HIGHER EDUCATION AND
INNOVATION
Stéphan Vincent-Lancrin
Senior Analyst and Project Leader
OECD Directorate for Education and Skills
Poitiers, 25 January 2016
Skills and education for innovation
« 21st Century Skills »
Innovation
Skills
Education
and
training
qualifications for innovation
Qualifications for innovation
Innovation
Skills
Education
and
training
• What
skills/qualifications
foster innovation in
the economy?
• Creative destruction
and lifelong skill
development?
Diversity of qualifications for innovation
across sectors
Mining Electricity, Water, Gas
Finance and insurance
Source: Toner (2010)
Fields of study of highly innovative
professionals (%), selected sectors
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Manufacturing Financial
intermediation
Business activities Health
others
law
education
arts
humanities
social sciences
business
agriculture
health
architecture
sciences & maths
engineering & computing
Fields of study of highly innovative
professionals (%), by type of innovation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Product innovation Technology
innovation
Knowledge
innovation
Any innovation
others
law
education
arts
humanities
social sciences
business
agriculture
health
architecture
sciences & maths
engineering & computing
Skills for innovation
Innovation
Skills
Education
and
training
• What
skills/qualifications
foster innovation in
the economy?
• Creative destruction
and lifelong skill
development
Creative Destruction
skills for innovation (and
entrepreneurship)
Skills that tertiary-educated professionals
report as very important in their job
Percentage of employees reporting the following skills as very important in their job
Source: OECD, based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
22.7
30.6
40.2
40.3
40.4
40.4
40.5
41.8
46.5
48.0
50.0
53.4
54.2
55.0
56.5
56.9
58.6
60.8
61.7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
knowledge of other fields
write and speak a foreign language
assert your authority
negociate
alertness to opportunities
present ideas in audience
willingness to question ideas
mobilize capacities of others
analytical thinking
come with news ideas/solutions
write reports or documents
acquire new knowledge
master of your own field
coordinate activities
use computers and internet
make your meaning clear
work productively with others
perform under pressure
use time efficiently
Critical skills for entrepreneurship (according
to tertiary-educated workers)
Likelihood (odds ratios) of reporting the following skills: people
in self-employed vs. employees
Source: OECD, based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.6
0.5 1 2
work productively with others
use computers and internet
write reports or documents
write and speak a foreign language
analytical thinking
use time efficiently
mobilize capacities of others
make your meaning clear
coordinate activities
acquire new knowledge
present ideas in audience
perform under pressure
willingness to question ideas
knowledge of other fields
come with news ideas/solutions
master of your own field
alertness to opportunities
assert your authority
negociate
Critical skills for innovative entrepreneurship
(according to tertiary-educated workers)
Likelihood (odds ratios) of reporting the following skills: people
in innovative entrepreneurs vs. entrepreneurs
Source: OECD, based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
2.0
0.8 1.6
knowledge of other fields
negociate
use time efficiently
make your meaning clear
assert your authority
coordinate activities
perform under pressure
write reports or documents
work productively with others
mobilize capacities of others
master of your own field
use computers and internet
analytical thinking
present ideas in audience
write and speak a foreign language
willingness to question ideas
alertness to opportunities
acquire new knowledge
come with news ideas/solutions
Critical skills for the most innovative jobs
(according to tertiary-educated workers)
1.56
1.76
1.76
1.81
1.94
1.95
1.97
1.98
1.99
2.00
2.02
2.05
2.11
2.15
2.18
2.24
2.34
2.44
2.97
0.80
assert your authority
negociate
knowledge of other fields
perform under pressure
write reports or documents
work productively with others
mobilize capacities of others
use time efficiently
make your meaning clear
use computers and internet
write and speak a foreign language
coordinate activities
master of your own field
analytical thinking
present ideas in audience
alertness to opportunities
willingness to question ideas
acquire new knowledge
come with news ideas/solutions
Likelihood (odds ratios) of reporting the following skills: people
in the most innovative jobs vs. least innovative jobs
Source: OECD, based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
What individual skills should
education systems foster?
Technical skills
(know-what and know-
how)
Skills in thinking
and creativity
(Critical thinking,
observation, curiosity,
ability to make
connections,
imagination,...)
Behavioural and
social skills
(character)
(Self-confidence, energy,
perseverance, passion,
leadership, collaboration,
communication)
Some comments on these skill
categories
• They are domain-specific
– Skills are generally domain-specific: one is creative in a field, one knows how to
behave/communicate in a specific context, one has problem-solving skills in a field,
one has content knowledge in a field
• They can become « domain-generic »
– A skills becomes « domain-generic » when one has gained it in a number of
domains or settings, so that it becomes a « habit of mind » (a disposition or a
stabilised skill) that one can apply to new fields
• They overlap and may reinforce
each other
But
• They are different and cannot
be reduced to a single skill (or
measure)
Technical skills
Skills in
thinking and
creativity
Behavioural and
social skills
(character)
higher education for innovation
Higher education for innovation
Innovation
Skills
Education
and
training
• Which graduates get
highly innovative jobs?
• Do higher education
systems foster skills for
innovation?
• Which pedagogic practices
are associated with highly
innovative jobs?
• What do these pedagogies
look like?
What share of graduates of a given field
have a highly innovative job?
20.3
22.9
23.4
25.4
27.6
28.1
28.1
28.4
28.8
30.9
32.7
36.5
37.6
0 10 20 30 40 50
law
health
humanities
others
business
sciences & maths
education
average
social sciences
architecture
agriculture
arts
engineering & computing
Product /service innovation
What share of graduates of a given field
have a highly innovative job?
12.4
12.6
13.2
15.2
16.0
18.4
18.6
21.0
23.9
24.2
28.6
28.8
38.4
0 10 20 30 40 50
law
others
humanities
social sciences
education
health
business
average
arts
agriculture
architecture
sciences & maths
engineering & computing
Technology, tool, instrument innovation
What share of graduates of a given field
have a highly innovative job?
30.4
31.5
35.1
36.1
37.6
38.0
38.3
38.5
39.5
39.9
41.7
41.7
48.3
0 10 20 30 40 50
law
others
business
humanities
social sciences
arts
average
health
agriculture
architecture
engineering & computing
education
sciences & maths
Knowledge / method innovation
Higher education for innovation
Innovation
Skills
Education
and
training
• Which graduates get
highly innovative jobs?
• Do higher education
systems foster skills for
innovation?
• Which pedagogic practices
are associated with highly
innovative jobs?
• What do these pedagogies
look like?
Strong points of higher education
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
assert your authority
mobilize capacities of others
negociate
alertness to opportunities
willingness to question ideas
coordinate activities
write and speak a foreign language
make your meaning clear
come with news ideas/solutions
present ideas in audience
knowledge of other fields
use time efficiently
use computers and internet
perform under pressure
work productively with others
write reports or documents
acquire new knowledge
analytical thinking
master of your own field
Ranking of 3 top strong skills by graduates
Source: OECD, based on REFLEX, HEGESCO and PROFLEX data
Strong points of higher education
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
assert your authority
mobilize capacities of others
negociate
alertness to opportunities
willingness to question ideas
coordinate activities
write and speak a foreign language
make your meaning clear
come with news ideas/solutions
present ideas in audience
knowledge of other fields
use time efficiently
use computers and internet
perform under pressure
work productively with others
write reports or documents
acquire new knowledge
analytical thinking
master of your own field
Ranking of 3 top strong skills by graduates
Source: OECD, based on REFLEX, HEGESCO and PROFLEX data
Weak points of higher education
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
acquire new knowledge
master of your own field
make your meaning clear
coordinate activities
work productively with others
willingness to question ideas
analytical thinking
perform under pressure
use time efficiently
alertness to opportunities
come with news ideas/solutions
write reports or documents
mobilize capacities of others
knowledge of other fields
use computers and internet
present ideas in audience
assert your authority
negociate
write and speak a foreign language
Ranking of 3 top weak skills by graduates
Source: OECD, based on REFLEX, HEGESCO and PROFLEX data
Weak points of higher education
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
acquire new knowledge
master of your own field
make your meaning clear
coordinate activities
work productively with others
willingness to question ideas
analytical thinking
perform under pressure
use time efficiently
alertness to opportunities
come with news ideas/solutions
write reports or documents
mobilize capacities of others
knowledge of other fields
use computers and internet
present ideas in audience
assert your authority
negociate
write and speak a foreign language
Ranking of 3 top weak skills by graduates
Source: OECD, based on REFLEX, HEGESCO and PROFLEX data
Higher education for innovation
Innovation
Skills
Education
and
training
• Which graduates get
highly innovative jobs?
• Do higher education
systems foster skills for
innovation?
• Which pedagogic practices
are associated with highly
innovative jobs?
• What do these pedagogies
look like?
Innovation and the relative emphasis on
practice- and theory-based instruction
0.95
1
1.05
1.1
1.15
1.2
engineering business health education science others
practice score theory score
Odds ratios between innovators and non-innovators, by field of study
Source: OECD, based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
Innovation and the relative emphasis on
practice- and theory-based instruction
0.95
1
1.05
1.1
1.15
1.2
any innovation technology, tools product, service knowledge,
methods
practice score theory score
Odds ratios between innovators and non-innovators, by type of innovation
Source: OECD, based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
Higher education for innovation
Innovation
Skills
Education
and
training
• Which graduates get highly
innovative jobs?
• Do higher education systems
foster skills for innovation?
• Which pedagogic practices are
associated with highly
innovative jobs?
• What higher education
pedagogies to foster
innovation?
Evidence on Problem-based learning
(OECD WP by Hoidn and Kärkkäinen)
• Categorised based on student learning outcomes
– Knowledge acquisition and academic achievement
– Reasoning and knowledge application
– Social and behavioural skills
• PBL more beneficial regarding long-term retention and
application of knowledge and skills
• Positive impact on students’ motivation, satisfaction,
and attitudes toward learning
• No clear difference emerges as to test performance
Traditional approaches versus PBL
(effect sizes)
Traditional approaches versus PBL
(effect sizes)
ICT-enhanced pedagogic models to
foster « skills for innovation » in STEM
• Virtual and remote
laboratories
• Educational games
• Technology-enhanced
cooperative learning
• Real-time formative
assessment
• Skills-based
assessment
• Experiential learning (e.g. remote and virtual labs,
project-based and enquiry-based pedagogies)
• Hands-on pedagogies (e.g. game development)
• Cooperative learning (e.g. local and global
collaboration)
• Interactive and metacognitive pedagogies (e.g.
real-time assessment)
A few pedagogical models fostered by
ICT
• Pedagogical change:
– Design thinking (IStanford University; EMLyon
Business school and Ecole Centrale de Lyon (France);; i-
school at Tokyo University; UDD, UC, etc. (Chile)
– Design factories: Aalto Design Factory, Aalto service
factory, (Finland), MIT Fab labs (US), etc.
– Entrepreneurship programmes (Centre for
Entrepreneurship (Amsterdam university)
• Institutional change:
– Aalto University in Finland (economics, arts and design, science
and technology)
– European Institute of Innovation and Technology (structured
around Knowledge and Innovation Communities (KIC))
– Olin College of Engineering in the US; etc.
New types of transversal programmes
innovation in education
Towards innovation-friendly ecosystems in
education?
Innovation
in
education
Technology
School
organisation
System
organisation
Research and
Development
Measurement of innovation in education
New report
• 4 objectives:
– Informative
– Methodological
– Heuristic
– Prospective
• 2 approaches:
– Innovation surveys
– Organisational change surveys
• Databases / Coverage:
– Reflex and Hegesco (19 EU
countries + Japan)
– PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS (broad
international coverage)
What we mean by innovation
– Product (object, tool)
– Process (pedagogy)
– Organisation
– Marketing method
(external relations,
pricing, etc.)
– New to the world
– New to the sector
– New to the
organisation
• Introduction/implementation of a new or
significantly improved…
Percentage of highly innovative jobs, by
sector (2005-2008)
39.5
49.7 50.4
52.0 53.3 54.4 54.9 55.4 55.6
59.0 59.3 59.5 60.5
64.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Source: Measuring Innovation in Education (2014), based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
At least one type of innovation
Percentage of highly innovative jobs in
product or service (2005-2008)
17.7
20.3
22.5
25.1 25.3
28.5 28.8 28.8
33.5 33.7 33.9 34.2 34.6
36.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Source: Measuring Innovation in Education (2014), based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
Percentage of highly innovative jobs in
technology, tools or instruments (2005-2008)
12.8
15.7 16.0 16.9 18.0 19.1
20.6 21.3
23.0 23.6
25.3
27.7 28.6 29.2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Source: Measuring Innovation in Education (2014), based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
Percentage of highly innovative jobs in
knowledge or methods (2005-2008)
26.3
30.4
32.2 32.4 33.2
35.3 36.4 36.6 37.7 38.0
40.4 41.0
43.5
48.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Source: Measuring Innovation in Education (2014), based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
Highly innovative jobs in education and
other sectors of the economy
40
50 50 52 53 54 54 55 55 56 56
59 59 59 61
64
69
5
9 7 9 7 6 8 9 8 9 8 9 11 13 13 13 15
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
%
At least one type of innovation Three types of innovations
Source: OECD (Scoreboard on Innovation in Education), based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
Source: Measuring Innovation in Education (2014), based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
Percentage of highly innovative jobs, by innovation
type and education level (2005-2008)
24.6
20.1
28.8
24.8
15.7 16.0
28.7
20.6
45.2
42.2
58.7
47.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Primary education Secondary education Higher education Total education
Product or service Technology, tools or instruments Knowledge or methods
Source: Measuring Innovation in Education (2014), based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
conclusions
Some future policy challenges
• A broad mix of degrees/qualifications is needed that
includes but goes beyond science and engineering
• Does higher education empower people to innovate?
Is the glass half-empty or half-full?
• How to rebalance higher education missions to give
more weight to good pedagogies?
• Do we have the main drivers in place to foster
innovation in the higher education sector – and make
sure higher education contributes to innovation in
education and more broadly?
• 2 networks:
– Higher education to start in 2016
– School (primary and secondary)
• 3 approaches:
– One STEM discipline
– One arts education discipline
– One generic approach to innovation/creativity
• Activities in primary-secondary education:
– Develop a pedagogical toolkit (rubric, pedagogical activities and
assessments, student work)
– Document pedagogies to foster the selected skills/dispositions
• Activities in tertiary education:
– Share about pedagogies and identification of skills
Ongoing OECD project on assessing
progression in creativity and critical thinking
An increasing interest in innovative
pedagogies and structures in HE
Veuillez consulter cet ouvrage en ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264214019-fr.
Cet ouvrage est publié sur OECD iLibrary, la bibliothèque en ligne de l’OCDE, qui regroupe tous les livres, périodiques
et bases de données statistiques de l’Organisation.
Rendez-vous sur le site www.oecd-ilibrary.org pour plus d’informations.
Examens de l’OCDE des politiques d’innovation
FRANCE
Sommaire
Guide du lecteur
Résumé
Chapitre 1. Évaluation d’ensemble et recommandations
Chapitre 2. Performance économique de la France et innovation
Chapitre 3. La formation initiale des ressources humaines pour la recherche et l’innovation
Chapitre 4. La recherche publique
Chapitre 5. Les transferts entre la recherche publique et les entreprises
Chapitre 6. Les politiques de soutien à la recherche et à l’innovation
Chapitre 7. L’entrepreneuriat innovant
Chapitre 8. Gouvernance d’ensemble des politiques de recherche et d’innovation
www.oecd.org/sti/innovation/reviews
Examensdel’OCDEdespolitiquesd’innovationFRANCE
Examens de l’OCDE des politiques
d’innovation
FRANCE
ISBN 978-92-64-21400-2
92 2014 10 2 P
www.oecd.org/edu/innovation
www.oecd.org/edu/universityfutures
www.oecd.org/edu/internationalisation
Stephan.Vincent-Lancrin@oecd.org
THANK YOU

Stéphan Vincent-Lancrin - Stimulating Innovation in Higher Education

  • 1.
    HIGHER EDUCATION AND INNOVATION StéphanVincent-Lancrin Senior Analyst and Project Leader OECD Directorate for Education and Skills Poitiers, 25 January 2016
  • 2.
    Skills and educationfor innovation « 21st Century Skills » Innovation Skills Education and training
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Qualifications for innovation Innovation Skills Education and training •What skills/qualifications foster innovation in the economy? • Creative destruction and lifelong skill development?
  • 5.
    Diversity of qualificationsfor innovation across sectors Mining Electricity, Water, Gas Finance and insurance Source: Toner (2010)
  • 6.
    Fields of studyof highly innovative professionals (%), selected sectors 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Manufacturing Financial intermediation Business activities Health others law education arts humanities social sciences business agriculture health architecture sciences & maths engineering & computing
  • 7.
    Fields of studyof highly innovative professionals (%), by type of innovation 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Product innovation Technology innovation Knowledge innovation Any innovation others law education arts humanities social sciences business agriculture health architecture sciences & maths engineering & computing
  • 8.
    Skills for innovation Innovation Skills Education and training •What skills/qualifications foster innovation in the economy? • Creative destruction and lifelong skill development
  • 9.
  • 10.
    skills for innovation(and entrepreneurship)
  • 11.
    Skills that tertiary-educatedprofessionals report as very important in their job Percentage of employees reporting the following skills as very important in their job Source: OECD, based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data 22.7 30.6 40.2 40.3 40.4 40.4 40.5 41.8 46.5 48.0 50.0 53.4 54.2 55.0 56.5 56.9 58.6 60.8 61.7 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 knowledge of other fields write and speak a foreign language assert your authority negociate alertness to opportunities present ideas in audience willingness to question ideas mobilize capacities of others analytical thinking come with news ideas/solutions write reports or documents acquire new knowledge master of your own field coordinate activities use computers and internet make your meaning clear work productively with others perform under pressure use time efficiently
  • 12.
    Critical skills forentrepreneurship (according to tertiary-educated workers) Likelihood (odds ratios) of reporting the following skills: people in self-employed vs. employees Source: OECD, based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.6 0.5 1 2 work productively with others use computers and internet write reports or documents write and speak a foreign language analytical thinking use time efficiently mobilize capacities of others make your meaning clear coordinate activities acquire new knowledge present ideas in audience perform under pressure willingness to question ideas knowledge of other fields come with news ideas/solutions master of your own field alertness to opportunities assert your authority negociate
  • 13.
    Critical skills forinnovative entrepreneurship (according to tertiary-educated workers) Likelihood (odds ratios) of reporting the following skills: people in innovative entrepreneurs vs. entrepreneurs Source: OECD, based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 2.0 0.8 1.6 knowledge of other fields negociate use time efficiently make your meaning clear assert your authority coordinate activities perform under pressure write reports or documents work productively with others mobilize capacities of others master of your own field use computers and internet analytical thinking present ideas in audience write and speak a foreign language willingness to question ideas alertness to opportunities acquire new knowledge come with news ideas/solutions
  • 14.
    Critical skills forthe most innovative jobs (according to tertiary-educated workers) 1.56 1.76 1.76 1.81 1.94 1.95 1.97 1.98 1.99 2.00 2.02 2.05 2.11 2.15 2.18 2.24 2.34 2.44 2.97 0.80 assert your authority negociate knowledge of other fields perform under pressure write reports or documents work productively with others mobilize capacities of others use time efficiently make your meaning clear use computers and internet write and speak a foreign language coordinate activities master of your own field analytical thinking present ideas in audience alertness to opportunities willingness to question ideas acquire new knowledge come with news ideas/solutions Likelihood (odds ratios) of reporting the following skills: people in the most innovative jobs vs. least innovative jobs Source: OECD, based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
  • 15.
    What individual skillsshould education systems foster? Technical skills (know-what and know- how) Skills in thinking and creativity (Critical thinking, observation, curiosity, ability to make connections, imagination,...) Behavioural and social skills (character) (Self-confidence, energy, perseverance, passion, leadership, collaboration, communication)
  • 16.
    Some comments onthese skill categories • They are domain-specific – Skills are generally domain-specific: one is creative in a field, one knows how to behave/communicate in a specific context, one has problem-solving skills in a field, one has content knowledge in a field • They can become « domain-generic » – A skills becomes « domain-generic » when one has gained it in a number of domains or settings, so that it becomes a « habit of mind » (a disposition or a stabilised skill) that one can apply to new fields • They overlap and may reinforce each other But • They are different and cannot be reduced to a single skill (or measure) Technical skills Skills in thinking and creativity Behavioural and social skills (character)
  • 17.
  • 18.
    Higher education forinnovation Innovation Skills Education and training • Which graduates get highly innovative jobs? • Do higher education systems foster skills for innovation? • Which pedagogic practices are associated with highly innovative jobs? • What do these pedagogies look like?
  • 19.
    What share ofgraduates of a given field have a highly innovative job? 20.3 22.9 23.4 25.4 27.6 28.1 28.1 28.4 28.8 30.9 32.7 36.5 37.6 0 10 20 30 40 50 law health humanities others business sciences & maths education average social sciences architecture agriculture arts engineering & computing Product /service innovation
  • 20.
    What share ofgraduates of a given field have a highly innovative job? 12.4 12.6 13.2 15.2 16.0 18.4 18.6 21.0 23.9 24.2 28.6 28.8 38.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 law others humanities social sciences education health business average arts agriculture architecture sciences & maths engineering & computing Technology, tool, instrument innovation
  • 21.
    What share ofgraduates of a given field have a highly innovative job? 30.4 31.5 35.1 36.1 37.6 38.0 38.3 38.5 39.5 39.9 41.7 41.7 48.3 0 10 20 30 40 50 law others business humanities social sciences arts average health agriculture architecture engineering & computing education sciences & maths Knowledge / method innovation
  • 22.
    Higher education forinnovation Innovation Skills Education and training • Which graduates get highly innovative jobs? • Do higher education systems foster skills for innovation? • Which pedagogic practices are associated with highly innovative jobs? • What do these pedagogies look like?
  • 23.
    Strong points ofhigher education 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 assert your authority mobilize capacities of others negociate alertness to opportunities willingness to question ideas coordinate activities write and speak a foreign language make your meaning clear come with news ideas/solutions present ideas in audience knowledge of other fields use time efficiently use computers and internet perform under pressure work productively with others write reports or documents acquire new knowledge analytical thinking master of your own field Ranking of 3 top strong skills by graduates Source: OECD, based on REFLEX, HEGESCO and PROFLEX data
  • 24.
    Strong points ofhigher education 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 assert your authority mobilize capacities of others negociate alertness to opportunities willingness to question ideas coordinate activities write and speak a foreign language make your meaning clear come with news ideas/solutions present ideas in audience knowledge of other fields use time efficiently use computers and internet perform under pressure work productively with others write reports or documents acquire new knowledge analytical thinking master of your own field Ranking of 3 top strong skills by graduates Source: OECD, based on REFLEX, HEGESCO and PROFLEX data
  • 25.
    Weak points ofhigher education 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 acquire new knowledge master of your own field make your meaning clear coordinate activities work productively with others willingness to question ideas analytical thinking perform under pressure use time efficiently alertness to opportunities come with news ideas/solutions write reports or documents mobilize capacities of others knowledge of other fields use computers and internet present ideas in audience assert your authority negociate write and speak a foreign language Ranking of 3 top weak skills by graduates Source: OECD, based on REFLEX, HEGESCO and PROFLEX data
  • 26.
    Weak points ofhigher education 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 acquire new knowledge master of your own field make your meaning clear coordinate activities work productively with others willingness to question ideas analytical thinking perform under pressure use time efficiently alertness to opportunities come with news ideas/solutions write reports or documents mobilize capacities of others knowledge of other fields use computers and internet present ideas in audience assert your authority negociate write and speak a foreign language Ranking of 3 top weak skills by graduates Source: OECD, based on REFLEX, HEGESCO and PROFLEX data
  • 27.
    Higher education forinnovation Innovation Skills Education and training • Which graduates get highly innovative jobs? • Do higher education systems foster skills for innovation? • Which pedagogic practices are associated with highly innovative jobs? • What do these pedagogies look like?
  • 28.
    Innovation and therelative emphasis on practice- and theory-based instruction 0.95 1 1.05 1.1 1.15 1.2 engineering business health education science others practice score theory score Odds ratios between innovators and non-innovators, by field of study Source: OECD, based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
  • 29.
    Innovation and therelative emphasis on practice- and theory-based instruction 0.95 1 1.05 1.1 1.15 1.2 any innovation technology, tools product, service knowledge, methods practice score theory score Odds ratios between innovators and non-innovators, by type of innovation Source: OECD, based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
  • 30.
    Higher education forinnovation Innovation Skills Education and training • Which graduates get highly innovative jobs? • Do higher education systems foster skills for innovation? • Which pedagogic practices are associated with highly innovative jobs? • What higher education pedagogies to foster innovation?
  • 31.
    Evidence on Problem-basedlearning (OECD WP by Hoidn and Kärkkäinen) • Categorised based on student learning outcomes – Knowledge acquisition and academic achievement – Reasoning and knowledge application – Social and behavioural skills • PBL more beneficial regarding long-term retention and application of knowledge and skills • Positive impact on students’ motivation, satisfaction, and attitudes toward learning • No clear difference emerges as to test performance
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34.
    ICT-enhanced pedagogic modelsto foster « skills for innovation » in STEM • Virtual and remote laboratories • Educational games • Technology-enhanced cooperative learning • Real-time formative assessment • Skills-based assessment
  • 35.
    • Experiential learning(e.g. remote and virtual labs, project-based and enquiry-based pedagogies) • Hands-on pedagogies (e.g. game development) • Cooperative learning (e.g. local and global collaboration) • Interactive and metacognitive pedagogies (e.g. real-time assessment) A few pedagogical models fostered by ICT
  • 36.
    • Pedagogical change: –Design thinking (IStanford University; EMLyon Business school and Ecole Centrale de Lyon (France);; i- school at Tokyo University; UDD, UC, etc. (Chile) – Design factories: Aalto Design Factory, Aalto service factory, (Finland), MIT Fab labs (US), etc. – Entrepreneurship programmes (Centre for Entrepreneurship (Amsterdam university) • Institutional change: – Aalto University in Finland (economics, arts and design, science and technology) – European Institute of Innovation and Technology (structured around Knowledge and Innovation Communities (KIC)) – Olin College of Engineering in the US; etc. New types of transversal programmes
  • 37.
  • 38.
    Towards innovation-friendly ecosystemsin education? Innovation in education Technology School organisation System organisation Research and Development
  • 39.
    Measurement of innovationin education New report • 4 objectives: – Informative – Methodological – Heuristic – Prospective • 2 approaches: – Innovation surveys – Organisational change surveys • Databases / Coverage: – Reflex and Hegesco (19 EU countries + Japan) – PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS (broad international coverage)
  • 40.
    What we meanby innovation – Product (object, tool) – Process (pedagogy) – Organisation – Marketing method (external relations, pricing, etc.) – New to the world – New to the sector – New to the organisation • Introduction/implementation of a new or significantly improved…
  • 41.
    Percentage of highlyinnovative jobs, by sector (2005-2008) 39.5 49.7 50.4 52.0 53.3 54.4 54.9 55.4 55.6 59.0 59.3 59.5 60.5 64.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Source: Measuring Innovation in Education (2014), based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data At least one type of innovation
  • 42.
    Percentage of highlyinnovative jobs in product or service (2005-2008) 17.7 20.3 22.5 25.1 25.3 28.5 28.8 28.8 33.5 33.7 33.9 34.2 34.6 36.7 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Source: Measuring Innovation in Education (2014), based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
  • 43.
    Percentage of highlyinnovative jobs in technology, tools or instruments (2005-2008) 12.8 15.7 16.0 16.9 18.0 19.1 20.6 21.3 23.0 23.6 25.3 27.7 28.6 29.2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Source: Measuring Innovation in Education (2014), based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
  • 44.
    Percentage of highlyinnovative jobs in knowledge or methods (2005-2008) 26.3 30.4 32.2 32.4 33.2 35.3 36.4 36.6 37.7 38.0 40.4 41.0 43.5 48.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Source: Measuring Innovation in Education (2014), based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
  • 45.
    Highly innovative jobsin education and other sectors of the economy 40 50 50 52 53 54 54 55 55 56 56 59 59 59 61 64 69 5 9 7 9 7 6 8 9 8 9 8 9 11 13 13 13 15 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 % At least one type of innovation Three types of innovations Source: OECD (Scoreboard on Innovation in Education), based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data Source: Measuring Innovation in Education (2014), based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
  • 46.
    Percentage of highlyinnovative jobs, by innovation type and education level (2005-2008) 24.6 20.1 28.8 24.8 15.7 16.0 28.7 20.6 45.2 42.2 58.7 47.7 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Primary education Secondary education Higher education Total education Product or service Technology, tools or instruments Knowledge or methods Source: Measuring Innovation in Education (2014), based on REFLEX and HEGESCO data
  • 47.
  • 48.
    Some future policychallenges • A broad mix of degrees/qualifications is needed that includes but goes beyond science and engineering • Does higher education empower people to innovate? Is the glass half-empty or half-full? • How to rebalance higher education missions to give more weight to good pedagogies? • Do we have the main drivers in place to foster innovation in the higher education sector – and make sure higher education contributes to innovation in education and more broadly?
  • 49.
    • 2 networks: –Higher education to start in 2016 – School (primary and secondary) • 3 approaches: – One STEM discipline – One arts education discipline – One generic approach to innovation/creativity • Activities in primary-secondary education: – Develop a pedagogical toolkit (rubric, pedagogical activities and assessments, student work) – Document pedagogies to foster the selected skills/dispositions • Activities in tertiary education: – Share about pedagogies and identification of skills Ongoing OECD project on assessing progression in creativity and critical thinking
  • 50.
    An increasing interestin innovative pedagogies and structures in HE Veuillez consulter cet ouvrage en ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264214019-fr. Cet ouvrage est publié sur OECD iLibrary, la bibliothèque en ligne de l’OCDE, qui regroupe tous les livres, périodiques et bases de données statistiques de l’Organisation. Rendez-vous sur le site www.oecd-ilibrary.org pour plus d’informations. Examens de l’OCDE des politiques d’innovation FRANCE Sommaire Guide du lecteur Résumé Chapitre 1. Évaluation d’ensemble et recommandations Chapitre 2. Performance économique de la France et innovation Chapitre 3. La formation initiale des ressources humaines pour la recherche et l’innovation Chapitre 4. La recherche publique Chapitre 5. Les transferts entre la recherche publique et les entreprises Chapitre 6. Les politiques de soutien à la recherche et à l’innovation Chapitre 7. L’entrepreneuriat innovant Chapitre 8. Gouvernance d’ensemble des politiques de recherche et d’innovation www.oecd.org/sti/innovation/reviews Examensdel’OCDEdespolitiquesd’innovationFRANCE Examens de l’OCDE des politiques d’innovation FRANCE ISBN 978-92-64-21400-2 92 2014 10 2 P
  • 51.