-2 1st Medium maturity, high yield, better disease tolerance, white in seed/grain color, high market demand, high market price Serie-125 2nd Medium maturity, high yield, better disease tolerance, Red in seed/grain color, medium market demand, medium market price Conclusion and Recommendation The yield of the improved varieties (Aawash-2 and serie-125) was 18.26, 23.64 20.46, and 23.64 qt/ha at Ifadin and Riski Kebeles respectively. The average yield performance of Serie-125 and Awash-2 at both locations statistically significant differences at 5% significance level. It is better to disseminate the variety that has market demand, better market price, and good color variety for scaling up to enhance dissemination. Therefore, the agricultural research center and agriculture office should work in collaboration on the Awash-2 variety in the study area and similar agroecology for further promotion. References [1] Agete J. 2014. Analysis of factors influencing participation of smallholder farmers in red bean marketing in Halaba special district, Ethiopia. MSc Thesis. University of Nairobi, Kenya, p: 109. [2] FAO (2019).Special Report Fao/Wfp Crop and Food Security Assessment Mission to Ethiopia. FAO/WFP. [3] Gurmu F (2013) Assessment of farmers’ criteria for common bean variety selection: The case of Umbullo watershed in Sidama zone of the southern region of Ethiopia. Ethiopian e- journal for Research and Innovation Foresight 5: 4-13. [4] Kabata A, Henry C, Moges D, Kebebu A, Whiting S, et al. (2017) Determinants and constraints of pulse production and consumption among farming households of Ethiopia. Journal of Food Research 6: 41-49. [5] Kebebu, A., Whiting, S. J., Dahl, W. J., Henry, C. J., & Kebede, A. (2013). Formulation and acceptability testing of a complementary food with added broad bean (Viciafaba) in southern Ethiopia. African Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition and Development, 13(3). [6] Kebede B, Korji D, Amare G (2018) Participatory Evaluation and Selection of Improved Haricot bean Varieties at Liben District, Lowland Agro Ecology of Guji Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Adv Crop Sci Tech 6: 332. doi:10.4172/2329-8863.1000332 [7] Mulugeta A, Tesfaye K, Dagne K (2015). The importance of legumes in the Ethiopian farming system and overall economy: An overview. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture 7: 347-358. [8] Roba, A. C., Gebremichael, K., Zello, G.A., Whiting, S.J.,& Henry, C.J. (2015). Nutritional status and dietary intakes of rural adolescent girls in southern Ethiopia. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 54(3),240 54. https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.2014.974593 Burman, R., Singh, S.K., Singh, L., & Singh, A. [9] Wondimu W, Bogale A (2017) Genetic Variability, Heritability and Genetic Advance of Some: Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Varieties at Bench-Maji Zone, Southwest Ethiopia: Asian Journal of Crop Science 9: 133- 140.