Structural Bioinformatics
in Drug Discovery
Melissa Passino
Structural Bioinformatics
• What is SBI?
“Structural bioinformatics is a subset of
bioinformatics concerned with the use
of biological structures – proteins, DNA,
RNA, ligands etc. and complexes thereof
to further our understanding of
biological systems.”
http://biology.sdsc.edu/strucb.html
SBI in Drug Design and Discovery
• SBI can be used to examine:
• drug targets (usually proteins)
• binding of ligands
↓
“rational” drug design
(benefits = saved time and $$$)
Traditional Methods of Drug Discovery
natural
(plant-derived)
treatment for
illness/ailments
↓
isolation of active
compound
(small, organic)
synthesis
of compound
↓
manipulation of
structure to get
better drug
(greater efficacy,
fewer side effects)
Aspirin
Modern Methods of Drug Discovery
What’s different?
• Drug discovery process begins
with a disease (rather than a treatment)
• Use disease model to pinpoint
relevant genetic/biological
components (i.e. possible drug targets)
Modern Drug Discovery
disease → genetic/biological target
↓
discovery of a “lead” molecule
- design assay to measure function of
target
- use assay to look for modulators of
target’s function
↓
high throughput screen (HTS)
- to identify “hits” (compounds with
binding in low nM to low μM range)
Modern Drug Discovery
small molecule hits
↓
manipulate structure to increase potency
i.e. decrease Ki to low nM affinity
↓
*optimization of lead molecule into candidate drug*
fulfillment of required pharmacological properties:
potency, absorption, bioavailability, metabolism, safety
↓
clinical trials
Interesting facts...
• Over 90% of drugs
entering clinical
trials fail to make it
to market
• The average cost
to bring a new
drug to market is
estimated at $770
million
Impact of Structural Bioinformatics
on Drug Discovery
Genome Gene Protein HTS Hit Lead Candidate Drug
Genomics
Bioinformatics
Structural Bioinformatics
Chemoinformatics
Structure-based Drug Design
ADMET Modelling
• Speeds up key steps in
DD process by combining
aspects of bioinformatics,
structural biology, and
structure-based drug
design
Fig 1 & 2
Fauman et al.
Identifying Targets:
The “Druggable Genome”
human genome
polysaccharides lipids nucleic acids proteins
Problems with toxicity, specificity, and
difficulty in creating potent inhibitors
eliminate the first 3 categories...
human genome
polysaccharides lipids nucleic acids proteins
proteins with
binding site
“druggable genome” = subset of genes which
express proteins capable of binding small drug-like
molecules
Relating druggable targets
to disease...
GPCR
STY kinases
Zinc peptidases
Serine
proteases
PDE
Other 110
families
Cys proteases
Gated ion-
channel Ion channels
Nuclear
receptor
P450 enzymes
Analysis of pharm
industry reveals:
• Over 400 proteins
used as drug targets
• Sequence analysis of
these proteins shows
that most targets fall
within a few major
gene families
(GPCRs, kinases,
proteases and
peptidases)
Fig. 3, Fauman et al.
Assessing Target Druggability
• Once a target is defined for your
disease of interest, SBI can help
answer the question:
Is this a “druggable” target?
• Does it have sequence/domains similar to
known targets?
• Does the target have a site where a drug
can bind, and with appropriate affinity?
Other roles for SBI in drug discovery
• Binding pocket modeling
• Lead identification
• Similarity with known
proteins or ligands
• Chemical library design /
combinatorial chemistry
• Virtual screening
• *Lead optimization*
• Binding
• ADMET
SBI in cancer therapy:
MMPIs
• Inability to control metastasis is the
leading cause of death in patients
with cancer (Zucker et al. Oncogene. 2000, 19,
6642-6650.)
• Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors
(MMPIs) are a newer class of cancer
therapeutics
• can prevent metastasis (but not cytotoxic);
may also play role in blocking tumor
angiogenesis (growth inhibition)
• Used to treat “major” cancers: lung,
GI, prostate
What is an MMP?
• Family of over 20 structurally related
proteinases
• Principal substrates:
• protein components of extracellular matrix
(collagen, fibronectin, laminin, proteoglycan
core protein)
• Functions:
• Breakdown of connective tissue; tissue
remodeling
• Role in cancer:
• Increased levels/activity of MMPs in area
surrounding tumor
Brown PD. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1998, 52, 125-136.
Whittaker et al. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2735-2776
MMP-1,3,8
MMP-2
MMP-7
MMP-9
MMP-10 to 13,19,20
MMP-14
to 17
Whittaker et al. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2735-2776
Whittaker et al. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2735-2776
“metallo” in MMP = zinc
→ catalytic domain contains 2 zinc atoms
MMP catalysis
Peptidic inhibitors
• Structure based
design
– based on natural
substrate collagen
– zinc binding group
• Poor Ki values, not
very selective
(inhibit other MPs)
Brown PD. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1998, 52, 125-136.
Peptidic hydroxamate inhibitors
• Specificity for
MMPs over
other MPs
• Better binding
(low nM Ki)
• But poor oral
bioavailability
A (not very) long time ago,
in a town (not too) far away…
…lived a company
named Agouron…
…and this company
had a dream, a
dream to design a
nonpeptidic
hydroxamate
inhibitor of MMPs…
...so they made some special crystals…
used x-ray
crystallography/3D
structure of
recombinant human
MMPs bound to
various inhibitors
↓
to determine key a.a.
residues, ligand
substituents needed
for binding Gelatinase A
http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/
…and used the magic of structural
bioinformatics to design many, many
nonpeptidic hydroxylates.
oral
bioavailabity
Ki
anti-
growth
anti-
metastasis
repeat…
Results…
AG3340
“Prinomastat”
• Good oral
bioavailability
• Selective for
specific MMPs
– may implicate their
roles in certain
cancers
Prinomastat
• Evidence showing prevention of lung
cancer metastasis in rat and mice models
• Clinical trials
→ non small cell lung cancer
→ hormone refractory prostate cancer
…stopped at Phase 3 (Aug 2000) because
did not show effects against late stage
metastasis
Morals of the story…
• SBI can be used as basis for lead
discovery and optimization
• MMPs are good targets for chemotherapy
to help control metastasis…
…but MMPIs must be combined with other
cytotoxic drugs to get maximum benefits,
and used at earliest stage possible

Structural Bioinformatics in Drug Discovery.ppt

  • 1.
    Structural Bioinformatics in DrugDiscovery Melissa Passino
  • 2.
    Structural Bioinformatics • Whatis SBI? “Structural bioinformatics is a subset of bioinformatics concerned with the use of biological structures – proteins, DNA, RNA, ligands etc. and complexes thereof to further our understanding of biological systems.” http://biology.sdsc.edu/strucb.html
  • 3.
    SBI in DrugDesign and Discovery • SBI can be used to examine: • drug targets (usually proteins) • binding of ligands ↓ “rational” drug design (benefits = saved time and $$$)
  • 4.
    Traditional Methods ofDrug Discovery natural (plant-derived) treatment for illness/ailments ↓ isolation of active compound (small, organic)
  • 5.
    synthesis of compound ↓ manipulation of structureto get better drug (greater efficacy, fewer side effects) Aspirin
  • 6.
    Modern Methods ofDrug Discovery What’s different? • Drug discovery process begins with a disease (rather than a treatment) • Use disease model to pinpoint relevant genetic/biological components (i.e. possible drug targets)
  • 7.
    Modern Drug Discovery disease→ genetic/biological target ↓ discovery of a “lead” molecule - design assay to measure function of target - use assay to look for modulators of target’s function ↓ high throughput screen (HTS) - to identify “hits” (compounds with binding in low nM to low μM range)
  • 8.
    Modern Drug Discovery smallmolecule hits ↓ manipulate structure to increase potency i.e. decrease Ki to low nM affinity ↓ *optimization of lead molecule into candidate drug* fulfillment of required pharmacological properties: potency, absorption, bioavailability, metabolism, safety ↓ clinical trials
  • 9.
    Interesting facts... • Over90% of drugs entering clinical trials fail to make it to market • The average cost to bring a new drug to market is estimated at $770 million
  • 10.
    Impact of StructuralBioinformatics on Drug Discovery Genome Gene Protein HTS Hit Lead Candidate Drug Genomics Bioinformatics Structural Bioinformatics Chemoinformatics Structure-based Drug Design ADMET Modelling • Speeds up key steps in DD process by combining aspects of bioinformatics, structural biology, and structure-based drug design Fig 1 & 2 Fauman et al.
  • 11.
  • 12.
    human genome polysaccharides lipidsnucleic acids proteins Problems with toxicity, specificity, and difficulty in creating potent inhibitors eliminate the first 3 categories...
  • 13.
    human genome polysaccharides lipidsnucleic acids proteins proteins with binding site “druggable genome” = subset of genes which express proteins capable of binding small drug-like molecules
  • 14.
    Relating druggable targets todisease... GPCR STY kinases Zinc peptidases Serine proteases PDE Other 110 families Cys proteases Gated ion- channel Ion channels Nuclear receptor P450 enzymes Analysis of pharm industry reveals: • Over 400 proteins used as drug targets • Sequence analysis of these proteins shows that most targets fall within a few major gene families (GPCRs, kinases, proteases and peptidases) Fig. 3, Fauman et al.
  • 15.
    Assessing Target Druggability •Once a target is defined for your disease of interest, SBI can help answer the question: Is this a “druggable” target? • Does it have sequence/domains similar to known targets? • Does the target have a site where a drug can bind, and with appropriate affinity?
  • 16.
    Other roles forSBI in drug discovery • Binding pocket modeling • Lead identification • Similarity with known proteins or ligands • Chemical library design / combinatorial chemistry • Virtual screening • *Lead optimization* • Binding • ADMET
  • 17.
    SBI in cancertherapy: MMPIs
  • 18.
    • Inability tocontrol metastasis is the leading cause of death in patients with cancer (Zucker et al. Oncogene. 2000, 19, 6642-6650.) • Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors (MMPIs) are a newer class of cancer therapeutics • can prevent metastasis (but not cytotoxic); may also play role in blocking tumor angiogenesis (growth inhibition) • Used to treat “major” cancers: lung, GI, prostate
  • 19.
    What is anMMP? • Family of over 20 structurally related proteinases • Principal substrates: • protein components of extracellular matrix (collagen, fibronectin, laminin, proteoglycan core protein) • Functions: • Breakdown of connective tissue; tissue remodeling • Role in cancer: • Increased levels/activity of MMPs in area surrounding tumor
  • 20.
    Brown PD. BreastCancer Res Treat 1998, 52, 125-136.
  • 21.
    Whittaker et al.Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2735-2776
  • 22.
    MMP-1,3,8 MMP-2 MMP-7 MMP-9 MMP-10 to 13,19,20 MMP-14 to17 Whittaker et al. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2735-2776
  • 23.
    Whittaker et al.Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2735-2776 “metallo” in MMP = zinc → catalytic domain contains 2 zinc atoms MMP catalysis
  • 24.
    Peptidic inhibitors • Structurebased design – based on natural substrate collagen – zinc binding group • Poor Ki values, not very selective (inhibit other MPs) Brown PD. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1998, 52, 125-136.
  • 25.
    Peptidic hydroxamate inhibitors •Specificity for MMPs over other MPs • Better binding (low nM Ki) • But poor oral bioavailability
  • 26.
    A (not very)long time ago, in a town (not too) far away… …lived a company named Agouron… …and this company had a dream, a dream to design a nonpeptidic hydroxamate inhibitor of MMPs…
  • 27.
    ...so they madesome special crystals… used x-ray crystallography/3D structure of recombinant human MMPs bound to various inhibitors ↓ to determine key a.a. residues, ligand substituents needed for binding Gelatinase A http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/
  • 28.
    …and used themagic of structural bioinformatics to design many, many nonpeptidic hydroxylates. oral bioavailabity Ki anti- growth anti- metastasis repeat…
  • 29.
    Results… AG3340 “Prinomastat” • Good oral bioavailability •Selective for specific MMPs – may implicate their roles in certain cancers
  • 30.
    Prinomastat • Evidence showingprevention of lung cancer metastasis in rat and mice models • Clinical trials → non small cell lung cancer → hormone refractory prostate cancer …stopped at Phase 3 (Aug 2000) because did not show effects against late stage metastasis
  • 31.
    Morals of thestory… • SBI can be used as basis for lead discovery and optimization • MMPs are good targets for chemotherapy to help control metastasis… …but MMPIs must be combined with other cytotoxic drugs to get maximum benefits, and used at earliest stage possible