The document discusses the key features and concepts of a Registrar's Caveat (RC) under Malaysian law. It explains that an RC is entered by the Registrar to protect land from fraudulent or improper dealings. The Registrar has discretion to enter an RC when necessary to prevent fraud, protect government interests, or rectify errors. An RC prevents dealings on the land but does not affect prior registered interests. The document outlines the procedures for entering, duration of, and removing an RC through the Registrar or courts.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 2
Outline
•Examine the features & important concepts
related to RC
•Effect of RC
•Procedure for entry & removal of RC
3.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 3
– A specific type of caveat where power to
enter caveat lies with Registrar.
4.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 4
Nature & Scope
– RC is entered to protect and inhibit dealings
with land
– Entry or lodgement of RC does not create or
enhance any existing claim to title or interest
or give rise to any claim to title or interest
5.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 5
Functions of Registrar
• S.319(a) NLC: “A caveat may be entered by
the Registrar on the register document of
title of any land.”
6.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 6
• Issue: Whether Registrar has discretion to
enter caveat or refuse entry of Caveat
• AR. PL. Palaniappa Chettiar v PL. AR.
Letchumanan Chettiar & Anor[1982] 1 MLJ
232 – discretion is with Registrar as to
whether to enter a caveat.
• discretion of Registrar must be exercised
judiciously and reasonably without any
element of mala fide (bad faith)
7.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 7
Registrars Powers
RC entered in circumstances specified in
S.320(1) NLC whenever it appears
necessary or desirable to Registrar.
• Registrar performs quasi-judicial function
8.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 8
• Court can remove RC if entry is
misleading and no longer necessary or
desirable - Lim Ah Hun v Pendaftar
Hakmilik Tanah, Pulau Pinang & Anor
[1990] 3 MLJ 34 p.37
9.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 9
• Issue: Can Court order
Registrar to enter caveat
pursuant to s.417(1) NLC?
10.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 10
• S. 417 (1) NLC
• “The court may make an order directing
Registrar or LA to do all such things as may
be necessary to give effect to any judgment
or order of given or made in any proceedings
relating to land, and it shall be the duty of
the registrar or collector to comply with the
order forthwith.”
11.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 11
• Palaniappa Chetty v Letchumanan
Chetty [1982] 1 MLJ 232 - Ct have no
jurisdiction to order entry of RC since
Registrar was not made a party to
proceedings
12.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 12
• Seet Soh Ngoh v Venkateswara
Bhd. [1976] 1 MLJ 242, - power
to order Registrar to enter RC
since Registrar was before court.
13.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 13
• prudent to include Registrar as a party to
action,
• however no provisions in NLC preventing or
restricting courts powers if it deems just to
order Registrar
• HC –Ct has powers pursuant to s.417(1) NLC
to order Registrar to enter RC pursuant to
s.320 NLC for prevention of fraud, or
improper dealings, whether or not Registrar
is a party to proceedings
14.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 14
• In Tan Soo Bing v Tan Kooi Fook [1996] 3 MLJ
547 at 557 (the decision in the above cases were
overruled), per Wan Adnan FCJ:
“… it is clear that a person who desires to have a RC
entered in respect of any land must apply to
Registrar. If registrar refuses his application, his
remedy is to appeal to court against such refusal.
He cannot go straight to court… the court has no
jurisdiction to entertain such applications. The
court only has appellate jurisdiction under S.418
NLC.
15.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 15
• Under S.418 NLC - court may reverse decision
of Registrar and direct him to enter RC.
• aggrieved party cannot disregard appeal
provisions under S.418 and go to High Court for
an order that Registrar enters a RC.
• court can only direct Registrar to enter RC if
court do not agree with decision of Registrar
when exercising the appellate jurisdiction under
S.418 NLC.”
16.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 16
• Effect of Registrars Caveat - S.319(1)(b)
is to prevent:
• a. Any Dealings on disputed land
• b. Claim for tenancy exempt from
registration on disputed land
• c. Entry of a Lien-Holders caveat on
disputed land.
17.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 17
• RC takes retrospective effect.
• It has the effect of preventing
registration of any dealing, which was
presented for registration and yet to be
registered when RC was entered.
• RC will not have any effect on a prior
registered dealing.
18.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 18
• Lim Ah Hun v Pendaftar Hakmilik Tanah
Pulau Pinang & Anor [1990] 3 MLJ 34
• Development and Commercial Bank Bhd v
Govt of Malaysia & Ors [1989]3 MLJ 359
• Temenggong Securities Ltd. v Registrar
of Titles [1974] 2 MLJ 45
READ
19.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 19
• Overseas Chinese Banking Corp.Ltd. v
PHT Negeri Kedah [1990] 2 MLJ 478;
[1991] 2MLJ 177
• Development and Commercial Bank Bhd.
v Land Administrator WP [1991] 2 MLJ
180
• MUI Finance Bhd. v Pendaftar Hakmilik
Shah Alam & Anor [1993] 1 AMR
20.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 20
Circumstances where Registrars
Caveat Can be Entered
S.320(1)
21.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 21
• RC can be entered in respect of any land
wherever it appears to Registrar to be
necessary or desirable.
• (a) for the prevention of fraud or
improper dealing; or
22.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 22
• (b) for protecting interests of the
followings:
– (i) federation or State Authority
– (ii) any person under:
-disability of minority; or
- mental disorder or unsound mind; or
- absent from the Federation
23.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 23
• (ba ) to restraint the land from being dealt
with in order to ensure that the land is
available to satisfy the whole or any part of
debt due to the Federation or the State
Authority, irrespective if judgment has
been obtained or nor; or
• (c) due to an error on the register
document of title to land or any related
instrument
24.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 24
Prevention of Fraud or Improper
Dealing
S 320 (1)(a) NLC
25.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 25
• Registrar can enter RC on application of
persons or representatives of persons in
s.320(1)(a)(b) NLC to prevent fraud or
improper dealing with land.
• Registrar does not have to take part in
any examination of severity of fraud or
improper dealing
26.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 26
• If there is evidence that raises suspicion
of such dealing, should be adequate for
Registrar to decide to enter RC.
• Registrar must make adequate inquiries
but not required to make a decision that
alleged act of fraud has actually been
committed.
27.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 27
Caveating one’s own land
• Landowner is prohibited from caveating own
land, unless can show existence of an interest
to that arising beyond legal proprietorship.
• This is difficult to prove
• However, in instances where IDT to land is lost
or stolen owner since cannot enter a Private
Caveat can apply to Registrar to enter a RC
for prevention of fraud or improper dealings
28.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 28
• Re An Application by Haupiri Courts
(No.2) [1969] NZLR 358
• Eu Finance Berhad v Siland S.B.& (M&J)
Frozen Food S.B. [1989]1 MLJ 195
• Boonsom Boonyanit v Adorna Properties
[1990] 3 MLJ 444
• Lim Ah Hun v Pendaftar Hakimilik Tanah
Pulau Pinang & Anor [1990] 3 MLJ 34
29.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 29
• Ss-320(1)(b)(i) NLC provides that interest of
Federation or SA can be protected using RC
• Registrar usually enter a caveat even before an
interest in land in favour of Federation or State
Authority arises.
• Temenggong Securities Ltd. v Registrar of Titles
[1974] 2 MLJ 45 registrar entered a Caveat to
protect interest of IRD in respect of a claim for
unpaid income tax.
30.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 30
• Privy Council - interests, which can be
protected are those ‘in land that are
recognised by NLC as being either
registerable or otherwise entitled to
protection.
• interest must be proprietary as such an
unsecured creditor of proprietor of land
has no such interest in the land.
• Caveat must be removed because interest
did not represent an interest in land
31.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 31
• Government dissatisfied with decision in
Temenggong Securities inserted sub-sec
(ba)
• In circumstances where debt is unsecured
or judgment has yet to be obtained
against registered proprietor, Govt
reserves right to apply to enter a RC to
prevent dealing with caveated land prior
to settlement of Government’s claim.
Amendment to NLC to
Insert Subsection(ba)
32.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 32
Effect of RC entered by
govt
• Though Registrar is permitted to enter
caveat on behalf of Govt, caveat will
not have effect of overriding interests
of existing interest holders.
• Thus prior registered chargee’s rights
will never be affected by subsequent
entry RC on behalf of Govt.
33.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 33
• Development & Commercial Bank Bhd v
Govt. of Malaysia &Ors.[1989]3MLJ 359
• Overseas Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd. v
PHT Negeri Kedah [1990]2 MLJ 478;
[1991]2 MLJ 177
• Development and Commercial Bank Bhd. v
Land Administrator WP [1991] 2 MLJ 180
• MUI Finance Bhd. v Pendaftar Hakmilik
Shah Alam & Anor [1993]1 AMR
34.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 34
• (i) Federation or State Authority
• (ii) any person under the
– (a) disability of minority; or
– (b) mental disorder or unsound mind; or
– (c) absent from the Federation.
Who can apply for RC
-S.320(1)(b) NLC
35.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 35
(a) disability of minority
• Registrar can enter RC to protect
interest in land or a right to such an
interest for a minor.
• Age of Majority Act 1971 (Act 21)
provides in S.2 that age of majority is
18 years old.
36.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 36
• (b)mental disorder or unsound mind; or
• Registrar can enter RC to protect interest
in land or a right to such an interest for a
person who is unsound mind.
• Mental Disorders Ordinance 1952.
37.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 37
(c)absent from
Federation
• Registrar can enter RC to protect
interest in land or a right to such an
interest for a person who is absent from
Federation
38.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 38
• Form 19F, endorsed & sealed by Registrar:
“Registrars Caveat Entered” together with
statement of time and entry.
Entry of RC
S.321 NLC
39.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 39
• No fixed duration or specific life span for
RC
• s.321(3) - RC shall continue in force until
cancelled by Registrar.
• RC does not lapse with the effluxion of
time.
Duration -S.321(3) NLC
40.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 40
• Once RC entered - serve notice on
registered proprietor in Form 19A -
s.321(2) NLC
41.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 41
• RC continue in force until cancelled by
Registrar:
• a.S.321(3)(a) - of his own motion;
• b.S.321(3)(b)- application by proprietor of
caveated land; or
• b.S.321(3)(c) - pursuant to Court Order.
42.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 42
Questions
• Who can apply to enter RC
• What are the functions/discretionary powers
of Registrar in RC
• What are the functions of RC
• Can a RC affect prior registered interests to
give effect to subsequent unsecured
interests/claims
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 44
• RC continue in force until cancelled by
Registrar:
• a.S.321(3)(a) - of his own motion;
• b.S.321(3)(b)- application by proprietor of
caveated land; or
• b.S.321(3)(c) - pursuant to Court Order.
45.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 45
Removal by Registrar
s.321(3)(a) NLC
• Registrar can remove caveat when he is
of view that there is no need for caveat
to remain as it has served its’ purpose.
46.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 46
Removal by landowner-s.321(3)(b)
• Registered proprietor (Caveatee) of land,
upon receiving Notice of Entry of Caveat
Form 19A can apply to Registrar to remove
caveat.
47.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 47
• Registrar can remove or reject
application for removal.
• Registrar removes RC, matter will be
resolved
• Registrar refuses to remove RC,
Caveatee can appeal to Court against
decision of Registrar not to remove RC.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 49
Pursuant to Court
order -S.321(3)(c)
• Caveatee, can appeal against decision
of Registrar not to remove caveat
pursuant to S.418 - S.321(3)(c) NLC
50.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 50
Appeal pursuant to s.418
NLC
• registered proprietor is required to appeal
to High Court within 3 months from time of
communication of decision of Registrar
rejecting the application to remove
Registrars Caveat - S. 321(3)(b) NLC
51.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 51
• Any other person who is not registered
proprietor but aggrieved by decision of
Registrar must appeal to H Ct within 3
months from date on which decision was
communicated to him.
52.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 52
Removal of Registrars’ Caveat
by Aggrieved Chargees
53.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 53
• registered Chargee aggrieved by entry of
Registrars Caveat has right to seek to
remove the Registrars Caveat from time
entry of Caveat is communicated to them.
• appeal can be made pursuant to S 418 NLC
54.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 54
• Aggrieved chargee cannot apply to
Registrar to remove caveat –s.321(3)(c)
• S.321(3)(C) NLC–provides for registered
proprietor whose application to remove
caveat to registrar is rejected.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 56
• Development & Commercial Bank v LA WP
[1991] 2 MLJ 180
• SC -considered issue whether chargee
who is not aware of entry of Registrars
Caveat or who has not objected to entry
of caveat in first instance has a right to
appeal pursuant to S.418 NLC
57.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 57
Azmi SCJ at p.185 …,
• “… firstly there is no express provision in
s 321 NLC to enable a chargee on its own
right to apply to Registrar or Land
Administrator to cancel or remove the
registrars caveat, thereby making it
quite impossible for the chargee to
obtain a decision of the registrars
caveat, for the purpose of an appeal
under s. 418
58.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 58
• Secondly, under s 321(3) read with s.418, a
in the absence of the right to apply for
cancellation and as well as the absence of
express appeal provision chargee can only
appeal against the decision of the registrar
to enter the caveat but not against a
decision refusing to cancel the caveat.
59.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 59
• In absence of right to apply for cancellation
and as well as the absence of express appeal
provision by a chargee relating to refusal of
Registrar to remove caveat entered under s
320(1)(ba) declaratory relief should be
available to chargee.
60.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 60
• power to grant a declaratory
judgment must be exercised with
great care and judiciously and in
appropriate cases
61.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 61
• Pendaftar Hakmilik Negeri Kedah v Overseas Chineese
Banking Corp. Ltd. (1991) 2 MLJ 177 at 179 (SC)
• sale of charged land by chargee was disrupted by
existence of RC entered by Registrar to protect interest
of unsecured debt of the federation.
• Gunn Chit Tuan SCJ - … Registrar had failed to take into
consideration several material factors in entering RC on
application of IRD.
• Reg has not acted judiciously or reasonably within ambit
of NLC.
• He has exceeded his powers and acted ultra vires and his
act is invalid.
62.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 62
… cont….
• court - before exercising his discretionary
power under subsection (ba) Registrar must
first check market value of disputed land &
amount of debt due to government.
• If debt due on any prior charge or charges
exceeds market value of land, RC cannot be
entered against land as it can be reasonably
inferred that debt due to Federation can
never be satisfied from sale of land.
63.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 63
Public Bank Berhad v Pengarah
Tanah & Galian & Anor.[1990] 2
MLJ 510
• Ct - rights of a prior registered interest-
holder would enable him to defeat rights of
Federation or State Authority.
• Ct - willing to allow entry of RC on behalf by
unsecured Federal or state government.
• Interest of Federation can be upheld only if
there are no prior registered interest of a
third party which would have been adversely
affected by existence of caveat.
64.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 64
• Development and Commercial Bank Bhd v
Government of Malaysia & Ors [1989] 3 MLJ
359
• Overseas Chinese Banking Corpn. Ltd. v PHT
Negeri Kedah [1990] 2 MLJ 478; [1991] 2
MLJ 177
• MUI Finance Bhd v Pendaftar Hakmilik Shah
Alam & Anor [1993] 1 AMR
• Lim Ah Hun v Pendaftar Hakimilik Tanah Pulau
Pinang & Anor [1990] 3 MLJ 34
65.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 65
Summary
Procedure of Removal of RC
by Registered Proprietor
66.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 66
• i. Communication of entry of caveat
by Registrar to proprietor
• ii. Proprietor appeal to registrar
against entry of caveat
• Registrar refuse to remove caveat
• Appeal to court –s.418 within 3
months from decision of Registrar to
remove RC.
67.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 67
Procedure of Removal of RC
Registered Interest Holder
68.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 68
• Communication of entry of RC by
registrar.
• Within 3 months from decision of
Registrar to enter RC must apply to court
to remove RC.
69.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 69
Registered Interest Holder
• D&C Bank v Govt. of M’sia [1989] 3 MLJ
359 – time to seek to remove RC by any
person having registered interest on land
begins from time of communication of
entry of RC.
• registered interest holder has no right to
apply for removal of RC to the registrar
• He must act expeditiously under s.418.
70.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 70
• Public Back Bhd. v Pengarah Tanah &
Galian JB [1990] 3 MLJ 100 – right of
appeal for others with registered
interest is pursuant to s.418.
05/14/14 Ainul JariaMaidin 72
• Registrar shall give effect to any order of
court by making a note under his hands
and seal the date of cancellation of
Caveat entered – s.417
• If Registrar acts on his own motion to
remove Caveat, he shall notify registered
proprietor of affected land.