Pulmonary Hypertension associated with Connective Tissue Disease.
The document discusses the prevalence, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pulmonary hypertension associated with connective tissue disease (CTD). It highlights the variability in prevalence rates and diagnostic methods, emphasizing the importance of early screening, particularly in high-risk populations such as patients with systemic sclerosis. The findings are supported by various registries and studies, and it outlines recommendations for improving detection and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension in CTD patients.
Introduction to pulmonary hypertension in connective tissue diseases; includes historical context.
Definitions and classification of pulmonary hypertension (PH/PAH) with hemodynamic criteria.
Discussion on prevalence of PH in connective tissue diseases with variances depending on study methods. Data from studies on abnormal echo and RHC prevalence in different connective tissue diseases. Insights from various registries on the prevalence and demographics of CTD-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Detailed statistics of CTD-PAH from various registries, identifying significant patterns in prevalence.
Pathogenetic factors contributing to pulmonary hypertension in connective tissue diseases.
Description of vascular remodeling and how it correlates with pulmonary hypertension.
Identifies various clinical and serological risk factors for developing pulmonary hypertension in scleroderma and lupus.
Analysis of timeframes and prognostic class stratification in systemic sclerosis and PH.
Importance of early diagnosis and screening protocols for pulmonary hypertension in high-risk CTD populations.
Algorithm for diagnosing pulmonary hypertension, emphasizing the necessity of right heart catheterization.
Survival outcomes from major studies comparing CTD-PAH with idiopathic forms and related pathologies.
Current treatment options for pulmonary arterial hypertension, highlighting the importance of early intervention.
Discussion on combination therapy efficacy and the systematic approach to managing PAH in CTD.
Insights into immunosuppressive therapy providing benefits in managing pulmonary hypertension associated with connective tissue diseases.
Final thoughts on the treatment protocols for CTD-PAH, emphasizing the need for personalized management strategies.
Pulmonary Hypertension associated with Connective Tissue Disease.
1.
Pulmonary Hypertension
in
Connective TissueDisease
Sarfraz Saleemi
Pulmonary Hypertension Program
Section of pulmonary medicine
Department of medicine
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center
Ibn al-Nafis
• DiscoveredPulmonary circulation
nearly 350 years before Sir William
Harvey(1616) of England
• Described the purification of blood in
the lungs where it was refined in
contact with the air inhaled from the
outer atmosphere
5.
Badesch D etal. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:S55-S66.
McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.
Hemodynamic Definition of PH/PAH
PH
PAH
Mean PAP ≥25 mmHg
PCWP/LVEDP ≤15 mmHg
PVR >3 Wood Units
Mean PAP ≥25 mm Hg
Prevalence of CTD-PAH
Highlyvariable
Lack of consistent epidemiological data
Method used for assessing PA pressure
Diagnostic tools – Echocardiogram, Right heart catheterization
Potential bias concerning the study population
– Rheumatologic definitions, criteria etc
Geographical variation in the epidemiology of CTD
Prevalence of PAHin CTD 13% 9.18 % to 18.16 %
Range (95% CI)
Yang, X., Mardekian, J., Sanders, K.N. et al. Clin Rheumatol (2013) 32: 1519.
Prevalence of PH in Connective Tissue Disease
(systematic review)
12.
Prevalence of CTD-PAH
ingeneral population
2.3 – 10 cases per million
Pulmonary arterial hypertension in France: results from a national registry.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;173:1023–1030
Connective Tissue Disease–associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the Modern Treatment Era.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 179. pp 151–157, 2009
An epidemiological study of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Eur Respir J 2007;30:104–109.
13.
REVEAL Registry
2967 patients.
Adaptedfrom Badesch DB et al. Chest. 2010;137:376-387.
Overall group 1 PAH Associated PH
Associated
(50.7%)
Idiopathic
(46.2%)
Heritable
(2.7%)
Pulmonary
veno-occlusive
(0.4%)
Connective tissue/
collagen vascular
(49.9%)
Congenital
heart disease
(19.5%)
HIV
(4.0%)
Other
(5.5%)
Portopulmonary (10.6%)
Nearly 25% of group 1 PAH is CTD-related
14.
Prevalence of PHin Connective Tissue Disease
CTD-PAH SSc SLE Other Registry
641 62% 17% 21% REVEAL
343 76% 8% 16% UK CTD-PH
188 83% 17% Aspire
103 76% 15% 9% French
Chest. 2010;137:376-387
Am J Respir Crit Care Med VOL 179 2009
Eur Respir J. 2012 Apr;39(4):945-55
Eur Respir J. 2012 Apr;39(4):945-55
Limited SSc
Late ageof onset of SSc
Raynaud phenomenon
Long standing diseae (>5 years)
Telangectasia
FVC %: DLCO% > 1.6
DLCO <55% predicted
Increased NT-proBNP
Antibodies (Anti-U1 RNP, Anti-
centromere, Anti-nuclear pattern ANA)
Absence of anti-Scl 70 antibody
Risk
factors
for
PH
In
Scleroderma
27.
Female gender
Isolated reductionin DLCO on PFT
Renal disease
Cutaneous vasculitis
Antiribonuclear proteins
Antiphospholipid antibodies
Antiendothelial antibodies
Risk
factors
for
PH
In
SLE
28.
Development of pulmonaryhypertension in a high-risk population
with systemic sclerosis in the Pulmonary Hypertension Assessment and
Recognition of Outcomes in Scleroderma (PHAROS) cohort study
V.M. Hsu et al. / Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism 44( 2014)55–6260
Risk Factors
• sPAP >40 mmHg on echocardiogram,
• (DLCO) <55% predicted
• FVC%/ DLCO% >1.6
• Exercise-induced hypoxemia
The time to PH 10% at 2 years
13% at 3 years
25% at 5 years
29.
When to suspectPH in CTD
Clinical and
Lab finding
suggestive
of PH
Allergology International. 2011;60:405-409
Raised
JVP
ECG
RBBB RVH
tall P wave
Exertional
dyspnea
Elevated
pro-BNP
Hyper-
uricemia
Para-sternal
heave
%FVC/
%DLCO
>1.4
30.
Dyspnea in SScpatients
Dyspnea
Lung
disease
Sedentary
life style
Cardiac
disease
Anemia
PAH
A forgotten
killer
Chest wall
tightness
Muscle
disease Thromboembolic
disease
31.
Survival from diagnosisof patients with isolated SSc-PAH
grouped by World Health Organization (WHO) functional class.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 179. pp 151–157, 2009
Cumulativesurvival
Years from diagnosis
32.
Badesch DB etal. Chest. 2010;137:376-387
CTD-PAH functional class at diagnosis
7,6
36,7
50,0
5,6
0
20
40
60
80
100
I II III IV
Patients(%)
FC at Enrollment
REVEAL Registry (All Patients)
(n=2525)
5,7
32,2
54,9
7,2
0
20
40
60
80
100
I II III IV
FC at Enrollment
REVEAL Registry (CVD/CTD)
(n=639)
33.
Screening – Earlydiagnosis
1
24
63
12
0
20
40
60
80
100
I II III IV
Patients(%)
NYHA FC (N=674)
Humbert M et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173:1023-1030.
Hachulla E et al. Arthritis Rheum 2005: 52:3792-3800.
No Screening
5
44
28
11
0
20
40
60
80
100
I II III IV
NYHA FC (N=18)
With Screening
34.
PAH: Screening highrisk population
Key to early diagnosis – screening high risk populations:
Family members of a patient with familial Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (FPAH)
Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc)
Patients with HIV
Patients with chronic liver disease and portal hypertension
International guidelines recommend annual screening with Doppler
echocardiography.
Early diagnosis improves outcome
• Hachulla E et al Ann Rheum Dis 2004
• Galie N et al. Eur Heart J 2004
• McGoon M et al. Chest 2004
35.
Echocardiographic probability ofpulmonary hypertension
patients with a suspicion of pulmonary hypertension
ESC/ERS 2015 guidelines – Screening
36.
ASIG (Australian SclerodermaInterest Group)
Screening algorithm
Intern Med J. 2015 Nov;45(11):1134-40. doi: 10.1111/imj.12890
37.
Evidence-based detection ofpulmonary arterial
hypertension in systemic sclerosis: the DETECT study
Coghlan JG, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;00:1–10
SSc patients screened = 646
RHC analysis set = 466
SSc patients enrolled = 488
PH
N=145(31%)
Non-PH
N=321(69%)
PAH
N=87 (19%)
Group 2 PH
N=30 (6%)
Group 3 PH
N=27 (6%)
Screen failure, n=158
No RHC
consent withdrawn
N=22
38.
DETECT nomogram forPH screening in SSC
STEP 1
Criteria for
Referral to
Echo
STEP 2
Criteria for
Referral to
RHC
39.
The DETECT algorithmfor PAH screening in SSc patients
is a sensitive, non-invasive screening tool, which minimizes missed
diagnoses, identifies even mild disease and optimizes resource utilization.
SSc patients to be screened
Step 1 Non-echo variables
FVC/DLCO%, Telangiectasia, ECG–RAD,
ACA, pro-BNP, Uric Acid
Total risk score >300 No
Yes
No referral for ECHO
Step 2: step1 variable plus 2 echo variables
Right atrium area TR velocity
Total risk score >35 No
Yes
No referral for RHC
RHC for diagnosis of
presence /absence of PAH
Coghlan JG, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;00:1–10.
ESC/ERS 2015 guidelines
•Clearly recognized the limitations of relying on
TR velocity.
• Described single tools for screening.
• Described DETECT as a composite tool.
• But did not recommend any (more validation is
required).
Galie N. et al. Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 1;37(1):67-119.
44.
General recommendations, initialscreening evaluation, and frequency
of noninvasive tests for early detection of CTD-associated PAH
Recommendation Level of
evidence
All patients with SSc should be screened for PAH Moderate
Patients with MCTD or other CTDs with scleroderma features (Scleroderma
spectrum) should be screened in a similar manner to patients with SSc
Very low
Screening is not recommended for asymptomatic patients with MCTD or
other CTDs (including SLE, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory myositis,
Sjögren’s syndrome) without features of scleroderma
Low to
moderate
For unexplained signs and symptoms of PH in patients with MCTD, SLE, or
other CTDs without scleroderma features, one may consider the diagnostic
algorithm evaluation for PH
Moderate
All patients with SSc and scleroderma spectrum disorders with a positive
results on a noninvasive screen should be referred for RHC
High
RHC is mandatory for diagnosis of PAH High
Vasoreactivity testing is not required for evaluation of PAH in patients CTDs Moderate to high
systematic review of the literature – consensus based evidence driven
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM Vol. 65, No. 12, December 2013, pp 3194–3201
45.
Recommendation Level of
evidence
Initialscreening evaluation
Transthoracic echo
PFTs with DLCO
NT-proBNP
DETECT algorithm if DLCO < 60% predicted and disease
duration 3 years or more
High
High
Moderate
Moderate
Frequency of noninvasive tests
Transthoracic echo annually as screening
Transthoracic echo if new signs or symptoms develop
PFTs with DLCO annually as a screening test
PFTs with DLCO if new signs or symptoms develop
NT-proBNP if new signs or symptoms develop
Low
High
Low
Low
Low
General recommendations, initial screening evaluation, and frequency
of noninvasive tests for early detection of CTD-associated PAH
systematic review of the literature – consensus based evidence driven
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM Vol. 65, No. 12, December 2013, pp 3194–3201
46.
Diagnostic algorithm
Echocardiography
NO YESNO YES
PH
Right heart catheterization
sPAP
<35 mmHg
sPAP
36-50 mmHg
sPAP
>50 mmHg
Other clinical
and
Lab features
Other clinical
and
Lab features
PH
suspected
PH ruled out
(periodic
assessment
recommended
RHC is recommended in all
cases of suspected PAH
associated with CTD to confirm
the diagnosis, determine
severity and rule out left heart
disease
47.
Stupi AM etal. Arthritis Rheum.1986;29:515-524.
Steen VD, Medsger TA Jr. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:516-522.
Impact of PAH on Survival in Limited SSc Before
PAH Therapy
SSc with
PAH
(n=20)
(n=106)
SSc without
PAH
(n=287)
(n=106)
%
cumulative
survival
Follow-up (yr)
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5
48.
Koh et al,Br J Rheumatol, 1996
Outcome of Scleroderma Patients with
Pulmonary Hypertension
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Years From Diagnosis of PHT
PHT
Lung Involvement (without PHT)
None
Survival,%
Survival – PAH-SScvs PAH-SLE
Condliffe, Kiely, Peacock, et al.: U.K. CTD-PAH Registry
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 179 2009
51.
Survival – CTD-PAHvs ILD-PAH
Condliffe, Kiely, Peacock, et al.: U.K. CTD-PAH Registry
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 179 2009
52.
Prognosis of SSc-PAHin major registries
Registry Year n Age
(yrs)
Incident
cases
(%)
WHO FC
I&II/III/IV
(%)
mPAP
(mmHg)
PVR
(dyns.s.cm5)
1 yr
survival
(%)
3 yr
survival
(%)
UK 2009 259 64 100 16/68/16 42 715 78 47
REVEAL 2010 399 62 18 25/60/15 45 768 82 n/a
ASPIRE 2012 156 66 100 19/67/14 43 678 82 52
French 2013 85 65 100 21/67/12 41 680 90 56
PHAROS 2014 131 60 100 56/38/6 36 448 93 75
53.
CTD-PAH vs iPAH
Comparedto patients with iPAH, patients with CTD-PAH have:
• higher mortality
• lower 6-minute walk distance
• Higher pro-BNP
• more right ventricular dysfunction
• Poor lung functions
• More pericardial disease
Rhee et al Arth& Rheum 2015
54.
Factors Role Evidence
AgeMean age of diagnosis
SSc-PAH ≈10 yrs > IPAH
Arthritis Rheum 2006, 54:3043-50
Pulmonary
vasculopathy
Higher proportion of pulmonary venule
involvement in SSc-PAH
Eur Respir J 2009, 34:371-9.
Right ventricle (RV) Reduced RV contractility
Higher NT-proBNP despite less severe
pulmonary haemodynamics
Respir Res 2008, 9:68.
Eur Respir J 2010, 35:95-104
Left ventricle (LV) High prevalence of LV dysfunction
≈1/3 of patients with SSc-PAH have
occult LV dysfunction on fluid challenge
Ann Rheum Dis 2009, 68:1878-84.
Eur Respir J 2013,42:1083-91.
Interstitial lung
disease (ILD)
ILD common in SSc
Response to PH therapy in the presence
of ILD appears poor
Arthritis Rheum 2011, 63:2456-64
Multisystem disease Coexisting renovascular and
gastrointestinal disease
Antibodies Possible role of autoantibodies Am J Respir Crit Care
Med 2010, 181:1285-93
Potential reasons for poorer outcome in SSc-PAH than in IPAH
55.
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC PROGNOSTIC MARKERSIN CONNECTIVE
TISSUE DISEASE ASSOCIATED PULMONARY HYPERTENSION DIFFER
FROM IDIOPATHIC PULMONARY HYPERTENSION
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(13_S):2071-2071. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(16)32072-1
56.
Treatment of PulmonaryArterial Hypertension
Currently there is no cure for PAH
Those who start therapy in WHO FC I or II demonstrate a
better prognosis than those whose therapy is started in the
more advanced stages
By recognizing and treating patients as early as possible,
disease progression may be delayed
Sitbon O et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002
57.
Treatment algorithm
2015 ESC/ERSGuidelines
Treatment
naive patient
PAH confirmed by
expert center
General measures
Supportive therapy
Acute vasoreactivity test
(I-PAH, H-PAH, D-PAH only)
Vasoreactive
CCB Therapy
Non-vasoreactive
(or not IPAH/HPAH/DPAH)
Low/intermediate
Risk (FC II/III)
High Risk (FC IV)
Oral
Monotherapy
Oral Combo
Therapy
Parenteral
Therapy
Inadequate response
Double/triple sequential therapy
.
Galie N, ESC/ERS 2015 Guidelines,
Alreadyon
treatment
Inadequate response Lung Transplant
European Heart Journal August 29, 2015
58.
Risk assessment inPulmonary Arterial Hypertension
.
Galie N, ESC/ERS 2015 Guidelines
Estimated1-year
mortality
LowRisk
(<5%)
Intermediate
(5-10%)
High Risk
(>10%)
Right heart failure No No Yes
Progression No Slow Rapid
Syncope No Occasional Repeated
WHO FC I or II III IV
CPET VO2 max >15
Ve/VCO2 <36
VO2 max 11-15
Ve/VCO2 36-45
VO2 max<11
Ve/VCO2 >45
BNP <50 50-300 >300
Hemodynamics RA <8 mmHg
CI>2.5
SvO2 >65%
RA 8-14 mmHg
CI2.0-2.4
SvO2 60-65%
RA >14 mmHg
CI<2
SvO2 <60%
59.
PAH Therapy: Generaland supportive
Sodium restriction
Contraception
Vaccination
Oxygen
Diuretics if signs of right heart failure
Anticoagulation
Digoxin if evidence of atrial arrythmias
60.
Humbert M etal. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1425-1436.
Targets for current PAH-specific therapy
Big Endothelin
Endothelin-
converting
Enzyme
Endothelin
Receptor A
Endothelin
Receptor B
Vasoconstriction
and
Proliferation
Endothelin
Receptor
Antagonists
Endothelin-1
Endothelin Pathway
Arginine
Nitric Oxide
Synthase
Vasodilatation
and
Antiproliferation
Nitric Oxide
cGMP Exogenous
Nitric Oxide
Phosphodiesterase Type-5
Phosphodiesterase
Type-5 Inhibitors
Nitric Oxide Pathway
Arachidonic Acid
Prostacyclin
Synthase
Vasodilatation
and
Antiproliferation
Prostacyclin
cAMP
Prostacyclin
Derivatives
Prostacyclin
Derivatives
Prostacyclin Pathway
sGC stimulators
60
IP receptor
agonist
61.
<1995 1995 20012002 2004 2005 2007 2009 2013 2015
CCB
Anticoagulation
Digitalis
Diuretics
IV Epoprostenol
Bosentan
SC Treprostenol
IV Treprostenol
Inhaled
Iloprost
Sildenafil
Ambrisartan
Tadalafil
Inhaled
Treprostinil
Macitentan
Riociguat
Pulmonary Hypertension Treatment Timeline
IV Sildenafil
Oral
Treprostinil
Selexipag
BREATHE
SUPER
ARIES
PHIRST
AIR
SERAPHIN
PATENT
CHEST
GRIPHON
FREEDOM
TIMELINE for PAH targeted therapy
62.
Treatment response inCTD-PH vs iPAH
Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 192, Iss 9, pp 1111–1117, Nov 1, 2015
63.
Source PAH agentNumber of
patients
Number (%) of
CTD-PAH patients
Galiè et al
(SUPER-1)
Sildenafil 278 84 (30)
Simonneau et al
(PACES)
Sildenafil 267 55 (21)
Galiè et al
(PHIRST)
Tadalafil 405 95 (24)
Rubin et al20
(BREATHE-1)
Bosentan 213 63 (30)
Galiè et al
(EARLY)
Bosentan 185 33 (18)
Galiè et al
(ARIES)
Ambrisentan 393 124 (32)
Badesch et al Epoprostenol 111 111 (100)
Galiè et al
(ALPHABET)
Beraprost 130 13 (10)
Simonneau et al Treprostinil 469 90 (19)
Hiremath et al Treprostinil 44 2 (5)
CTD-PAH patients included in major RCTs
Bosentan for PAH-CTD
BREATHE-1Trial Subgroup analysis
Time to clinical worseningSurvival
Bosentan
Historical group
6MWT = mean difference 43 m in Bosentan group
Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:1336–1340
Pulmonary vasodilators inCTD-PH
PDE-5 inhibitors
Kuwana M, Watanabe H, Matsuoka N, et
al. BMJ Open 2013;3:e003113
Kuwana M, Watanabe H, Matsuoka N, et al. BMJ Open 2013;3:e003113
70.
Pulmonary vasodilators inCTD-PH
Endothelin Receptor Antagonists
Kuwana M, Watanabe H, Matsuoka N, et al. BMJ Open 2013;3:e003113
71.
Pulmonary vasodilators inCTD-PH
Prostacyclin Analogs
Kuwana M, Watanabe H, Matsuoka N, et al. BMJ Open 2013;3:e003113
SERAPHIN study -Macitentan
Pulido T. et al. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 29;369(9):809-18.
224/742 (30.5%) had CTD-PAH
HR,0.55; 97.5% CI, 0.39 to 0.76;
log-rank P<0.001
74.
GRIPHON study -Selexipag
HR, 0.60; 99% CI, 0.46 to 0.78;
log rank P<0.001
334/1156 (28.9) had CTD-PAH
Sitbon O. et al. N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 24;373(26):2522-33.
75.
Ambrisentan response inconnective tissue disease-associated
pulmonary arterial hypertension (CTD-PAH)
A subgroup analysis of the ARIES-E clinical trial.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Nov 17;54(21):1971-81
ARIES-E trial
124 patients with CTD-PAH were evaluated.
62.6%, 57.3%, and 58.2% of CTD-PAH
patients treated with ambrisentan exhibited
increases in 6MWD at 1-, 2-, and 3- years
respectively.
At 3 years, 64% of patients were free from
clinical worsening .
And 76% of patients were still alive.
Respir Med. 2016 Aug;117:254-63.
76.
Riociguat for thetreatment of pulmonary arterial
hypertension associated with connective tissue
disease: results from PATENT-1 and PATENT-2
Humbert M, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;0:1–5
• 443 patients
• 111 patients had PAH-CTD
(66 SSc,18 SLE; 11 RA 10 MCTD), and 6 unspecified CTD)
• Riociguat improved mean 6MWD, WHO FC, PVR, CI.
• Improvements in 6MWD and WHO FC persisted at 2 years.
• Two-year survival of patients with PAH-CTD was the same as
for idiopathic PAH (93%).
• Riociguat had a similar safety profile in patients with PAH-CTD
to that of the overall population
77.
There is noconsensus as to which oral
agent should be used as initial therapy
78.
Choice of InitialPAH Therapy
Dependent on many factors
– Disease severity
– Approval status
– Route of administration
– Side-effect profile
– Patient preference
– Cost consideration
– Physician experience, clinical judgment
Barst RJ, et al. J ACC 2009
79.
Association Between InitialOral Therapy
and Outcome in SSc-PAH
DATA FROM PHAROS REGISTRY - 98 patients 24=ERA, 59=PDE5, 15=RRA/PDE5
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Mar;68(3):740-8
Percentage of patients with qualifying
events for time to clinical worsening
Kaplan-Meier curves showing
time to clinical worsening
At 1 year free of CW
ERA=63.0%
PDE5=85.9%
PDE5+ERA=85.7%
Combination Therapy
*Half ofpatients on combination therapy
†SERAPHIN, 64% on combination therapy, 5% of patients on prostanoid; PATENT 1, 6%.
SGC
Stimulators Prostanoids
Endothelin
Receptor
Antagonists
Phospho-
diesterase
Inhibitors
TRIUMPH
STEP
SERAPHIN†
TRIUMPH
PACES
PATENT-1*
PATENT-1*
PHIRST*
SERAPHIN†
82.
Recommendations for efficacyof
sequential drug combination therapy
for pulmonary arterial hypertension (group 1) according to WHO class
Circulation 2009;119:2894–2903
Cardiovasc Ther 2012;30:93–99.
Eur Heart J 2006;27:589–595.
Eur Respir J 2015;46:405–413..
Eur Respir J 2015;46:414–421.
Eur Respir J 2015;46:414–421.
PATENT PLUS. Eur Respir J 2015;45:1314–1322.
2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines. European Heart Journal August 29, 2015
83.
Recommendations for efficacyof
sequential drug combination therapy
for pulmonary arterial hypertension (group 1) according to WHO class
SERAPHIN
Engl J Med 2013; 369:809–818.
(PATENT-1 PATENT-2)
N Engl J Med 2013;369:330–340
Humbert M, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;0:1–5
Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:1101–1102 GRIPHON study.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65(Suppl A):A380.
Ann Intern Med 2008;149:521–530.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1915–1922.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;174:1257–1263.
Eur Respir J 2006;4:691–694
2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines. European Heart Journal August 29, 2015
84.
Recommendations for efficacyof
upfront drug combination therapy
for pulmonary arterial hypertension (group 1) according to
WHO functional class.
Galie` N, et al; Ambition trial
New Engl J Med 2015;379(9):834–844
Sitbon O. et al; a pilot study.
Eur Respir J 2014;43:1691–1697.
Humbert M, et al; BREATHE-2.
Eur Respir J 2004;24:353–359.
Kemp K, et al; an observational study
J Heart Lung Transplant 2012;31:150–158.
2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines. European Heart Journal August 29, 2015
85.
Ambition study
Galie E.et al. N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 27;373(9):834-44.
Pooled monotherapy 103/253 (41%) had CTD-PAH
Combination therapy 84/247 (34%) had CTD-PAH
Outcome Combination (n = 103) Monotherapy (n = 84)
Any event, % 21 40
Improvement in
6-minute walking, m
40 12
86.
Initial combination therapywith ambrisentan and tadalafil in
connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary arterial
hypertension (CTD-PAH):
subgroup analysis from the AMBITION trial
John Gerry Coghlan, Nazzareno Galiè, Joan Albert Barberà et al.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Published Online First: 30 December 2016
88.
Kaplan-Meier curves forthe time from randomisation
to first adjudicated clinical failure
John Gerry Coghlan et al. Ann Rheum Dis doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210236
(A) CTD-PH
(B) SSc-PH
89.
John Gerry Coghlanet al. Ann Rheum Dis doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210236
(A) CTD-PH
(B) SSc-PH
90.
Ambrisentan and TadalafilUp-front Combination Therapy in
Scleroderma-associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Paul M. Hassoun et al.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Volume 192 Number 9 | November 1 2015
Open labeled – 36 weeks
19 patient with treatment naïve SSc-PH
Tadalfil 40 mg plus Abrisartan 10 mg
PVR
RVmassRVEF
91.
There is noconsensus as to which
combination should be used
92.
Immunosuppressive therapy inSLE & MCTD-PAH
Immuno-
suppression
Vasodilators ±
immunosuppression
SLE-PH
MCTD-PH
Supportive therapy: Diuretics,
Oxygen, anticoagulants
WHO FC
II IV
III
CI<3.1
III
CI>3.1
Clinical and hemodynamic
Evaluation 4-6 months
Clinical and hemodynamic
Evaluation 4-6 months
No
Response
Response Response
No
Response
Maintenance
immunosuppression regimen
Azathioprine, FK506
Combination vasodilators
Stop immunosuppression
unless indicated
Clinical and
Hemodynamic
follow up
Start vasodilators
Stop immunosupp.
unless indicated Chest. 2006 Jul;130(1):182-9
CTD-PAH and LungTransplant
• CTD-PAH patients who fail maximum PH therapy are candidates for
lung transplant
• Associated morbidity and organ dysfunction other than the lung, places
them at a significantly increased risk for lung transplant
• Esophageal motility disorders and GERD in patients with SSc is
contraindicated for transplant
• Post-transplant survival is 52–75% at 5 years and to 45–66% at 10
years.
• The short and intermediate-term post-lung transplant survival are
similar to IPAH and ILD patients requiring lung transplantation.
• The frequency of recurrent disease after Lung transplant is low at 1%
in a population of 1394 transplant patients.
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Dec; 54(12):3954-61
Radiology 2001;219:503–9.
Respiratory Medicine (2013) 107, 2081e2087
95.
Post-transplant Survival
Saggar Ret al. Eur Respir J. 2010;36:893-900. [Epub 2010 Mar 29.]
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
Survival
proportion
Time after lung transplant (mo)
0 12 24 36 48 60
SSc
IPF
96.
Recommendations for pulmonaryarterial
hypertension associated with connective tissue disease
Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:
3792–3800
DETECT study.
Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1340–1349
Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:521–531.
(COMPERA). Circulation 2014;129: 57–65
2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines. European Heart Journal August 29, 2015
97.
Conclusion
• Pulmonary arterialhypertension (PAH) is a common
complication of CTD particularly scleroderma
• PAH complicating CTD significantly worsens survival and is a
leading cause of death in these patients
• SSc-PAH carries a significantly worse prognosis compared to
other forms of PAH
• Treatment of patients with CTD -PAH should follow the same
treatment algorithm as in IPAH
• Standard PAH-specific therapy is not as effective in CTD-PAH
compared to iPAH
• Immunosuppressive therapy combined with vasodilator
treatment may result in clinical improvement in patients with
PAH associated with SLE or MCTD
98.
Conclusion
Risk benefit ratioof oral anticoagulation is less favorable in CTD-
PAH than in IPAH and should be considered on individual basis.
Calcium Channel Blockers are not recommended in CTD-PAH
Generalized microangiopathy must take into account when
choosing PAH therapy in SSc
There is no consensus as to the initial choice of monotherapy or
order of combination therapy in treating patients with CTD-PAH.
There is a need for a better understanding of underlying
mechanisms of CTD-PAH in order to achieve therapeutic goals
Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:521–531.
Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:808–814.
Circulation 2014;129:57–65.