Future leaders
recruitment report
autumn 2015AIESEc in poland
Dear AIESEC in Poland,
With a huge pleasure, we would like to inform you about results of
autumn’s 2015 recruitment in AIESEC in Poland. As members of
AIESEC we spent a lot of time to prepare to this process. We were
promoting FL for long hours, preparing a lot of assessement sheets,
providing knowledge about this process to LCs and now we should
be proud that we gave an opportunity to many young people who
want to be part of our amazing organization.
We want to thank all LCVPs TM and every of you that was engaged
for your work and effort during these intense months of
preparation and work.
We are really proud of you !
Yours,
Ala MCVP TM 15.16 and Gosia NST TxP 15.16
overall results
We achieved
94,31 %plans nationally in new
members recruitment
*all data in this report exclude lc szczecin which didn’t
provide needed information.
Overall results
We had 1526 applications
We allocated 778 new members
Including 16 returnees
95 TMP-TMP
In general we allocated
889 members
How many people were engaged in
recruitment process?
33,3 %
40 %
6,7 %
20 %
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
up to 10 from 10 up to 20 from 20 up to 30 more than 30
In recruitment process were engaged mostly from 10 up to 20 people. In 5 Local
Committees were engaged up to 10 members. More than 30 people took part in
processes in 3 LCs.
How did you prepare lc members
to recruitment process?
15
6
1 1
3
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Training for
assessors
Simulation of
recruitment
Webinar for
assessors
Only sent
materials via
e-mail
Others
15 LCs conducted training for assessors and 6 LCs prepared a simulation of
recruitment. There was a webinar for assessors in one Local Committee and in
another one materials were sent via e-mail.
73,3 %
26,7 %
Yes
No
Did you use materials recommended by
MC in whole recruitment process?
Approximately 175 people resigned
after filling the application,
240 people resigned after rb
and 55 resigned after
Group Exercize.
When did you allocate people?
2
12
1
0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Pre-allocation on
each step of the
process
After interview On LCC After LCC
In 12 Local Committees people were allocated after interview. There was pre-
allocation on each step of the process in another 2 LCs. Only in one LC
allocation was done on LCC.
How did you allocate people?
1
8
0
3
7
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
With
engagement of
OCPs
Final decision
of LCVP TM
Final decision
of LCVP TM
and LCP
Final decision
of EB
Others
In 8 Local Committees final decision about allocation was done by LCVP TM in
another 3 LCs by Executive Board. Only one Local Committe engaged OCPs in
allocation process.
What percentage of allocated
people are women and what man?
69 %
31 %
Woman
Man
In autumn recruitment 69% of allocated people are woman, 31% man.
One of the LCs allocated more pepople that
was planned. Then after skips there was exact
amount of people in projects. If some projects
there were still too many people that didn’t go
to LCC, TM reallocated them to other areas that
were their second choice.
How was the gap filled in situation
when you didn’t recruit enough people?
In 7 Local Committees
recruitment process for
returnees was simplified.
Fast tracks were recruited in
8 local committees in general
number of 21 people.
Thank you for attention and
engagement in recruitment!

TMP Sept-Oct 2015

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Dear AIESEC inPoland, With a huge pleasure, we would like to inform you about results of autumn’s 2015 recruitment in AIESEC in Poland. As members of AIESEC we spent a lot of time to prepare to this process. We were promoting FL for long hours, preparing a lot of assessement sheets, providing knowledge about this process to LCs and now we should be proud that we gave an opportunity to many young people who want to be part of our amazing organization. We want to thank all LCVPs TM and every of you that was engaged for your work and effort during these intense months of preparation and work. We are really proud of you ! Yours, Ala MCVP TM 15.16 and Gosia NST TxP 15.16
  • 3.
    overall results We achieved 94,31%plans nationally in new members recruitment *all data in this report exclude lc szczecin which didn’t provide needed information.
  • 4.
    Overall results We had1526 applications We allocated 778 new members Including 16 returnees 95 TMP-TMP In general we allocated 889 members
  • 5.
    How many peoplewere engaged in recruitment process? 33,3 % 40 % 6,7 % 20 % 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 up to 10 from 10 up to 20 from 20 up to 30 more than 30 In recruitment process were engaged mostly from 10 up to 20 people. In 5 Local Committees were engaged up to 10 members. More than 30 people took part in processes in 3 LCs.
  • 6.
    How did youprepare lc members to recruitment process? 15 6 1 1 3 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Training for assessors Simulation of recruitment Webinar for assessors Only sent materials via e-mail Others 15 LCs conducted training for assessors and 6 LCs prepared a simulation of recruitment. There was a webinar for assessors in one Local Committee and in another one materials were sent via e-mail.
  • 7.
    73,3 % 26,7 % Yes No Didyou use materials recommended by MC in whole recruitment process?
  • 8.
    Approximately 175 peopleresigned after filling the application, 240 people resigned after rb and 55 resigned after Group Exercize.
  • 9.
    When did youallocate people? 2 12 1 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Pre-allocation on each step of the process After interview On LCC After LCC In 12 Local Committees people were allocated after interview. There was pre- allocation on each step of the process in another 2 LCs. Only in one LC allocation was done on LCC.
  • 10.
    How did youallocate people? 1 8 0 3 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 With engagement of OCPs Final decision of LCVP TM Final decision of LCVP TM and LCP Final decision of EB Others In 8 Local Committees final decision about allocation was done by LCVP TM in another 3 LCs by Executive Board. Only one Local Committe engaged OCPs in allocation process.
  • 11.
    What percentage ofallocated people are women and what man? 69 % 31 % Woman Man In autumn recruitment 69% of allocated people are woman, 31% man.
  • 12.
    One of theLCs allocated more pepople that was planned. Then after skips there was exact amount of people in projects. If some projects there were still too many people that didn’t go to LCC, TM reallocated them to other areas that were their second choice. How was the gap filled in situation when you didn’t recruit enough people?
  • 13.
    In 7 LocalCommittees recruitment process for returnees was simplified.
  • 14.
    Fast tracks wererecruited in 8 local committees in general number of 21 people.
  • 15.
    Thank you forattention and engagement in recruitment!