INSTITUTE OF
PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE
KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY
SUBMITTED TO : MRS.ANJU GOYAL SUBMITTED BY:
JYOTI (PROFESSOR). M PHARMA 1 SEM ( QA)
SIX SYSTEM INSPECTION MODEL
• HELP PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURERS TO FOLLOW CGMP GUIDELINES.
• THE SIX SYSTEM INSPECTION MODEL ARE AS QUALITY, PRODUCTION, FACILITIES,
EQUIPMENT, LABORATORY CONTROLS, MATERIALS & PACKAGING & LABELLING
• APPROACH OF SIX SYSTEM
• ASSURE BEST QUALITY SYSTEM MODEL FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS.
• ASSURES MORE UNDERSTANDING OF WHOLE OPERATION LEADING TO A MORE
POWERFUL SYSTEM WITH CGMP GUIDELINES.
• HIGHLIGHT MODEL’S CONSISTENCY WITH CGMP REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR
MANUFACTURING HUMAN & VETERINARY DRUGS.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
• IT IS A SYSTEM IN WHICH DOCUMENTS PROCESSES PROCEDURES, &
RESPONSIBILITY FOR ATTAINING APPROACHES & GOALS
• LEADERSHIP
• HELP TO COMMUNICATE ORGANIZATION ‘S ACTIVITIES.
• HELP TO MEET CUSTOMER & REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS.
• KEY COMPONENTS OF QMS
• QUALITY MEANS EXCELLENCE OF ANYTHING.
• PLANNING
• MAINTAIN CUSTOMER CONNECTION.
• CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
• QUALITY PRINCIPLES
• FOCUS ON CUSTOMER
• ADMINISTRATION
• TO ENGAGE THE PEOPLE
• APPROACH TOWARD PROCESS
• CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
FACT DECISION MAKING
• MANAGE RELATIONSHIP
OBJECTIVE OF QUALITY
• LESS DEFECTS
• GOOD EFFICACY
• EFFECTIVE PHARMACEUTICALS
• GIVE CLEAR IDEABTO KNOW ABOUT PROGRESS TOWARDS GOALS , INVOLVING
THE TIMELINES TO ACHIEVE IT
QUALITY MANUAL
• DESCRIBES;
• SCOPE OF QMS
• CLARIFY NEEDS OF OMS STRATEGY
• MENTION ANY PART OF QMS
• QUALITY STEPS USED IN ORGANIZATION
• DESCRIBES ORGANIZATION’S QUALITY GOALS & STRATEGY
RESPONSIBILITY OF ORGANISATIONS & IT’S
STRUCTURE
• STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTATION INCLUDES GUIDES SUCH AS FLOWCHARTS
• PERSONNEL
• INSTRUMENT
• KNOW ABOUT STRUCTURE
• KEY OF EVALUATION
• PROVISIONS
• PURCHASING & INVENTORY
• MANAGE PROCESS
• DOCUMENTS & RECORDS .
MANAGE THE DATA
• DATA IS A KEY APPROACH TO TQM.
• GIVE CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
• GIVE UP TYPES OF DATA ,SOURCES, COLLECTION METHODS, RESPONSIBILITIES, STORAGE , DISPOSAL
& ANALYSIS.
• INVOLVES FOLLOWING SOURCES:
• SATISFACTION OF CUSTOMER
• SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE
• PROCESS OBSERVATION
• TRENDS
• CORRECTIVE ACTION
PROCESSES
• TO CONTROL QUALITY & ASSURANCE
• QMS IS APPROACH TOWARD OPERATING PROCESSES
• DESCRIBES ALL STEPS TO CHANGE INPUT INTO OUTPUTS
• AFTER IDENTICATION OF THE PROCESS ,ORGANIZATION STARTS DEFINES KEY SUCCESS
• IDENTIFY ORGANIZATION PROCESSES
• DEFINE PROCESS STANDARD
• ESTABLISH METHODS FOR MEASURING SUCCESS
• DOCUMENTS STANDARDIZATION APPROACH TO ENSURE QUALITY
• DRIVE CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT
QUALITY OF PRODUCTS DEFINE CUSTOMER
SATISFACTION
TO MEASURE CUSTOMER ATTITUDE & COMPLAINT IS FIRST STEP TOWARDS
MONITORING SATISFACTION OF CUSTOMER
• SATISFACTION SURVEYS
• COMPLAINTS PROCEDURES
• ANALYTICAL APPLICATIONS TO MEASURES SATISFACTION TRENDS
• MANAGEMENT REVIEW OF CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
CONTINUAL ENHANCEMENT
• TO MAINTAIN SATISFACTION OF CUSTOMER CONTINUOUS ENHANCEMENT.
• CLEAR DOCUMENTATION NEEDED FOR CONTINUOUS ENHANCEMENT FOR PLANNING ORGANIZATIONAL PROCESSES TO ACHIEVE QMS STANDARDS.
• ENHANCEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION SHOULD ENCLOSED WITH
• QUALITY PLANNING PROCEDURE
• COMPLAINCE REQUIREMENTS
• SAFETY DESIGN
• RISK BASED THINKING
• CORRECTIVE ACTION
• BREAKTHROUGH IMPROVEMENT
• INNOVATION
• ASSESSMENT OF QMS
INSTRUMENTS OF QUALITY
• FOR THE SUCCESS OF QMS BASIC THING IS TO CONTROL &CALIBRATE
INSTRUMENTS WHICH ARE USED TO MEASURE QUALITY.
• INSTRUMENTS ARE CALIBRATED ACCORDING TO STANDARD OF
ORGANISATIONS.
• MAINTAIN QUALITY OF EQUIPMENT
• MAINTAIN CLEAR DOCUMENTATION OF OF CALIBRATION RESULT, SOPS,
CALIBRATION RESULTS
TO CONTROL THE DOCUMENTS
• ACCORDING TO ISO TO DEFINE DOCUMENTS IN QUALITY ORGANIZATION
INVOLVE RECORDS OF:
• COMMUNICATION
• EVIDENCE
• QMS CONFORMITY
• KNOWLEDGE SHARING
PRODUCTION SYSTEM
• INCLUDE PLANNING FOR PRODUCTION
• CONTROL OF PRODUCTION
• PRODUCTION SYSTEM IS DEFINED AS STRUCTURE OF ACTIVITIES WHERE INPUTS ARE
MODIFY INTO VALUE ADDED TO PRODUCT.
• PRODUCTION PLANNING OBJECTIVE
• TO PRODUCE THE PRODUCT WITHIN TIME PLANNING
• ENHANCE PRODUCTIVITY
• PLANNING INCREASE SYSTEMATIC WAY IN CASE OF SERIES OF OPERATION
• TYPES OF PRODUCTION
• CONTINUOUS PRODUCTION SYSTEM
• INTERMITTENT PRODUCTION SYSTEM
• DISPATCHING RECORDS
• PRODUCTION CONTROL
• FUNCTION OF PRODUCTION CONTROL
• PROGRESS CONTROL
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
• DEPENDS ON INTERNAL & EXTERNAL FACTORS ;
• INTERNAL FACTORS : CONTROL WITHIN ORGANISATIONS,INTERNAL ISSUES ( LACK OF REQUIRED INSTRUCTIONS,
MATERIALS
• EXTERNAL FACTORS NOT CONTROL WITHIN ORGANISATIONS (PRODUCT DEMAND, )
• METHODS TO TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION
• MAKE THE PLAN
• CHANGING NUMBER OF WORKING HOURS & NUMBER OF WORKERS
• MODIFICATION IS DONE
• MINIMIZE THE EQUIPMENT HANDLING TIME
• WELL PLANNING
FACILITY & EQUIPMENT SYSTEM
• EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE QUALIFIED, CALIBRATED,CLEANED AS TO PREVENT
CONTAMINATION.
• THIS INVOLVE :
• MAINTENANCE OF BUILDINGS & FACILITIES
• QUALIFICATIONS OF EQUIPMENT ( INSTALLATION & OPERATIONS, PREVENTIVE
MAINTENANCE & CLEANING
• 21 CFR 211 SUBPART B , INCLUDING ORGANIZATION & PERSONNEL, C INCLUDES
BUILDINGS & FACILITIES,D INCLUDE EQUIPMENTS.
LABORATORY CONTROL SYSTEM
• CONSIST WITH ACTIVITIES REGARDING TO LABORATORY PROCEDURES, EVALUATION,
ANALYTICAL METHODS DEVELOPMENT & VALIDATION
• CGMP REGULATIONS 21 CFR 211 INCLUDES
• SUBPART I HAVING LABORATORY CONTROL RELATED TO GENERAL REQUIREMENTS,
TESTING, STABILITY TESTING
• SUBPART J HAVING RECORDS & REPORTS RELATED TO GENERAL REQUIREMENTS,
EQUIPMENT CLEANING & USE COMPONENTS, LABELLING RECORDING, CLOSURE ,
BATCH PRODUCTION & CONTROL RECORDS , LABORATORY RECORDS ,
DISTRIBUTION RECORDS , COMPLAINT FILES
• SUBPART K RELATED TO RETURNED DRUG PRODUCTS, DRUG PRODUCT SALAVAGING
MATERIAL SYSTEM
• INCLUDE THE MAJOR ACTIVITIES TO CONTROL FINISHED PRODUCT, CONTAINER
& CLOSURE
• VALIDATION OF CONTROL PROCESSES
• DRUG STORAGE
• DISTRIBUTION CONTROL
• RECORDS
PACKAGING & LABELLING SYSTEM
• CONTROL PACKAGING & LABELLING OF DRUG OR DRUG PRODUCT
• INCKUDE DOCUMENTATION OF PROCEDURES, LABEL EXAMINATION & USAGE ,
LABEL STORAGE & ISSUANCE, PACKAGING & LABELLING OPERATION CONTROL &
VALIDATION OF THESE OPERATIONS
• CGMP REGULATIONS 21 CFR SUBPARTS B,G & J
CONCEPT OF SELF INSPECTION
IS A PROCESS TO ANALYSE SELF PERFORMANCE RELATED TO ANY ASPECT OF
QUALITY
.IDENTIFY THE PROBLEMS, WHETHER PROBLEM OR DEFECT IS MAJOR , MINOR, OR
CRITICAL IN NATURE
CHANGE MANAGEMENT & CHANGE CONTROL
• ASSURES CHANGE TO PRODUCTS WHICH ARE INTRODUCED IN CONTROLLED &
COORDINATE MANNER
• MAINLY INVOLVE MINIMUM DISTURBANCE TO SYSTEM
• DECREASE PREVIOUS STEPS
• COST EFFECTIVE USE OF SOURCES
OUT OF SPECIFICATIONS
• DEFINES EVALUATION OF TEST RESULTS WHICH ARE COMES OUT OF SPECIFICATIONS
• GIVE UP THE SERVICE FOR THE UPDATE INFORMATION
• INCLUDE RESULT OF ALL TEST
• FDA GUIDELINES FOR OOS
• FINISHED PRODUCT & ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENTS
• BIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PRODUCT
• HUMAN DRUGS
• VETERINARY DRUGS
• COMBINATION OF PRODUCT
• TYPE MEDICATED ARTICLES
• MEDICATED FEED
• DIETARY SUPPLEMENT
• TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN TISSUES UNDER SECTION 361 SECTION
OUT OF TRENDS
• ARE STABILITY RESULT THAT DOES NOT GO WITH PREDICATED PATH
• HANDLE LATEST QUALITY SYSTEM
• ENCOURAGE INDUSTRY NEW TECHNOLOGIES ADVANCES
• GUIDANCE ON QUALITY SYSTEM APPROACH TO PHARMACEUTICAL CGMP
REGULATIONS
• PRODUCE MORE EFFICIENT & LOW COST DRUG
COMPLAINTS EVALUATION & HANDLING
• TWO PARTS OF COMPLAINTS HANDLING PROCEDURE:
• FIRST PART MUST BE APPLICABLE FOR CUSTOMER, EXPLAINING THE PROCESS OF
FILLING A COMPLAINT
• SECOND PART MUST BE INCLUDE INTERNAL STEPS REQUIRED FOR EMPLOYEES
• COMPLAINTS HANDLING PROCEDURE
• PROVIDES STEPS THAT HOW TO APPLY COMPLAINT
• PROCEDURE PROVIDED BY COMPANY HELP THE CUSTOMER TO FILE THE
COMPLAINT
• INTERNAL COMPLAINT HANDLING PROCEDURE
• DEFINE ROLE & RESPONSIBILITY OF EMPLOYEES TO HANDLE COMPLAINTS , STEPS
TAKEN FOR COMPLAINT
• RESOLVE THE COMPLAINT
• APOLOGISE FOR DELAY DELIVERY , REFUND, EXCHANGE OF PRODUCT,ETC
STEPS TO HANDLE COMPLAINTS
• RECORD THE COMPLAINT
• COMPLAINT ANALYSIS
• COMPLAINTS RESOLUTION
• CONPLAINT INVESTIGATION
INVESTIGATION & DETERMINATION OF ROOT
CAUSE
• TYPE OF PROBLEM SOLVING METHOD
• AIM TO PREVENT REPETITION OF PROBLEMS
• ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
• WHO SHOULD WORK ON EVALUATING PROBLEM
• DEFINE PROBLEM
• WHAT IS IT?
• WHEN DID IT HAPPEN?
• HOW WERE OVERALL GOALS AFFECTED
• WHAT WILL BE DONE?
CORRECTIVE & PREVENTIVE ACTION
• CORRECTIVE ACTION
• LABORATORY CONTROL THE RESULTS OF CORRECTIVE ACTION TO ENSURE IT WAS
EFFECTIVE
• IF EFFECTIVE: CORRECTIVE ACTION
• IF NOT EFFECTIVE: SELECT ANOTHER CORRECTIVE ACTION
• PREVENTION ACTION
• PROCESS OF CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT
• IMPROVEMENT OF QMS
• IMPROVEMENT OF TECHNICAL OPERATIONS
RETURNS & RECALL
• RECALL IS THE STEPS TO PUT SOMETHING BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL PLACE
• DEMAND TO RETURNS ,EXCHANGE , REPLACE THE PRODUCT
• TO AWARE SAFETY OF CUSTOMER
• PRODUCT RECALL
• DONE BY VARIOUS SOURCES INCLUDING MANUFACTURERS WHOLESALERS ,
RETAILERS , CUSTOMER
APPROACH TO PRODUCTS RECALL TEAM
• EXAMPLE IF PRODUCTION OF 15 BATCHES DONE LAST 3 YEAR , THEN TAKE LATEST 19 BATCHES , BUT IF ONLY 8
BATCHES WERE MANUFACTURED OVER LAST 3 YEARS REVIEW THE 8 BATCHES
• THE APR INVOLVE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PREVIOUS YEAR REVIEW REPORT TO EVALUATE YEAR TO YEAR
CONSISTENTCY
• SIX AREA TO REVIEW OF PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS
• LEGAL: MARKET APPROVAL AS WELL AS REGULATORY NOTICE
• EXTERNAL: COMPLAINTS, RECALL ADVERSE EVENTS & RETURNS
• PROCESSES: CONTROL, CHANGES, PROCESS VALIDATION
• PRODUCT : PRODUCT TESTING, OOS TEST METHODS
• QUALITY CONTROL: TEST METHODS
• EVENTS : PRODUCT RELATED INCIDENTS
APR SUMMARY REPORTS FORMAT
• CONSIST OF VARIOUS FORMS
• APR INCLUDE COVER PAGE , SUBSECTION, SUMMARY, REFRENCES
• COVER PAGE INCLUDE TITLE OF APR RODUCT COVERED , SIGNATURE OF APR
AUTHORITY
• SUBSECTION CONSIST ALL DATA & DOCUMENTATION FOR EACH STEPS
• SUMMARY ANNUAL PRODUCT REVIEW SUMMARY , OVERALL APR RATING
• REFERENCE CONSIST ALL LIST OF ALL CAPA RAISED AS RESULTS OF APR
SUMMARY
APR CONCLUSION & RATING
• SATISFACTORY
• ACCEPTABLE
• ACCEPTABLE WITH CONDITIONS
• UNACCEPTABLE
APR REPORT APPROVAL
• SIGNED OF WITH
• QA MANAGER
• REGUKATIRY AFFAIRS MANAGER
• PRODUCTION MANAGER
• OTHER GROUPS WHO MAY BE AFFECTED BY ANY CHANGES
BATCH REVIEW & BATCH RELEASE
• PURPOSE FOR APPROVAL & RELEASE OF FINISHED PRODUCT BATCH ESTABLISH
THE PRODUCT
• RESPONSIBILITY SOP FOR BATCH RELEASE
• QA DEPARTMENT RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING THE BATCH RECORDS
• HEAD PRODUCTION RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETION & REVIEW OF BMR
• HEAD QC OR QM RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETION OF ANALYTICAL RECORDS
• PROCESS FOR BATCH RELEASE SUBMITTED BY PRODUCTION DEPARTMENT &
APPROVED BY PRODUCTION OFFICER & THEN PROCEED TO QA DEPARTMENT
REVIEW
REVIEW OF BATCH RECORDS
• AFTER APPROVAL OF CONTRACT THEN THERE WILL BE PLANNED FOR
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER
• NO PERMISSION TO OTHER PARTY TO SELL PRODUCTS
• OFFICER OR EXCEUTIVE OF QA REVIEW THE DOCUMENTS OF BOTH BATCH
MANUFACTURING & BATCH PACKAGING RECORDS
CONCYOF IPQC
• STANDS FOR IN PROCESS QUALITY CONTROL
• AIM: TO DEVELOP THE TECHNICAL PROCEDURE USED IN MANUFACTURING PROCESS
• AT ALL STEPS OF OPERATION NEED TO OBSERVE , CONTROL & ENHANCE EFFICACY OF
FINISHED PRODUCT
• INVESTIGATION OF RAW MATERIAL, INSTRUMENTS, ENVIRONMENT, PROCESS, EVALUATION &
PACKAGING
• USFDA GUIDELINES
• TO ENSURE UNIFORMITY OF DRUG PRODUCT
• ESTABLISHED WRITTEN PROCEDURE & FOLLOWED TO MENTION IN PROCESS & EVALUATION
DONE ON PARTICULAR SAMPLE OF IN PROCESS OF EACH BATCH
IPQC FOR PARENTERAL PRODUCTS
• TO CHECK THE BULK SOLUTION TO FILL DRUG CONTENT, OH, COLOR, CLARITY OF SOLUTION
• TESTING FOR LEAKAGE OF SEALED AMPOULES
• EXAMINE FILLED VOLUME OF LIQUID
• IPQC FOR SOLID DOSAGE FORM
• CHECK VARIATION IN WEIGHT OF TABLET & CAPSULE WITHIN PARTICULAR DURATION
• DISSOLUTION TIME , HARDNESS
• IPQC FOR SEMI-SOLID
• DETERMINE PARTICLE SIZE OF PREPARATION
• CHECK APPERANCE, VISCOSITY ,SPECIFIC GRAVITY SEDIMENTATION
DOCUMENTATION & EVALUATION OF DATA
• IF THERE ANY REQUIRED IN PROCESS CONTROLS AS WELL AS ENVIRONMENTAL
CONTROL DONE IT MUST BE RECORDED
• IF THERE IS ANY VARIATION THEN SIGNATURE OF PERSON WHO APPROVED THE
VARIATION
• PRODUCTION HEAD REPONSIBLT FOR VARIATION PROCESS
AREA CLEARANCE & LINE CLEARANCE
• ASSURES THAT PRODUCTION SHOULD BE FREE FORN CONTAMINATION
• SOP IS APPLICABLE FOR LINE CLEARANCE OF PRODUCTION, WAREHOUSE AREAS
OF FORMULATION PLANT
• AUTHORITY
• FOR PROPER CLEANING OF INSTRUMENTS & AREA OPERATOR SHALL BE
CONSIDERED
• CHECK CLEANLINESS OF INSTRUMENTS & PRODUCTION OFFICER SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE
• IPQA OFFICEYSHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR GIVING LINE CLEARANCE
PROCEDURE
• AFTER AREA IS CHECKED & FOUND APPROPRIATE WAREHOUSE
• AFTER RECIEVING INSTRUCTION FORM PRODUCTION, IPQA PERSON SHOULD CHECK THE AREA , EQUIPMENT &
DOCUMENTS
• IF THERE IS ANY DISSATISFACTION AS PER LINE CLEARANCE GUIDELINES PRODUCTION PERSONNEL COMPARE IT &
AGAIN GIVE INSTRUCTIONS TO IOWA PERSONNEL FOR LINE CLEARANCE
• WHILE COMPLETING PROPER CLEANING OF INSTRUMENTS OR AREA IF NECESSARY PRODUCTION PERSONNEL GIVE
INTIMATION TO IPQA PERSONNEL FOR SLIP OF COLLECTING SAMPLE
• IF THERE IS BREAKDOWN OF MORE THAN HALF HR IN BETWEEN ANY PROCESS THEN LINE CLEARANCE SHOULD BE
TAKEN AGAIN
• NO NEED TO ATTACH ADDITIONAL LINE CLEARANCE SHEET FOR CARRY FORWARD LINE CLEARANCE DUE TO SHIFT
OR DATE CHANGE
•
LIST OF ANNEXURE
• LINE CLEARANCE CHECK LIST FOR DISPENSING
• LINE CLEARANCE CHECK LIST FOR MANUFACTURING
• LIBE CLEARANCE CHECK LIST FOR PRIMARY PACAKGING
• LIJE CLEARANCE CHECK LIST FOR SECONDARY PACKAGING
THANK YOU

Six system inspection model

  • 1.
    INSTITUTE OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE KURUKSHETRAUNIVERSITY SUBMITTED TO : MRS.ANJU GOYAL SUBMITTED BY: JYOTI (PROFESSOR). M PHARMA 1 SEM ( QA)
  • 2.
    SIX SYSTEM INSPECTIONMODEL • HELP PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURERS TO FOLLOW CGMP GUIDELINES. • THE SIX SYSTEM INSPECTION MODEL ARE AS QUALITY, PRODUCTION, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, LABORATORY CONTROLS, MATERIALS & PACKAGING & LABELLING • APPROACH OF SIX SYSTEM • ASSURE BEST QUALITY SYSTEM MODEL FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS. • ASSURES MORE UNDERSTANDING OF WHOLE OPERATION LEADING TO A MORE POWERFUL SYSTEM WITH CGMP GUIDELINES. • HIGHLIGHT MODEL’S CONSISTENCY WITH CGMP REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR MANUFACTURING HUMAN & VETERINARY DRUGS.
  • 3.
    QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM •IT IS A SYSTEM IN WHICH DOCUMENTS PROCESSES PROCEDURES, & RESPONSIBILITY FOR ATTAINING APPROACHES & GOALS • LEADERSHIP • HELP TO COMMUNICATE ORGANIZATION ‘S ACTIVITIES. • HELP TO MEET CUSTOMER & REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS. • KEY COMPONENTS OF QMS • QUALITY MEANS EXCELLENCE OF ANYTHING.
  • 4.
    • PLANNING • MAINTAINCUSTOMER CONNECTION. • CUSTOMER SATISFACTION • QUALITY PRINCIPLES • FOCUS ON CUSTOMER • ADMINISTRATION • TO ENGAGE THE PEOPLE • APPROACH TOWARD PROCESS • CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT FACT DECISION MAKING • MANAGE RELATIONSHIP
  • 5.
    OBJECTIVE OF QUALITY •LESS DEFECTS • GOOD EFFICACY • EFFECTIVE PHARMACEUTICALS • GIVE CLEAR IDEABTO KNOW ABOUT PROGRESS TOWARDS GOALS , INVOLVING THE TIMELINES TO ACHIEVE IT
  • 6.
    QUALITY MANUAL • DESCRIBES; •SCOPE OF QMS • CLARIFY NEEDS OF OMS STRATEGY • MENTION ANY PART OF QMS • QUALITY STEPS USED IN ORGANIZATION • DESCRIBES ORGANIZATION’S QUALITY GOALS & STRATEGY
  • 7.
    RESPONSIBILITY OF ORGANISATIONS& IT’S STRUCTURE • STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTATION INCLUDES GUIDES SUCH AS FLOWCHARTS • PERSONNEL • INSTRUMENT • KNOW ABOUT STRUCTURE • KEY OF EVALUATION • PROVISIONS • PURCHASING & INVENTORY • MANAGE PROCESS • DOCUMENTS & RECORDS .
  • 8.
    MANAGE THE DATA •DATA IS A KEY APPROACH TO TQM. • GIVE CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT • GIVE UP TYPES OF DATA ,SOURCES, COLLECTION METHODS, RESPONSIBILITIES, STORAGE , DISPOSAL & ANALYSIS. • INVOLVES FOLLOWING SOURCES: • SATISFACTION OF CUSTOMER • SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE • PROCESS OBSERVATION • TRENDS • CORRECTIVE ACTION
  • 9.
    PROCESSES • TO CONTROLQUALITY & ASSURANCE • QMS IS APPROACH TOWARD OPERATING PROCESSES • DESCRIBES ALL STEPS TO CHANGE INPUT INTO OUTPUTS • AFTER IDENTICATION OF THE PROCESS ,ORGANIZATION STARTS DEFINES KEY SUCCESS • IDENTIFY ORGANIZATION PROCESSES • DEFINE PROCESS STANDARD • ESTABLISH METHODS FOR MEASURING SUCCESS • DOCUMENTS STANDARDIZATION APPROACH TO ENSURE QUALITY • DRIVE CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT
  • 10.
    QUALITY OF PRODUCTSDEFINE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION TO MEASURE CUSTOMER ATTITUDE & COMPLAINT IS FIRST STEP TOWARDS MONITORING SATISFACTION OF CUSTOMER • SATISFACTION SURVEYS • COMPLAINTS PROCEDURES • ANALYTICAL APPLICATIONS TO MEASURES SATISFACTION TRENDS • MANAGEMENT REVIEW OF CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
  • 11.
    CONTINUAL ENHANCEMENT • TOMAINTAIN SATISFACTION OF CUSTOMER CONTINUOUS ENHANCEMENT. • CLEAR DOCUMENTATION NEEDED FOR CONTINUOUS ENHANCEMENT FOR PLANNING ORGANIZATIONAL PROCESSES TO ACHIEVE QMS STANDARDS. • ENHANCEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION SHOULD ENCLOSED WITH • QUALITY PLANNING PROCEDURE • COMPLAINCE REQUIREMENTS • SAFETY DESIGN • RISK BASED THINKING • CORRECTIVE ACTION • BREAKTHROUGH IMPROVEMENT • INNOVATION • ASSESSMENT OF QMS
  • 12.
    INSTRUMENTS OF QUALITY •FOR THE SUCCESS OF QMS BASIC THING IS TO CONTROL &CALIBRATE INSTRUMENTS WHICH ARE USED TO MEASURE QUALITY. • INSTRUMENTS ARE CALIBRATED ACCORDING TO STANDARD OF ORGANISATIONS. • MAINTAIN QUALITY OF EQUIPMENT • MAINTAIN CLEAR DOCUMENTATION OF OF CALIBRATION RESULT, SOPS, CALIBRATION RESULTS
  • 13.
    TO CONTROL THEDOCUMENTS • ACCORDING TO ISO TO DEFINE DOCUMENTS IN QUALITY ORGANIZATION INVOLVE RECORDS OF: • COMMUNICATION • EVIDENCE • QMS CONFORMITY • KNOWLEDGE SHARING
  • 14.
    PRODUCTION SYSTEM • INCLUDEPLANNING FOR PRODUCTION • CONTROL OF PRODUCTION • PRODUCTION SYSTEM IS DEFINED AS STRUCTURE OF ACTIVITIES WHERE INPUTS ARE MODIFY INTO VALUE ADDED TO PRODUCT. • PRODUCTION PLANNING OBJECTIVE • TO PRODUCE THE PRODUCT WITHIN TIME PLANNING • ENHANCE PRODUCTIVITY • PLANNING INCREASE SYSTEMATIC WAY IN CASE OF SERIES OF OPERATION
  • 15.
    • TYPES OFPRODUCTION • CONTINUOUS PRODUCTION SYSTEM • INTERMITTENT PRODUCTION SYSTEM • DISPATCHING RECORDS • PRODUCTION CONTROL • FUNCTION OF PRODUCTION CONTROL • PROGRESS CONTROL
  • 16.
    CORRECTIVE ACTIONS • DEPENDSON INTERNAL & EXTERNAL FACTORS ; • INTERNAL FACTORS : CONTROL WITHIN ORGANISATIONS,INTERNAL ISSUES ( LACK OF REQUIRED INSTRUCTIONS, MATERIALS • EXTERNAL FACTORS NOT CONTROL WITHIN ORGANISATIONS (PRODUCT DEMAND, ) • METHODS TO TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION • MAKE THE PLAN • CHANGING NUMBER OF WORKING HOURS & NUMBER OF WORKERS • MODIFICATION IS DONE • MINIMIZE THE EQUIPMENT HANDLING TIME • WELL PLANNING
  • 17.
    FACILITY & EQUIPMENTSYSTEM • EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE QUALIFIED, CALIBRATED,CLEANED AS TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION. • THIS INVOLVE : • MAINTENANCE OF BUILDINGS & FACILITIES • QUALIFICATIONS OF EQUIPMENT ( INSTALLATION & OPERATIONS, PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE & CLEANING • 21 CFR 211 SUBPART B , INCLUDING ORGANIZATION & PERSONNEL, C INCLUDES BUILDINGS & FACILITIES,D INCLUDE EQUIPMENTS.
  • 18.
    LABORATORY CONTROL SYSTEM •CONSIST WITH ACTIVITIES REGARDING TO LABORATORY PROCEDURES, EVALUATION, ANALYTICAL METHODS DEVELOPMENT & VALIDATION • CGMP REGULATIONS 21 CFR 211 INCLUDES • SUBPART I HAVING LABORATORY CONTROL RELATED TO GENERAL REQUIREMENTS, TESTING, STABILITY TESTING • SUBPART J HAVING RECORDS & REPORTS RELATED TO GENERAL REQUIREMENTS, EQUIPMENT CLEANING & USE COMPONENTS, LABELLING RECORDING, CLOSURE , BATCH PRODUCTION & CONTROL RECORDS , LABORATORY RECORDS , DISTRIBUTION RECORDS , COMPLAINT FILES • SUBPART K RELATED TO RETURNED DRUG PRODUCTS, DRUG PRODUCT SALAVAGING
  • 19.
    MATERIAL SYSTEM • INCLUDETHE MAJOR ACTIVITIES TO CONTROL FINISHED PRODUCT, CONTAINER & CLOSURE • VALIDATION OF CONTROL PROCESSES • DRUG STORAGE • DISTRIBUTION CONTROL • RECORDS
  • 20.
    PACKAGING & LABELLINGSYSTEM • CONTROL PACKAGING & LABELLING OF DRUG OR DRUG PRODUCT • INCKUDE DOCUMENTATION OF PROCEDURES, LABEL EXAMINATION & USAGE , LABEL STORAGE & ISSUANCE, PACKAGING & LABELLING OPERATION CONTROL & VALIDATION OF THESE OPERATIONS • CGMP REGULATIONS 21 CFR SUBPARTS B,G & J
  • 21.
    CONCEPT OF SELFINSPECTION IS A PROCESS TO ANALYSE SELF PERFORMANCE RELATED TO ANY ASPECT OF QUALITY .IDENTIFY THE PROBLEMS, WHETHER PROBLEM OR DEFECT IS MAJOR , MINOR, OR CRITICAL IN NATURE
  • 22.
    CHANGE MANAGEMENT &CHANGE CONTROL • ASSURES CHANGE TO PRODUCTS WHICH ARE INTRODUCED IN CONTROLLED & COORDINATE MANNER • MAINLY INVOLVE MINIMUM DISTURBANCE TO SYSTEM • DECREASE PREVIOUS STEPS • COST EFFECTIVE USE OF SOURCES
  • 23.
    OUT OF SPECIFICATIONS •DEFINES EVALUATION OF TEST RESULTS WHICH ARE COMES OUT OF SPECIFICATIONS • GIVE UP THE SERVICE FOR THE UPDATE INFORMATION • INCLUDE RESULT OF ALL TEST • FDA GUIDELINES FOR OOS • FINISHED PRODUCT & ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENTS • BIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PRODUCT • HUMAN DRUGS • VETERINARY DRUGS • COMBINATION OF PRODUCT • TYPE MEDICATED ARTICLES • MEDICATED FEED • DIETARY SUPPLEMENT • TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN TISSUES UNDER SECTION 361 SECTION
  • 24.
    OUT OF TRENDS •ARE STABILITY RESULT THAT DOES NOT GO WITH PREDICATED PATH • HANDLE LATEST QUALITY SYSTEM • ENCOURAGE INDUSTRY NEW TECHNOLOGIES ADVANCES • GUIDANCE ON QUALITY SYSTEM APPROACH TO PHARMACEUTICAL CGMP REGULATIONS • PRODUCE MORE EFFICIENT & LOW COST DRUG
  • 25.
    COMPLAINTS EVALUATION &HANDLING • TWO PARTS OF COMPLAINTS HANDLING PROCEDURE: • FIRST PART MUST BE APPLICABLE FOR CUSTOMER, EXPLAINING THE PROCESS OF FILLING A COMPLAINT • SECOND PART MUST BE INCLUDE INTERNAL STEPS REQUIRED FOR EMPLOYEES • COMPLAINTS HANDLING PROCEDURE • PROVIDES STEPS THAT HOW TO APPLY COMPLAINT • PROCEDURE PROVIDED BY COMPANY HELP THE CUSTOMER TO FILE THE COMPLAINT
  • 26.
    • INTERNAL COMPLAINTHANDLING PROCEDURE • DEFINE ROLE & RESPONSIBILITY OF EMPLOYEES TO HANDLE COMPLAINTS , STEPS TAKEN FOR COMPLAINT • RESOLVE THE COMPLAINT • APOLOGISE FOR DELAY DELIVERY , REFUND, EXCHANGE OF PRODUCT,ETC
  • 27.
    STEPS TO HANDLECOMPLAINTS • RECORD THE COMPLAINT • COMPLAINT ANALYSIS • COMPLAINTS RESOLUTION • CONPLAINT INVESTIGATION
  • 28.
    INVESTIGATION & DETERMINATIONOF ROOT CAUSE • TYPE OF PROBLEM SOLVING METHOD • AIM TO PREVENT REPETITION OF PROBLEMS • ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS • WHO SHOULD WORK ON EVALUATING PROBLEM • DEFINE PROBLEM • WHAT IS IT? • WHEN DID IT HAPPEN? • HOW WERE OVERALL GOALS AFFECTED • WHAT WILL BE DONE?
  • 29.
    CORRECTIVE & PREVENTIVEACTION • CORRECTIVE ACTION • LABORATORY CONTROL THE RESULTS OF CORRECTIVE ACTION TO ENSURE IT WAS EFFECTIVE • IF EFFECTIVE: CORRECTIVE ACTION • IF NOT EFFECTIVE: SELECT ANOTHER CORRECTIVE ACTION • PREVENTION ACTION • PROCESS OF CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT • IMPROVEMENT OF QMS • IMPROVEMENT OF TECHNICAL OPERATIONS
  • 30.
    RETURNS & RECALL •RECALL IS THE STEPS TO PUT SOMETHING BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL PLACE • DEMAND TO RETURNS ,EXCHANGE , REPLACE THE PRODUCT • TO AWARE SAFETY OF CUSTOMER • PRODUCT RECALL • DONE BY VARIOUS SOURCES INCLUDING MANUFACTURERS WHOLESALERS , RETAILERS , CUSTOMER
  • 31.
    APPROACH TO PRODUCTSRECALL TEAM • EXAMPLE IF PRODUCTION OF 15 BATCHES DONE LAST 3 YEAR , THEN TAKE LATEST 19 BATCHES , BUT IF ONLY 8 BATCHES WERE MANUFACTURED OVER LAST 3 YEARS REVIEW THE 8 BATCHES • THE APR INVOLVE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PREVIOUS YEAR REVIEW REPORT TO EVALUATE YEAR TO YEAR CONSISTENTCY • SIX AREA TO REVIEW OF PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS • LEGAL: MARKET APPROVAL AS WELL AS REGULATORY NOTICE • EXTERNAL: COMPLAINTS, RECALL ADVERSE EVENTS & RETURNS • PROCESSES: CONTROL, CHANGES, PROCESS VALIDATION • PRODUCT : PRODUCT TESTING, OOS TEST METHODS • QUALITY CONTROL: TEST METHODS • EVENTS : PRODUCT RELATED INCIDENTS
  • 32.
    APR SUMMARY REPORTSFORMAT • CONSIST OF VARIOUS FORMS • APR INCLUDE COVER PAGE , SUBSECTION, SUMMARY, REFRENCES • COVER PAGE INCLUDE TITLE OF APR RODUCT COVERED , SIGNATURE OF APR AUTHORITY • SUBSECTION CONSIST ALL DATA & DOCUMENTATION FOR EACH STEPS • SUMMARY ANNUAL PRODUCT REVIEW SUMMARY , OVERALL APR RATING • REFERENCE CONSIST ALL LIST OF ALL CAPA RAISED AS RESULTS OF APR SUMMARY
  • 33.
    APR CONCLUSION &RATING • SATISFACTORY • ACCEPTABLE • ACCEPTABLE WITH CONDITIONS • UNACCEPTABLE
  • 34.
    APR REPORT APPROVAL •SIGNED OF WITH • QA MANAGER • REGUKATIRY AFFAIRS MANAGER • PRODUCTION MANAGER • OTHER GROUPS WHO MAY BE AFFECTED BY ANY CHANGES
  • 35.
    BATCH REVIEW &BATCH RELEASE • PURPOSE FOR APPROVAL & RELEASE OF FINISHED PRODUCT BATCH ESTABLISH THE PRODUCT • RESPONSIBILITY SOP FOR BATCH RELEASE • QA DEPARTMENT RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING THE BATCH RECORDS • HEAD PRODUCTION RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETION & REVIEW OF BMR • HEAD QC OR QM RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETION OF ANALYTICAL RECORDS • PROCESS FOR BATCH RELEASE SUBMITTED BY PRODUCTION DEPARTMENT & APPROVED BY PRODUCTION OFFICER & THEN PROCEED TO QA DEPARTMENT REVIEW
  • 36.
    REVIEW OF BATCHRECORDS • AFTER APPROVAL OF CONTRACT THEN THERE WILL BE PLANNED FOR CONDITIONAL TRANSFER • NO PERMISSION TO OTHER PARTY TO SELL PRODUCTS • OFFICER OR EXCEUTIVE OF QA REVIEW THE DOCUMENTS OF BOTH BATCH MANUFACTURING & BATCH PACKAGING RECORDS
  • 37.
    CONCYOF IPQC • STANDSFOR IN PROCESS QUALITY CONTROL • AIM: TO DEVELOP THE TECHNICAL PROCEDURE USED IN MANUFACTURING PROCESS • AT ALL STEPS OF OPERATION NEED TO OBSERVE , CONTROL & ENHANCE EFFICACY OF FINISHED PRODUCT • INVESTIGATION OF RAW MATERIAL, INSTRUMENTS, ENVIRONMENT, PROCESS, EVALUATION & PACKAGING • USFDA GUIDELINES • TO ENSURE UNIFORMITY OF DRUG PRODUCT • ESTABLISHED WRITTEN PROCEDURE & FOLLOWED TO MENTION IN PROCESS & EVALUATION DONE ON PARTICULAR SAMPLE OF IN PROCESS OF EACH BATCH
  • 38.
    IPQC FOR PARENTERALPRODUCTS • TO CHECK THE BULK SOLUTION TO FILL DRUG CONTENT, OH, COLOR, CLARITY OF SOLUTION • TESTING FOR LEAKAGE OF SEALED AMPOULES • EXAMINE FILLED VOLUME OF LIQUID • IPQC FOR SOLID DOSAGE FORM • CHECK VARIATION IN WEIGHT OF TABLET & CAPSULE WITHIN PARTICULAR DURATION • DISSOLUTION TIME , HARDNESS • IPQC FOR SEMI-SOLID • DETERMINE PARTICLE SIZE OF PREPARATION • CHECK APPERANCE, VISCOSITY ,SPECIFIC GRAVITY SEDIMENTATION
  • 39.
    DOCUMENTATION & EVALUATIONOF DATA • IF THERE ANY REQUIRED IN PROCESS CONTROLS AS WELL AS ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL DONE IT MUST BE RECORDED • IF THERE IS ANY VARIATION THEN SIGNATURE OF PERSON WHO APPROVED THE VARIATION • PRODUCTION HEAD REPONSIBLT FOR VARIATION PROCESS
  • 40.
    AREA CLEARANCE &LINE CLEARANCE • ASSURES THAT PRODUCTION SHOULD BE FREE FORN CONTAMINATION • SOP IS APPLICABLE FOR LINE CLEARANCE OF PRODUCTION, WAREHOUSE AREAS OF FORMULATION PLANT • AUTHORITY • FOR PROPER CLEANING OF INSTRUMENTS & AREA OPERATOR SHALL BE CONSIDERED • CHECK CLEANLINESS OF INSTRUMENTS & PRODUCTION OFFICER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE • IPQA OFFICEYSHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR GIVING LINE CLEARANCE
  • 41.
    PROCEDURE • AFTER AREAIS CHECKED & FOUND APPROPRIATE WAREHOUSE • AFTER RECIEVING INSTRUCTION FORM PRODUCTION, IPQA PERSON SHOULD CHECK THE AREA , EQUIPMENT & DOCUMENTS • IF THERE IS ANY DISSATISFACTION AS PER LINE CLEARANCE GUIDELINES PRODUCTION PERSONNEL COMPARE IT & AGAIN GIVE INSTRUCTIONS TO IOWA PERSONNEL FOR LINE CLEARANCE • WHILE COMPLETING PROPER CLEANING OF INSTRUMENTS OR AREA IF NECESSARY PRODUCTION PERSONNEL GIVE INTIMATION TO IPQA PERSONNEL FOR SLIP OF COLLECTING SAMPLE • IF THERE IS BREAKDOWN OF MORE THAN HALF HR IN BETWEEN ANY PROCESS THEN LINE CLEARANCE SHOULD BE TAKEN AGAIN • NO NEED TO ATTACH ADDITIONAL LINE CLEARANCE SHEET FOR CARRY FORWARD LINE CLEARANCE DUE TO SHIFT OR DATE CHANGE •
  • 42.
    LIST OF ANNEXURE •LINE CLEARANCE CHECK LIST FOR DISPENSING • LINE CLEARANCE CHECK LIST FOR MANUFACTURING • LIBE CLEARANCE CHECK LIST FOR PRIMARY PACAKGING • LIJE CLEARANCE CHECK LIST FOR SECONDARY PACKAGING
  • 43.