The document discusses several theoretical frameworks that have been proposed to explain pain perception physiology. It outlines several theories including: the intensity/summation theory which defines pain as an emotion from excessive stimulation; the specificity theory which proposes pain receptors transmit signals to a pain center in the brain; and the pattern theory which suggests pain results from certain patterns of neural activity. It also describes Melzack and Wall's gate control theory, which proposes that large diameter fibers can open or close a 'gate' in the spinal cord to pain signal transmission from small fibers to the brain.
Several theoreticalframeworks have been proposed to explain the
physiological basis of pain, although none yet completely accounts for all
aspects of pain perception.
A number of theories have been postulated to describe mechanisms
underlying pain perception.
3.
Referred toas the Intensity/Summation Theory
The theory defines pain, not as a unique sensory experience but rather, as
an emotion that occurs when a stimulus is stronger than usual
This theory is based on Aristotle’s concept that pain resulted from
excessive stimulation of the sense of touch.
Both stimulus intensity and central summation are critical determinants
of pain.
It was implied that the summation occurred in the dorsal horn cells
There must be some form of summation that occurs for the sub threshold
stimuli to become unbearably painful.
4.
One ofthe first modern theories for pain.
It holds that specific pain receptors transmit signals to a "pain center"
in the brain that produces the perception of pain
This theory considers pain as an independent sensation with
specialised peripheral sensory receptors [nociceptors], which respond
to damage and send signals through pathways (along nerve fibres) in
the nervous system to target centres in the brain.
These brain centres process the signals to produce the experience of
pain.
Thus, it is based on the assumption that the free nerve endings are pain
receptors.
5.
This theorystates that pain was an experience based on both the
noxious stimulus and the psychic reaction or displeasure
provoked by the sensation.
6.
The theorystated that any somaesthetic sensation occurred by a
specific and particular pattern of neural firing and that the spatial and
temporal profile of firing of the peripheral nerves encoded the
stimulus type and intensity
There is no separate system for perceiving pain, and the receptors
for pain are shared with other senses, such as of touch
It suggested that all cutaneous qualities are produced by spatial and
temporal patterns of nerve impulses rather than by separate, modality
specific transmission route
7.
This theoryconsiders that peripheral sensory receptors, responding to
touch, warmth and other non-damaging as well as to damaging stimuli,
give rise to non-painful or painful experiences as a result of differences in
the patterns [in time] of the signals sent through the nervous system.
Thus, according to this view, people feel pain when certain patterns of
neural activity occur, such as when appropriate types of activity reach
excessively high levels in the brain.
These patterns occur only with intense stimulation. Because strong and
mild stimuli of the same sense modality produce different patterns of
neural activity, being hit hard feels painful, but being caressed does not.
8.
It proposedthat the intense stimulation resulting from the nerve
and tissue damage activates fibers that project to internuncial
neuron pools within the spinal cord creating abnormal
reverberating circuits with self-activating neurons.
Prolonged abnormal activity bombards cells in the spinal cord, and
information is projected to the brain for pain perception
9.
It statedthat pain was composed of two components: the perception
of pain and the reaction one has towards it.
The reaction was described as a complex physiopsychological process
involving cognition, past experience, culture and various psychological
factors which influence pain perception
10.
It describestwo systems involving transmission of pain: fast and slow
system.
The later presumed to conduct somatic and visceral afferents whereas
the former was considered to inhibit transmission of the small fibers
11.
pain stimulationis carried by small, slow fibers that enter the dorsal
horn of the spinal cord; then other cells transmit the impulses from the
spinal cord up to the brain. These fibers are called T-cells.
The T-cells can be located in a specific area of the spinal cord, known as the
substantial gelatinosa.
These fibers can have an impact on the smaller fibers that carry the pain
stimulation. In some cases they can inhibit the communication of
stimulation, while in other cases they can allow stimulation to be
communicated into the central nervous system.
12.
For example,large fibers can prohibit the impulses from the small
fibers from ever communicating with the brain.
In this way, the large fibers create a hypothetical "gate" that can open or
close the system to pain stimulation.
According to the theory, the gate can sometimes be overwhelmed by a
large number of small activated fibers. In other words, the greater the
level of pain stimulation, the less adequate the gate in blocking the
communication of this information.
13.
There are3 factors which influence the 'opening and closing' of the
gate
1. The amount of activity in the pain fibers.
2. The amount of activity in other peripheral fibers
3. Messages that descend from the brain.
Theory provides a physiological basis for the complex
phenomenon of pain.
14.
The amountof activity in the pain fibers. Activity in these fibers
tends to open the gate. The stronger the noxious stimulation, the more
active the pain fibers.
The amount of activity in other peripheral fibers—that is, those
fibers that carry information about harmless stimuli or mild irritation,
such as touching, rubbing, or lightly scratching the skin. These are
large-diameter fibers called A-beta fibers.
Activity in A-beta fibers tends to close the gate, inhibiting the
perception of pain when noxious stimulation exists. This would explain
why gently massaging or applying heat to sore muscles decreases the
pain.
15.
Messages thatdescend from the brain. Neurons in the brainstem and
cortex have efferent pathways to the spinal cord, and the impulses they
send can open or close the gate.
The effects of some brain processes, such as those in anxiety or excitement,
probably have a general impact, opening or closing the gate for all inputs
from any areas of the body.
But the impact of other brain processes may be very specific, applying to
only some inputs from certain parts of the body.
The idea that brain impulses influence the gating mechanism helps to
explain why people who are hypnotized or distracted by competing
environmental stimuli may not notice the pain of an injury
18.
The SGhas both excitatory and inhibitory synapses with the T cells.
Three kinds of neurons send signals to the SG. Two of them (A-delta and
C) are slow conducting and transmit pain signals; the third (A-beta)
inhibits the transmission of pain signals.
Pain Signal ---> Excites the SG+ --->Opens Gate ---> T-cells fire ---> Pain
signal sent
Non-painful Stimulus ---> Excites the SG - --->Closes Gate ---> T-cells
inhibited ---> Reduces pain signal
20.
It statesthat pain is not simply a neurophysiological phenomenon,
but also involves social and psychological factors.
It says that factors like culture, family, nociceptive stimuli and
environment influence pain perception and thus ultimately affect a
person’s emotions, behaviors and cognition