Production of bioethanol from wheat straw

Production of bioethanol from wheat straw

• 2.
  Introduction  Global demand for energy continues to grow  Energy demand is still supplied from conventional fossil fuels such as oil, coal and natural gas.  Growing demand for human food, as it is for energy, would make sugar and starch expensive in the near future compared to lignocellulosic materials.  Lignocellulosic waste materials obtained from energy crops,wood and agricultural residues, represent the most abundant global source of renewable biomass. Wheat straw being one of the most prominent crops.
• 3.
  Wheat straw: productionand fate  Wheat is the world’s most widely grown crop, cultivated in over 115 nations under a wide range of environmental conditions.  Annual global production of dry wheat in 2008 was estimated to be over 650 Tg.  Assuming residue/crop ratio of 1.3, about 850 Tg of wheat residues are annually produced.  430 Tg of wheat straw is avaliable to produce120 GL of ethanol wich can replace about 93(±3) GL of gasoline.
• 4.
  Wheat straw asa potential feedstock for 2nd generation bioethanol  Cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin content of wheat straw are in the range of 33–40, 20–25, and 15–20 (%w/w), respectively (Prasad et al., 2007).  Due to structural complexity of the lignocellulosic matrix, ethanol production from wheat straw requires at least four major unit operations:  Pretreatment  Hydrolysis  Fermentation  Distillation.
• 5.
  Pretreatment of wheatstraw  Pretreatment plays a significant role in ethanol production from lignocellulosic materials such as wheat straw. The objectives are to increase the surface area and porosity of the substrate, reduce the crystallinity of cellulose and disrupt the heterogeneous structure of cellulosic materials.  Physical  Physico-Chemical  Chemical  Biological
• 8.
  Hydrolysis  Hydrolysis using appropriate enzymes represents the most effective method to liberate simple sugars from cellulosic materials.  Cellulose hydrolysis is catalyzed by a class of enzymes known as cellulases. These enzymes can be produced by fungi such as Trichoderma reesei and A. niger (Table 2) and/or bacteria such as Clostridium cellulovorans (Arai et al., 2006).  Most research for commercial cellulase production has focused on fungi since majority of relevant bacteria are anaerobes with a very low growth rates.
• 9.
  Sugar yield inthe enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw after various pretreatments.
• 10.
  Fermentation  The ideal microorganism should have broad substrate utilization, high ethanol yield and productivity, tolerance to inhibitors present in the hydrolyzates and to high concentrations of ethanol, cellulolytic activity and ability for sugar fermentation at high temperatures
• 11.
  Properties of someethanol producing microorganisms involved in ethanol fermentation of wheat straw-based hydrolyzates.
• 12.
  Future perspective and conclusions  As the price of current ethanol feedstocks (e.g. Corn) is estimatedto increase, lignocellulosic materials remain the only viablecandidate to serve as renewable feedstock for ethanol production.  There are huge amounts of wheat straw that are currently burned on the field or wasted otherwise which can be used as low value row material for ethanol production.  Pretreatment is estimated to account for 33% of the total cost.  The next significant technical barrier is cost of enzymes.
• 13.
   Additionally, the economy of lignocellulosic ethanol could be improved by simultaneous fermentation of hexose and pentose sugars in fermentation step.  In recent year, several biorefinery concepts have been introduced as a solution for clean, efficient and economically-feasible utilization of lignocellulosic materials.  By further decrease in the cost of enzymes for hydrolysis, and modern technology such as process integration for new ethanol plants, the second generation of ethanol, will gain the potential to compete on a large scale with gasoline without subsidies in near future.