Software Quality Models Presentation.pptx

Software Quality Models
by:
Dr. Shahid Farid
Software Quality Assurance

Software Quality Assurance (SQA) 2
Outline
￭ McCall’s Quality Model (1977)
￭ Boehm’s Quality Model (1978)
￭ FURPS/FURPS+
￭ Dromey's Quality Model
￭ ISO Models (ISO 9126)
￭ Capability Maturity Model(s)
￭ Six Sigma

McCall’s Quality Model
￭ Three major perspectives for defining
and identifying the quality of a
software product:
￭ Product Revision (ability to undergo
changes),
￭ Product Transition (adaptability to new
environments) and
￭ Product Operations (its operation
characteristics).

￭ The model details the three types of
quality characteristics in a hierarchy of
￭ 11 Factors,
￭ 23 Quality Criteria and
￭ Metrics

McCall’s Quality Model (Cont.)
 It distinguishes between two levels of quality attributes:
1. Quality Factors
 The higher level quality attributes which can be accessed
directly are called quality factors.
 These attributes are external attributes.
 The attributes in this level are given more importance by the
users and managers.
2. Quality Criteria
 The lower or second level quality attributes which can be
accessed either subjectively or objectively are called Quality
Criteria.
 These attributes are internal attributes.
 Each quality factor has many second level of quality
attributes or quality criteria.

 It classifies all software requirements
into 11 software quality factors.
 The 11 factors are organized into three
product quality factors
 Product operation,
 Product revision, and
 Product transition factors.

Software Quality Assurance (SQA)
Use Factor Criteria
Product
Operation
Usability oOperability
oTraining
oCommunicativeness
oI/O Volume
oI/O Rate
Integrity oAccess Control
oAccess Audit
Efficiency oStorage Requirement
oExecution Speed
Correctness oTraceability
oCompleteness
oConsistency
Reliability oAccuracy
oError Tolerance
oConsistency
oSimplicity 8

Product Revision
Maintainability oConsistency
oSimplicity
oConciseness
oSelf-descriptiveness
oModularity
Testability oSimplicity
oScope for Automation
Flexibility oExpandability
oArchitecture Usability
oSelf descriptiveness
oModularity

Product
Transition
Re-usability oArchitectural Usability
oSelf Descriptiveness
oModularity
oMachine Independence
oOperating system Independence
Portability oSelf Descriptiveness
oModularity
oMachine Independence
oOS Independence

Boehm’s Quality Model
￭ Similar to the McCall Quality Model
￭ Presents a hierarchical quality model
structured around
￭ High-level characteristics,
￭ Intermediate level characteristics,
￭ Primitive characteristics

The Highest Level
1. As is utility
 Extent to which, we can use software as-is.
2. Maintainability
 Effort required to detect and fix an error
during maintenance.
3. Portability
 Effort required to change software to fit in
a new environment

Intermediate Level
Characteristic
 Portability –
Effort required to change software to fit in a new
environment.
 Reliability –
Extent to which software performs according to
requirements.
 Efficiency –
Amount of hardware resources and code required to
execute a function.
 Usability (Human Engineering) –
Extent of effort required to learn, operate and
understand functions of the software.

Intermediate Level
Characteristic (cont.)
 Testability –
Effort required to verify that software
performs its intended functions.
 Understandability –
Effort required for a user to recognize
logical concept and its applicability.
 Modifiability –
Effort required to modify a software during
maintenance phase.

Boehm’s Quality Model
Boehm's Software Quality Characteristics
Tree

McCall’s & Boehm’s Quality
Models: a comparison

Boehm’s Model
 Advantages :
 It focuses and tries to satisfy the needs of the
user.
 It focuses on software maintenance cost
effectiveness.
 Disadvantages :
 It doesn’t suggest, how to measure the quality
characteristics.
 It is difficult to evaluate the quality of software
using the top-down approach

FURPS/FURPS+
￭ Similar to the McCall’s and Boehm’s
Quality Models
￭ Divides quality attributes into two
￭ Functional (F)
￭ Nonfunctional (URPS)
￭ Proposed by Robert Grady
￭ Extended by Rational Software, now IBM
Rational Software - into FURPS+

FURPS/FURPS+
1. Functionality – which may include feature sets, capabilities
and security
2. Usability – which may include human factors, aesthetics,
consistency in the user interface, online and context sensitive help,
wizards and agents, user documentation, and training materials
3. Reliability - which may include frequency and severity of
failure, recoverability, predictability, accuracy, and mean time
between failure (MTBF)
4. Performance - imposes conditions on functional requirements
such as speed, efficiency, availability, accuracy, throughput,
response time, recovery time, and resource usage
5. Supportability - which may include testability, extensibility,
adaptability, maintainability, compatibility, configurability,
serviceability, installability, localizability (internationalization)

Dromey's Quality Model
￭ Geoff Dromey proposed a product
based quality model
￭ Similar to the McCall’s, Boehm’s and
the FURPS(+) quality model,
￭ The basic idea is: “quality evaluation
differs for each product”

￭ Dromey's Quality Model is further structured
around a 5 step process:
1. Chose a set of high-level quality attributes
necessary for the evaluation.
2. List components/modules in your system.
3. Identify quality-carrying properties for the
components / modules (qualities of the
component that have the most impact on the
product properties from the list above).
4. Determine how each property effects the quality
attributes.
5. Evaluate the model and identify weaknesses.

ISO 9126 Standard Quality Model
￭ A deviation of McCall’s Factor-Criteria-
Metric Model
￭ Established in 1993
￭ Defines software quality as:
“The totality of features and characteristics of a
software product that bear on it ability to satisfy
stated or implied needs.”

ISO 9126
￭ Quality is decomposed into six factors:
1. Functionality
2. Reliability
3. Efficiency
4. Usability
5. Maintainability and
6. Portability

ISO 9126

Comparison

Outline
￭ McCall’s Quality Model (1977)
￭ Boehm’s Quality Model (1978)
￭ FURPS/FURPS+
￭ Dromey's Quality Model
￭ ISO Models (ISO 9126)
￭ Capability Maturity Model(s) (TBD)
￭ Six Sigma (TBD)

Acknowledgments
 A number of slides are borrowed from
different authors

Software Quality Models Presentation.pptx

More Related Content

What's hot

Similar to Software Quality Models Presentation.pptx

Recently uploaded

Software Quality Models Presentation.pptx