Chapter 11
Organizations as Political Arenas and
Political Agents
Organizations as Political Arenas
and Political Agents
 Organizations as Arenas
 Wal-Mart as agent and arena
 Ross Johnson Barbarians at the Gate
 Organizations as Political Agents
 Ecosystems I
 Ecosystems II
 Pfeffer and Salancik The External Control of
Organizations
Organizations as Arenas
 Arenas shape:
 Rules of the game
 Players
 Stakes
 Bottom-up Political Action
 Labor unions and civil rights movements
 Political Barriers to Control from the Top
 U.S. Department of Education scenario: initiatives
often lost to political opposition despite new resources
and top-down support
Organizations as Political Agents
 Organizations exist in ecosystems
 Organizations depend on environment for
resources support
 Organizations needs the skills of a politician:
develop agenda, map environment, manage
relationships with allies and competitors,
negotiate
 Ecosystem
 “Organizational field” in which competitors and
allies co-evolve
Ecosystems
 Business Ecosystems
 Apple  IBM  “Wintel”
 General Motors and General Electric
 Public Policy Ecosystems
 Federal Aviation Administration
 Schools
 Business-government ecosystems
 Pharmaceutical companies, physicians and
government
 Fedex lobbying clout
Ecosystems II
 Society as Ecosystem
 Business, public and government
 What is and should be the power relationship
between organizations and society?
 Are organizations “instruments of market tyranny”
or largely shaped by larger social and economic
forces?
 Jihad vs. McWorld
Pfeffer and Salancik, The External
Control of Organizations
 Organizations are controlled more than they control
their external environment
 Organizations are “other-directed”
 Struggle for autonomy and discretion in the face of
constraint and external control
 Confront conflicting demands from multiple
constituents
 Organizations’ understanding of environment is often
distorted, imperfect
 Dilemma: alliances essential to gain influence, but
reduce autonomy by increasing dependency and
obligations
Conclusion
 Organizations are both arenas for internal
politics and political agents with their own
agendas, resources, and strategies
 Arenas house contests, shape ongoing
interplay of interests and agendas
 Agents exist, compete and co-evolve in larger
ecosystems (“organizational fields”)

Week7 bolman deal_chap 11

  • 1.
    Chapter 11 Organizations asPolitical Arenas and Political Agents
  • 2.
    Organizations as PoliticalArenas and Political Agents  Organizations as Arenas  Wal-Mart as agent and arena  Ross Johnson Barbarians at the Gate  Organizations as Political Agents  Ecosystems I  Ecosystems II  Pfeffer and Salancik The External Control of Organizations
  • 3.
    Organizations as Arenas Arenas shape:  Rules of the game  Players  Stakes  Bottom-up Political Action  Labor unions and civil rights movements  Political Barriers to Control from the Top  U.S. Department of Education scenario: initiatives often lost to political opposition despite new resources and top-down support
  • 4.
    Organizations as PoliticalAgents  Organizations exist in ecosystems  Organizations depend on environment for resources support  Organizations needs the skills of a politician: develop agenda, map environment, manage relationships with allies and competitors, negotiate  Ecosystem  “Organizational field” in which competitors and allies co-evolve
  • 5.
    Ecosystems  Business Ecosystems Apple  IBM  “Wintel”  General Motors and General Electric  Public Policy Ecosystems  Federal Aviation Administration  Schools  Business-government ecosystems  Pharmaceutical companies, physicians and government  Fedex lobbying clout
  • 6.
    Ecosystems II  Societyas Ecosystem  Business, public and government  What is and should be the power relationship between organizations and society?  Are organizations “instruments of market tyranny” or largely shaped by larger social and economic forces?  Jihad vs. McWorld
  • 7.
    Pfeffer and Salancik,The External Control of Organizations  Organizations are controlled more than they control their external environment  Organizations are “other-directed”  Struggle for autonomy and discretion in the face of constraint and external control  Confront conflicting demands from multiple constituents  Organizations’ understanding of environment is often distorted, imperfect  Dilemma: alliances essential to gain influence, but reduce autonomy by increasing dependency and obligations
  • 8.
    Conclusion  Organizations areboth arenas for internal politics and political agents with their own agendas, resources, and strategies  Arenas house contests, shape ongoing interplay of interests and agendas  Agents exist, compete and co-evolve in larger ecosystems (“organizational fields”)