BY
Senior Fellow (Security & Strategic Studies)
Research Directorate, NIPSS, Kuru – Jos, NIGERIA
A Paper Presented to Participants of the
NIPSS Policy, Strategy and Leadership
Course No. 21 (4th – 29th April 2016)
Monday, 11 April 2016
A Preamble
• Strategic management process involves complex
cross-functional relationships of organizational
components geared towards attainment of set
objectives.
• It is a veritable tool of strategy for navigating the
complexity of applying the tenets of mission and
vision of organizations.
• This paper discusses, explains and relates how
leadership of organizations harnesses resources
in series of decisions and actions that determine
performance and results.
Nature of Strategic Management Process
• The Strategic Management Process requires that
various organizational components are put to
work for attainment of common objectives.
• The complex and contingency nature of strategic
management process blends an agenda
resource-based, structure-conduct-performance,
agency and other theories.
• Literature survey on the subject reveals
emphasis on ways to simplify and understand
the multifarious nature of strategic management
process.
Challenge to Organizational Leadership
• The challenge and burden of strategic
management process rest on the shoulders of
organizational leadership or senior executives
charged with decisions and actions.
• The paper breaks down this process into
strategic formulation; strategic
implementation; and, strategic evaluation
and control.
• An exercise is designed for senior executives
to practice on the workings of strategic
management process in groups representing
organizational situations.
Some Captions on SMP
• Strategy is the great work … in situations of
life and death. It is the ‘Tao’ (or ultimate
reality) of survival or extinction. Its study
cannot be neglected. – Sun Tzu, The Art of War
• Strategy without process is little more than a
wish list. – Robert Filek
• Leaders establish the vision for the future and
set the strategy for getting there. - S. P. Kotter
• However beautiful the strategy, you should
occasionally look at the results. – Sir Winston
Churchill
Comments on Captions
These 4 captions sum up needs for
organizational strategy to be:
 designed or formulated;
 applied or implemented;
 analysed or evaluated.
It is in a continuous cycle or process, by
leadership, on dictates of situations,
over time.
INTRODUCTION
Background
• Strategic management process (SMP) involves
cross-functional relationship of organizational
components geared towards attainment of
common objectives.
• It is often divided into five main stages of goal
setting, analysis, strategy formulation, strategy
implementation, and evaluation and control
(Tse, 2010; Clayton, 2016).
• It is a veritable tool for navigating the
complexity of applying the tenets of mission
and vision of organizations to routine activities
by leadership or senior executive cadre.
Burden of Strategy
• The challenge and burden of strategy rests on the shoulders
of senior executives who handle the management and
decision making components and processes of organizations.
• Management and managers are central in running the affairs
of an organization as well as critical to strategic principles
and practice of leadership.
• The SMP reflects the application of day-to-day activities
aimed at achieving the overall goals or objectives of an
organization.
• This paper discusses, explains and relates the alignment of
routine affairs and activities to the mission and vision of
organizational leadership.
Literature
• Literature on SMP tends to focus on ways to
counter the complexity and obscurity of the subject
for ease of clarity and understanding.
• Guerras-Martin, Madhok & Montoro-Sanchez
(2014) trace the historical background, recent
trends and current directions of SMP and observe
the need for decipherment of its difficult terrain.
• An earlier work (Hunger & Wheelen (1997) points
to managerial decisions and actions contributing to
performance toward goal attainment as aggregated
SMP.
More Recent Works
• Aremu (2003) and Parnell (2005) also establish
correlation of SMP with performance, as basis
for strategic philosophy of organizations.
• More recent works incline towards modelling
and breaking down of SMP stages and activities
for better understanding and more effective
application (David, 2008; Vasile & Iancu, 2009;
Clayton, 2015).
• Particular contributors of interest bring in
contents history of SMP and case studies with
emphasis on the need for elucidation.
Literature View Point
• This paper treads on same guiding
principles as aforementioned;
• That is, the decipherment of SMP for
clarity and understanding.
Theorem
• The contingency nature of strategic
management process tends to harbour
multiple but synergic theoretical foundation
including resource-based, structure-conduct-
performance, agency, and other related
approaches.
• Theories used in SMP share common core
elements of simplification, assumptions,
concepts, processes and cross-functional
relationships (Parnell, 2005; Bettis, et al.
2014).
A Theoretical Framework
• An Assemblage of various theories of SMP
produces cumulative cross-functional
relationship of organizational resources
harnessed for attainment of common goals
or objectives (Ologbo, et al. 2012).
• This paper dwells on the contingency nature
of SMP in building a theoretical framework
based on cross-functional relationship of
organizational resources.
STATEMENT
OF THE
PROBLEM
The Statement
• As leadership of organizations harnesses
resources in series of decisions and actions, it is
often difficult to grasp and understand what
goes around in complex activities.
• The need to control and direct affairs of
organizations in sequential order in response to
changing situations and larger environment is
harder to absorb.
• Also, the desire to evaluate and control
performance and results is critical in directing
resources at attainment of set goals.
The Problem
• The SMP is a veritable and necessary tool for
navigating the difficult terrain of applying
organizational mission and vision to routine
activities.
• It involves complex series of decisions and
actions further compounded by natural or
situational occurrences.
• The challenges and burden of SMP rest on the
shoulders of leadership who must seek to
understand and direct the affairs of
organizations towards attainment of set goals.
Aims and Objectives of the Paper
• This paper aims at decipherment of complex and
contingency nature of the SMP for its clear
understanding and application by organizational
leadership or senior executives.
• The paper defines and discusses the SMP and its
associated key components;
• It breaks the SMP into segments for ease of
discourse and explains the complex cross-
functional relationship of organizational
components;
• It determines the challenges faced by leadership
in application of the SMP in organizational
mission and vision for attainment of set goals.
Style of the Paper
• The single-phase title of the paper – ‘THE
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS’ -
without a rider signifies a fast-track monorail
discourse.
• The discussions may infer and/or bypass familiar
tracks like strategic planning, organizational
culture, organizational resource dimension, data
synthesis, environmental scanning and many
others.
• These are reserved for further discourse and
exercises in papers assigned to oncoming
presentations.
CONCEPTUAL
DISCOURSE
Organizational Leadership
• Organization and Leadership studies are wide
fields often defined in many ways depending
on purpose and direction of discourse,
including situational process of strategic
management.
• Organizations are groups, ventures, affairs,
arrangements or relationships characterized by
common or shared interests, purposes, goals
or objectives.
• Leadership is the complex system of effects
influencing decisions and actions in setting and
achieving goals or objectives (Scouller, 2011).
Organizational leadership (Contd…)
Organizational leadership is the management
staff that provides inspiration, objectives,
operational oversight and other administrative
services to the organization often seen in
Mission and Vision Statements
(BusinessDictionary.com).
Mission and Vision
• Mission refers to assigned task, goal, objective
set for attainment.
• Vision is a mental picture, an image or concept
in one’s imagination often called a dream, a plan
at individual or group levels.
• Mission and Vision Statements are formal
documents or pronouncements stating aims and
objectives of an organization.
• They represent the proficiency to plan, set goals
or anticipate future events and developments.
Mission and Vision Statements
• In organizational studies, mission and vision
are associated with future plan, intention,
direction, strategy or strategic plan often
expressed as ‘mission and vision statement’.
• Mission and Vision Statements usually imply
well thought-out ideas, mental picture, far-
sightedness, conceptualization, visualization,
foresight, forethought, imagination or
prescience for direction.
• They are used for communicating set
objectives and direction in short, simple, but
adjustable pronouncements responding to
situational dictates of organizational strategy.
Organizational Strategy
• Strategy is a carefully devised plan of action to
achieve set objectives and ways for carrying it
out.
• It is the practice of higher level plans or
leadership in achieving set goals of organizations
under ever changing situations or environments.
• It also involves patterns in streams of decisions
and actions that shape the future into desirable
ends by means of available resources (Mintzberg,
1978; Mintzberg & Quinn, 1996; Kvint, 2009;
Freedman, 2013).
Organizational Strategy (Contd…)
• Organizational strategy is an expression of how
organizations need to evolve over tie to meet their
objectives along with detailed assessment of what
needs to be done and by who
(BusinessDictionary.com).
• In a wider view, it is the overall plan of action on
how to develop or response to the ever changing
organizational environment in attaining set goals.
• According to Johnson (2016), organizational
strategy sums up decisions and actions expressed
by leadership intent in achieving set goals or
objectives in a charted course as strategic
management process.
Strategic Management Process
• The strategic management process (SMP) is
an objective, logical, systematic and
continuous approach for making major
decisions and taking actions in an
organization (Yousuf, 2016).
• It is defined as a dynamic process of strategy
formulation, implementation, evaluation and
control (Parnell, 2005; David, 2008; Vasile & Iancu,
2009; Vatchkova, 2010; Hill, Jones & Schilling, 2015;
Yousuf, 2016).
Strategic Management Process (Contd…)
• Yousuf (2016) reflects on central cross-functional
feature of the SMP, synonymous to strategic
planning, in exploiting and creating new
opportunities for the future based on present
trends or conditions.
• The various stages or tasks of the SMP include
strategy formulation, strategy implementation,
and strategy evaluation and control.
• They are created and guided by organizational
leadership, expressed by the mission and vision
statements and run by organizational strategy.
Strategic Formulation
• Formulation involves the assemblage,
arrangement or putting together of different
components into a working structure or
relationship for the purpose of attaining set
objectives.
• Strategy formulation is the task of analyzing
the organization’s internal and external
environments, and selecting or devising
appropriate plans or strategies in setting
goals or objectives and ways of achieving
them.
Strategic Formulation (Contd…)
• Strategy formulation is the baseline task of
the SMP involving the establishment of
mission and vision statements,
environmental analysis or scanning, setting
goals or objectives, and the ways and means
for attainment (Nabradi, n.d; Mitchell, n.d).
• Strategy formulation embeds in the SMP or
strategic plan as a living document that
changes and grows as organizational
situation changes with time or events.
Strategic Implementation
• Implementation is the process of carrying out,
fulfilling, realization or execution of a task, an
application or a plan.
• Strategy implementation is the second stage
task after strategy formulation, involving the
application or execution of plans through series
of decisions and actions in pursue of set goals or
objectives.
• Brinkschroder (2014) put this task on the
shoulders of organizational leadership for
communication of mission; allocation of tasks
and resources; and coordination of cross-
functional relationships.
Strategic Evaluation and Control
• Evaluation is the act of considering, examining,
assessing, calculating or appraising activities,
functions or situation to ascertain expected
value, quality, quantity, extent or condition.
• Control involves the exercise of power or
authority to oversee, manage or adjust
activities, tasks or ventures in line with set
direction.
• Strategy evaluation and control constitutes the
final tier completing the tasks of the SMP cycle.
Strategic Evaluation and Control (Contd…)
This stage weighs performance data and
activity reports to appraise and adjust
undesired performance due to improper
application of the SMP for the purpose of
adjustment in line with organizational strategy
(Gomes, 2010).
UNDERSTANDING THE
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
PROCESS
Essentials of the SMP
Understanding the SMP is best by capturing its
main stages of strategy formulation; strategy
implementation; and strategy evaluation and
control all charged to organizational leadership
tasks.
Hunger & Wheelen (1997) built on same
concepts and explanation of the SMP to propose
its essentials with the following components:
oEnvironmental Scanning;
oStrategy Formulation;
oStrategy Implementation; and
oStrategy Evaluation and Control.
Environmental Scanning
• The obvious addition or inclusion of
‘environmental scanning’ or assessment of
internal strengths and weaknesses; and
external opportunities and threats is to
underscore the importance of preparations.
• This proposal runs through decades of trials
and rests strongly on the shoulders of
organizational leadership (Aremu, 2003;
Parnell, 2005; David, 2008; Vatchkova, 2012;
Clayton, 2016).
Modelling of the SMP
• Models provide simplified versions of complex
processes for ease of understanding and
analysis.
• Vasile & Iancu (2009) and Niere (2012) explain
the SMP model as useful in the prediction and
evaluation of the environment for possible
modifications to harmonize with and achieve
organizational mission and objectives.
• According to Vasile & Iancu, the SMP
Modelling originated from ‘The First
International Conference of Strategic
Management’ in 1973 and still applied to
facilitate organizational leadership.
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
PROCESS AND ORGANIZATIONAL
LEADERSHIP
Strategic Responsibilities
• Organizations run on multiple and overlapping
functions and components with strategic
responsibilities on certain level of leadership.
• Parnell (2005) identifies the middle-to-high level
executives as top managers who “… view
strategy formulation as an art and science.” (p.
157).
• Organizational leadership therefore exercises
influence through timely decisions and actions
on how missions are performed and objectives
attained (Vigoda-Gadot & Drory, 2006).
The SMP and Organizational Leadership Cadre
The Policy Strategy and Leadership Course
(PSLC) of the National Institute for Policy and
Strategic Studies (NIPSS) or the NIPSS-PSLC
describe its Participants as:
“… middle-to-high level executives in both the
public and private sectors … who amongst other
responsibilities, provide key input into
organizational/national policy formulation and
implementation as well as facilitate the
effectiveness of the top managers and decision
makers in their organizations.”
Leadership Cadre for the SMP
• This leadership cadre or core group facilitates
general management; relates strategy and
operations; re-orient performance to set
objectives; and establish long-term directions
and results.
• By implication the Participants of the NIPSS-
PSLC represent the organizational leadership
cadre or core group charged with the
Strategic Management Process of their
various organizations.
CONCLUSION
Summary
• Strategy without process is little more than wishful
thinking.
• Organizations of various forms require the strategic
management process to initiate, run or achieve set
objectives.
• A particular cadre of organizational leadership is
charged with the responsibilities for the strategic
management process.
• This paper sets out to discus and simplifies the
strategic management process as a veritable tool
for navigating the complexity of applying
organizational mission to routine activities by a
specific leadership cadre know as senior executives.
Conclusion
• The paper explains the common grounds of
literature and synergic theorem for simplification;
and deciphers the SMP to its basics and practice.
• It concludes that responsibilities for the SMP are
charged to the leadership cadre or core group of
middle-to-higher executives.
• The NIPSS-PSLC Participants drawn from the public
and private sectors of Nigeria are defined and
established as representatives of organizational
leadership cadre charged with responsibilities of
the strategic management process of their
organizations.
Recommendations
Recommended: Appendix 1 – Exercise on the
SMP Planning
An exercise on the SMP planning is designed
for senior executives to practice on the
workings of strategic management process in
groups representing organizational situations.
• Aremu, M. A. (2003). Enhancing organizational performance through strategic management: Conceptual and theoretical approach. Ilorin, NG: University
of Ilorin. http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/publications/maaremu/Ehancing-Organizational-Performance-through-Strategic-Manag.htm
• Bettis, R. A., A. Gambardella, C. Helfat, & Mitchell, W. (2014). Theory in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, June 25.
Http://www.wileyonlinelibrary.com DOI:10.1002/smj.2308
• Brinkschroder, N. (2014). Strategy implementation: Key factors, challenges and solutions. A Presentation at the 4th IBA Bachelor Thesis Conference,
November 6th. University of Twente, Faculty of Management and Governance, Enschede, The Netherlands.
• BusinessDictionary.com http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/-organizational-leadership.html
• Clayton, J. (2016). The five stages of the strategic management process. Houston Chronicle. http://smallbusiness.cohn.com/five-stages-strategic-
mamngement-process.18785.html
• David, F. R. (2008). Concepts of strategic management. (6th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prince-Hall
• Freedman, L. (2013). Strategy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Gomes, S. (2010). Strategic management process. https://xisspm.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/sm-chapter-2.pd
• Guerras-Martin, L. A., Madhok, A. & Montoro-Sachez, A. (2014). The evolution of strategic management research: Recent trends and current directions.
BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 17(2), April-June, 69-76
• Hill, C. W., Jones, G. R. & Schilling, M. A. (2015). Strategic management theory. (11th Edition). London, UK: Cengage Learning
• Hunger, J. D. & Wheelen, T. L. (1997). Essentials of strategic management. HR Folks International. Retrieved from http://www.hrfolk.com
• Johnson, S. (2016). What is the meaning of organizational strategy? Houston Chronicle Small Business. Retrieved from
http://www.smalbusiness.chron.com/meaning-organizational-strategy-59427.html
• Kvint, V. (2009). The global emerging market: Strategic management and economics. New York, NY: Routledge Publishing
• Mintzberg, H. & Quinn, J. B. (1996). The strategy process: Concepts, contexts, cases. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
• Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24(9), 934-948
• Ologbo, A. C., O. S. Oluwatosin, & Okyere-Kwakye, E. (2012). Strategic management theories and linkage with firm competitive advantage from the
human resource-based view. International Journal of Research in Management and Technology, 2(4), August, 366-376
• Parnell, J. A. (2005). Strategic philosophy and management level. Management Decision, 3(2), 157-170. Retrieved from
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/0025.1747.htm
• Scouller, J. (2011). Three levels of leadership: How to develop your leadership presence, knowhow and skills. Cirencester, UK: Management Books 2000
• Tse, E. (2010). The China strategy: Harnessing the power of the world’s fastest growing economy. New York, NY: Basic Books
• Vasile, T. & Iancu, A. (2009). A model of the strategic management process.
• Vatchkova, E. (2012). Contents historical development of strategy: Strategic management. Retrieved from
http://www.iuc.edu.eu./group/mba_learning/2012STRATMAN/EV-L1-introduction.pdf
• Vigoda-Gadot, E. & Drory, A. (ed). (2006). Handbook of organizational politics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing
• Yousuf, M. (2016). The nature of strategic management Chapter I, What is strategic management. Academia.
https://www.academia.edu/6349510/THE_NATURE_OF_STRATEGIC_MANAGEMENT_I_WHAT_IS_STRATEGIC_MANAGEMENT
Reference
SIMULATION EXERCISE
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS
FOR THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR
POLICY AND STRATEGIC STUDIES
(NIPSS), KURU-JOS, NIGERIA
INTRODUCTION
Background
The National Institute for Policy and Strategic
Studies (NIPSS) was established by Decree No.
20 of 1 January 1979 (now NIPSS Act CAP 262
of 1990) to conduct policy research for
government and train senior executives in
policymaking and implementation skills, with
the following aims and objectives:
NIPSS Aims and Objectives
 To conduct courses for top level policy makers and
executors on conceptual capacity, quality of analysis
and decision making;
 To conduct research into social, cultural, economic,
political, scientific, technological, security and other
problems for their solutions;
 To conduct seminars, workshops and other action-
oriented programmes for leaders and potential
leaders;
 To organize brainstorming sessions for urgent national
issues and policy measures for their solutions; and
 To disseminate information of its activities.
NIPSS Mission and Vision Statements
• NIPSS Mission Statement - “To serve as the
centre for policy, advocacy, advice and
training for Nigeria and Africa in the context
of a dynamic and changing world.”
• NIPSS Vision Statement - “To be the apex
centre of policy, research and reflection for
better Nigerian and human society”
• NIPSS Motto - “Towards a Better Society”
NIPSS Retreat
• The Institute had recently conducted a
Retreat for its internal and external
stakeholders and discovered an internal weak
resource base and external competition by
similar agencies of government.
• There is an urgent need to come up with a
strategic management beginning with
amending the Institute’s vision and mission
statements.
THE EXERCISE
Task
• This simulation exercise is specially designed
for the NIPSS Policy Strategy and Leadership
Course (PSLC 21) to bring out the knowledge,
understanding and practice from the Lecture
on ‘The Strategic Management Process’.
• The task is for the Course Participants to
extract and apply the essentials of the SMP in
amending the mission and vision statements
of the NIPSS and its sub-units.
NIPSS – National Institute for Policy and Strategic
Studies, 1979
NIPSS Consult – Policy, Strategy &
Leadership Course (PSLC) 2007
NIPSS Centre for Excellence – Political Parties
Leadership & Policy Development Centre (PPLPDC)
2013
Mandate *To conduct courses for top level policy
makers and executors;
*To conduct policy research;
*To conduct seminar, workshop and other
action-oriented programmes;
*To organize brainstorming session for
urgent national issues; and
*To disseminate information by
publication.
*To conduct short term capacity
enhancement and management
development programmes and
courses; and
*To render management
consultancy services
*To organize series of trainings for
political party leadership and other
stakeholders;
*To improve understanding of party
development, renewal and revitalization
processes; and
*To build capacities in strategic policy
development, governance processes and
respect for democratic principles, values
and culture
Vision To be the apex centre of policy, research
and reflection for better Nigerian and
human society
To become the preferred choice
locally and international in
consultancy industry, and through
its activities, expand the
intellectual frontiers of knowledge
for a better Nigerian and human
society
To promote an inclusive democracy in
Nigeria, and indeed Africa, deepened by
strong, issue-based political practices
whose policies serve as the interest of
citizens
Mission To serve as the centre for policy, advocacy,
advice and training for Nigeria and Africa in
the context of a dynamic and changing
world.
To consistently produce excellent
services which are of the best
standard, using the best practices
in the industry
To build capacity of political parties and
leaders for an inclusive democracy,
serving the needs of citizens by
networking with national, regional and
global partners, undertaking research,
training, conferences, and workshops.
Motto “… Towards a Better Society …” “… Leadership, policy & strategy
enhancement … ”
“… Capacity building for Leadership in a
Democracy …”
NIPSS MAIN MANDATE AND SUB-MANDATES
Instructions
• The time for planning and execution
of the exercise is 30 minutes.
• Group Representatives will brief the
Class on the result.
• Thank you.

THE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS

  • 1.
    BY Senior Fellow (Security& Strategic Studies) Research Directorate, NIPSS, Kuru – Jos, NIGERIA
  • 2.
    A Paper Presentedto Participants of the NIPSS Policy, Strategy and Leadership Course No. 21 (4th – 29th April 2016) Monday, 11 April 2016
  • 3.
    A Preamble • Strategicmanagement process involves complex cross-functional relationships of organizational components geared towards attainment of set objectives. • It is a veritable tool of strategy for navigating the complexity of applying the tenets of mission and vision of organizations. • This paper discusses, explains and relates how leadership of organizations harnesses resources in series of decisions and actions that determine performance and results.
  • 4.
    Nature of StrategicManagement Process • The Strategic Management Process requires that various organizational components are put to work for attainment of common objectives. • The complex and contingency nature of strategic management process blends an agenda resource-based, structure-conduct-performance, agency and other theories. • Literature survey on the subject reveals emphasis on ways to simplify and understand the multifarious nature of strategic management process.
  • 5.
    Challenge to OrganizationalLeadership • The challenge and burden of strategic management process rest on the shoulders of organizational leadership or senior executives charged with decisions and actions. • The paper breaks down this process into strategic formulation; strategic implementation; and, strategic evaluation and control. • An exercise is designed for senior executives to practice on the workings of strategic management process in groups representing organizational situations.
  • 6.
    Some Captions onSMP • Strategy is the great work … in situations of life and death. It is the ‘Tao’ (or ultimate reality) of survival or extinction. Its study cannot be neglected. – Sun Tzu, The Art of War • Strategy without process is little more than a wish list. – Robert Filek • Leaders establish the vision for the future and set the strategy for getting there. - S. P. Kotter • However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results. – Sir Winston Churchill
  • 7.
    Comments on Captions These4 captions sum up needs for organizational strategy to be:  designed or formulated;  applied or implemented;  analysed or evaluated. It is in a continuous cycle or process, by leadership, on dictates of situations, over time.
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Background • Strategic managementprocess (SMP) involves cross-functional relationship of organizational components geared towards attainment of common objectives. • It is often divided into five main stages of goal setting, analysis, strategy formulation, strategy implementation, and evaluation and control (Tse, 2010; Clayton, 2016). • It is a veritable tool for navigating the complexity of applying the tenets of mission and vision of organizations to routine activities by leadership or senior executive cadre.
  • 10.
    Burden of Strategy •The challenge and burden of strategy rests on the shoulders of senior executives who handle the management and decision making components and processes of organizations. • Management and managers are central in running the affairs of an organization as well as critical to strategic principles and practice of leadership. • The SMP reflects the application of day-to-day activities aimed at achieving the overall goals or objectives of an organization. • This paper discusses, explains and relates the alignment of routine affairs and activities to the mission and vision of organizational leadership.
  • 11.
    Literature • Literature onSMP tends to focus on ways to counter the complexity and obscurity of the subject for ease of clarity and understanding. • Guerras-Martin, Madhok & Montoro-Sanchez (2014) trace the historical background, recent trends and current directions of SMP and observe the need for decipherment of its difficult terrain. • An earlier work (Hunger & Wheelen (1997) points to managerial decisions and actions contributing to performance toward goal attainment as aggregated SMP.
  • 12.
    More Recent Works •Aremu (2003) and Parnell (2005) also establish correlation of SMP with performance, as basis for strategic philosophy of organizations. • More recent works incline towards modelling and breaking down of SMP stages and activities for better understanding and more effective application (David, 2008; Vasile & Iancu, 2009; Clayton, 2015). • Particular contributors of interest bring in contents history of SMP and case studies with emphasis on the need for elucidation.
  • 13.
    Literature View Point •This paper treads on same guiding principles as aforementioned; • That is, the decipherment of SMP for clarity and understanding.
  • 14.
    Theorem • The contingencynature of strategic management process tends to harbour multiple but synergic theoretical foundation including resource-based, structure-conduct- performance, agency, and other related approaches. • Theories used in SMP share common core elements of simplification, assumptions, concepts, processes and cross-functional relationships (Parnell, 2005; Bettis, et al. 2014).
  • 15.
    A Theoretical Framework •An Assemblage of various theories of SMP produces cumulative cross-functional relationship of organizational resources harnessed for attainment of common goals or objectives (Ologbo, et al. 2012). • This paper dwells on the contingency nature of SMP in building a theoretical framework based on cross-functional relationship of organizational resources.
  • 16.
  • 17.
    The Statement • Asleadership of organizations harnesses resources in series of decisions and actions, it is often difficult to grasp and understand what goes around in complex activities. • The need to control and direct affairs of organizations in sequential order in response to changing situations and larger environment is harder to absorb. • Also, the desire to evaluate and control performance and results is critical in directing resources at attainment of set goals.
  • 18.
    The Problem • TheSMP is a veritable and necessary tool for navigating the difficult terrain of applying organizational mission and vision to routine activities. • It involves complex series of decisions and actions further compounded by natural or situational occurrences. • The challenges and burden of SMP rest on the shoulders of leadership who must seek to understand and direct the affairs of organizations towards attainment of set goals.
  • 19.
    Aims and Objectivesof the Paper • This paper aims at decipherment of complex and contingency nature of the SMP for its clear understanding and application by organizational leadership or senior executives. • The paper defines and discusses the SMP and its associated key components; • It breaks the SMP into segments for ease of discourse and explains the complex cross- functional relationship of organizational components; • It determines the challenges faced by leadership in application of the SMP in organizational mission and vision for attainment of set goals.
  • 20.
    Style of thePaper • The single-phase title of the paper – ‘THE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS’ - without a rider signifies a fast-track monorail discourse. • The discussions may infer and/or bypass familiar tracks like strategic planning, organizational culture, organizational resource dimension, data synthesis, environmental scanning and many others. • These are reserved for further discourse and exercises in papers assigned to oncoming presentations.
  • 21.
  • 22.
    Organizational Leadership • Organizationand Leadership studies are wide fields often defined in many ways depending on purpose and direction of discourse, including situational process of strategic management. • Organizations are groups, ventures, affairs, arrangements or relationships characterized by common or shared interests, purposes, goals or objectives. • Leadership is the complex system of effects influencing decisions and actions in setting and achieving goals or objectives (Scouller, 2011).
  • 23.
    Organizational leadership (Contd…) Organizationalleadership is the management staff that provides inspiration, objectives, operational oversight and other administrative services to the organization often seen in Mission and Vision Statements (BusinessDictionary.com).
  • 24.
    Mission and Vision •Mission refers to assigned task, goal, objective set for attainment. • Vision is a mental picture, an image or concept in one’s imagination often called a dream, a plan at individual or group levels. • Mission and Vision Statements are formal documents or pronouncements stating aims and objectives of an organization. • They represent the proficiency to plan, set goals or anticipate future events and developments.
  • 25.
    Mission and VisionStatements • In organizational studies, mission and vision are associated with future plan, intention, direction, strategy or strategic plan often expressed as ‘mission and vision statement’. • Mission and Vision Statements usually imply well thought-out ideas, mental picture, far- sightedness, conceptualization, visualization, foresight, forethought, imagination or prescience for direction. • They are used for communicating set objectives and direction in short, simple, but adjustable pronouncements responding to situational dictates of organizational strategy.
  • 26.
    Organizational Strategy • Strategyis a carefully devised plan of action to achieve set objectives and ways for carrying it out. • It is the practice of higher level plans or leadership in achieving set goals of organizations under ever changing situations or environments. • It also involves patterns in streams of decisions and actions that shape the future into desirable ends by means of available resources (Mintzberg, 1978; Mintzberg & Quinn, 1996; Kvint, 2009; Freedman, 2013).
  • 27.
    Organizational Strategy (Contd…) •Organizational strategy is an expression of how organizations need to evolve over tie to meet their objectives along with detailed assessment of what needs to be done and by who (BusinessDictionary.com). • In a wider view, it is the overall plan of action on how to develop or response to the ever changing organizational environment in attaining set goals. • According to Johnson (2016), organizational strategy sums up decisions and actions expressed by leadership intent in achieving set goals or objectives in a charted course as strategic management process.
  • 28.
    Strategic Management Process •The strategic management process (SMP) is an objective, logical, systematic and continuous approach for making major decisions and taking actions in an organization (Yousuf, 2016). • It is defined as a dynamic process of strategy formulation, implementation, evaluation and control (Parnell, 2005; David, 2008; Vasile & Iancu, 2009; Vatchkova, 2010; Hill, Jones & Schilling, 2015; Yousuf, 2016).
  • 29.
    Strategic Management Process(Contd…) • Yousuf (2016) reflects on central cross-functional feature of the SMP, synonymous to strategic planning, in exploiting and creating new opportunities for the future based on present trends or conditions. • The various stages or tasks of the SMP include strategy formulation, strategy implementation, and strategy evaluation and control. • They are created and guided by organizational leadership, expressed by the mission and vision statements and run by organizational strategy.
  • 30.
    Strategic Formulation • Formulationinvolves the assemblage, arrangement or putting together of different components into a working structure or relationship for the purpose of attaining set objectives. • Strategy formulation is the task of analyzing the organization’s internal and external environments, and selecting or devising appropriate plans or strategies in setting goals or objectives and ways of achieving them.
  • 31.
    Strategic Formulation (Contd…) •Strategy formulation is the baseline task of the SMP involving the establishment of mission and vision statements, environmental analysis or scanning, setting goals or objectives, and the ways and means for attainment (Nabradi, n.d; Mitchell, n.d). • Strategy formulation embeds in the SMP or strategic plan as a living document that changes and grows as organizational situation changes with time or events.
  • 32.
    Strategic Implementation • Implementationis the process of carrying out, fulfilling, realization or execution of a task, an application or a plan. • Strategy implementation is the second stage task after strategy formulation, involving the application or execution of plans through series of decisions and actions in pursue of set goals or objectives. • Brinkschroder (2014) put this task on the shoulders of organizational leadership for communication of mission; allocation of tasks and resources; and coordination of cross- functional relationships.
  • 33.
    Strategic Evaluation andControl • Evaluation is the act of considering, examining, assessing, calculating or appraising activities, functions or situation to ascertain expected value, quality, quantity, extent or condition. • Control involves the exercise of power or authority to oversee, manage or adjust activities, tasks or ventures in line with set direction. • Strategy evaluation and control constitutes the final tier completing the tasks of the SMP cycle.
  • 34.
    Strategic Evaluation andControl (Contd…) This stage weighs performance data and activity reports to appraise and adjust undesired performance due to improper application of the SMP for the purpose of adjustment in line with organizational strategy (Gomes, 2010).
  • 35.
  • 36.
    Essentials of theSMP Understanding the SMP is best by capturing its main stages of strategy formulation; strategy implementation; and strategy evaluation and control all charged to organizational leadership tasks. Hunger & Wheelen (1997) built on same concepts and explanation of the SMP to propose its essentials with the following components: oEnvironmental Scanning; oStrategy Formulation; oStrategy Implementation; and oStrategy Evaluation and Control.
  • 37.
    Environmental Scanning • Theobvious addition or inclusion of ‘environmental scanning’ or assessment of internal strengths and weaknesses; and external opportunities and threats is to underscore the importance of preparations. • This proposal runs through decades of trials and rests strongly on the shoulders of organizational leadership (Aremu, 2003; Parnell, 2005; David, 2008; Vatchkova, 2012; Clayton, 2016).
  • 38.
    Modelling of theSMP • Models provide simplified versions of complex processes for ease of understanding and analysis. • Vasile & Iancu (2009) and Niere (2012) explain the SMP model as useful in the prediction and evaluation of the environment for possible modifications to harmonize with and achieve organizational mission and objectives. • According to Vasile & Iancu, the SMP Modelling originated from ‘The First International Conference of Strategic Management’ in 1973 and still applied to facilitate organizational leadership.
  • 39.
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS ANDORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
  • 40.
    Strategic Responsibilities • Organizationsrun on multiple and overlapping functions and components with strategic responsibilities on certain level of leadership. • Parnell (2005) identifies the middle-to-high level executives as top managers who “… view strategy formulation as an art and science.” (p. 157). • Organizational leadership therefore exercises influence through timely decisions and actions on how missions are performed and objectives attained (Vigoda-Gadot & Drory, 2006).
  • 41.
    The SMP andOrganizational Leadership Cadre The Policy Strategy and Leadership Course (PSLC) of the National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS) or the NIPSS-PSLC describe its Participants as: “… middle-to-high level executives in both the public and private sectors … who amongst other responsibilities, provide key input into organizational/national policy formulation and implementation as well as facilitate the effectiveness of the top managers and decision makers in their organizations.”
  • 42.
    Leadership Cadre forthe SMP • This leadership cadre or core group facilitates general management; relates strategy and operations; re-orient performance to set objectives; and establish long-term directions and results. • By implication the Participants of the NIPSS- PSLC represent the organizational leadership cadre or core group charged with the Strategic Management Process of their various organizations.
  • 43.
  • 44.
    Summary • Strategy withoutprocess is little more than wishful thinking. • Organizations of various forms require the strategic management process to initiate, run or achieve set objectives. • A particular cadre of organizational leadership is charged with the responsibilities for the strategic management process. • This paper sets out to discus and simplifies the strategic management process as a veritable tool for navigating the complexity of applying organizational mission to routine activities by a specific leadership cadre know as senior executives.
  • 45.
    Conclusion • The paperexplains the common grounds of literature and synergic theorem for simplification; and deciphers the SMP to its basics and practice. • It concludes that responsibilities for the SMP are charged to the leadership cadre or core group of middle-to-higher executives. • The NIPSS-PSLC Participants drawn from the public and private sectors of Nigeria are defined and established as representatives of organizational leadership cadre charged with responsibilities of the strategic management process of their organizations.
  • 46.
    Recommendations Recommended: Appendix 1– Exercise on the SMP Planning An exercise on the SMP planning is designed for senior executives to practice on the workings of strategic management process in groups representing organizational situations.
  • 47.
    • Aremu, M.A. (2003). Enhancing organizational performance through strategic management: Conceptual and theoretical approach. Ilorin, NG: University of Ilorin. http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/publications/maaremu/Ehancing-Organizational-Performance-through-Strategic-Manag.htm • Bettis, R. A., A. Gambardella, C. Helfat, & Mitchell, W. (2014). Theory in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, June 25. Http://www.wileyonlinelibrary.com DOI:10.1002/smj.2308 • Brinkschroder, N. (2014). Strategy implementation: Key factors, challenges and solutions. A Presentation at the 4th IBA Bachelor Thesis Conference, November 6th. University of Twente, Faculty of Management and Governance, Enschede, The Netherlands. • BusinessDictionary.com http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/-organizational-leadership.html • Clayton, J. (2016). The five stages of the strategic management process. Houston Chronicle. http://smallbusiness.cohn.com/five-stages-strategic- mamngement-process.18785.html • David, F. R. (2008). Concepts of strategic management. (6th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prince-Hall • Freedman, L. (2013). Strategy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. • Gomes, S. (2010). Strategic management process. https://xisspm.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/sm-chapter-2.pd • Guerras-Martin, L. A., Madhok, A. & Montoro-Sachez, A. (2014). The evolution of strategic management research: Recent trends and current directions. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 17(2), April-June, 69-76 • Hill, C. W., Jones, G. R. & Schilling, M. A. (2015). Strategic management theory. (11th Edition). London, UK: Cengage Learning • Hunger, J. D. & Wheelen, T. L. (1997). Essentials of strategic management. HR Folks International. Retrieved from http://www.hrfolk.com • Johnson, S. (2016). What is the meaning of organizational strategy? Houston Chronicle Small Business. Retrieved from http://www.smalbusiness.chron.com/meaning-organizational-strategy-59427.html • Kvint, V. (2009). The global emerging market: Strategic management and economics. New York, NY: Routledge Publishing • Mintzberg, H. & Quinn, J. B. (1996). The strategy process: Concepts, contexts, cases. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall • Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24(9), 934-948 • Ologbo, A. C., O. S. Oluwatosin, & Okyere-Kwakye, E. (2012). Strategic management theories and linkage with firm competitive advantage from the human resource-based view. International Journal of Research in Management and Technology, 2(4), August, 366-376 • Parnell, J. A. (2005). Strategic philosophy and management level. Management Decision, 3(2), 157-170. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/0025.1747.htm • Scouller, J. (2011). Three levels of leadership: How to develop your leadership presence, knowhow and skills. Cirencester, UK: Management Books 2000 • Tse, E. (2010). The China strategy: Harnessing the power of the world’s fastest growing economy. New York, NY: Basic Books • Vasile, T. & Iancu, A. (2009). A model of the strategic management process. • Vatchkova, E. (2012). Contents historical development of strategy: Strategic management. Retrieved from http://www.iuc.edu.eu./group/mba_learning/2012STRATMAN/EV-L1-introduction.pdf • Vigoda-Gadot, E. & Drory, A. (ed). (2006). Handbook of organizational politics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing • Yousuf, M. (2016). The nature of strategic management Chapter I, What is strategic management. Academia. https://www.academia.edu/6349510/THE_NATURE_OF_STRATEGIC_MANAGEMENT_I_WHAT_IS_STRATEGIC_MANAGEMENT Reference
  • 48.
    SIMULATION EXERCISE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENTPROCESS FOR THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR POLICY AND STRATEGIC STUDIES (NIPSS), KURU-JOS, NIGERIA
  • 49.
  • 50.
    Background The National Institutefor Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS) was established by Decree No. 20 of 1 January 1979 (now NIPSS Act CAP 262 of 1990) to conduct policy research for government and train senior executives in policymaking and implementation skills, with the following aims and objectives:
  • 51.
    NIPSS Aims andObjectives  To conduct courses for top level policy makers and executors on conceptual capacity, quality of analysis and decision making;  To conduct research into social, cultural, economic, political, scientific, technological, security and other problems for their solutions;  To conduct seminars, workshops and other action- oriented programmes for leaders and potential leaders;  To organize brainstorming sessions for urgent national issues and policy measures for their solutions; and  To disseminate information of its activities.
  • 52.
    NIPSS Mission andVision Statements • NIPSS Mission Statement - “To serve as the centre for policy, advocacy, advice and training for Nigeria and Africa in the context of a dynamic and changing world.” • NIPSS Vision Statement - “To be the apex centre of policy, research and reflection for better Nigerian and human society” • NIPSS Motto - “Towards a Better Society”
  • 53.
    NIPSS Retreat • TheInstitute had recently conducted a Retreat for its internal and external stakeholders and discovered an internal weak resource base and external competition by similar agencies of government. • There is an urgent need to come up with a strategic management beginning with amending the Institute’s vision and mission statements.
  • 54.
  • 55.
    Task • This simulationexercise is specially designed for the NIPSS Policy Strategy and Leadership Course (PSLC 21) to bring out the knowledge, understanding and practice from the Lecture on ‘The Strategic Management Process’. • The task is for the Course Participants to extract and apply the essentials of the SMP in amending the mission and vision statements of the NIPSS and its sub-units.
  • 56.
    NIPSS – NationalInstitute for Policy and Strategic Studies, 1979 NIPSS Consult – Policy, Strategy & Leadership Course (PSLC) 2007 NIPSS Centre for Excellence – Political Parties Leadership & Policy Development Centre (PPLPDC) 2013 Mandate *To conduct courses for top level policy makers and executors; *To conduct policy research; *To conduct seminar, workshop and other action-oriented programmes; *To organize brainstorming session for urgent national issues; and *To disseminate information by publication. *To conduct short term capacity enhancement and management development programmes and courses; and *To render management consultancy services *To organize series of trainings for political party leadership and other stakeholders; *To improve understanding of party development, renewal and revitalization processes; and *To build capacities in strategic policy development, governance processes and respect for democratic principles, values and culture Vision To be the apex centre of policy, research and reflection for better Nigerian and human society To become the preferred choice locally and international in consultancy industry, and through its activities, expand the intellectual frontiers of knowledge for a better Nigerian and human society To promote an inclusive democracy in Nigeria, and indeed Africa, deepened by strong, issue-based political practices whose policies serve as the interest of citizens Mission To serve as the centre for policy, advocacy, advice and training for Nigeria and Africa in the context of a dynamic and changing world. To consistently produce excellent services which are of the best standard, using the best practices in the industry To build capacity of political parties and leaders for an inclusive democracy, serving the needs of citizens by networking with national, regional and global partners, undertaking research, training, conferences, and workshops. Motto “… Towards a Better Society …” “… Leadership, policy & strategy enhancement … ” “… Capacity building for Leadership in a Democracy …” NIPSS MAIN MANDATE AND SUB-MANDATES
  • 57.
    Instructions • The timefor planning and execution of the exercise is 30 minutes. • Group Representatives will brief the Class on the result. • Thank you.