UNIT- 3
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
BY DEEPALI GUPTA
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
• The composition of Long term sources of funds such as debentures, long term
debts, preference & share capital & retained earning (reserves & surpluses).
• To decide the proportion of ownership funds & borrowed funds.
• Ownership funds include ordinary, preference share capital & retained earning.
• Borrowed funds include the amt. raised (i.e) issue of debentures & loan taken from
institution.
OPTIMUM CAPITAL STRUCTURE
• The capital structure or composition of debt & equity that leads to maximum
value of firm, max. wealth of share holders & minimizing the cost of capital.
• Following consideration:
 If the ROI is higher than F.C : Co. should prefer to raise funds having F.C (i.e.) debt, loans, pref.
share capital Increase earning per share & mkt value of firm
OPTIMUM CAPITAL STRUCTURE
When debt is used as a sources of finance: the firm saves amt of tax as int.
allowed is deductible exp.
 Advantage of tax leverage & cost of debt is reduced.
• Firm should avoid Undue financial risk : Increased debt – equity
increase risk & reduce mkt price of share.
• Capital structure should be flexible.
THEORIES OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE: DURANT
DAVID
• Net Income Approach
• Changes in financial structure causes corresponding changes in overall cost of capital & also
in total value in firm
• A firm can minimize avg. cost of capital & increase the value of firm as well as mkt price of
equity share by using debt financing
• Following assumption:
• The cost of debt < cost of equity
• There are no tax.
• The risk perception of investor is not changed by the use of debt.
NET INCOME APPROACH
Ke ( Cost of equity)
Kd ( Cost of debt)
Cost
of
Capital
Degree of Leverage
Effect of Leverage on cost of capital
NET INCOME APPROACH
• The total mkt value of a firm on the basis of Net Income Approach of can be ascertain by:
• V= S+D where,
• V = total mkt value of firm;
• S= Mkt value of equity share
• D= Mkt value of debt
• = earnings available to equity shareholders (NI)
equity capitalization rate
• Weighted cost of capital
K0 = EBIT
V
NET OPERATING INCOME APPROACH
• Suggested by Durand 1976 : Another extreme of effect of leverage on the value of firm.
• Opposite of N.I approach
• Change in the capital structure does not effect the market value of firm & overall cost of capital remains
constant whether debt – equity mix is 50:50 or 20:80 or 0:100.
• Increase in proportion of debt in capital structure would increase the financial risk of the shareholders.
• No optimal capital structure
• Assumption:
• The mkt capitalize the value of firm as a whole.
• Business risk remain constant at every level of debt- equity mix.
• There are no corporate tax.
NOI
Ke (cost of equity)
Ko (over all cost of
capital)
Kd ( cost of debt)
Degree of Leverage
Cost
of
capital
NOI
• Can be determined as below :
• V = EBIT
Ko
Ko = overall cost of capital
Mkt value of the equity share (S) = V – D where;
V = total mkt value of firm
D = Mkt value of debt.
Cost of equity or equity capitalization rate
Ke = EBIT – I
V - D
THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH
• Also k/n as Intermediate approach.
• Compromise b/w two extremes of N.I & N.O. Approach.
• The value of the firm can be increased initially or cost of capital can be decreased by using
proper debt- equity mix but beyond a particular point, the cost of equity increases with the
increase of debt or F.L
• Thus, overall cost of capital decrease upto certain point, remains more or less unchanged for
moderate & increases risk after a certain point.
• Increase Kd Increases Financial Risk
TRADITIONAL APPROACH
•Effect of
Leverage on
cost of
capital
Ke
Ko
Kd
A B
O X
Cost
of
Capital
Degree of Leverage
Range of optimal
Capital structure
MODIGLIANI & MILLER APPROACH (THEORY OF
IRRELEVANCE)
• M&M hypothesis is identical with N.O.I, if
taxes are ignored.
• Debt-equity is irrelevant in determining
the total value of firm.
• Though debt is the cheaper source but
with the increase use, financial risk
increase & affect cost of equity, overall
cost of capital remain constant.
• Two identical firms cannot have diff. mkt
value or cost of capital b’coz of
arbitrage process.
Assumptions
•There are no Corporate tax.
•There is a perfect market.
•Investor act rationally.
•The expected earnings of all the firms
have identical risk characteristic.
•The cut-off point of investment in a
firm is a capitalization rate.
•All the earnings is distributed to the
shareholders.
•Risk to investors depend upon random
fluctuation of expected earning & the
possibilities that actual value may turn
out to be diff. from best estimates
ESSENTIAL FEATURES OF A SOUND
CAPITAL MIX
• Max. possible use of leverage.
• Capital Structure should be flexible.
• To avoid undue financial/business risk with the increase of debt.
• Use of debt should be within the capacity of a firm.
• Should involve min. possible risk of loss of control.
• Must avoid undue restriction in agreement of debt

Unit- 3 capital structure.pdf

  • 1.
  • 2.
    CAPITAL STRUCTURE • Thecomposition of Long term sources of funds such as debentures, long term debts, preference & share capital & retained earning (reserves & surpluses). • To decide the proportion of ownership funds & borrowed funds. • Ownership funds include ordinary, preference share capital & retained earning. • Borrowed funds include the amt. raised (i.e) issue of debentures & loan taken from institution.
  • 3.
    OPTIMUM CAPITAL STRUCTURE •The capital structure or composition of debt & equity that leads to maximum value of firm, max. wealth of share holders & minimizing the cost of capital. • Following consideration:  If the ROI is higher than F.C : Co. should prefer to raise funds having F.C (i.e.) debt, loans, pref. share capital Increase earning per share & mkt value of firm
  • 4.
    OPTIMUM CAPITAL STRUCTURE Whendebt is used as a sources of finance: the firm saves amt of tax as int. allowed is deductible exp.  Advantage of tax leverage & cost of debt is reduced. • Firm should avoid Undue financial risk : Increased debt – equity increase risk & reduce mkt price of share. • Capital structure should be flexible.
  • 5.
    THEORIES OF CAPITALSTRUCTURE: DURANT DAVID • Net Income Approach • Changes in financial structure causes corresponding changes in overall cost of capital & also in total value in firm • A firm can minimize avg. cost of capital & increase the value of firm as well as mkt price of equity share by using debt financing • Following assumption: • The cost of debt < cost of equity • There are no tax. • The risk perception of investor is not changed by the use of debt.
  • 6.
    NET INCOME APPROACH Ke( Cost of equity) Kd ( Cost of debt) Cost of Capital Degree of Leverage Effect of Leverage on cost of capital
  • 7.
    NET INCOME APPROACH •The total mkt value of a firm on the basis of Net Income Approach of can be ascertain by: • V= S+D where, • V = total mkt value of firm; • S= Mkt value of equity share • D= Mkt value of debt • = earnings available to equity shareholders (NI) equity capitalization rate • Weighted cost of capital K0 = EBIT V
  • 8.
    NET OPERATING INCOMEAPPROACH • Suggested by Durand 1976 : Another extreme of effect of leverage on the value of firm. • Opposite of N.I approach • Change in the capital structure does not effect the market value of firm & overall cost of capital remains constant whether debt – equity mix is 50:50 or 20:80 or 0:100. • Increase in proportion of debt in capital structure would increase the financial risk of the shareholders. • No optimal capital structure • Assumption: • The mkt capitalize the value of firm as a whole. • Business risk remain constant at every level of debt- equity mix. • There are no corporate tax.
  • 9.
    NOI Ke (cost ofequity) Ko (over all cost of capital) Kd ( cost of debt) Degree of Leverage Cost of capital
  • 10.
    NOI • Can bedetermined as below : • V = EBIT Ko Ko = overall cost of capital Mkt value of the equity share (S) = V – D where; V = total mkt value of firm D = Mkt value of debt. Cost of equity or equity capitalization rate Ke = EBIT – I V - D
  • 11.
    THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH •Also k/n as Intermediate approach. • Compromise b/w two extremes of N.I & N.O. Approach. • The value of the firm can be increased initially or cost of capital can be decreased by using proper debt- equity mix but beyond a particular point, the cost of equity increases with the increase of debt or F.L • Thus, overall cost of capital decrease upto certain point, remains more or less unchanged for moderate & increases risk after a certain point. • Increase Kd Increases Financial Risk
  • 12.
    TRADITIONAL APPROACH •Effect of Leverageon cost of capital Ke Ko Kd A B O X Cost of Capital Degree of Leverage Range of optimal Capital structure
  • 13.
    MODIGLIANI & MILLERAPPROACH (THEORY OF IRRELEVANCE) • M&M hypothesis is identical with N.O.I, if taxes are ignored. • Debt-equity is irrelevant in determining the total value of firm. • Though debt is the cheaper source but with the increase use, financial risk increase & affect cost of equity, overall cost of capital remain constant. • Two identical firms cannot have diff. mkt value or cost of capital b’coz of arbitrage process. Assumptions •There are no Corporate tax. •There is a perfect market. •Investor act rationally. •The expected earnings of all the firms have identical risk characteristic. •The cut-off point of investment in a firm is a capitalization rate. •All the earnings is distributed to the shareholders. •Risk to investors depend upon random fluctuation of expected earning & the possibilities that actual value may turn out to be diff. from best estimates
  • 14.
    ESSENTIAL FEATURES OFA SOUND CAPITAL MIX • Max. possible use of leverage. • Capital Structure should be flexible. • To avoid undue financial/business risk with the increase of debt. • Use of debt should be within the capacity of a firm. • Should involve min. possible risk of loss of control. • Must avoid undue restriction in agreement of debt