A Curriculum for an
Uncertain World
Ronald Barnett, Institute of Education, London
Annual conference on Learning and Teaching
University of Liverpool, 23 June 2010
Centre for Higher
Education Studies
Sub-brand to go here
2
Context – and Emma’s tale
A present context: the unemployed graduate
‘Last year, I created a new society for the University, for my course. That involved
quite a lot of responsibility and taking control and I’ve never been in that, sort of,
leadership position before. … the society stuff definitely helped my degree – if
no other reason than just feeling more accessible to the lecturers and the tutors.
‘I’m [also] an artist .. I tend to do [large] landscapes in acylics.
Q Do you see that as something quite separate or do you think it spills over in any
way?
‘Yeah, I think it does in a way because I was thinking about how long it takes me to
do the paintings, I think that’s, kind of, patience and the motivation to do it
because there’s times when I think, I just want to give up.’
3
Beginning questions
So from this starting point:
 Just what is it to be a graduate in the C21?
 Just what might we hope for from our students?
 What might they want of themselves?
 Employability? Career?
 But, NB,
 global recession,
 graduate unemployment,
 weak and fluid patters of transition from HE-world of work,
 successively shorter periods of employment in any one area,
 ‘portfolio’ work patterns
 Being a citizen, contributing to the social, political and cultural fabric
 So, what is it to learn in a university? What are the responsibilities of a university towards
its students?
4
Changing answers
Built successively around the themes of:
- knowledge/ understanding (‘initiation’)
- skills (‘employability’)
Problems:
- Neither my knowledge nor my skills may be adequate tomorrow
- I may have all the knowledge or skills in the world but (a) I many not be inclined
to use them; (b) I may use them inappropriately and may even harm the world.
5
The twenty-first century
• Challenge
• Change
• Uncertainty – of/in the world; in one’s very being
• Complexity/ supercomplexity
• Division – differences – of values, of resources, of
perspectives
• Global dimension
6
Employability – an inadequate concept
• ‘Employability’ – a concept that denotes the transition from higher
education to the wider world
• Inadequate concept, a thin concept
• But the ‘world of work’ is a troublesome concept
• Not merely graduate unemployment
• Or rapid transitions – from accountancy to primary school teacher – a
fluid world
• But implies the wider world & the world of work are coterminous
• But there is a wider world beyond wld of work that exerts its calling
7
Being in the world
• Not just being in the world but being in the world;
• What is it to be in the world?
• In a world that is changing and contestable at that?
• We have to be in certain kinds of way;
• Persons of a certain kind
• So is emerging a (renewed) concern with students as
persons
8
A schema
• Acting
• Being
• Knowing
NB: even knowledge and action require engagement,
ultimately; they cannot be inert.
9
Forms of inquiry (Liu)
• Intellectual inquiry
• Practical inquiry
• Emotional inquiry
– Being oneself; placing one’s being into the inquiry
(cf the personal pronoun (‘I’) in PhD theses)
10
Crossing the disciplines
- The weightings of the three dimensions vary
- Characteristically, one is dominant
- Compare sciences/ humanities/ professional/ creative arts fields
- Other dimensions (Bigland; Becher; Liu):
- Hard/soft (quantitative/ qualitative)
- Academic/ professional
11
Reclaiming the student
• Both knowledge and skills are exterior
• Now, the student as person is being called forth
• Reflective logs; attitudes; values; ‘global citizen’; personality
structure; group projects
• Sense in post-modernity that the individual has to give of
herself; always remaking herself
• A heavy burden (that is too much for some)
12
The re-birth of breadth
• Formerly, breadth – a matter of breadth across disciplines
• Then a mix of knowledge and skills
• Now: the insertion of the student into the process of inquiry
– ‘Personalisation’
• But unduly technologicised, eg:
– Personal tutoring systems;
– Problem-based inquiry;
– Interactive WLEs
13
Lifewide learning
• Distinguish lifelong learning/ lifewide learning
– And the C21 calls for both
• Lifewide learning – explicitly connects with the life-world of the student
• Many students are lifewide learners
• - with learning experiences that are demanding
• - and are contributing to their learning within the U (Emma’s tale) – thro
the formation of their Ds and Qs
• And LW lng is also helping their formation as global citizens
• So: what is special about the student’s academic learning?
• How are universities to respond?
14
Students as Global Citizens
• A care/ concern for the world
• A sense of interconnectedness
• Not living in one’s own world
• Helping to bring about a better world (cf ‘wisdom’)
• A project of ‘engagement’
• Implies first-handedness; genuine (critical) thought & action
• Impact on curricula
• And on opportunities while a student
15
The ideas of ‘graduate attributes’ &
‘graduateness’
• (So) the world presents human being with considerable challenges –
technical, social, communicative, personal
• We look to graduates esp to be human beings who can live purposively
in the face of these challenges
• Even to be exemplary human beings
• Such a world requires, in the first place, neither knowledge nor skills but
human beings of certain kinds
• Searching for a language – ‘graduate attributes’; ‘graduateness’
• My own suggestion: ‘dispositions’ and ‘qualities’
16
Dispositions for a world of challenge
• A will to learn
• A will to engage
• A preparedness to listen
• A preparedness to explore
• A willingness to hold oneself open to experiences
• A determination to keep going forward
17
Qualities for a world of challenge
• Carefulness
• Courage
• Resilience
• Self-discipline
• Integrity
• Restraint
• Respect for others
• Openness
(Qs are extendable; & offer a palette of pathways to a worthwhile identity)
18
The (higher) educational significance of
the dispositions and qualities
• The dispositions and qualities are concomitants of a
genuine higher education
• Curricula and pedagogies could nurture them
• But often fall short
• Students are denied curricula space, and pedagogical
affirmation and encouragement
• But the dispositions and qualities (above) are logically
implied in a ‘higher’ education.
19
The ecological curriculum
Promotes:
•Being in the world
•Sensitive to its interconnectedness
•Not inert but engaged
•- in its sustainability and even its improvement
•A care for the world
•The student as global citizen
•An active empathy for the world
Contains
•Spaces for reflection; critical self-reflection
•And spaces for engagement, with self, society and the world (problems)
• Multidisciplinary
- a demanding set of experiences
20
The ecological graduate
• Self-sustaining, yes, but
• a self-understanding on different levels – global/ local; personal/ professional;
systems/ ideas/ persons;
• Different ecological registers (networks & nodes)
• - and having a care/ concern towards them and their wellbeing
• Recognizing the call of responsibilities towards not merely their sustainability
(including one’s own sustainability) but also their improvement
• (cf the financial crisis and the banking ‘industry’ – devoid of an ‘ecological’
perspective – business as usual)
• The Ec G works in and for the interests of the world.
21
Conclusions: conditions of a
contemporary curriculum
 Spaces for K/ A and B; and their interconnections
 Encourages the student to K/ A and B on different levels
 Including the global context
 Encourages student to reflect on his/ her LWL
 Includes the language of ‘responsibility/ responsibilities’
 Nurtures the Ds and opens spaces for the flourishing of the
student’s own Qs
 Not just matters for the curriculum
 - but also crucially for pedagogy, for the student-teacher relationship
 But also raises qs as to what we take a university to be in the
modern age – can the university identity and live out its
responsibilities in the world?
Institute of Education
University of London
20 Bedford Way
London WC1H 0AL
Tel +44 (0)20 7612 6000
Fax +44 (0)20 7612 6126
Email info@ioe.ac.uk
Web www.ioe.ac.uk

Ronald barnett conf_10

  • 1.
    A Curriculum foran Uncertain World Ronald Barnett, Institute of Education, London Annual conference on Learning and Teaching University of Liverpool, 23 June 2010 Centre for Higher Education Studies Sub-brand to go here
  • 2.
    2 Context – andEmma’s tale A present context: the unemployed graduate ‘Last year, I created a new society for the University, for my course. That involved quite a lot of responsibility and taking control and I’ve never been in that, sort of, leadership position before. … the society stuff definitely helped my degree – if no other reason than just feeling more accessible to the lecturers and the tutors. ‘I’m [also] an artist .. I tend to do [large] landscapes in acylics. Q Do you see that as something quite separate or do you think it spills over in any way? ‘Yeah, I think it does in a way because I was thinking about how long it takes me to do the paintings, I think that’s, kind of, patience and the motivation to do it because there’s times when I think, I just want to give up.’
  • 3.
    3 Beginning questions So fromthis starting point:  Just what is it to be a graduate in the C21?  Just what might we hope for from our students?  What might they want of themselves?  Employability? Career?  But, NB,  global recession,  graduate unemployment,  weak and fluid patters of transition from HE-world of work,  successively shorter periods of employment in any one area,  ‘portfolio’ work patterns  Being a citizen, contributing to the social, political and cultural fabric  So, what is it to learn in a university? What are the responsibilities of a university towards its students?
  • 4.
    4 Changing answers Built successivelyaround the themes of: - knowledge/ understanding (‘initiation’) - skills (‘employability’) Problems: - Neither my knowledge nor my skills may be adequate tomorrow - I may have all the knowledge or skills in the world but (a) I many not be inclined to use them; (b) I may use them inappropriately and may even harm the world.
  • 5.
    5 The twenty-first century •Challenge • Change • Uncertainty – of/in the world; in one’s very being • Complexity/ supercomplexity • Division – differences – of values, of resources, of perspectives • Global dimension
  • 6.
    6 Employability – aninadequate concept • ‘Employability’ – a concept that denotes the transition from higher education to the wider world • Inadequate concept, a thin concept • But the ‘world of work’ is a troublesome concept • Not merely graduate unemployment • Or rapid transitions – from accountancy to primary school teacher – a fluid world • But implies the wider world & the world of work are coterminous • But there is a wider world beyond wld of work that exerts its calling
  • 7.
    7 Being in theworld • Not just being in the world but being in the world; • What is it to be in the world? • In a world that is changing and contestable at that? • We have to be in certain kinds of way; • Persons of a certain kind • So is emerging a (renewed) concern with students as persons
  • 8.
    8 A schema • Acting •Being • Knowing NB: even knowledge and action require engagement, ultimately; they cannot be inert.
  • 9.
    9 Forms of inquiry(Liu) • Intellectual inquiry • Practical inquiry • Emotional inquiry – Being oneself; placing one’s being into the inquiry (cf the personal pronoun (‘I’) in PhD theses)
  • 10.
    10 Crossing the disciplines -The weightings of the three dimensions vary - Characteristically, one is dominant - Compare sciences/ humanities/ professional/ creative arts fields - Other dimensions (Bigland; Becher; Liu): - Hard/soft (quantitative/ qualitative) - Academic/ professional
  • 11.
    11 Reclaiming the student •Both knowledge and skills are exterior • Now, the student as person is being called forth • Reflective logs; attitudes; values; ‘global citizen’; personality structure; group projects • Sense in post-modernity that the individual has to give of herself; always remaking herself • A heavy burden (that is too much for some)
  • 12.
    12 The re-birth ofbreadth • Formerly, breadth – a matter of breadth across disciplines • Then a mix of knowledge and skills • Now: the insertion of the student into the process of inquiry – ‘Personalisation’ • But unduly technologicised, eg: – Personal tutoring systems; – Problem-based inquiry; – Interactive WLEs
  • 13.
    13 Lifewide learning • Distinguishlifelong learning/ lifewide learning – And the C21 calls for both • Lifewide learning – explicitly connects with the life-world of the student • Many students are lifewide learners • - with learning experiences that are demanding • - and are contributing to their learning within the U (Emma’s tale) – thro the formation of their Ds and Qs • And LW lng is also helping their formation as global citizens • So: what is special about the student’s academic learning? • How are universities to respond?
  • 14.
    14 Students as GlobalCitizens • A care/ concern for the world • A sense of interconnectedness • Not living in one’s own world • Helping to bring about a better world (cf ‘wisdom’) • A project of ‘engagement’ • Implies first-handedness; genuine (critical) thought & action • Impact on curricula • And on opportunities while a student
  • 15.
    15 The ideas of‘graduate attributes’ & ‘graduateness’ • (So) the world presents human being with considerable challenges – technical, social, communicative, personal • We look to graduates esp to be human beings who can live purposively in the face of these challenges • Even to be exemplary human beings • Such a world requires, in the first place, neither knowledge nor skills but human beings of certain kinds • Searching for a language – ‘graduate attributes’; ‘graduateness’ • My own suggestion: ‘dispositions’ and ‘qualities’
  • 16.
    16 Dispositions for aworld of challenge • A will to learn • A will to engage • A preparedness to listen • A preparedness to explore • A willingness to hold oneself open to experiences • A determination to keep going forward
  • 17.
    17 Qualities for aworld of challenge • Carefulness • Courage • Resilience • Self-discipline • Integrity • Restraint • Respect for others • Openness (Qs are extendable; & offer a palette of pathways to a worthwhile identity)
  • 18.
    18 The (higher) educationalsignificance of the dispositions and qualities • The dispositions and qualities are concomitants of a genuine higher education • Curricula and pedagogies could nurture them • But often fall short • Students are denied curricula space, and pedagogical affirmation and encouragement • But the dispositions and qualities (above) are logically implied in a ‘higher’ education.
  • 19.
    19 The ecological curriculum Promotes: •Beingin the world •Sensitive to its interconnectedness •Not inert but engaged •- in its sustainability and even its improvement •A care for the world •The student as global citizen •An active empathy for the world Contains •Spaces for reflection; critical self-reflection •And spaces for engagement, with self, society and the world (problems) • Multidisciplinary - a demanding set of experiences
  • 20.
    20 The ecological graduate •Self-sustaining, yes, but • a self-understanding on different levels – global/ local; personal/ professional; systems/ ideas/ persons; • Different ecological registers (networks & nodes) • - and having a care/ concern towards them and their wellbeing • Recognizing the call of responsibilities towards not merely their sustainability (including one’s own sustainability) but also their improvement • (cf the financial crisis and the banking ‘industry’ – devoid of an ‘ecological’ perspective – business as usual) • The Ec G works in and for the interests of the world.
  • 21.
    21 Conclusions: conditions ofa contemporary curriculum  Spaces for K/ A and B; and their interconnections  Encourages the student to K/ A and B on different levels  Including the global context  Encourages student to reflect on his/ her LWL  Includes the language of ‘responsibility/ responsibilities’  Nurtures the Ds and opens spaces for the flourishing of the student’s own Qs  Not just matters for the curriculum  - but also crucially for pedagogy, for the student-teacher relationship  But also raises qs as to what we take a university to be in the modern age – can the university identity and live out its responsibilities in the world? Institute of Education University of London 20 Bedford Way London WC1H 0AL Tel +44 (0)20 7612 6000 Fax +44 (0)20 7612 6126 Email [email protected] Web www.ioe.ac.uk