Downloaded 13 times
More Related Content
Similar to Theories of calculus formation.pptx
Theories of calculus formation.pptx
- 1. Theories of calculusformation Dr. Amrita Das Department of periodontology DR. HSRSM DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL HINGOLI
- 2. What is dentalcalculus ?? • Dental calculus is a hard deposit that is formed by calcification of dental plaque primarily composed of calcium phosphate mineral salts which is deposited on natural teeth and restorations and is covered by a layer of unmineralized plaque. These hard deposits may form coronal to or apical to the gingival margin, hence named accordingly as supragingival and subgingival calculus respectively. The distribution of calculus is very versatile and it differs from individual to individual, from tooth to tooth, and from surface to surface. • So, a thorough knowledge on prevalence of calculus is important for the clinician in outlining the treatment plan. It is a well-known fact that calculus is itself not an inducing agent for pathological changes that occur in gingival tissues; instead it is covered by a layer of un mineralized plaque which is proven to be the key etiological agent involved in these pathogenic mechanisms. But, attributing to the porosity of calculus and its ability to retain bacterial antigens makes it an important contributing factor in initiating and accentuating periodontal disease progression. In this review, we made an attempt to discuss various aspects of calculus composition, its formation, and its etiological significance in periodontal disease progression
- 3. Classification of calculus •CLASSIFICATION • According to location – Supragingival calculus – Subgingival calculus • According to source of mineralization – Salivary calculus – Serumal calculus (Jenkins, Stewart 1966) • According to surface – Exogenous – Endogenous (Melz 1950) • According to initiation and rate of accumulation, calculus formers are classified as: – Noncalculus formers – Slight calculus formers – Moderate calculus formers – Heavy calculus formers. • COMPOSITION OF CALCULUS- Calculus consists of both inorganic and organic components.
- 4. COMPOSITION • Inorganic Contents(70–90%) Principle elements: • Calcium – 39% • Phosphorous – 19% • Carbon dioxide – 1.9% • Magnesium – 0.8% • Trace amounts of Na, Ba, Zn, Str, Br, Cu, Ag, Al, Fe, Fl Components: • Calcium phosphate – 75.9% • Calcium carbonate – 3.1% • Magnesium phosphate – traces and other metals Crystal forms: • Hydroxyapatite (HA) – 58% • Octa calcium phosphate (OCP) – 21% • Magnesium whitelockite (MWL) – 12% • Brushite (BS) – 9% Supragingival calculus – HA and OCP are detected most frequently. Subgingival calculus – MWL is present in high concentrations and same HA content. Mandibular anterior region – BS is more common. Posterior areas – MWL is more common .
- 5. • PREVALENCE -Anemphasis on the prevalence of calculus is important as it not only provides an outlook of health but also helps us in plotting the treatment required and professional services accordingly. There are a multitude of recent reports available on prevalence of calculus from all over. • FORMATION OF CALCULUS After the tooth eruption or a dental prophylaxis, pellicle proteins rapidly adsorb onto the enamel surface which favors bacterial adhesion and subsequent development of biofilm occurs. Maturation of biofilm proceeds with the characteristic microbial maturation of initial Grampositive coccoidal organisms followed by outgrowth of filamentous bacteria leading to the development of plaque. Mineralizing agents from saliva and GCF for supra- and subgingival calculus respectively enter the biofilm leading to mineralization of plaque intercellular matrix. Hereafter, calcium ions from saliva are removed by chelation promoting binding of calcium with carbohydrate/protein complexes leading to the precipitation of crystalline calcium phosphate salts, and coalescence of these crystals aids in the formation of calcified mass, thereby leading to calculus formation
- 6. • THEORIES OFCALCULUS FORMATION Many theories were proposed to better understand the mechanism of calculus formation. They are as follows: • Booster mechanism • Epitactic concept • Inhibition theory • Transformation theory • Bacterial theory • Enzymatic theory
- 7. • Booster MechanismMajor salivary ducts secrete saliva at a high CO2 tension, about 54 to 65 mm Hg; but the pressure of CO2 in atmospheric air is only about 0.3 mm Hg. As a result of large disparity in CO2 tension, saliva emerging from the salivary ducts loses CO2 to the atmosphere. pH in saliva will increase when CO2 escapes since pH in saliva depends largely on the ratio between bicarbonates and free carbonic acid. Phosphoric acid dissociation increases with rise in the alkalinity, thus increasing the concentration of less soluble secondary and tertiary phosphate ions. This boost in phosphate ions concentration leads to a situation where solubility product of calcium phosphate is exceeded and crystals form.
- 8. • Epitactic TheoryIn saliva the concentration of certain ions like calcium and phosphate is not high enough to precipitate but is ample enough to promote the growth of hydroxyapatite crystals once an initial seed or nucleus is formed. The term epitactic refers to crystal formation through seeding by another compound which is similar to hydroxyapatite crystals, leading to precipitation of calcium salts from the metastable solution of saliva. Seeding agents provoke small foci of calcification enlarge and coalesce to form the calcified mass. Intercellular matrix or plaque plays an important role. Calcification will be initiated by a carbohydrate/protein complex which removes calcium from saliva by chelation process and binds with the nuclei that stimulates subsequent deposition of minerals
- 9. INHIBITION THEORY • Thistheory assumes about calcification as occurring only at specific sites because of existence of an inhibiting mechanism at noncalcifying sites. According to this theory, the sites where calcification occurs, the inhibitor is apparently altered or removed. Pyrophosphate is thought to be one possible inhibiting substance and other possible inhibiting substances include polyphosphates. Alkaline pyrophosphatase is the enzyme involved in controlling mechanism which hydrolyzes the pyrophosphate to phosphate (Russell and Fleisch 1970) and this pyrophosphate prevents the initial nucleus from growing and inhibits their calcification possibly by poisoning the growth centers of the crystals
- 10. • Most noticeablehypothesis states that hydroxyapatite need not arise exclusively via epitaxis or nucleation. Octa calcium phosphate isamorphous noncrystalline deposits and brushite and then transformed to hydroxyapatite (Eanes et al 1970). It has been suggested that controlling mechanism in transformation mechanism can be pyrophosphate (Fleisch et al 1968). formed by the transformation
- 11. BACTERIOLOGICAL THEORY • Accordingto this theory, the primary cause of calculus formation is oral microorganisms and their involvement in attachment to the tooth surface. Leptotrichia and actinomyces have been considered most often as the causative microorganisms
- 12. • According tothis theory, calculus formation is the resultant of the action of phosphatases derived from either oral tissues or oral microorganism on some salivary phosphate containing complex, most probably phospheric esters of the hexophosphoric group
- 13. CALCULUS ATTACHMENT • Thefollowing four modes of attachment have been described 1. Attachment by means of organic pellicle on enamel 2. Mechanical interlocking in cemental resorption lacunae 3. Close adaptation of calculus undersurface depressions to gently sloping mounds on the unaltered cementum surface 4. Penetration of calculus bacteria in cementum. But this mode of attachment was not acknowledged.
- 14. • ATTACHMENT OFCALCULUS ON IMPLANT • Calculus attachment to pure titanium is less intimate than to root surfaces structure. • Smooth machined implants have less micro porosities for retention. This would mean that calculus may be chipped off from implants without affecting it.
- 15. TRANSFORMATION THEORY • Mostnoticeable hypothesis states that hydroxyapatite need not arise exclusively via epitaxis or nucleation. Octa calcium phosphateamorphous noncrystalline deposits and brushite and then transformed to hydroxyapatite (Eanes et al 1970). It has been suggested that controlling mechanism in transformation mechanism can be pyrophosphate (Fleisch et al 1968) is formed by the transformation of amorphous noncrystalline deposits and brushite and then transformed to hydroxyapatite (Eanes et al 1970). It has been suggested that controlling mechanism in transformation mechanism can be pyrophosphate (Fleisch et al 1968).
- 16. ENZYMATIC THEORY • Accordingto this theory, calculus formation is the resultant of the action of phosphatases derived from either oral tissues or oral microorganism on some salivary phosphate containing complex, most probably phospheric esters of the hexophosphoric group
- 17. CALCULUS ATTACHMENT • Thefollowing four modes of attachment have been • described • 1. Attachment by means of organic pellicle on enamel • 2. Mechanical interlocking in cemental resorption • lacunae • 3. Close adaptation of calculus undersurface depressions • to gently sloping mounds on the unaltered cementum • surface • 4. Penetration of calculus bacteria in cementum. But this • mode of attachment was not acknowledged.
- 18. MICROBIOLOGY OF DENTALCALCULUS • The average microscopic count of bacteria in unmineralized dental plaque has been calculated to be up to 2.1 × 10 mg wet weight. Lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline and acid phosphatase activities have been identified in dental plaque suggestive of a boosted calcification by the plaque enzymes. In supragingival calculus, viable aerobic and anaerobic bacteria have been detected while subgingival calculus provides an excellent environment for further microbial adhesion and growth.
- 19. • Periopathogens, suchas Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Treponema denticola have been found within the lacunae of both supra- and subgingival calculus. • Bacteria are not essential for calculus formation, but they enable its development. Hence, high amount of calculus indicates that oral hygiene has been poor for months or even years
- 20. ETIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE • Itis a quite challenging task to distinguish the effects of calculus and plaque on gingiva, because the former is always covered by a layer of plaque. There is always a correlation between the presence of calculus and prevalence of gingivitis though greater association was found between plaque and gingivitis. This association may lead to initiation and progression of periodontal diseases. • The rough calculus surface may not, in itself, induce inflammation in the adjacent periodontal tissues, instead it serves as an ideal substrate for subgingival microbial colonization and also
- 21. ETIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE • actsas a niche which harbors bacterial plaque • • acts as an irritant to the periodontal tissues • • distends the periodontal pocket wall • • inhibits the ingress of polymorphonuclear leukocytes. • So, regardless of its primary or secondary relationship • in pocket formation, i.e., periodontal disease progression and although the principal irritating features is its surface plaque rather than its interior, calculus is a significant pathogenic factor in periodontal disease.
- 22. • After theinitial examination, patients were • given detailed oral hygiene instructions and divided • into four groups. • Group 1: No treatment, • Group 2: Scaling and root planing alone, • Group 3: Administration of tetracycline alone, and scaling and • Group 4: Root planing combined with the administration of tetracycline.
- 23. • INDICES USEDFOR CALCULUS DETECTION33 • Oral Calculus Index (OCI) (Greene and • Vermilion, 1964). • Calculus Index – CI (Ramfjord, 1959) • Calculus Surface Severity Index (CSI) • (Ennener et al, 1961) • Calculus Rating (Volpe and Manhold, 1962) • Marginal Line Calculus Index (MLC-I) • (Muhlanann and Villa, 1967)
- 24. ADVANCE DIAGNOSTIC AIDS •Calculus Detection Systems Only • PERIOSCOPE – Fiberoptic endoscopy-based technology34,35 • DETECTAR – Spectro-optical technology • DIAGNODENT – Autofluorescence-based technology
- 25. • Calculus Detection+ Removal Systems • PERIOSCAN – Ultrasound technology • KEYLASER – Laser-based technology.
- 26. CLASSIFICATION OF DENTALCALCULUS
- 27. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SUBGINGIVAL AND SUPRA GINIVAL CALCULUS
- 28.
- 29. CLINICAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SUPRAGINGIVALAND SUBGINGIVAL CALCULUS
- 30.
- 31.
- 32.
- 33.
- 34.
- 35.
- 36.