SAFETY IN INTERVENTIONAL
PAIN PRACTICE
Dr. Gautam Das
www.Daradia.com
RISKS OF INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES:
 Risks related to invasiveness of the procedure.
 Risks related to drugs used in the procedure.
 Risks involved with the instruments used in the
procedure.
 Risks due to anatomical location of the procedure
 Risks related to any invasive procedure.
SAFETY STEPS IN
INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES
SAFETY STEP-I: SELECTION OF RIGHT
PATIENT FOR RIGHT PROCEDURE
 Will end in failure if not right patient is chosen
for right procedure.
 Patient will be facing undue risks of a
interventional procedure.
 No interventions should be done unless all
criteria for selecting a patient for a procedure is
fulfilled.
SAFETY STEP-II: INVESTIGATIONS TO
RULE OUT CONTRAINDICATIONS
 TLC, DLC rule out infection.
 Blood sugar level to rule out uncontrolled
diabetes.
 Coagulation profile to rule out coagulopathy.
SAFETY STEP-III: EXPLANATION OF
PROCEDURE, RISKS & BENEFITS TO THE
PATIENT AND THEIR RELATIVES
 Informed consent .
 Preliminary psychological evaluation .
 Explanation risks and benefits.
SAFETY STEP-IV: PRE-PROCEDURE
PREPARATION
 Nil per mouth for few hours,
 Intravenous line should be secured,
 Skin test of antibiotics should be done when
required,
 Patients vital parameters measured,
 General anesthesia should be avoided.
SAFETY STEP-V: THOROUGH
ANATOMICAL KNOWLEDGE
 It is essential to have thorough anatomical
knowledge of that region where procedure is
done.
 We can see only bone on fluoroscopy, not the
other structures.
 We must know about other structures which are
not seen in relation with bones.
SAFETY STEP-VI: KNOWLEDGE OF ALL
POSSIBLE COMPLICATIONS
 We must know all possible complications,
 How to avoid those complications.
 Identification of complications as early as
possible, if it happens.
 Management of those complications.
SAFETY STEP-VII: POST-PROCEDURE
ADVICE
 At the time of discharge patients must be
explained about all the danger signals when
they must report clinic.
 Long term complications must also be
explained nicely.
SAFETY STEP-VIII: SAFETY OF DOCTORS
 Possible radiation hazards and how to
minimize.
 Legal hazards regarding new procedures;
 Efficacy & complications of the procedure
must be explained to the patients;
 Current level of evidence and
recommendation of that procedure.
CASE-I
 A 60 years old female patient of vertebral
compression fracture of 4 weeks duration.
 But diagnosed only recently.
 Pain already reduced from 9/10 to 2/10 with
conservative management.
 She can sit comfortably with mild pain.
 Patient is very much worried because of presence
of fracture.
 She is ready for any procedure if it is required to
prevent future complications.
CASE-II
 A 30 years old male patient suffering from leg
pain on right side which is going down up to
great toe.
 MRI shows L4-5 disc prolapse with L5 nerve root
compression right side.
 Pain reduced to 1/10 from 7/10 over 6 weeks with
conservative management.
 No neurodeficits were present from the
beginning.
 Patient is very much worried and is ready for any
procedure if it is required to prevent future
complications.
ETHICS IN INTERVENTIONAL PRACTICE:
 Don’t do procedure unless it is essential.
 Always try conservative management wherever
there is such scope.
 Never do any procedure in asymptomatic patient
whatever is image findings.
 Don’t consider more invasive procedure without
trying less invasive procedure.
 Never do any procedure primarily for
1. Money
2. Publication
3. Learning or practicing a procedure
THANK YOU
www.Daradia.com

Safety in Interventional Pain Practice: Step-by-Step Protocols and Ethical Guidelines

  • 1.
    SAFETY IN INTERVENTIONAL PAINPRACTICE Dr. Gautam Das www.Daradia.com
  • 2.
    RISKS OF INTERVENTIONALPROCEDURES:  Risks related to invasiveness of the procedure.  Risks related to drugs used in the procedure.  Risks involved with the instruments used in the procedure.  Risks due to anatomical location of the procedure  Risks related to any invasive procedure.
  • 3.
  • 4.
    SAFETY STEP-I: SELECTIONOF RIGHT PATIENT FOR RIGHT PROCEDURE  Will end in failure if not right patient is chosen for right procedure.  Patient will be facing undue risks of a interventional procedure.  No interventions should be done unless all criteria for selecting a patient for a procedure is fulfilled.
  • 5.
    SAFETY STEP-II: INVESTIGATIONSTO RULE OUT CONTRAINDICATIONS  TLC, DLC rule out infection.  Blood sugar level to rule out uncontrolled diabetes.  Coagulation profile to rule out coagulopathy.
  • 6.
    SAFETY STEP-III: EXPLANATIONOF PROCEDURE, RISKS & BENEFITS TO THE PATIENT AND THEIR RELATIVES  Informed consent .  Preliminary psychological evaluation .  Explanation risks and benefits.
  • 7.
    SAFETY STEP-IV: PRE-PROCEDURE PREPARATION Nil per mouth for few hours,  Intravenous line should be secured,  Skin test of antibiotics should be done when required,  Patients vital parameters measured,  General anesthesia should be avoided.
  • 8.
    SAFETY STEP-V: THOROUGH ANATOMICALKNOWLEDGE  It is essential to have thorough anatomical knowledge of that region where procedure is done.  We can see only bone on fluoroscopy, not the other structures.  We must know about other structures which are not seen in relation with bones.
  • 9.
    SAFETY STEP-VI: KNOWLEDGEOF ALL POSSIBLE COMPLICATIONS  We must know all possible complications,  How to avoid those complications.  Identification of complications as early as possible, if it happens.  Management of those complications.
  • 10.
    SAFETY STEP-VII: POST-PROCEDURE ADVICE At the time of discharge patients must be explained about all the danger signals when they must report clinic.  Long term complications must also be explained nicely.
  • 11.
    SAFETY STEP-VIII: SAFETYOF DOCTORS  Possible radiation hazards and how to minimize.  Legal hazards regarding new procedures;  Efficacy & complications of the procedure must be explained to the patients;  Current level of evidence and recommendation of that procedure.
  • 12.
    CASE-I  A 60years old female patient of vertebral compression fracture of 4 weeks duration.  But diagnosed only recently.  Pain already reduced from 9/10 to 2/10 with conservative management.  She can sit comfortably with mild pain.  Patient is very much worried because of presence of fracture.  She is ready for any procedure if it is required to prevent future complications.
  • 13.
    CASE-II  A 30years old male patient suffering from leg pain on right side which is going down up to great toe.  MRI shows L4-5 disc prolapse with L5 nerve root compression right side.  Pain reduced to 1/10 from 7/10 over 6 weeks with conservative management.  No neurodeficits were present from the beginning.  Patient is very much worried and is ready for any procedure if it is required to prevent future complications.
  • 14.
    ETHICS IN INTERVENTIONALPRACTICE:  Don’t do procedure unless it is essential.  Always try conservative management wherever there is such scope.  Never do any procedure in asymptomatic patient whatever is image findings.  Don’t consider more invasive procedure without trying less invasive procedure.  Never do any procedure primarily for 1. Money 2. Publication 3. Learning or practicing a procedure
  • 15.