Presenter-
Dr. Nisha Bharti
Corneal dystrophies are group of heterogeneous
slowly progressive, usually bilateral, mostly
genetically determined, non-inflammatory
opacifying disorders without any systemic and
environmental associations.
•Most of the corneal dystrophies begin in the early
decades of life and progress gradually. The effect of these
changes in some of the dystrophies may not be clinically
apparent till the later years.
•The underlying basis of all corneal dystrophies are genetic
mutations some of which have been mapped, while others
are yet to be identified.
• Most of these mutations result in the transcription of
aberrant proteins. These proteins are deposited in various
corneal layers and give rise to the characteristic clinical
features.
• The pace of deposition also determines the natural
history of the corneal dystrophy.
Drawbacks of older classification
•Certain dystrophies extend beyond these strict
anatomical demarcations like the Reis-Buckler
Corneal Dystrophy, which initially affects the
sub-epithelial area and Bowman’s layer and
later the anterior and deep stroma
•MCD affects both stroma and endothelium
•Based on pathological and clinical features
only
IC3D Classification of the Corneal
Dystophies
• Category 1: A well defined corneal dystrophy in which a
gene has been mapped and identified and specific
mutations are known.
• • Category 2: A well-defined corneal dystrophy that has
been mapped to one or more specific chromosomal loci,
but the gene (or genes) remains to be identified.
• • Category 3: A well-defined corneal dystrophy that has not
yet been mapped to a chromosomal locus.
• • Category 4: This category is reserved for suspected new
(or previously documented) corneal dystrophies, although
the evidence for such dystrophies being separate and
distinct is not yet convincing.
Advantages of newer classification
• flexibility:As information accumulates, all true
dystrophies should eventually reach category 1
• Or, some conditions that were once thought to be
independent dystrophies may be later proven to be a
variant of a different dystrophy. e.g Genetic and
histopathological studies of central discoid corneal
dystrophy have indicated that this condition is
actually Schnyder corneal dystrophy.
• The system also groups dystrophies together if they
have a common genetic relationship
• For example, there have been over 30 mutations in
the transforming growth factor beta-induced gene
(TGFBI) that have been found to cause types of lattice
corneal dystrophy and granular corneal dystrophy
•Bowmans and descemets layer were excluded
•Reclassified CHED type 1 as PPMD
•Included three types of ERED
•Removed Grayson –wilbrandt CD
•The current IC3D classification replaces the
traditional classification system with a new system:
epithelial and subepithelial dystrophies,
•epithelial-stromal TGFBI dystrophies,
• stromal dystrophies, and endothelial
dystrophies
Epithelial basement membrane dystrophy
eponyms -Map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy
Cogan microcystic epithelial dystrophy
Anterior basement membrane dystrophy
Inheritance- sporadic & rarely AD.
Histology- thickening of basement membrane with
deposition of fibrillary protein b/w basement
membrane & bowman’s layer. Absence of
hemidesmosomes of basal epithelial cells which is
responsible for recurrent corneal erosions.
Onset 2nd decade
10% of pts develop recurrent corneal erosions in 3rd
decade & others remain asymptomatic throughout
life.
Signs-
Dot like opacities
Epithelial
microcysts
Subepithelial map-like patterns surrounded by a
faint haze
Whorled fingerprint - like lines
•The geographic figures in this disorder are caused by
reduplications of basement membrane.
• Similar geographic reduplications of basement
membrane may be seen in the area of a healed
epithelial defect; therefore, these changes may
represent a response of the cornea to various insults
•Recurrent corneal erosion (RCE) is a common
complication of EBMD. If medical management of RCE
fails, phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) or epithelial
debridement and polishing of Bowman’s layer using a
diamond burr have been proven effective treatments.
Epithelial recurrent erosion dystrophy
(ERED)
• Epithelial recurrent erosion dystrophy (ERED) is
characterized by RCE that occurs spontaneously or after
minimal trauma.
• The attacks have been documented in patients as young as
eight months, but usually appear around four to six years of
age.
• In most cases, the attacks decline in frequency and
intensity by 50 years of age.
• But in the Smolandiensis variant, half of patients develop
progressive central subepithelial opacities as early as age
seven.
• In these cases, corneal erosions are treated medically, and
a corneal graft is needed in about one-fourth of patients.
Juvenile hereditary epithelial dystrophy; Stocker-
Holt variant
Very rare, non-progressive abnormality of
corneal epithelial metabolism, underlying
which mutations in the gene encoding
corneal epithelial keratins have been
reported.
Genetic Locus 12q13 (KRT3)and Gene -Keratin K3
Locus 17q12 (KRT12) Stocker–Holt variant
Keratin K12 – Stocker-Holt variant
Onset and course Early childhood. Stationary
or slowly progressive
Multiple tiny intra-epithelial vesicles extend to the limbus
and are more numerous in the interpalpebral area with
clear surrounding epithelium.
Whorled, wedged shaped opacities, cyst-like lesions or
refractile linear opacities.
In the Stocker-Holt variant the entire corneal is covered by
fine grayish opacities that are fluorescein positive with fine
linear lines in whorl pattern. It presents with more severe
signs and symptoms
Histology- irregular thickening of the epithelial
basement membrane & intraepithelial cysts
Symptoms are variable. Pts may be
asymptomatic or ocular irritation may begin
in the first few mnths of life.
Signs
 Myraid tiny intraepithelial cysts of uniform
size but variable density are maximal
centrally & extend towards but do not reach
the limbus
The cysts occasionally rupture onto the ocular
surface and can cause pain and decreased vision
due to scarring.
 Cornea may be slightly thinned & sensation
reduced.
- Treatment depends on severity, and can
include lubricants, therapeutic contacts,
Previously thought to be a variant of
meesmann, now believed to be genetically
distinct.
Inheritance is AD or X- linked dominant with
gene locus on Xp22.3 in the later in at least
some patients.
It is the only known corneal epithelial
dystrophy with X-chromosomal dominant
inheritance.
Signs
 Grey bands with a whorled configuration
 Retroillumination shows densely packed
Treatment
• Debridement of the corneal epithelium does
not prevent the opacities from recurring, but
rigid contact lenses have been shown to
lessen the number of opacities in some
patients
Rare disorder mainly affecting japanese patients
Inheritance is AR with gene locus at 1q32
Tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 2 (TACSTD2)
In this dystrophy, subepithelial gelatinous deposits
composed of amyloid form on the surface of the
cornea.
The corneal surface develops a "mulberry"
appearance. Symptoms of photophobia and
decreased vision begin in the first two decades of life.
The disorder recurs in corneal grafts.
• 4 types
• band keratopathy
• stromal opacity
• kumquat-like
• typical mulberry
Signs
 Grey subepithelial nodules
 Gradual confluence, stromal involvement &
increase in size giving rise to a mulberry like
appearance
In advanced cases there is stromal opacities with
large nodules and the cornea resembles the
kumquat fruit (kumquat-lesions).
Treatment is with repeated superficial
keratectomy because of early recurrences on
corneal grafts
• Contact lenses can help manage corneal
surface irregularities. Superficial
keratectomy (SK), LK, or PK have all been
used in treatment, but the dystrophy often
recurs within a few years. Limbal stem cell
transplantation, along with PK or LK, has
shown some success in preventing
recurrence.
Epithelial stromal (TGFb1)dystrophies
• Ries buckler
• Thiel behnke
• Lattice type1
• Granular type1
• Granular type2
• (All are category 1)
 Reis- Bucklers dystrophy
Inheritance is AD with gene locus on 5q31
(gene TGFB1)
Histology shows replacement of Bowman layer
& epithelial basement membrane with fibrous
tissue which stains red with Masson trichome
Onset is in 1st or 2nd decade with severe
recurrent corneal erosions.
Signs
 Grey-white, fine, round & polygonal
subepithelial opacities , most dense
centrally.
 Changes increase in density with age resulting
in a reticular pattern due to the laying down of
irregular bands of collagen replacing Bowman
layer.
these opacities extend into superficial then deep stroma
and also to the limbus. In advance cases the opacities
are denser and looks similar to curdled milk
appearance . There may be clear spaces within the
irregular opacities.
course of RBCD is often more aggressive than
 Corneal sensation is reduced & visual
impairment may occur due to scarring at level
of Bowman layer.
 Treatment is directed at recurrent erosions.
Therapeutic contact lenses,
medical management of RCE, SK,
PK, and PTK have all been used in
the treatment of RBCD, but
recurrence rates are high.
Mytomycin C may aid in preventing
recurrence when used in
conjunction with PTK in RBCD.
• Grayson-Wilbrandt Corneal Dystrophy (GWCD) is
described as having variable patterns of
opacification that extend anteriorly into the
epithelium, as well as refractile bodies in the
stroma. It is a good example of a category 4
dystrophy because there has only been one
publication that describes only a single family
with this condition, and the limited information
we have on this condition does not rule out the
possibility that it could be a variant of a better-
described dystrophy, such as RBCD
Inheritance is AD with gene locus on 10q24 &
5q31(geneTGFB1)
Histology shows curly fibres in Bowman layer
on electron microscopy
Onset is at end of 1st decade with recurrent
erosions
Signs : subepithelial opacities in a honeycomb
morphology involving central cornea
Treatment not required as visual impairment is
less than Reiss- Bucklers dystrophy
This corneal dystrophy is often confused with Reis-Blucklers' dystrophy because it
has a similar clinical appearance.
Both dystrophies are autosomal dominant with recurrent erosions starting early in
childhood.
The visual impairment in Thiel-Behnke dystrophy begins much later in life than the
visual impairment in Reis-Blucklers' dystrophy.
Transmission electron microscopy differentiates these two dystrophies. In Reis-
Blucklers' dystrophy rod-like bodies are seen in the region of Bowman's layer, and in
Thiel-Behnke dystrophy "curly" fibers are seen in the region of Bowman's layer.
Similar to Reis-Blucklers' dystrophy, Thiel-Behnke dystrophy is due to mutations in the
beta-transfoming growth factor-induced gene human clone 3 (BigH3) located on
chromosome 5, but the mutations occur with different amino acids at different sites
within the gene.
• SCHNYDER CENTRAL CRYSTALLINE
DYSTROPHY
Disorder of corneal lipid metabolism
associated with raised serum cholesterol in
approx 50% pts
Inheritance is AD with gene locus at 1q36
Signs
 Central, oval, subepithelial crystalline opacity
 Diffuse corneal haze & prominent corneal
arcus develop by 3rd decade
Treatment by excimer laser Keratectomy
Lattice corneal dystrophy type 1
Aka biber haab dimmer CD
 Inheritance is AD with locus at 5q31 (gene
TGFB1)
 Histology shows amyloid, staining with congo
red & exhibiting characteristic green
birefringence when viewed with a polarizing
filter
Onset is at end of 1st decade with recurrent
erosions which precede typical stromal
changes, progressive with marked
reduction in vision by 4th decade
Signs
 Anterior stromal, glassy, refractile dots
 Coalescence into fine lattice lines, best seen
on retroillumination
 Deep & outward spread sparing the periphery
Initially the stroma between lines is clear but
later ground glass apperance develops
 Corneal sensation is reduced
 Treatment by penetrating or deep lamellar
keratoplasty is frequently required.
Recurrence in graft may occur.
Histology shows subepithelial & anterior stromal
accumulation of amyloid
Onset is within 1st & 2nd decades with severe
photophobia, watering & visual impairement
LCD type 1 vs type 2
• LCD1 is a more common corneal dystrophy found in a variety of Asian
and European populations, where LCD2 is more rare and found mostly
in people of Finnish decent.
• The classic refractile lines or dots are seen in both disorders, but in
LCD1, they generally are more prominent centrally and leave the
peripheral 1mm of cornea spared, whereas in LCD2, they are more
peripheral and less numerous.
• Ocular signs and symptoms in LCD1 are generally notable within the
first decade of life, while LCD2 generally becomes apparent after the
age of 20.
• In LCD1, recurrent erosions are common, and visual deterioration
often requires corneal transplantation after the fourth decade of life.
Recurrence generally occurs in grafts two to 14 years later.
• Corneal transplantation is rarely indicated in LCD2; neurotrophic
persistent epithelial defects after PK have been described. LK and PTK
can also be used in the treatment of LCD1, but as with PK, the
dystrophy eventually recurs.
Inheritance is AD with gene locus at 5q31
Gene TGFB1
Histology shows amorphous hyaline deposits
which stain bright red with masson trichrome
Onset is in 1st decade but vision is usually not
affected in early stage of disease
Very slow progression
GRANULAR DYSTROPHY CLASSIC type 1
Signs
 Small, white, sharply demarcated deposits
resembling crumbs, sugar granules, rings or
snowflakes in central anterior stroma
 Overall pattern of deposition is radial or disc
shaped or may be in the form of a christmas
tree
 Initially the stroma b/w the opacities is clear
 Gradual increase in number & size of deposits
with deeper & outward spread but not
reaching the limbus
 Corneal sensation is impaired
Treatment by penetrating or deep lamellar
keratopasty is usually required by 5th decade.
Superficial recurrences may require repeated
excimer laser keratectomy
GRANULAR DYSTROPHY TYPE 2
• Avellino dystrophy
• Combined granular-lattice dystrophy
• Autosomal dominant
• Genetic locus 5q31 , TGFB1
• Onset -Early Childhood,Slowly progressive
• Vision is affected only late when opacities
affect the visual axis. Sometimes epithelial
erosions occur
• Well defined white granular opacities like
bread-crumb with star-shaped peripheries,
central clear areas within the white opacities.
There are lattice lines, which are short, dash-
like, less refractile and do not intersect each
other
• Deposition of both hyaline and amyloid
material in the corneal stroma that stain with
Masson trichrome and Congo red
 systemic inborn error of keratin sulphate
metabolism seems to have only corneal
manifestations
 Divided in type 1, 1A & 2 depending on the
presence or absence of antigenic keratan
sulphate in the serum & cornea, these have
been shown to be due to mutations in same
sulphotransferase gene (CHST6)
Inheritance is AR with gene locus at 16q22
Histology shows abnormally close packing at
collagen in corneal lamellae & abnormal
aggregations of GAG intra and
extracellularly which stain with prussian
blue & colloidal iron
Onset is toward end of 1st decade with
Profound visual impairment in late childhood and
early adult life.
Signs
 Anterior stromal haze involving central
cornea
 Greyish- white, dense, focal, poorly
delineated spots in anterior stroma centrally
& posterior stroma in the periphery
 Superficial deposits may produce an
irregularity of the corneal surface, although
recurrent erosions are unusual
 Increase in size & stromal haze
 Increasing opacification with eventual
involvement of full-thickness stroma up to
the limbus.
The cornea is thin.
Treatment by penetrating keratoplasty is
successful but late recurrences on the graft
may occur
Fuchs endothelial dystrophy
 Bilateral accelerated endothelial cell loss
 More common in women
 Associated with slight increased prevalence of
open angle glaucoma
Inheritance AD although majority are sporadic
Onset slowly progressive disease is commonly
in old age, although earlier onset can occur
Signs
 Cornea guttata refers to irregular warts or
excrescences of Descemet membrane
secreted by abnormal endothelial cells
 Specular reflection shows tiny dark spots caused
by disruption of regular endothelial mosaic
 Progression occurs to a beaten metal appearance
In the natural course of the disease there is initially
reduced or cloudy vision in the morning on waking
up which is transient and clears within few hours.
With progression there is delayed clearance and
then there is no clearance.

 Persistent epithelial oedema results in the
formation of microcysts & bullae (bullous
keratopathy) which causes pain & discomfort
on rupture, thought to be due to exposure of
naked nerve endings
• Stage 1: Cornea guttate- center to involve the
periphery
• Stage 2: Corneal edema
• Stage 3: Bullous keratopathy
• Stage 4: subepithelial fibrosis, scarring and
superficial vascularization in longstanding eyes
Specular or confocal microscopy: Polymegathism,
pleomorphism, decreased hexagonality and reduced number
of endothelial cells
THANK YOU
Treatment
 Topical sodium chloride 5% drops or
ointment, reduction in IOP
 Bandage contact lens
 Penetrating or deep lamellar keratoplasty
 Other options- conjunctival flaps & amniotic
membrane transplants
 Cataract surgery may accelerate endothelial
cell loss, a triple procedure (cataract surgery,
lens implantation & keratoplasty) may be
considered in eyes with corneal epithelial
oedema .
posterior polymorphous corneal
dystrophy (PPCD)
• Most cases demonstrate autosomal-dominant
inheritance, but isolated unilateral cases show no
heredity, according to the IC3D.
• Deep corneal lesions with nodular, vesicular or blister-
like shapes are present, as well as linear lesions that
resemble railroad tracks
• Approximately 25% of patients show iridocorneal
adhesions, and 15% have elevated intraocular pressure
• Many times PPCD is fairly stationary; however, if patients
do progress, treatment options are similar to those for
FECD
Thank you

Presentation on CORNEAL DYSTROPHY PPT.pptx

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Corneal dystrophies aregroup of heterogeneous slowly progressive, usually bilateral, mostly genetically determined, non-inflammatory opacifying disorders without any systemic and environmental associations.
  • 5.
    •Most of thecorneal dystrophies begin in the early decades of life and progress gradually. The effect of these changes in some of the dystrophies may not be clinically apparent till the later years. •The underlying basis of all corneal dystrophies are genetic mutations some of which have been mapped, while others are yet to be identified. • Most of these mutations result in the transcription of aberrant proteins. These proteins are deposited in various corneal layers and give rise to the characteristic clinical features. • The pace of deposition also determines the natural history of the corneal dystrophy.
  • 7.
    Drawbacks of olderclassification •Certain dystrophies extend beyond these strict anatomical demarcations like the Reis-Buckler Corneal Dystrophy, which initially affects the sub-epithelial area and Bowman’s layer and later the anterior and deep stroma •MCD affects both stroma and endothelium •Based on pathological and clinical features only
  • 8.
    IC3D Classification ofthe Corneal Dystophies • Category 1: A well defined corneal dystrophy in which a gene has been mapped and identified and specific mutations are known. • • Category 2: A well-defined corneal dystrophy that has been mapped to one or more specific chromosomal loci, but the gene (or genes) remains to be identified. • • Category 3: A well-defined corneal dystrophy that has not yet been mapped to a chromosomal locus. • • Category 4: This category is reserved for suspected new (or previously documented) corneal dystrophies, although the evidence for such dystrophies being separate and distinct is not yet convincing.
  • 9.
    Advantages of newerclassification • flexibility:As information accumulates, all true dystrophies should eventually reach category 1 • Or, some conditions that were once thought to be independent dystrophies may be later proven to be a variant of a different dystrophy. e.g Genetic and histopathological studies of central discoid corneal dystrophy have indicated that this condition is actually Schnyder corneal dystrophy. • The system also groups dystrophies together if they have a common genetic relationship • For example, there have been over 30 mutations in the transforming growth factor beta-induced gene (TGFBI) that have been found to cause types of lattice corneal dystrophy and granular corneal dystrophy
  • 10.
    •Bowmans and descemetslayer were excluded •Reclassified CHED type 1 as PPMD •Included three types of ERED •Removed Grayson –wilbrandt CD •The current IC3D classification replaces the traditional classification system with a new system: epithelial and subepithelial dystrophies, •epithelial-stromal TGFBI dystrophies, • stromal dystrophies, and endothelial dystrophies
  • 12.
    Epithelial basement membranedystrophy eponyms -Map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy Cogan microcystic epithelial dystrophy Anterior basement membrane dystrophy Inheritance- sporadic & rarely AD. Histology- thickening of basement membrane with deposition of fibrillary protein b/w basement membrane & bowman’s layer. Absence of hemidesmosomes of basal epithelial cells which is responsible for recurrent corneal erosions.
  • 14.
    Onset 2nd decade 10%of pts develop recurrent corneal erosions in 3rd decade & others remain asymptomatic throughout life. Signs- Dot like opacities Epithelial microcysts Subepithelial map-like patterns surrounded by a faint haze Whorled fingerprint - like lines
  • 16.
    •The geographic figuresin this disorder are caused by reduplications of basement membrane. • Similar geographic reduplications of basement membrane may be seen in the area of a healed epithelial defect; therefore, these changes may represent a response of the cornea to various insults •Recurrent corneal erosion (RCE) is a common complication of EBMD. If medical management of RCE fails, phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) or epithelial debridement and polishing of Bowman’s layer using a diamond burr have been proven effective treatments.
  • 17.
    Epithelial recurrent erosiondystrophy (ERED) • Epithelial recurrent erosion dystrophy (ERED) is characterized by RCE that occurs spontaneously or after minimal trauma. • The attacks have been documented in patients as young as eight months, but usually appear around four to six years of age. • In most cases, the attacks decline in frequency and intensity by 50 years of age. • But in the Smolandiensis variant, half of patients develop progressive central subepithelial opacities as early as age seven. • In these cases, corneal erosions are treated medically, and a corneal graft is needed in about one-fourth of patients.
  • 18.
    Juvenile hereditary epithelialdystrophy; Stocker- Holt variant Very rare, non-progressive abnormality of corneal epithelial metabolism, underlying which mutations in the gene encoding corneal epithelial keratins have been reported. Genetic Locus 12q13 (KRT3)and Gene -Keratin K3 Locus 17q12 (KRT12) Stocker–Holt variant Keratin K12 – Stocker-Holt variant
  • 19.
    Onset and courseEarly childhood. Stationary or slowly progressive Multiple tiny intra-epithelial vesicles extend to the limbus and are more numerous in the interpalpebral area with clear surrounding epithelium. Whorled, wedged shaped opacities, cyst-like lesions or refractile linear opacities. In the Stocker-Holt variant the entire corneal is covered by fine grayish opacities that are fluorescein positive with fine linear lines in whorl pattern. It presents with more severe signs and symptoms Histology- irregular thickening of the epithelial basement membrane & intraepithelial cysts
  • 21.
    Symptoms are variable.Pts may be asymptomatic or ocular irritation may begin in the first few mnths of life. Signs  Myraid tiny intraepithelial cysts of uniform size but variable density are maximal centrally & extend towards but do not reach the limbus The cysts occasionally rupture onto the ocular surface and can cause pain and decreased vision due to scarring.  Cornea may be slightly thinned & sensation reduced. - Treatment depends on severity, and can include lubricants, therapeutic contacts,
  • 23.
    Previously thought tobe a variant of meesmann, now believed to be genetically distinct. Inheritance is AD or X- linked dominant with gene locus on Xp22.3 in the later in at least some patients. It is the only known corneal epithelial dystrophy with X-chromosomal dominant inheritance. Signs  Grey bands with a whorled configuration  Retroillumination shows densely packed
  • 26.
    Treatment • Debridement ofthe corneal epithelium does not prevent the opacities from recurring, but rigid contact lenses have been shown to lessen the number of opacities in some patients
  • 27.
    Rare disorder mainlyaffecting japanese patients Inheritance is AR with gene locus at 1q32 Tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 2 (TACSTD2) In this dystrophy, subepithelial gelatinous deposits composed of amyloid form on the surface of the cornea. The corneal surface develops a "mulberry" appearance. Symptoms of photophobia and decreased vision begin in the first two decades of life. The disorder recurs in corneal grafts.
  • 29.
    • 4 types •band keratopathy • stromal opacity • kumquat-like • typical mulberry
  • 30.
    Signs  Grey subepithelialnodules  Gradual confluence, stromal involvement & increase in size giving rise to a mulberry like appearance In advanced cases there is stromal opacities with large nodules and the cornea resembles the kumquat fruit (kumquat-lesions). Treatment is with repeated superficial keratectomy because of early recurrences on corneal grafts
  • 31.
    • Contact lensescan help manage corneal surface irregularities. Superficial keratectomy (SK), LK, or PK have all been used in treatment, but the dystrophy often recurs within a few years. Limbal stem cell transplantation, along with PK or LK, has shown some success in preventing recurrence.
  • 32.
    Epithelial stromal (TGFb1)dystrophies •Ries buckler • Thiel behnke • Lattice type1 • Granular type1 • Granular type2 • (All are category 1)
  • 33.
     Reis- Bucklersdystrophy Inheritance is AD with gene locus on 5q31 (gene TGFB1) Histology shows replacement of Bowman layer & epithelial basement membrane with fibrous tissue which stains red with Masson trichome
  • 35.
    Onset is in1st or 2nd decade with severe recurrent corneal erosions. Signs  Grey-white, fine, round & polygonal subepithelial opacities , most dense centrally.  Changes increase in density with age resulting in a reticular pattern due to the laying down of irregular bands of collagen replacing Bowman layer. these opacities extend into superficial then deep stroma and also to the limbus. In advance cases the opacities are denser and looks similar to curdled milk appearance . There may be clear spaces within the irregular opacities. course of RBCD is often more aggressive than
  • 37.
     Corneal sensationis reduced & visual impairment may occur due to scarring at level of Bowman layer.  Treatment is directed at recurrent erosions. Therapeutic contact lenses, medical management of RCE, SK, PK, and PTK have all been used in the treatment of RBCD, but recurrence rates are high. Mytomycin C may aid in preventing recurrence when used in conjunction with PTK in RBCD.
  • 38.
    • Grayson-Wilbrandt CornealDystrophy (GWCD) is described as having variable patterns of opacification that extend anteriorly into the epithelium, as well as refractile bodies in the stroma. It is a good example of a category 4 dystrophy because there has only been one publication that describes only a single family with this condition, and the limited information we have on this condition does not rule out the possibility that it could be a variant of a better- described dystrophy, such as RBCD
  • 39.
    Inheritance is ADwith gene locus on 10q24 & 5q31(geneTGFB1) Histology shows curly fibres in Bowman layer on electron microscopy Onset is at end of 1st decade with recurrent erosions
  • 40.
    Signs : subepithelialopacities in a honeycomb morphology involving central cornea Treatment not required as visual impairment is less than Reiss- Bucklers dystrophy
  • 44.
    This corneal dystrophyis often confused with Reis-Blucklers' dystrophy because it has a similar clinical appearance. Both dystrophies are autosomal dominant with recurrent erosions starting early in childhood. The visual impairment in Thiel-Behnke dystrophy begins much later in life than the visual impairment in Reis-Blucklers' dystrophy. Transmission electron microscopy differentiates these two dystrophies. In Reis- Blucklers' dystrophy rod-like bodies are seen in the region of Bowman's layer, and in Thiel-Behnke dystrophy "curly" fibers are seen in the region of Bowman's layer. Similar to Reis-Blucklers' dystrophy, Thiel-Behnke dystrophy is due to mutations in the beta-transfoming growth factor-induced gene human clone 3 (BigH3) located on chromosome 5, but the mutations occur with different amino acids at different sites within the gene.
  • 45.
    • SCHNYDER CENTRALCRYSTALLINE DYSTROPHY Disorder of corneal lipid metabolism associated with raised serum cholesterol in approx 50% pts Inheritance is AD with gene locus at 1q36
  • 47.
    Signs  Central, oval,subepithelial crystalline opacity  Diffuse corneal haze & prominent corneal arcus develop by 3rd decade Treatment by excimer laser Keratectomy
  • 49.
    Lattice corneal dystrophytype 1 Aka biber haab dimmer CD  Inheritance is AD with locus at 5q31 (gene TGFB1)  Histology shows amyloid, staining with congo red & exhibiting characteristic green birefringence when viewed with a polarizing filter
  • 51.
    Onset is atend of 1st decade with recurrent erosions which precede typical stromal changes, progressive with marked reduction in vision by 4th decade Signs  Anterior stromal, glassy, refractile dots  Coalescence into fine lattice lines, best seen on retroillumination  Deep & outward spread sparing the periphery Initially the stroma between lines is clear but later ground glass apperance develops
  • 53.
     Corneal sensationis reduced  Treatment by penetrating or deep lamellar keratoplasty is frequently required. Recurrence in graft may occur.
  • 55.
    Histology shows subepithelial& anterior stromal accumulation of amyloid Onset is within 1st & 2nd decades with severe photophobia, watering & visual impairement
  • 56.
    LCD type 1vs type 2 • LCD1 is a more common corneal dystrophy found in a variety of Asian and European populations, where LCD2 is more rare and found mostly in people of Finnish decent. • The classic refractile lines or dots are seen in both disorders, but in LCD1, they generally are more prominent centrally and leave the peripheral 1mm of cornea spared, whereas in LCD2, they are more peripheral and less numerous. • Ocular signs and symptoms in LCD1 are generally notable within the first decade of life, while LCD2 generally becomes apparent after the age of 20. • In LCD1, recurrent erosions are common, and visual deterioration often requires corneal transplantation after the fourth decade of life. Recurrence generally occurs in grafts two to 14 years later. • Corneal transplantation is rarely indicated in LCD2; neurotrophic persistent epithelial defects after PK have been described. LK and PTK can also be used in the treatment of LCD1, but as with PK, the dystrophy eventually recurs.
  • 57.
    Inheritance is ADwith gene locus at 5q31 Gene TGFB1 Histology shows amorphous hyaline deposits which stain bright red with masson trichrome Onset is in 1st decade but vision is usually not affected in early stage of disease Very slow progression GRANULAR DYSTROPHY CLASSIC type 1
  • 59.
    Signs  Small, white,sharply demarcated deposits resembling crumbs, sugar granules, rings or snowflakes in central anterior stroma  Overall pattern of deposition is radial or disc shaped or may be in the form of a christmas tree  Initially the stroma b/w the opacities is clear
  • 60.
     Gradual increasein number & size of deposits with deeper & outward spread but not reaching the limbus  Corneal sensation is impaired Treatment by penetrating or deep lamellar keratopasty is usually required by 5th decade. Superficial recurrences may require repeated excimer laser keratectomy
  • 62.
    GRANULAR DYSTROPHY TYPE2 • Avellino dystrophy • Combined granular-lattice dystrophy • Autosomal dominant • Genetic locus 5q31 , TGFB1 • Onset -Early Childhood,Slowly progressive • Vision is affected only late when opacities affect the visual axis. Sometimes epithelial erosions occur
  • 63.
    • Well definedwhite granular opacities like bread-crumb with star-shaped peripheries, central clear areas within the white opacities. There are lattice lines, which are short, dash- like, less refractile and do not intersect each other • Deposition of both hyaline and amyloid material in the corneal stroma that stain with Masson trichrome and Congo red
  • 64.
     systemic inbornerror of keratin sulphate metabolism seems to have only corneal manifestations  Divided in type 1, 1A & 2 depending on the presence or absence of antigenic keratan sulphate in the serum & cornea, these have been shown to be due to mutations in same sulphotransferase gene (CHST6)
  • 65.
    Inheritance is ARwith gene locus at 16q22 Histology shows abnormally close packing at collagen in corneal lamellae & abnormal aggregations of GAG intra and extracellularly which stain with prussian blue & colloidal iron Onset is toward end of 1st decade with Profound visual impairment in late childhood and early adult life.
  • 66.
    Signs  Anterior stromalhaze involving central cornea  Greyish- white, dense, focal, poorly delineated spots in anterior stroma centrally & posterior stroma in the periphery  Superficial deposits may produce an irregularity of the corneal surface, although recurrent erosions are unusual
  • 67.
     Increase insize & stromal haze  Increasing opacification with eventual involvement of full-thickness stroma up to the limbus. The cornea is thin. Treatment by penetrating keratoplasty is successful but late recurrences on the graft may occur
  • 69.
    Fuchs endothelial dystrophy Bilateral accelerated endothelial cell loss  More common in women  Associated with slight increased prevalence of open angle glaucoma
  • 70.
    Inheritance AD althoughmajority are sporadic Onset slowly progressive disease is commonly in old age, although earlier onset can occur Signs  Cornea guttata refers to irregular warts or excrescences of Descemet membrane secreted by abnormal endothelial cells
  • 71.
     Specular reflectionshows tiny dark spots caused by disruption of regular endothelial mosaic  Progression occurs to a beaten metal appearance In the natural course of the disease there is initially reduced or cloudy vision in the morning on waking up which is transient and clears within few hours. With progression there is delayed clearance and then there is no clearance.   Persistent epithelial oedema results in the formation of microcysts & bullae (bullous keratopathy) which causes pain & discomfort on rupture, thought to be due to exposure of naked nerve endings
  • 72.
    • Stage 1:Cornea guttate- center to involve the periphery • Stage 2: Corneal edema • Stage 3: Bullous keratopathy • Stage 4: subepithelial fibrosis, scarring and superficial vascularization in longstanding eyes
  • 75.
    Specular or confocalmicroscopy: Polymegathism, pleomorphism, decreased hexagonality and reduced number of endothelial cells
  • 76.
  • 77.
    Treatment  Topical sodiumchloride 5% drops or ointment, reduction in IOP  Bandage contact lens  Penetrating or deep lamellar keratoplasty  Other options- conjunctival flaps & amniotic membrane transplants  Cataract surgery may accelerate endothelial cell loss, a triple procedure (cataract surgery, lens implantation & keratoplasty) may be considered in eyes with corneal epithelial oedema .
  • 78.
    posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy(PPCD) • Most cases demonstrate autosomal-dominant inheritance, but isolated unilateral cases show no heredity, according to the IC3D. • Deep corneal lesions with nodular, vesicular or blister- like shapes are present, as well as linear lesions that resemble railroad tracks • Approximately 25% of patients show iridocorneal adhesions, and 15% have elevated intraocular pressure • Many times PPCD is fairly stationary; however, if patients do progress, treatment options are similar to those for FECD
  • 88.