Clinical utility of sperm DNA
fragmentation tests
Aboubakr Elnashar
Benha University Hospital, Egypt
Aboubakr Elnashar
CONTENTS
1. Origin of SDF
2. Etiology of SDF
3. Assessment of SDF
4. Correlation between semen parameters &
SDF
5. Correlation between clinical parameters &
SDF
6. Clinical utility of SDF tests
2013
2014
2015
 Conclusion 6Aboubakr Elnashar
1. ORIGIN OF SDF
(Marin et al, 2012)
 First line:
Spermiogenesis/or spermatogenesis
A breakdown in keys of cell system:
-Apoptosis
-DNA repair
-Chromatin remodelin
 Second line:
• Increase radical oxygen species
• Failure of antioxidant defense system during transport
through male reproductive tractAboubakr Elnashar
2. ETIOLOGY OF SDF
(Evgini et al, 2014)
I. Primary Testicular Factors
1. Abnormal germ cell apoptosis
2. Advanced paternal age
3. Exposure to gonadotoxins
4. Sperm protamine deficiency
5. High level of ROS
II. Extratesticular Factors
1. Smoking
2. Radiation
3. Chemotherapy
4. Genital tract inflammation
5. Testicular hyperthermia
6. Varicocele Aboubakr Elnashar
3. ASSESSMENT OF SDF
TestPrincipleMethod
TUNEL
ISNT
Incorporation of probes
at the site of damage
Direct
SCSA
SCD
Comet
Susceptibility of DBs to
denature in acid
solution
Indirect
Aniline blue
Toluidine blue
Incorporation of probes
to nuclear proteins
Chromatin
incorporation
(Feijo and Esteves, 2014)
Aboubakr Elnashar
Aboubakr Elnashar
Normal= 10
Fragmented= 4
DFI= 4X100/10+4
=28.5%
normal
normal
normal
normal
normal
normal
normal
normal
normal
fragmented
fragmented
fragmented
fragmented
normal
≥30: male infertility
15-30: RM.
≤15: Excellent to Good fertility potential
Aboubakr Elnashar
4. CORRELATION BETWEEN SEMEN
PARAMETERS & SDF
Majority of the studies:
an inverse correlation between SDF rate and sperm
quality (sperm concentration, motility, vitality and
morphology), irrespective of the age of the subjects
(Lo´pez et al, 2013; Evgini et al, 2014)
A significant negative correlation between % of
morphologically normal spermatozoa and SDF
Aboubakr Elnashar
5. CORRELATION BETWEEN
CLINICAL PARAMETERS & SDF
SDF showing correlations with
1. Fertilization rates
2. Embryonic development
3. Implantation
4. Pregnancy
5. Abortion rates
6. Congenital anomalies of the offspring
(Evgini et al, 2014)
Aboubakr Elnashar
6. CLINICAL UTILITY OF SDF TESTS
ASRM, 2013
5 questions
1. Does SDF test predict male fertility with natural
conception?
 There is an association with increased SDF and
reduced fertility in men
(Simon, Lewis; 2011)
Insufficient evidence (Level C) to use the test as a
predictor of fertility {cut-points have not been clearly
established and validated}
Aboubakr Elnashar
2. Does SDF test predict pregnancy with IUI?
Conflicting
A Level II-1study showed a positive predictive value of the
SCSA test with DFI ≥30% associated with a lower PR and
LBR.
(Bungum et al, 2007)
Other studies did not confirm the cutoff
 Another study found no association with DNA integrity and
pregnancy with IUI.
Insufficient evidence (Level C) to recommend the
use of SDF tests to predict pregnancy with IUI.
Aboubakr Elnashar
3. Is SDF predictive of pregnancy with in IVF?
Meta-analysis (Zini et al, 2011)
SDF was associated with a modest but significant.
reduction in IVF. PR
Insufficient evidence (Level C) to recommend
routine use of SDF testing for patients undergoing
IVF.
Aboubakr Elnashar
4. Is SDF predictive of pregnancy with IVF and
ICSI?
A meta-analysis (Collins et al, 2008)
SDF was significantly associated with PR in
IVF/ICSI cycles.
Association was mild
Predictive ability was weak.
Test cut-offs were not clearly established.
Aboubakr Elnashar
Meta-analysis [Zini et al, 2011]
No consistent relationship between SDF and
embryo quality and/or development.
The influence of SDF on embryo
quality/development may be more significant in
ICSI compared to IVF cycles.
Insufficient evidence (Level C) to recommend
routine DNA integrity testing for patients undergoing
IVF/ICSI.
Aboubakr Elnashar
5. Is SDF predictive of pregnancy loss?
 A meta-analysis (Zini, 2008)
significant association between SDF and pregnancy
loss after IVF or ICSI
 Insufficient evidence (Level C) to recommend
routine DNA integrity testing to predict
pregnancy loss.
For diagnostic test
1. Results must be reproducible
2. Applicable to a given patient
3. Change management of patient
Aboubakr Elnashar
II. British Fertility Society, 2013
Testing of SDF shows much promise both as
diagnostic test for male infertility and
prognostic test for ART outcomes.
SDF closely associated with fertility outcomes
including
Negative relationships with:
fertilization, embryo quality, implantation
Positive relationships with:
miscarriage and childhood diseases.
Aboubakr Elnashar
III. Evgni et al, 2014: Clinical indications
for SDF tests
1.Prolonged idiopathic infertility
2.Low fertilization rate or bad quality embryos in
IVF
3.Implantation failure following IVF
4.Repeated abortions
5.Prolonged exposure to toxic environmental
conditions affecting fertility
6.Conventional seminal parameters found below
the reference range
7.Advanced male partner age
8.Varicocele patients
9.Cancer patients
Aboubakr Elnashar
Semen analysis
Abnormal
SDF T
DFI≤30
ICSI
DFI≥30
Lifestyle, antioxidant
SDF T after 3 months
Normal+ Female factor
ICSIFailed
Due to its strong correlation with several aspects of ART
procedures and further consequences for the offspring: SDF T
should be integrated in routine clinical practice (Evgni et al, 2014)
Aboubakr Elnashar
Aboubakr Elnashar
Osman et al, 2015: SR and MA
LBR increased significantly in couples with low SDF
compared with those with high SDF
After IVF and ICSI, men with low SDF had
significantly higher LBR
A sensitivity analysis: no statistically significant
difference in LBR between low and high SDF when
ICSI was used
Aboubakr Elnashar
Conclusion
There is insufficient evidence to recommend the
routine use of SDF testing in evaluation and
treatment of infertile couple {level C}
?????????
For diagnostic test
1. Results must be reproducible
2. Applicable to a given patient
3. Change management of patient
Aboubakr Elnashar
Aboubakr Elnashar Lectures
https://www.facebook.com/
groups/227744884091351/

Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation tests Aboubakr Elnashar Benha University Hospital, Egypt

  • 1.
    Clinical utility ofsperm DNA fragmentation tests Aboubakr Elnashar Benha University Hospital, Egypt Aboubakr Elnashar
  • 2.
    CONTENTS 1. Origin ofSDF 2. Etiology of SDF 3. Assessment of SDF 4. Correlation between semen parameters & SDF 5. Correlation between clinical parameters & SDF 6. Clinical utility of SDF tests 2013 2014 2015  Conclusion 6Aboubakr Elnashar
  • 3.
    1. ORIGIN OFSDF (Marin et al, 2012)  First line: Spermiogenesis/or spermatogenesis A breakdown in keys of cell system: -Apoptosis -DNA repair -Chromatin remodelin  Second line: • Increase radical oxygen species • Failure of antioxidant defense system during transport through male reproductive tractAboubakr Elnashar
  • 4.
    2. ETIOLOGY OFSDF (Evgini et al, 2014) I. Primary Testicular Factors 1. Abnormal germ cell apoptosis 2. Advanced paternal age 3. Exposure to gonadotoxins 4. Sperm protamine deficiency 5. High level of ROS II. Extratesticular Factors 1. Smoking 2. Radiation 3. Chemotherapy 4. Genital tract inflammation 5. Testicular hyperthermia 6. Varicocele Aboubakr Elnashar
  • 5.
    3. ASSESSMENT OFSDF TestPrincipleMethod TUNEL ISNT Incorporation of probes at the site of damage Direct SCSA SCD Comet Susceptibility of DBs to denature in acid solution Indirect Aniline blue Toluidine blue Incorporation of probes to nuclear proteins Chromatin incorporation (Feijo and Esteves, 2014) Aboubakr Elnashar
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Normal= 10 Fragmented= 4 DFI=4X100/10+4 =28.5% normal normal normal normal normal normal normal normal normal fragmented fragmented fragmented fragmented normal ≥30: male infertility 15-30: RM. ≤15: Excellent to Good fertility potential Aboubakr Elnashar
  • 8.
    4. CORRELATION BETWEENSEMEN PARAMETERS & SDF Majority of the studies: an inverse correlation between SDF rate and sperm quality (sperm concentration, motility, vitality and morphology), irrespective of the age of the subjects (Lo´pez et al, 2013; Evgini et al, 2014) A significant negative correlation between % of morphologically normal spermatozoa and SDF Aboubakr Elnashar
  • 9.
    5. CORRELATION BETWEEN CLINICALPARAMETERS & SDF SDF showing correlations with 1. Fertilization rates 2. Embryonic development 3. Implantation 4. Pregnancy 5. Abortion rates 6. Congenital anomalies of the offspring (Evgini et al, 2014) Aboubakr Elnashar
  • 10.
    6. CLINICAL UTILITYOF SDF TESTS ASRM, 2013 5 questions 1. Does SDF test predict male fertility with natural conception?  There is an association with increased SDF and reduced fertility in men (Simon, Lewis; 2011) Insufficient evidence (Level C) to use the test as a predictor of fertility {cut-points have not been clearly established and validated} Aboubakr Elnashar
  • 11.
    2. Does SDFtest predict pregnancy with IUI? Conflicting A Level II-1study showed a positive predictive value of the SCSA test with DFI ≥30% associated with a lower PR and LBR. (Bungum et al, 2007) Other studies did not confirm the cutoff  Another study found no association with DNA integrity and pregnancy with IUI. Insufficient evidence (Level C) to recommend the use of SDF tests to predict pregnancy with IUI. Aboubakr Elnashar
  • 12.
    3. Is SDFpredictive of pregnancy with in IVF? Meta-analysis (Zini et al, 2011) SDF was associated with a modest but significant. reduction in IVF. PR Insufficient evidence (Level C) to recommend routine use of SDF testing for patients undergoing IVF. Aboubakr Elnashar
  • 13.
    4. Is SDFpredictive of pregnancy with IVF and ICSI? A meta-analysis (Collins et al, 2008) SDF was significantly associated with PR in IVF/ICSI cycles. Association was mild Predictive ability was weak. Test cut-offs were not clearly established. Aboubakr Elnashar
  • 14.
    Meta-analysis [Zini etal, 2011] No consistent relationship between SDF and embryo quality and/or development. The influence of SDF on embryo quality/development may be more significant in ICSI compared to IVF cycles. Insufficient evidence (Level C) to recommend routine DNA integrity testing for patients undergoing IVF/ICSI. Aboubakr Elnashar
  • 15.
    5. Is SDFpredictive of pregnancy loss?  A meta-analysis (Zini, 2008) significant association between SDF and pregnancy loss after IVF or ICSI  Insufficient evidence (Level C) to recommend routine DNA integrity testing to predict pregnancy loss. For diagnostic test 1. Results must be reproducible 2. Applicable to a given patient 3. Change management of patient Aboubakr Elnashar
  • 16.
    II. British FertilitySociety, 2013 Testing of SDF shows much promise both as diagnostic test for male infertility and prognostic test for ART outcomes. SDF closely associated with fertility outcomes including Negative relationships with: fertilization, embryo quality, implantation Positive relationships with: miscarriage and childhood diseases. Aboubakr Elnashar
  • 17.
    III. Evgni etal, 2014: Clinical indications for SDF tests 1.Prolonged idiopathic infertility 2.Low fertilization rate or bad quality embryos in IVF 3.Implantation failure following IVF 4.Repeated abortions 5.Prolonged exposure to toxic environmental conditions affecting fertility 6.Conventional seminal parameters found below the reference range 7.Advanced male partner age 8.Varicocele patients 9.Cancer patients Aboubakr Elnashar
  • 18.
    Semen analysis Abnormal SDF T DFI≤30 ICSI DFI≥30 Lifestyle,antioxidant SDF T after 3 months Normal+ Female factor ICSIFailed Due to its strong correlation with several aspects of ART procedures and further consequences for the offspring: SDF T should be integrated in routine clinical practice (Evgni et al, 2014) Aboubakr Elnashar
  • 19.
    Aboubakr Elnashar Osman etal, 2015: SR and MA LBR increased significantly in couples with low SDF compared with those with high SDF After IVF and ICSI, men with low SDF had significantly higher LBR A sensitivity analysis: no statistically significant difference in LBR between low and high SDF when ICSI was used
  • 20.
    Aboubakr Elnashar Conclusion There isinsufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of SDF testing in evaluation and treatment of infertile couple {level C} ????????? For diagnostic test 1. Results must be reproducible 2. Applicable to a given patient 3. Change management of patient
  • 21.
    Aboubakr Elnashar Aboubakr ElnasharLectures https://www.facebook.com/ groups/227744884091351/