The effectiveness of
school-based counselling
with young people
Mick Cooper, Professor of Counselling
EAC, Pushkin 2013
Thanks to: Jo Pybis, Katherine McArthur, Karen
Cromarty, Andy Hill, Nancy Rowland, Jamie Murdoch, Nick
Turner, Ruth Levesley, Peter Pearce, Sarah Osman, Ros
Sewell
Contact: mick.cooper@strath.ac.uk
Aims of talk
1. Review evidence from UK on
school-based counselling and
its effectiveness
2. Explore pathways by which
school-based counselling
might bring change about
The emergence of schoolbased counselling for young
people in the UK

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010
Source: Baginsky, 2004; BACP 2012
Widely disseminated
• Today, school-based
counselling is one of the most
common mental health and
wellbeing provisions for young
people in the UK

Source: BACP 2012; Hill, 2011; estimated figures
Dissemination of school-based counselling
in UK secondary schools
Scotland: 64-80% (approx.)
NI: All schools since 2007

England: 61-85% (approx.)

Wales: All schools since 2008

Source: BACP 2012; estimated data for England and Scotland
International prevalence
• 39 countries around globe mandate
school-based counselling (inc. Czech
Republic, Slovakia and Romania)
• 24 countries: well-established but not
compulsory (inc. Georgia, England)
• „Overall, school counselling is developing

relatively quickly into an integral part of
the education system in many parts of
the world‟ (Harris, 2013)
Service delivery in UK
• Delivered by qualified counsellors
• Primarily
humanistic/integrative, orientation:
relational, supportive, „nondirective‟ practice
• Generally one-to-one, confidential
• Orientation to mental wellbeing
• Mainly for young people: 11-18
Source: Cooper, 2009; Hill, 2011
Referral routes
School staff
Self
Parents/carers

Source: Cooper, 2009; Hill, 2011, estimates from approximately 20,000 young people
Reported waiting
times: relatively brief
50%

35%
1 week

15%
1 month

Source: BACP, 2012; Hill, 2011; approximate data, as reported by school staff and local authority leads
Psychological difficulties at
assessment (SDQ) (counselling)

„Normal‟

„Abnormal‟
„Borderline‟

Source: Cooper, 2009, from 611 young people
Presenting/developing issues
35

Percentage

30

25
20
15
10

5
0

Source: Cooper, 2009; Hill, 2011; approximate data from over 20,000 cases
BME under-represented
Percentage

2
1.5
1

0.5
0

Counselling clients

All Wales

Source: Hill, 2011; data from 11,043 cases
Effectiveness
Effectiveness
Pre-/postevaluation
YP-CORE:
Principal
outcome
measure for
school-based
counselling
in UK






Higher total
scores =
More distress
Change from pre- to postcounselling
Counselling consistently associated with significant
reductions in psychological distress from beginning to end

Meta-analyses, ES=
0.81 – 1.09 from
pre- to postOutcome measure score (higher scores mean more distress)

Welsh Strategy evaluation

25

20

15

10

5

Pre-counselling

Post-counselling

Source: Hill, 2011;
Cooper, 2009; data from
In “real” terms…
Over the last week…
„My problems have felt too much for me‟
After
counselling
av. = 1.05

Before
counselling
av. = 1.87

0

1

2

3

4

Not at all

Only
occasionally

Sometimes

Often

Most or
all of the
time
Randomised
controlled
trials
(RCTs)
The randomised controlled trial
„baseline‟

‟endpoint‟
Counselling

Random
allocation

Not counselling
(e.g., wait-list)
Global data
• School-based therapeutic interventions
significantly reduce psychological
distress (107 studies, mean „effect
size‟ = 0.45 = medium effect)
• But evidence comes mainly from US
studies, CBT/psycho-educational, often
group-based
• Is counselling, as delivered by UK
counsellors, effective?
„School-based humanistic
counselling‟
• Developed as distillation of
UK practice
• Based on humanistic
competences:
relational, supportive
approach, Rogerian
foundations
• Four pilot RCTs comparing
against waitlist
School-based humanistic
counselling
Reduced psychological distress

• Combined data
from three RCTs
with 53 clients in
counselling, and
57 in waiting list
Large effect • Up to 10 weeks
ES = 0.78
of SBHC
• Audited for
‘adherence’ to
humanistic
competences
Qualitative data
from service
users
Service user perspectives
“It really does help you to concentrate better in class cos all your
problems are like, sorted, so the teachers probably think it's good.”
“I was sad when I went in there cos I lost my grandmother….. She
says it goes– she says it goes on in my life, she says she knows how
hard it is ...The more and more I do learn from her, the more and
more I get happier.”

“Yeah it's changed my behaviour a lot.. I can walk away from
situations instead of swing punches. Before, if I was fighting and one
of my friends would grab me I'd hit „em but now if they grab me I'll
get off.”
“I have recommended it to my friend, I said it really, really helps, you
can talk about anything doesn't have to be a really big problem, just
any problem you have -- bullying, relationships, friendships, anything - and she always tries to understand everything you say and even if
she doesn't understand you can tell her off and just say, „No you got
it wrong,‟ and she listens to everything you're saying, and what I'm
describing -- it really helps.”
Do teachers
think counselling
is helpful for
clients?
Helpfulness: Teachers‟ ratings
(N = 125 pastoral care teachers)

„Extremely
unhelpful‟

„Neither helpful
or unhelpful‟

„Extremely
helpful‟
Teachers‟ open-ended responses
• In general, very positive about the
helpfulness of counselling:
„I was sceptical to begin with…but it‟s been
great, excellent, superb‟
„This is an excellent service which has been of
huge benefit to pupils on a short/long term
basis‟
„Excellent resource which pupils find very
valuable‟
Educational
impact
Global data
• School therapeutic interventions
significantly improve academic work
(83 studies, overall effect size = 0.38)
–
–
–
–

Class behaviour (teacher-rated): ES = 0.26
Academic achievement: ES = 0.36
Environmentally-related: ES = 0.26
Self-reported academic outcomes: ES = 0.59
Educational impact: UK data
• Self- and teacher-rated impact on: Motivation
to attend / Ability to concentrate / Motivation
to study / Willingness to participate in class

• Clients:
– Improved: 60-70%
– Same: 25-35%
– Worse: 5-10%

• Teachers
– Improved: 75-90%
– Same: 5-20%
– Worse: 2-3%
Long term
outcomes
Follow-up data: YP-CORE
25

counselling

20
15
10

6 months

endpoint

midpoint

startpoint

5

n = 17
Case controlled data: YP-CORE
25

counselling

20
15
10

6 months

endpoint

midpoint

startpoint

6 weeks pre

12 weeks pre

5

n = 11 (n = 5 at 6 months)
How might school-based counselling
help to bring about individual change?
Helpful aspects:
young people
1.
2.
3.
4.

Opportunity to talk and being listened to
Getting things off one‟s chest
Confidentiality
Counsellors‟ personal qualities
(e.g., accepting)
5. Independence of counsellor
6. Directive therapeutic interventions
(e.g., relaxation exercises)
Helpful aspects:
school staff
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Accessibility of service
Independence
Confidentiality
Specialist training
Available for extended time periods
Non-stigmatising
Summary
1. School-based counselling is major area
of development internationally
2. Increasing evidence that significantly
reduces young people‟s levels of
psychological distress, and their ability
to engage with education
3. Gives young people an opportunity to
talk through problems and feel better
about selves
Summary
• School-based counselling is a widely
disseminated intervention, but
rigorous evidence of effectiveness is
limited
• Emerging body of evidence suggests
that it does bring about significant
reductions in psychological distress
• Matches many clients‟ experiences of
counselling and cohort data

Pushkin

  • 1.
    The effectiveness of school-basedcounselling with young people Mick Cooper, Professor of Counselling EAC, Pushkin 2013 Thanks to: Jo Pybis, Katherine McArthur, Karen Cromarty, Andy Hill, Nancy Rowland, Jamie Murdoch, Nick Turner, Ruth Levesley, Peter Pearce, Sarah Osman, Ros Sewell Contact: [email protected]
  • 2.
    Aims of talk 1.Review evidence from UK on school-based counselling and its effectiveness 2. Explore pathways by which school-based counselling might bring change about
  • 3.
    The emergence ofschoolbased counselling for young people in the UK 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Source: Baginsky, 2004; BACP 2012
  • 4.
    Widely disseminated • Today,school-based counselling is one of the most common mental health and wellbeing provisions for young people in the UK Source: BACP 2012; Hill, 2011; estimated figures
  • 5.
    Dissemination of school-basedcounselling in UK secondary schools Scotland: 64-80% (approx.) NI: All schools since 2007 England: 61-85% (approx.) Wales: All schools since 2008 Source: BACP 2012; estimated data for England and Scotland
  • 6.
    International prevalence • 39countries around globe mandate school-based counselling (inc. Czech Republic, Slovakia and Romania) • 24 countries: well-established but not compulsory (inc. Georgia, England) • „Overall, school counselling is developing relatively quickly into an integral part of the education system in many parts of the world‟ (Harris, 2013)
  • 7.
    Service delivery inUK • Delivered by qualified counsellors • Primarily humanistic/integrative, orientation: relational, supportive, „nondirective‟ practice • Generally one-to-one, confidential • Orientation to mental wellbeing • Mainly for young people: 11-18 Source: Cooper, 2009; Hill, 2011
  • 8.
    Referral routes School staff Self Parents/carers Source:Cooper, 2009; Hill, 2011, estimates from approximately 20,000 young people
  • 9.
    Reported waiting times: relativelybrief 50% 35% 1 week 15% 1 month Source: BACP, 2012; Hill, 2011; approximate data, as reported by school staff and local authority leads
  • 10.
    Psychological difficulties at assessment(SDQ) (counselling) „Normal‟ „Abnormal‟ „Borderline‟ Source: Cooper, 2009, from 611 young people
  • 11.
    Presenting/developing issues 35 Percentage 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Source: Cooper,2009; Hill, 2011; approximate data from over 20,000 cases
  • 12.
    BME under-represented Percentage 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Counselling clients AllWales Source: Hill, 2011; data from 11,043 cases
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
    Change from pre-to postcounselling Counselling consistently associated with significant reductions in psychological distress from beginning to end Meta-analyses, ES= 0.81 – 1.09 from pre- to postOutcome measure score (higher scores mean more distress) Welsh Strategy evaluation 25 20 15 10 5 Pre-counselling Post-counselling Source: Hill, 2011; Cooper, 2009; data from
  • 17.
    In “real” terms… Overthe last week… „My problems have felt too much for me‟ After counselling av. = 1.05 Before counselling av. = 1.87 0 1 2 3 4 Not at all Only occasionally Sometimes Often Most or all of the time
  • 18.
  • 19.
    The randomised controlledtrial „baseline‟ ‟endpoint‟ Counselling Random allocation Not counselling (e.g., wait-list)
  • 20.
    Global data • School-basedtherapeutic interventions significantly reduce psychological distress (107 studies, mean „effect size‟ = 0.45 = medium effect) • But evidence comes mainly from US studies, CBT/psycho-educational, often group-based • Is counselling, as delivered by UK counsellors, effective?
  • 21.
    „School-based humanistic counselling‟ • Developedas distillation of UK practice • Based on humanistic competences: relational, supportive approach, Rogerian foundations • Four pilot RCTs comparing against waitlist
  • 22.
    School-based humanistic counselling Reduced psychologicaldistress • Combined data from three RCTs with 53 clients in counselling, and 57 in waiting list Large effect • Up to 10 weeks ES = 0.78 of SBHC • Audited for ‘adherence’ to humanistic competences
  • 23.
  • 24.
    Service user perspectives “Itreally does help you to concentrate better in class cos all your problems are like, sorted, so the teachers probably think it's good.” “I was sad when I went in there cos I lost my grandmother….. She says it goes– she says it goes on in my life, she says she knows how hard it is ...The more and more I do learn from her, the more and more I get happier.” “Yeah it's changed my behaviour a lot.. I can walk away from situations instead of swing punches. Before, if I was fighting and one of my friends would grab me I'd hit „em but now if they grab me I'll get off.” “I have recommended it to my friend, I said it really, really helps, you can talk about anything doesn't have to be a really big problem, just any problem you have -- bullying, relationships, friendships, anything - and she always tries to understand everything you say and even if she doesn't understand you can tell her off and just say, „No you got it wrong,‟ and she listens to everything you're saying, and what I'm describing -- it really helps.”
  • 25.
  • 26.
    Helpfulness: Teachers‟ ratings (N= 125 pastoral care teachers) „Extremely unhelpful‟ „Neither helpful or unhelpful‟ „Extremely helpful‟
  • 27.
    Teachers‟ open-ended responses •In general, very positive about the helpfulness of counselling: „I was sceptical to begin with…but it‟s been great, excellent, superb‟ „This is an excellent service which has been of huge benefit to pupils on a short/long term basis‟ „Excellent resource which pupils find very valuable‟
  • 28.
  • 29.
    Global data • Schooltherapeutic interventions significantly improve academic work (83 studies, overall effect size = 0.38) – – – – Class behaviour (teacher-rated): ES = 0.26 Academic achievement: ES = 0.36 Environmentally-related: ES = 0.26 Self-reported academic outcomes: ES = 0.59
  • 30.
    Educational impact: UKdata • Self- and teacher-rated impact on: Motivation to attend / Ability to concentrate / Motivation to study / Willingness to participate in class • Clients: – Improved: 60-70% – Same: 25-35% – Worse: 5-10% • Teachers – Improved: 75-90% – Same: 5-20% – Worse: 2-3%
  • 31.
  • 32.
    Follow-up data: YP-CORE 25 counselling 20 15 10 6months endpoint midpoint startpoint 5 n = 17
  • 33.
    Case controlled data:YP-CORE 25 counselling 20 15 10 6 months endpoint midpoint startpoint 6 weeks pre 12 weeks pre 5 n = 11 (n = 5 at 6 months)
  • 34.
    How might school-basedcounselling help to bring about individual change?
  • 35.
    Helpful aspects: young people 1. 2. 3. 4. Opportunityto talk and being listened to Getting things off one‟s chest Confidentiality Counsellors‟ personal qualities (e.g., accepting) 5. Independence of counsellor 6. Directive therapeutic interventions (e.g., relaxation exercises)
  • 36.
    Helpful aspects: school staff 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Accessibilityof service Independence Confidentiality Specialist training Available for extended time periods Non-stigmatising
  • 38.
    Summary 1. School-based counsellingis major area of development internationally 2. Increasing evidence that significantly reduces young people‟s levels of psychological distress, and their ability to engage with education 3. Gives young people an opportunity to talk through problems and feel better about selves
  • 39.
    Summary • School-based counsellingis a widely disseminated intervention, but rigorous evidence of effectiveness is limited • Emerging body of evidence suggests that it does bring about significant reductions in psychological distress • Matches many clients‟ experiences of counselling and cohort data

Editor's Notes

  • #23 Actually, really not at all. Without humanistic counselling over a 12 week period really didn’t do well, while those who received it improved very substantially