The document discusses the safety requirements of the anesthesia workstation. It outlines the hazards posed by the anesthesia machine and describes safety features that have been developed to prevent issues like insufficient oxygen supply, barotrauma, and excessive anesthetic concentrations. These features include monitors and alarms, standardized connections to prevent misconnections, and proportioning systems to ensure a minimum oxygen concentration. Regular maintenance and updating equipment as needed helps avoid critical incidents.
Introduction to the anesthesia workstation's safety requirements. Learning outcomes include understanding hazards, safety features, and machine obsolescence.
Overview of key components of the anesthesia workstation such as machines, ventilators, and monitoring systems.
Discussion of hazards linked to anesthesia workstations and major causes of patient injuries due to equipment failures.
Strategies to avoid critical incidents, emphasizing the importance of monitors, alarms, education, and standards.
Key safety features in anesthesia machines aimed at preventing errors and ensuring proper gas delivery.
Explanation of oxygen failure protection devices and their functionalities, including fail-safe systems and alarms.
Overview of various proportioning systems designed to prevent hypoxic gas mixtures in anesthesia machines.
Common mechanical issues including leaks in flowmeters and vaporizers, which can lead to significant operational hazards.
Criteria for determining anesthesia machine obsolescence, focusing on safety feature requirements and maintenance.
Recent design changes in anesthesia workstations aimed at increasing safety and preventing gas disconnections.
Advancements in monitoring technologies for breathing circuits and gas delivery systems, ensuring patient safety.
Discussion on the importance of effective alarm systems in monitoring and maintaining anesthesia patient safety.
Risks associated with interactions of anesthetics and desiccates, alongside the importance of preuse checks and new workstation designs.
Wrap-up of the presentation with resources for further learning and training on anesthesia workstation safety.
Safety Requirements ofthe AnesthesiaSafety Requirements of the Anesthesia
WorkstationWorkstation
Raafat Abdel-Azim
Anesthesia DepartmentAnesthesia Department
http://telemed.shams.edu.eg/moodle
2.
IIntended LLearning OOutcomes
Bythe end of this lecture, the student will be able to
understand :
1.The hazards of the anesthesia workstation (AWS)
2.The safety features developed to avoid these
hazards
3.The anesthesia machine obsolescence
4.Preuse checkout
2
3.
1. Anesthesia machine
2.Vaporizer(s)
3. Ventilator
4. Breathing system (patient circuit)
5. Waste gas scavenging system
6. Monitoring and alarm system
3
Major Causes forPatient Injury from
Anesthesia Equipment
• Insufficient O2 supply to the brain
• Insufficient CO2 removal
• Barotrauma (↑↑Paw)
• Excessive anesthetic concentration
• Foreign matter injuring the airway
6
7.
How to avoidcritical incidents?
1. Monitors and alarms:
– Anesthesia machine
– Breathing system
– Patient
2. Detailed education
3. Development and adoption of STANDARDS
4. Regular service of all equipment
5. Equipment should be updated as necessary
7
8.
A safety featureis designed
• to prevent the occurrence of a mistake
• to correct a mistake
• or to alert the anesthesia provider to a
condition with a high risk.
8
Insufficient O2 supplyto the brain
• Hypoxic gas mixture (hypoxia)
– Historical causes:
– Errors in correct couplings (various keyed couplings on
wall outlets, AM inlets & supply hoses are dedicated to
specific gases).
– Disconnection of the FG hose during the use of a hanging
bellows ventilator
– The O2 flow control valve is turned off
– Malfunction of the fail-safe system
– Failure of the N2O-O2 proportioning system
– O2 leak in the machine’s low-P system
– A closed circuit with an inadequate O2 supply inflow rate
• Inadequate movement of the gas to and from the lungs
(apnea)
• ↑ PA→ ↓ VR & COP
12
13.
Safety Measures
• Contentsof the cylinder = O2
• Safety pins projecting from the yoke:
– Sheared off
– Fallen out
• Gasket (seal):
never > 1
• Pipeline pressure gauge
• Cylinder pressure gauge
– If 2 cylinders of the same gas are open, the gauge will display the
higher pressure of the two
– In the event of a tight check valve in the yoke, the pressure at the
contents gauge may continue to display a reading even after the
cylinder has been removed from the yoke, thus indicating a reserve O2
supply which does not exist
Permit the attachment of a wrong cylinder
Accumulation of several gaskets on the inlet
nipple of the yoke may compromise the safety
potential of the pins
13
The DISS isdesigned to prevent
misconnection of the medical gases.
The end of the hose for each type
of medical gas is assigned a unique
diameter and thread that is used to
connect the pipeline gas supplies to
the anesthesia machine
17
Cylinder Yokes
Mechanical systemfor fitting cylinders
securely to the machine. Components
usually include:
1.Pins for the indexing system
2.Bodok seal - neoprene (synthetic
rubber) disk with aluminium or brass ring -
generates airtight seal
3.Check valve to prevent retrograde loss
of gas on cylinder disconnection
4.Filter - 34 micron - to prevent dust
entering and blocking needle valves etc
19
The Pin IndexSafety System (PISS)
• It uses geometric features on the yoke to ensure that
pneumatic connections between a gas cylinder and AM are
not connected to the wrong gas yoke.
• Each gas cylinder has a pin configuration to fit its respective
gas yoke.
– O2: 2-5
– N2O: 3-5
– Air: 1-5
– CO2: 1-6
– Heliox : 2-4
21
Fail-Safe System
(O2 pressurefailure protection device)
Its safety potential is
overestimated (limited)
•Valves inserted in all gas lines upstream
of each of the flowmeters except O2
•Controlled by O2 pressure
•↓ O2 P →
•Close the respective gas line (old)
•↓P in the respective gas line (new)
•Will not prevent ↓O2 conc <safe levels
•Drawbacks:
•Sensitive to P only, will not analyze
the supplied gas
•Closing O2 flow-control valve → O2
P will maintain all other gas lines
open → hypoxic mixture
29
30.
A reservoir isfilled with O2 when the machine is turned on.
When the O2 pressure ↓ < 30-35 psig, the gas in the reservoir
will pass through a clarinet-like reed → sound
Reservoir
The Oxygen Whistle Alarm
30
ORM, Oxygen RatioMonitor
•A set of linear resistors
inserted between the O2 &
N2O flow-control valves &
their associated flowmeters
•The P↓ across the 2
resistors is monitored &
transmitted via pilot lines to
an arrangement of opposing
diaphragms
•These diaphragms are
linked together with the
capability of closing a leaf-
spring contact & actuating
an alarm in the event that
the % of O2 concentration in
the mixture ↓ < a certain
predetermined value
It does not actively control the gas flow. It will
not sound an alarm if a hypoxic gas mixture is
administered when the O2 piping system
contains a gas other than O2
32
33.
ORMc, Oxygen RatioMonitor Controller
•North American Drager
ORMc not only generates
an alarm but also controls
the N2O flow automatically
in response to the O2 flow
•Basic design: similar to
ORM with the exception
that a slave regulator is
additionally controlled
•Advantage: automatically
responding to ↓O2 P or
operator error
•Disadvantage: the operator
can’t override the function
of the device when desired
(low O2 concentration with
low flows)
33
34.
Datex-Ohmeda Link-25 ProportionLimiting Control
(Proportioning) System
The combination of the mechanical and pneumatic aspects of the system yields the
final oxygen concentration
final 3:1 flow ratio
A system that ↑O2 flow when necessary to prevent delivery of a fresh gas mixture with
an O2 concentration of <25%
34
35.
Proportioning Systems
Manufacturers haveequipped newer machines with proportioning systems in an
attempt to prevent delivery of a hypoxic mixture. Nitrous oxide and oxygen are
interfaced mechanically or pneumatically so that the minimum oxygen concentration
at the common gas outlet is between 23% and 25%, depending on manufacturer
1.Datex-Ohmeda Link-25 Proportion Limiting Control System
2.North American Dräger Oxygen Ratio Monitor Controller
35
O2 Flowmeters Arrangedin Tandem
↑Accuracy
(deviation 3%)
↓Accuracy
(deviation 20%)
•↓ Diameter
•Condensation → small particles of dust
or moisture may cause the float not to
move freely
37
38.
Leaks at FlowmeterTubes
Leak → same effect of ↓FGF → ↓ O2 concentration
Possible sites of leak:
•Upper gasket of the O2
flowmeter tube
•Sealing screw
•The piping between flowmeter
tube & the manifold
38
39.
Leaks at Vaporizers
•Atthe inlet & outlet
connections when standard
cagemount fittings are used
•At the filler plug (funnel)
•At the draining device
39
Oxygen Analyzer
• Whatdesign?
• How to calibrate?
• High & low O2 alarm limits. Low alarm limit always
returns to 30% when the unit is initially turned on.
• It does not monitor the movement of gas to the
patient
• Where to place?
41
Location of O2Sensor
Not advisable (≠ FIO2)
Max. safety
Moisture conden.
Limited safety but maybe the only location
Limited safety (disconnection)
Slightly ↑ degree of safety
43
Standard Diameters inMillimeters for
Hose Connections
Different diameters for
hose terminals → ↓ the
possibility of
misconnection
Misconnection →
occlusion in BS
47
48.
The Use ofa Bellows or Self-Inflating Resuscitation Bag
for Checking Out the Breathing System before Use
Observe:
•Function of I & E valves
•System P gauge
•Movement of rebreathing bag
•Function of APL valve
48
Absolute criteria:
1.Lack ofessential safety features such as:
A. O2/N2O proportioning system
B. O2 failure safety device (‘‘fail--safe’’ system)
C. O2 supply failure alarm
D. vaporizer interlock device
E. noninterchangeable, gas-specific pinindexed and diameter-indexed
safety systems for gas supplies.
2.Presence of unacceptable features such as:
A. measured flow vaporizers (e.g., Copper Kettle)
B. more than one flow control knob for a single gas delivered to the
common gas outlet
C. vaporizer with a dial such that the concentration increases when the
dial is turned clockwise
D. connections in the scavenging system that are the same (15 or 22mm
diameter) as in the breathing system.
3.Adequate maintenance no longer possible
Anesthesia Machine Obsolescence
51
52.
Relative criteria:
1.Lack ofcertain safety features such as
A. a manual/automatic bag/ventilator selector switch
B. a fluted O2 flow-control knob that is larger than the other gas flow-
control knobs
C. an O2 flush control that is protected from unintentional activation
D. an antidisconnection device at the common gas outlet
E. an airway pressure alarm.
2.Problems with maintenance.
3.Potential for human error.
4.Inability to meet practice needs such as
A. accepting vaporizers for newer agents
B. ability to deliver low fresh gas flows (FGFs)
C. a ventilator that is not capable of safely ventilating the lungs of the
target patient population.
52
The Anesthesia BreathingSystem
• The bag-ventilator selector switch (older design: 5 steps,
each step→ error)
• PEEP valve: integrated component of the BS or built into
the ventilator (older design: freestanding→ mistakenly
placed into the inspiratory limb→ complete obstruction)
• Hoses and connections (new design ↓ their number)
• Fresh gas hose disconnection: prevented by:
– Retaining devices
– Connection is not accessible
• Filters and humidifiers can become blocked
• Failure to remove the plastic wrapping from facemasks
or breathing circuits
Designchangesmade
55
56.
Preventing fresh gashose disconnection
1. Certain North American Drager anesthesia machines have a
spring-loaded arm
56
2. Certain Ohmedaanesthesia machines have a locking
connector which includes a coiled spring, an L-shaped slot
and a mating pin for this purpose
59
60.
60
AWSPreuse
checkout
Gas
supply
Electric
supply
Safety features
Failure alarm
Batterybackup
Pipeline
Cylinders
Automatic
Manual
Connections
PISS
DISS
Flexible color-coded hoses
Connectors
•Unidirectional check valve
•Fail-safe valve
•2nd
Stage O2
Pressure Regulator
•Flowmeters
•O2
flush valve
•ORM and proportioning Systems
•O2
analyzer
•O2
supply failure alarm
•Datex-Ohmeda Link-25 Proportion
Limiting Control System
•NAD ORMC (Sensitive ORC
System)
Gas delivery
Anesthetic vapor delivery
Anesthesia ventilator
•Keyed fillers
•Vaporizer interlock
•Anti-spill mechanism
Monitors
61.
Monitoring the BreathingSystem
• Perhaps the greatest advance in the design of
modern anesthesia gas delivery systems has
been the incorporation of integrated
monitoring and prioritized alarm systems.
• With appropriate monitors, alarm threshold
limits, and alarms enabled and functioning,
such monitoring should detect most, but not
all, delivery system problems.
61
62.
Monitoring the BreathingSystem
1. Pressure
a) P monitoring
b) Alarms: low P, continuing P, high P,
subatmospheric P
2. Volume (spirometry)
3. PETCO2
4. Respiratory gas composition
5. Gas flows
62
63.
Pressure Monitoring
1. Mechanicalanalog P gauge
2. Electronic display:
The pressure waves are
converted to electrical
impulses that are analyzed
by a microcomputer.
If the user has altered the
manufacturer’s original
breathing circuit
configuration, the system
may fail to detect certain
cases of abnormal Paw.
Monitoring of circuit integrity
and correct configuration
is essential.
(Analog)
Patient side
1
2
63
64.
Sensing Points forPressure Alarms
Preferable
Problems: H2O condensation
Difficult sterilization
Will not recognize adverse P conditions or apnea in
the event of an occlusion in the shaded area
Respiratory meter measuring VE will reveal
occlusion in the breathing path
A pressure monitor is not designed to warn of occlusion or misconnections in the
BS & should not be relied upon for that purpose
Occlusion in the BS will be recognized by a respiratory flow monitor located in the
E limb, which measures VT, f & VM
64
65.
Low-pressure Alarm (Low-pressureMonitor)
• Sometimes have been called Disconnect Alarm (monitor). This is a
misnomer because it monitors P.
• An audible and visual alarm will be activated within 15 seconds
when a minimum P threshold is not exceeded within the circuit.
• This minimum P threshold should be adjusted to be just < PIP so
that any slight ↓ will trigger the alarm (if not close to PIP → a circuit
leak or disconnect may go undetected).
• A small-diameter ETT (e.g., 3-mm) might be pulled out. Because the
tube has a high R (& P= RxF), the P↑ in the circuit with each PPV
may satisfy the low-P alarm threshold & the disconnect may go
undetected by P monitoring.
• Thus, NOT all disconnections can be detected with pressure
actuated disconnect alarms.
65
• Display:
– Thecircuit P waveform
– High- and low-pressure alarm thresholds
– The high-P alarm threshold can be adjusted by the
user
– The low-P alarm threshold can be:
1. Automatically enabled whenever the ventilator is turned
on (new AWS)
2. Bracketed automatically to the existing PIP by pressing
one button (auto limits) (new AWS)
3. Adjusted by the user (user-variable) (old models)
4. Provided by a limited choice of settings (manual set) (e.g.,
8, 12, or 26 cm H2O) (older models) → may limit the
monitor’s sensitivity to detect small decreases in PIP →
readjust the ventilator settings such that the PIP just
exceeds one of the available low-P alarm limits
67
68.
Continuing Pressure Alarm
•When > 10 cm H2O > 15 sec
• Causes (gradual ↑ in circuit P):
– Malfunction of the ventilator P-relief valve (stuck
closed)
– Waste gas scavenging system occlusion: the rate
of P↑ will depend on FGF rate
68
69.
High-Pressure Alarm
• Innew AWS, threshold can be adjusted by the
user, with a default setting of 40 cm H2O
– The ability to set the high-P limit to values of 60-
65 cm H2O may be necessary to permit adequate
ventilation of patients whose lungs have ↓C (stiff)
• In some older models, it is not user-adjustable
& have a threshold of 65 cm H2O → too high
to detect an otherwise harmful high-P
69
70.
Subatmospheric Pressure Alarm
•Activated when P < -10 cm H2O
• →
– -ve P barotrauma
– -ve P pulmonary edema
• May be the result of:
– Spontaneous respiratory efforts (under MV)
– Malfunctioning scavenging system
– A side-stream sampling respiratory gas analyzer or capnography
when FGF is inadequate
– A suction catheter is passed into the airway
– Suction is applied through the working channel of a fiberscope
70
71.
Spirometry/Volume Monitoring
• ExhaledVT & VM
• Location: near the E unidirectional valve
• Used to monitor:
– Ventilation
– Circuit integrity
• Circuit disconnect → low VT alarm if appropriate limits
have been set
• In some older units the low-V alarm limit threshold may
not be user-adjustable (e.g., fixed at 80 ml).
• Hanging bellows → disconnection may fail to trigger a
low VT alarm
71
72.
• Because thespirometry sensor is usually placed by the E
valve at the CO2 absorber → it does not measure the
actual I or E VT. It measures VE + V that has been
compressed in the circle system tubing during I
• High VT alarm is also useful. In older AWS: ↑GF entering
the BS during I (when the BS is closed by closing the
ventilator P-relief valve) → ↑VT.
• This ↑may be due to:
– FGF
– ↑I:E
– Through a hole in the bellows
This is particularly hazardous for the pediatric patient
72
73.
• Modern electronicAWS incorporate features
designed to ensure that the patient will
always receive the intended VT
• Automated checkout is performed to ensure
that there are no leaks and to measure the C
of the BS
• FGD ensures that FGF does not ↑VT
• A spirometer that senses GF direction can
alert to a situation of reversed GF
(incompetent E valve, leak in the BS between
the E valve and the spirometer)
73
74.
The patient’s expiredgases flow through a cartridge
installed in the expiratory limb of the anesthesia
breathing circuit
Volume Disconnect Monitors
74
Gas Composition inthe Breathing System
• O2 analyzer
• Capnography
• N2O
• Anesthetic agents
• Nitrogen
79
80.
Monitoring Gas Flowsand Side Stream
Spirometry
• Side stream sampling (or diverting) gas analyzers
are used to monitor I & ET % of CO2, O2, N2O &
the anesthetic agent.
• Gas is sampled from an adaptor close to the
patient’s airway →sampling tube →analyzer
→BS or scavenging system
• The addition of Pitot tube flow sensors →
monitoring of P, F, V & respired gas composition
at the patient’s airway = side stream spirometry
80
81.
• VT andVM: I vs E → detection of a leak distal to
the airway adapter
I-E difference may be due to:
– Deflated TT cuff
– Poorly fitting LMA
• Loops:
– F/V
– P/V
• With appropriate alarm limits → greater patient
safety because it is less likely to be deceived than
are monitors whose sensors are remote from the
patient’s airway
81
82.
• Rather thanusing the disposable Pitot tube F
sensor placed by the airway, many AWSs use F
sensors placed in the vicinity of the I & E
unidirectional valves in the circle system.
• These sensors measure the F into the I limb of
the circle system during I and the F from the E
limb during E.
• The output of these sensors is compared and a
difference may indicate a leak in the circuit.
• In some AWSs, the sensors’ output is used to
correct VT for changes in FGF and other aspects
of ventilator control.
82
83.
Alarms
• Problems withmonitors or alarms:
– Absent
– Broken
– Disabled
– Ignored
– Led to an inadequate response by the caregiver
83
84.
• Monitors shouldbe:
– User friendly
– Automatically enabled when needed
– Have alarm thresholds easily bracketed to
prevailing “normal” conditions
– Intelligent (smart)
– Alarm signal should be appropriate in terms of:
• Urgency
• Specificity
• Audibility (volume): should be tested & adjusted. The
silencing of audible alarms (because “false alarms are
annoying”) should be discouraged
84
85.
Other Potential Problems:Fires from interactions of
anesthetics with desiccated absorbent
• Sevoflurane → CO & flammable gases
• Baralyme +:
– Sevoflurane → >200 °C → fire
– Desflurane & Isoflurane → 100 °C
So, baralyme has been withdrawn from the market
• Soda lime: ↓strong base than baralyme → ↓hazard
• Less basic CO2 absorbents are now available; e.g.,
Amsorb:
– No strong base (Na, K, or Ba hydroxides)
– It changes color from white to pink when desiccated
85
Although the newelectronic AWSs provide an
automated checkout, some steps in the
preuse checkout must be performed by the
user because they cannot be automated. It is
essential that the user understand what these
procedures are and perform them correctly.
For example, the oxygen tank must be opened
and then closed for the tank pressure to be
measured.
92
93.
• Although anautomated preuse checkout can pressurize the
BS, check for leaks, and measure C, it cannot check for
correct assembly of the BS and possible misconnections of
the hoses.
• Thus, in the 2008 preuse checkout guidelines, item 13
(‘‘Verify that gas flows properly through the breathing circuit
during both I & E’’) is an essential step. A 3-L bag should be
connected at the Y-piece of the breathing circuit to simulate
a model lung. Squeezing and releasing the reservoir bag in
manual (bag) mode and operation of the ventilator (in
automatic mode) should result in inflation and deflation of
the model lung and verify presence and correct operation of
the I & E unidirectional valves.
93
94.
New Workstation Designs:New Problems
• Some AWSs use FGD to ensure that changes in FGF do not
affect the desired (set) VT delivered to the patient’s airway.
• With FGD, during the I phase of IPPV, only gas from the
piston chamber (Drager) or hanging bellows (Anestar) is
delivered to the I limb of the circle system because the
decoupling valve closes to divert FG into the reservoir bag.
• The FGD circuits differ from the traditional circle system in
function and therefore may be associated with different
problems, including detection of an air entraining leak in
the BS and failure of the FGD valve resulting in failure to
ventilate.
94
95.
• The newAWSs incorporate many more
electronic systems than their predecessors.
These systems sometimes fail and render the
AWS nonfunctional. The user must
understand how to proceed in the event of a
power loss.
• In addition, the electrical systems are
sometimes the cause of a fire or smoke
condition
95