This document discusses reference and sense as two aspects of semantics. Reference deals with the relationship between language and the real world, referring to things that exist. Sense deals with relationships within language itself and does not refer to anything in the real world. While an expression can have only one reference, it can have multiple senses. The sense of an expression is its meaning and place within the semantic system of a language. Reference and sense are related but different - an expression has meaning (sense) but not necessarily a reference, and two expressions can have the same referent but different senses.
In this document
Powered by AI
Explores reference and sense in language. Reference ties words to real-world entities; sense involves abstract relations within language.
Discusses how expressions relate to referents. Examples show variable and constant references, and clarify the relationship between sense and reference.
Highlights the circular nature of dictionary definitions and meanings. Differentiates sense from reference using expressions without real-world counterparts.
Defines propositional completeness in relation to sense. Discusses how expressions can share senses across languages and the nature of utterances.
Examines the connection between reference and utterances, emphasizing that references are activated through speech and context.
Reference and
meaning
Two ways of talking about the meaning of words and other
expressions:
Sense Reference
We deal with relationships between
language and world.
We deal with relationships
inside the language.
The world
X1 x2
language
The world
y
X
language
Both reference and sense are different but related aspects of semantics •
2.
Reference
- Bymeans of reference a speaker indicates which thing or people
are being talked about .
- Reference is something haring physical existence.
Example:
My son is in the beech tree.
Referent: person referent: things
Note:
Referent of a part of language: things or people exist in the
world even something or someone that not exist but we believe
they are available.
3.
So we have2 things:
*the English expression (part of language)
*thing person (part of the world)
4.
Can a partof language (word expression) have more than one
referent??
Some other expressions never
refer to different references
Example :
“ The moon"
Have a constant reference
Some expressions in a
language can have variable
references
Example :
Orange
Fruit color
5.
Note :
Thereis very little constancy of reference in language , almost all of
the fixing of references comes from the context and according to
the circumstances "time , place ..etc " in which expressions are
used .
Example :
the president of USA in 1997 was George w Bush
in 2006 was Bill Clinton
in 2009 was Obama.
6.
Two different expressionscan have the same referent.
Example :
the morning star & the evening star (planet venus)
Mohamed Nagib & the 1st president .
7.
SENSE
- Thesense of a part of language
(wordsexpressions) is its place in a system of semantic
relationships with other expression in the language.
- Sense is something which doesn't have any physical
existence.
8.
- Sense dealswith intra-linguistic relationships "semantic
relationships"
- One of the semantic relationships is "sameness of meaning in
words, phrases and sentences "
More than one word can have the same sense .
- same language I (almostnearly)fell over.
- school école
sidewalk (A.E)------- pavement (B.E)
9.
Also more thanone expressionsentence can have the same sense :
Rupert took off his jacket = Rupert took his jacket off.
in some cases the same word can have more than one sense :
Example :
- I have an account at the bank of Scotland .
- we steered the raft to the other bank of river.
In some cases alike sentences have different sense :
Example :
- the chicken is ready to eat .
- the chicken is ready to be eaten.
- the chicken is ready to eat something.
10.
The relationship betweensense and reference
- the referent of an expression is often a thing or person
in the world .
- the sense of an expression is not a thing at all it is an
abstraction that can be entertained in the mind of a language user.
- it's difficult to say what sort of entity the sense of an expression
is .. it is useful to think of sense as that is a part of meaning of an
expression that is left over when reference is factored out .
- it's much easier to say whether or not two expressions have the
same sense .
11.
rule :
everyexpression that have meaning have sense ,
but not every expression has reference
almost , probable , if and above don't refer to a
thing in the world but they all have a sence
12.
circularity :
*there is something essential circular about the set
of definitions in a dictionary & defining the sense of
words and other expressions .
*not a bad thing
*often unavoidable >> ( e.g. cases of expressions that
have no referent " and " , etc. ) there is no way of
indicating the meaning of the expression exept with
the words
13.
sence and proposition
there is something semantically complete about a proposition as
opposed to the sense of a phrase of single word .
one might say , roughly , that a proposition corresponds to a
complete independent thought .
_____________________________________________________
grammatically complete >> whole sentence >> smaller
expressions
e.g. a phrase or a
single word .
_____________________________________________________
semantically complete >> a proposition >> sense of a phrase oryy
a single word
_____________________________________________________
14.
sense and differentlanguages
can the same sense to belong to expressions in different
languages ??
to the extent that perfect translation between languages is
possible ( a very debatable point ) essentially the same sense can
be said to belong to expressions in different languages .
Ex:
the pyramid of Khufu is the oldest and largest of the three pyramids
in the Giza . it's the only one of the seven wonders of the Ancient
world to remain largely intact
the relationship between :
* sense and propositions >> direct >> similarity
* sense and utterance >> not so direct >> similarity
_______________________________________________________
- both referring and uttering are acts performed by particular
speaker on particular occasion .
- most utterances contain , or are accompanied by , one or more
acts of referring .
- an act of referring is the picking out of a particular referent by a
speaker on a course of a particular utterance
15.
-- although theconcept of reference is fundamentally
related to utterances , in the acts of reference only
actually happen in the course of utterances .
-- when talking about reference in connection with
sentences , or parts of sentences , we are imagining a
potential utterance of the sentence or expression in
question .
-- in every day conversation , the words ( meaning _ means
_mean _meant _etc ) are sometimes used to indicate
reference and som times to indicate sense .