HOW TO MANAGE A TELECOMS
BUSINESS THANKS TO (OR DESPITE)
REGULATIONS
EU REGULATIONS & COMPETITION LAW IN
TELECOMS
EU REGULATIONS & COMPETITION LAW IN TELECOMS
Session 5
Session 1
INTRO: REGULATORY OBJ &
PRINCIPLES
Session 2
Session 3
Session 4
MARKET PLAYERS &
REGULATORS
REG & COMPETITION
POLICIES
REGULATORY MANAGEMENT
CONCL: CHALLENGES AHEAD
PROGRAM
EU REGULATIONS & COMPETITION LAW IN TELECOMS
SESSION 1
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
WHY REGULATE & WHAT
EFFECTS ON THE MARKET & IMPACT ON
OPERATORS
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
WHY
REGULATE
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
...the rules of the game !
But does any game need such rules/intervention?
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
 a policy instrument in a specific area of the
economy: utilities
 traditionally, intervention in all dimensions of
business activity: State-controlled
enterprises, under monopoly
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
WHY?
To safeguard public interests
 But in market-based economies, these rules
have to be consistent with free-market
principles
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
Specific objectives in telecoms
 protect public’s interests & consumers’ rights
 promote universal access to basic services
 prevent abuses of market power
 create favorable environment for investment
 optimize use of scarce resources
……” lower prices, more choice,
more efficiency “
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
National monopolies  International competition
HOW?
privatization
liberalization
competition
harmonization
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
WITH
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
relaxing previous rules
introducing new rules
empowering new institutions
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
REGULATIONS
WHO: a Reg Authority
WHAT:
standards
licensing
scarce resources (F, N)
access (interconnection)
universal service
quality
security
prices...
COMPETITION
LAW
WHO: a Comp Authority
WHAT:
anti-competitive behavior
abuse dominant position
denial of access/ supply
cross-subsidization
predatory pricing
tying/bundling
restrictive agreements
mergers & JV
ESTABLISHMENT OF SEPARATE REGULATORS
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
1990 1992 1994 1996 1999 2000
12 22 30
53
84
96
Sector
Regulator
Competition
Authority
30 23 27 27
0 1 3 1
Issuing
License
Intercon-
nection
Pricing
Service
Quality Merger
10
21
OECD 1999, Number of Countries in each Category
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
EFFECTS ON THE MARKET & IMPACT ON OPERATORS
.
WHAT
RESULTS?
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
EFFECTS ON THE MARKET & IMPACT ON OPERATORS
Indisputable facts
 more (private) service providers
 development & modernization of networks
 new services on innovative technologies
 lower prices
 better quality
 increased penetration
 globalization
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
EFFECTS ON THE MARKET & IMPACT ON OPERATORS
THE RESULT OF REGULATION?
 degree of State control
 degree of liberalization
 market structure
 degree of international opening
State Ownership and Privatisation
Austr 100 199667 F 100 1997
100A 199847.8 El
50I199551100B
199833.7100
00Ca
1998
00US
19866566Jap
089D
199000
Fin
1984022UK1992
2002
100
1992
199853.3
Priv 1992 Priv2002
NZ
55.7
3.6
82 16 UK 1020 7611
Austra
lia
A 11 100 0 Fin 20 55 40
Spain0100 31 97
? 3
OECD, 1998 Market Structure
N of
Licen
%
1st
%
2nd
N of
Licen
%
1st
%
2st
Liberalization & Market Structure: V.Telephony
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
IMPACT ON OPERATORS
CASE STUDY
2G License
a set of rights & obligations
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
IMPACT ON OPERATORS
CASE STUDY
the costs of regulation
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
EFFECT ON THE MARKET & IMPACT ON OPERATORS
“winners” & “losers”
 but also damage from indecisive
regulation
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
EFFECT ON THE MARKET & IMPACT ON OPERATORS
principles of “good” regulation:
• professionalism WHO?
• independence
• efficiency HOW
• objectivity
• transparency WHEN?
• participation
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
EFFECT ON THE MARKET & IMPACT ON OPERATORS
From Theory to Reality
 Objectives met?
 At what costs?
 Under-regulated or over-regulated?
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
EFFECT ON THE MARKET & IMPACT ON OPERATORS
 still limited evidence
 long timing from legislation to market
 market distortions
 accountability criticized
 regulatory intervention exceeding initial target
 legacy of the past
 different paces & extent of reform across
countries
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
CONCLUSIONS
However, liberalization, privatization &
competition prove to be beneficial for
efficiency and consumer welfare
In the short run: more regulations
Regulatory
Intensity
Time
Phase 1 :
Monopoly
Phase 2:
Monopoly &
Competition
Phase 3:
Competition
In the long run...
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
CONCLUSIONS
Competition better than monopoly
Regulated competition better than
monopoly
Regulated competition better than
un- regulated competition
REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES
CONCLUSION

TRAINING1

  • 1.
    HOW TO MANAGEA TELECOMS BUSINESS THANKS TO (OR DESPITE) REGULATIONS EU REGULATIONS & COMPETITION LAW IN TELECOMS
  • 2.
    EU REGULATIONS &COMPETITION LAW IN TELECOMS Session 5 Session 1 INTRO: REGULATORY OBJ & PRINCIPLES Session 2 Session 3 Session 4 MARKET PLAYERS & REGULATORS REG & COMPETITION POLICIES REGULATORY MANAGEMENT CONCL: CHALLENGES AHEAD PROGRAM
  • 3.
    EU REGULATIONS &COMPETITION LAW IN TELECOMS SESSION 1 REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES WHY REGULATE & WHAT EFFECTS ON THE MARKET & IMPACT ON OPERATORS
  • 4.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES WHY REGULATE
  • 5.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES ...the rules of the game ! But does any game need such rules/intervention?
  • 6.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES  a policy instrument in a specific area of the economy: utilities  traditionally, intervention in all dimensions of business activity: State-controlled enterprises, under monopoly
  • 7.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES WHY? To safeguard public interests  But in market-based economies, these rules have to be consistent with free-market principles
  • 8.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES Specific objectives in telecoms  protect public’s interests & consumers’ rights  promote universal access to basic services  prevent abuses of market power  create favorable environment for investment  optimize use of scarce resources ……” lower prices, more choice, more efficiency “
  • 9.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES National monopolies  International competition HOW? privatization liberalization competition harmonization
  • 10.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES WITH
  • 11.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES relaxing previous rules introducing new rules empowering new institutions
  • 12.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES REGULATIONS WHO: a Reg Authority WHAT: standards licensing scarce resources (F, N) access (interconnection) universal service quality security prices... COMPETITION LAW WHO: a Comp Authority WHAT: anti-competitive behavior abuse dominant position denial of access/ supply cross-subsidization predatory pricing tying/bundling restrictive agreements mergers & JV
  • 13.
    ESTABLISHMENT OF SEPARATEREGULATORS REGULATORY OBJECTIVES & PRINCIPLES 1990 1992 1994 1996 1999 2000 12 22 30 53 84 96
  • 14.
    Sector Regulator Competition Authority 30 23 2727 0 1 3 1 Issuing License Intercon- nection Pricing Service Quality Merger 10 21 OECD 1999, Number of Countries in each Category
  • 15.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES EFFECTS ON THE MARKET & IMPACT ON OPERATORS . WHAT RESULTS?
  • 16.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES EFFECTS ON THE MARKET & IMPACT ON OPERATORS Indisputable facts  more (private) service providers  development & modernization of networks  new services on innovative technologies  lower prices  better quality  increased penetration  globalization
  • 17.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES EFFECTS ON THE MARKET & IMPACT ON OPERATORS THE RESULT OF REGULATION?  degree of State control  degree of liberalization  market structure  degree of international opening
  • 18.
    State Ownership andPrivatisation Austr 100 199667 F 100 1997 100A 199847.8 El 50I199551100B 199833.7100 00Ca 1998 00US 19866566Jap 089D 199000 Fin 1984022UK1992 2002 100 1992 199853.3 Priv 1992 Priv2002 NZ 55.7 3.6
  • 19.
    82 16 UK1020 7611 Austra lia A 11 100 0 Fin 20 55 40 Spain0100 31 97 ? 3 OECD, 1998 Market Structure N of Licen % 1st % 2nd N of Licen % 1st % 2st Liberalization & Market Structure: V.Telephony
  • 20.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES IMPACT ON OPERATORS CASE STUDY 2G License a set of rights & obligations
  • 21.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES IMPACT ON OPERATORS CASE STUDY the costs of regulation
  • 22.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES EFFECT ON THE MARKET & IMPACT ON OPERATORS “winners” & “losers”  but also damage from indecisive regulation
  • 23.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES EFFECT ON THE MARKET & IMPACT ON OPERATORS principles of “good” regulation: • professionalism WHO? • independence • efficiency HOW • objectivity • transparency WHEN? • participation
  • 24.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES EFFECT ON THE MARKET & IMPACT ON OPERATORS From Theory to Reality  Objectives met?  At what costs?  Under-regulated or over-regulated?
  • 25.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES EFFECT ON THE MARKET & IMPACT ON OPERATORS  still limited evidence  long timing from legislation to market  market distortions  accountability criticized  regulatory intervention exceeding initial target  legacy of the past  different paces & extent of reform across countries
  • 26.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES CONCLUSIONS However, liberalization, privatization & competition prove to be beneficial for efficiency and consumer welfare In the short run: more regulations
  • 27.
    Regulatory Intensity Time Phase 1 : Monopoly Phase2: Monopoly & Competition Phase 3: Competition In the long run...
  • 28.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES CONCLUSIONS Competition better than monopoly Regulated competition better than monopoly Regulated competition better than un- regulated competition
  • 29.
    REGULATORY OBJECTIVES &PRINCIPLES CONCLUSION