Download to read offline
Uploaded byWWF-Australia
Rg numbers for podcast part 2 value
The document analyzes fundraising benchmarks from 2010, highlighting that face-to-face (f2f) solicitation remains the dominant channel for recruiting regular givers (RG). It notes a steady growth in average RG gifts while cash gifts have declined, and f2f recruits show higher upgrade rates. Additionally, it provides data on RG attrition and recruitment trends by year, emphasizing the effectiveness of f2f methods.
More Related Content
Rg numbers for podcast part 2 value
- 1. Pareto Fundraising BenchmarkingExtractsfrom Industry Trends Report: 2010Part II - Value© Pareto Fundraising April 2010
- 3. 3Individual RG incomeby channel of solicitationF2F continues to dominate RG recruitment.Base: All giving© Pareto Fundraising April 2010
- 4. 4Average Non F2FRG gift by yearAverage RG gift maintained steady growth in contrast to average cash gift decline.=$31.78NZD© Pareto Fundraising April 2010
- 5. 5Average F2F RGgift by year=$33.71NZD© Pareto Fundraising April 2010
- 6. 6New RG recruitsby year and channelF2F continues to dominate RG recruitment.© Pareto Fundraising April 2010
- 7. 7Value to date– F2F RG recruits © Pareto Fundraising April 2010
- 8. 8RG attrition byyear – F2F recruits© Pareto Fundraising April 2010
- 9. 9RG attrition byyear – non F2F recruits© Pareto Fundraising April 2010
- 10. 10RG upgrades byyear of recruitmentFace to face has higher upgrade rates (remember this is active donors). This could be a function of phone number availability© Pareto Fundraising April 2010
- 11. THANK YOU© ParetoFundraising April 2010