Downloaded 28 times
Uploaded byDavide Piga
The Knowledge Management Experience in the United Nations System (2011)
The document discusses lessons learned from 26 knowledge management (KM) projects within the UN system, focusing on key factors such as needs assessment, leadership, funding, partnerships, and technology. It emphasizes the importance of adapting to community needs, maintaining senior management buy-in, and leveraging collaborative partnerships to enhance knowledge sharing efforts. Additionally, it highlights the need for open-access content and effective facilitation to ensure successful knowledge management outcomes.
More Related Content
Similar to The Knowledge Management Experience in the United Nations System (2011)
The Knowledge Management Experience in the United Nations System (2011)
- 1. UN: The KMExperience Lessons learned from 26 KM projects within the UN system
- 2. The Source Inter-Agency Knowledge Fair on UN Effectiveness in Knowledge Sharing Turin, Nov 2010 116 presented projects, 26 selected: the core of KM within the UN system. • 11 solid platforms (websites, repositories) • 7 liquid networks (not strictly web-based) • 8 offline activities (learning, workshops, fairs, campaigns)
- 3. Keywords 1. Needs Assessment (Demand Driven Programming) 2. Commitment and Leadership from the top (Legitimacy) 3. Funding 4. Partnerships 5. Technology 6. Facilitation 7. Open-Access vs. Restricted Content 8. Repurposing of Knowledge 9. Impact of KM
- 4. Needs Assessment 1/9 Needs Assessment (Demand Driven Programming) See your Knowledge Sharing system through the eyes of your audience: “Tailor your system to the context and needs of its users. Understanding your target audience is critical to designing an effective Knowledge Sharing”.
- 5. Needs Assessment 1/9 How: “Work on specific needs assessment: discuss within specific groups and communities their business scenarios and find agreement on how the group wants to use a set of specific tools for their particular purpose. Guide the development process of the social media platform more closely along these business scenarios”.
- 6. Needs Assessment 1/9 Failing to consider the community’s needs is a major cause of nonsuccess in KM projects: “The formulation of top-down policies describing in detail specific workflows for staff, mandating them to use the system, and to use it a certain way, proved counter-productive. It created natural change resistance and diverted the perspective away from the actual benefits for the user”.
- 7. Needs Assessment 1/9 Feedback Establishing clear channels for user feedback is a way to integrate the demand driven approach in the long term programming. Knowledge Sharing initiatives need to be flexible, in order to be constantly adapted to the changing needs of the community: “We are constantly evolving and adapting our services through regular feedback from agencies, teachers, students and staff. To respond more effectively to the requirements and needs of our counterparts, agency and staff”.
- 8. Leadership from thetop 2/9 Goal: get a reputation of a well-known and useful tool for various stakeholders and practitioners. How? Senior Management Buy-in It increases legitimacy of the project and therefore effective interest and participation of all the actors involved. “Agency leadership is required. CoPs are voluntary and function successfully if they are driven by passion, including passion of the Convener”.
- 9. Leadership from thetop 2/9 “Affiliating with a respected, neutral body within the UN System produced buy-in and willingness from the highest level of the agencies and organizations it monitors, has successfully built the trust and confidence of UN specialized agencies and programmes, which have become active participants, feeding the knowledge-base with information about their activities. Therefore, the knowledge- base positioned itself as a neutral, high quality, reliable and up-to- date source of information”.
- 10. Funding 3/9 The sustainability of a KM project requires long term funding, as KM is never a one time initiative, it is a delicate process that needs to be sustained over time. 1. Promote funding at corporate level: It is essential to take into account the KM strategy in the annual work plan. Have a committed leadership. Adopt an aggressive resource mobilization strategy based on the successful track record of the project. 2. Innovative funding strategies based on partnerships: When facing financial constraints, several projects recurred to collaboration and/or financial support from the main stakeholders, partner institutions and online volunteers.
- 11. Funding 3/9 "After three years of development, the UN (WFP) created Nutrinet platform was successfully handed over to a regional institution, Nutrinet Foundation, who is now in charge of managing and further developing the knowledge management system. The Nutrinet Foundation is also responsible for mobilizing resources to fund it in a sustainable way and so far has received more than US$200,000".
- 12. Partnerships 4/9 Almost all contributors highlighted the value of working in collaboration and openly with all the actors involved in the process: “Comprehensive knowledge sharing requires partnership building with other UN agencies and outside partners”.
- 13. Partnerships 4/9 Benefits of partnerships: 1.Create synergies (unlock resources: funding, skills); 2.Increase outreach; 3.Reduce duplication (avoid “reinventing the wheel”).
- 14. Partnerships 4/9 Create synergies Working in collaboration with other stakeholders can lead to cost sharing and virtuous synergies: “Continue to build local linkages with women’s organizations and other grassroots movements. Also build greater synergies between existing projects supporting women in politics from the initiation of the project”.
- 15. Partnerships 4/9 Increase outreach Involving other actors working on the same topics also means getting access to new channels of communication to vehicle your message: “Global partnership between key organizations is one of the most important aspects of this project. Each of the 5 partners of iKNOW politics are leaders in the field of promoting women’s political participation and governance”
- 16. Partnerships 4/9 Reduce Duplication “The notion of “not invented here” and the hesitation to engage into a committed collaboration with other UN agencies often overshadow the obvious benefits that a consolidated and commonly owned approach would have for all UN partners”. Two common anomalies lead to “reinventing the wheel” and in some cases to duplication of projects: 1.“Not invented here” 2.Silos Effect
- 17. Partnerships 4/9 Not invented here UN: There is a general sense of diffidence when it comes to adopt solutions invented by other agencies, even if the solutions are good. Partnerships help to overcome this problem, by extending ownership to all involved actors: “Agency mandates were perceived as threatened by the initiative. The challenge was to gain recognition of the IAU as tool / service, not a competitor. The solution was to foster greater ownership by establishing a Steering Committee and ensuring that the Unit engages in all activities in response to requests from agencies”.
- 18. Partnerships 4/9 Silos effect Agencies are usually not comfortable having other agencies know what they are doing, and how, even if they would benefit from accessing each other’s knowledge: “The UNCT had recognized the need to have centralized data, but what was not clear was whether they would be willing to not only provide the data required but have that data publically accessible. Agencies were not comfortable having other agencies know what they were doing and how much funding they were receiving and from whom”
- 19. Partnerships 4/9 How to identify partners “The collective effort to network with and engage key stakeholders and partners in the design and construction of the portal was successful because the effort was based on careful research, assessment of partners’ relative interests, competitive advantages, and accessibility, and on clearly-defined channels for proposed collaboration”.
- 20. Technology 5/9 Technology vs. People Focus more attention on the “real” participant network, rather than the “virtual” platform and tools. Too much expectation given to the nice designs or modern tools can distract from the focus: “The final goal of technology in KM is creating links between assets, groups and people. All contents should be linked to people. People come first, technology must serve this purpose”. “Information is not the same as knowledge. The information can be shared. Knowledge cannot. Instead, knowledge is built through the interaction of relevant people. Good documents are not enough if you intend to change behaviors”.
- 21. Facilitation 6/9 Information sharing cannot rely on spontaneous interest or contributions from participants. To keep this kind of system alive, a basic support structure is needed. An adequate structure would include : •Web Team (web programmer, web designer) •Facilitation Team (“knowledge brokers”) •Documentation (help modules and guidelines)
- 22. Facilitation 6/9 Web Team “It is critical to have a competent technical web programmer who also fully understands the project’s mission, and who can communicate the relative benefits of each programming decision to the content editors and team”.
- 23. Facilitation 6/9 Facilitation Team Facilitators are Knowledge Brokers, not Knowledge Producers. Duties: 1. Collection, consolidation and distribution of information; 2. Proactive Moderation (internal and external promotion); 3. Identification and use of champions and local focal points (presence in the field is key).
- 24. Facilitation 6/9 Collection, Consolidation, Distribution of Knowledge Good pieces of information are not enough. Information has to be “digested” by someone in the system: “Dedicated support is required to draw up the regular newsletter, summarize the contributions to queries and e-discussions and foster engagement with network members”. “Simple, brief, and easy to read booklets should be developed to target policy/decision-makers on technical issues regarding MDG measurement and tracking”.
- 25. Facilitation 6/9 Mobilization Facilitating a network also means mobilizing members to actively participate: “Get the press officers or people involved to communicate directly to the project editors. Use direct communication channels (tel, email). Avoid sole reliance on information posted on the organizations’ and agencies’ websites. In addition, send people to cover relevant conferences”. “Define regular deadlines for sending contributions, to ensure accuracy and relevance”.
- 26. Facilitation 6/9 Focal Points Nominating focal points helps to anchor projects in country programmes, rather than isolating them in UN Offices: “Network in 5 regional offices: the degree of awareness of knowledge sharing in the project countries is extremely high”. “Absence of a dedicated editorial team made it difficult to guarantee quality of shared information. To overcome this challenge, each Nutrinet portal has relied on a dedicated focal point in the country”.
- 27. Facilitation 6/9 Champions “We have found champions that push forward the continuous use of the platform.” “Start piloting with a group of enthusiastic users and document the lessons you learn. Particularly try to win senior management champions who can spread the word and serve as role model within their teams”.
- 28. Open-Access vs. RestrictedContent 7/9 Broad membership and open access make it possible for the community to benefit from the knowledge and resources of a greater cross-section of society. This reduces isolation and helps contrasting the negative tendency to reinvent the wheel. “It is useful to engage with practitioners and experts beyond UN agencies, notably in government bodies, civil society, academia, development partners, donors and other organizations”.
- 29. Open-Access vs. RestrictedContent 7/9 How to open? “Open to the public requires starting a change in the management process within your organization which changes the mindset from the IT-driven paradigm “Only share what has to be shared with those who need to see it” to a new knowledge-driven paradigm: Restrict only content that absolutely has to be restricted; other than that share as widely as possible and appropriate”.
- 30. Open-Access vs. RestrictedContent 7/9 Problem: Copyright “The nebulous nature of information disclosure policies and concerns about providing open-access on the platform”. Solution “Engage partner agencies earlier on in the planning and designing of the project. This creates more buy-in and removes some of the copyright obstacles you might face at later stages”.
- 31. Open-Access vs. RestrictedContent 7/9 Problem: Discretion “People may not feel comfortable sharing their views publicly”. Solution “Usually this problem is due to simple lack of information. Respond directly to these concerns. For example, design clear guidelines for what will and will not be published as open-access”.
- 32. Repurposing of Knowledge 8/9 Replication, scalability of initiatives and re-purposing of knowledge are intrinsic objectives of KM. Producing knowledge is only an intermediate objective: knowledge is useful when it is used, and possibly re-used.
- 33. Repurposing of Knowledge 8/9 How to make knowledge re-usable: Flexibility “The concept has been successfully adapted to local circumstances in terms of the type of knowledge-sharing desired (e.g., CoP, programme-based network, or other configuration), the topics to organize networks around, and the operational arrangements. This flexible approach has facilitated replication”.
- 34. Repurposing of Knowledge 8/9 Standardization Standardization through the use of templates make it easy to categorize and reuse knowledge. Even case studies can be used as templates: “Collect and highlight common uses and good practices on how the system has been used in specific business scenarios. These can serve as templates for other users, who e.g. want to organize an event, jointly draft on a document, engage with external partners, coordinate within a project team, etc”.
- 35. Impact of KM 9/9 Balance between sharing knowledge and getting the work done There is a balance between sharing knowledge and spending time on policy and programming. It is important to not overburden practitioners with too much “knowledge”: “Several agencies expressed concern that an interactive platform through which agency staff would share knowledge and engage in dialogue would impose a burden on their staff rather than enhancing their efficiency and streamlining their work”.
- 36. Impact of KM 9/9 How to evaluate impact of KM? “The value of KM can only be appreciated by acknowledging the “hidden” value of collaboration, interaction, and knowledge sharing. To overcome this limit, consider keeping track of success cases. It is vital for raising funds”.
- 37. Thank You Davide Piga [email protected] http://pdavide.me