What characteristics of gamers’ profile should be taken into account in player- centred game design?

What characteristics of gamers’ profile should be taken into account in player- centred game design?

• 1.
  What characteristics ofgamers’ profile should be taken into account in player- centred game design? Maria Kambouri Institute of Education, University College London Christothea Herodotou, The Open University and Niall Winters, University of Oxford iLRN, Prague July 14th 2015
• 2.
  Gamers are not ahomogeneous population recent game demographics show that, alongside the traditional profile of the ‘hardcore’ gamer, casual gaming has become important 56% of gamers, male and 44% female. The most frequent female gamer is on average 43 years old while the male gamer is aged 35. the top three types of games played are social games action games and then puzzle/board/card games. more than half of the US population (>150 million) and almost 44% of Europeans are gaming. ESA (entertainment software association) 2015 report (US)
• 3.
  Usability in termsof playability and player-centered design. Febretti et al. (2009) proposed a distinction between the terms ‘usability’ and ‘playability’ and identified that playability factors such as social interaction, challenge, concentration, immersion, player ability, objectives, feedback, and control, foster or inhibit long-term game engagement SO : we wanted to examine players’ socio- emotional personality characteristics and how these might relate to certain game preferences (e.g., choice of certain games, nature of gameplay, in-game actions) We propose to use a personality theory that could assist in exemplifying the gamers’ profile.
• 4.
  Games are notsimply ‘software’ Considering that games directly relate to the experience of gaming (by producing feelings of fun and enjoyment) and game interaction, the concept of playability has been introduced to evaluate usability for games. (Malone, 1982, Fabricote et al. 2002, Sánchez, et.al 2009, )
• 5.
  Trait Emotional Intelligence (Petridesand Fernham) refers to’ individuals’ self-perceived emotion-related abilities and behaviour dispositions’. It is a construct measuring emotional intelligence and its four components: • Well-being – Individuals with high scores feel happiness, fulfilment, and well-being, • Emotionality – Individuals with high scores believe they have a wide range of emotion-related skills that can use to develop and sustain close emotional relationships, • Sociability – Individuals with high scores believe they can interact and communicate better within diverse social contexts (social influence and interaction in conditions other than family and personal relationships), and • Self-control – Individuals with high scores believe they can control their urges and desires and regulate stress
• 6.
  TEIQue:15 facets K.V.Petrides
• 7.
  Our previous research Theconcept of trait EI has been deployed in this study due to its relationship to gamers’ preferences for play and persistence of gaming. Game preferences were found to match with the gamers’ trait EI indicating that gamers are more likely to choose game practices that accord with their personality characteristics. Present studies investigate which characteristics of the gamers’ profile inform player-centered usability design.
• 8.
  Research Design: data from2 studies Study 1: A short-scale study examining general game use and Study 2: The gamers’ use of a specific game – World of Warcraft WoW is a PAY To PLAY MMORPG (Massively Multiplayer online role- play game Data for gender, age, ethnicity, trait EI, and game preferences/uses (Yee’s motivation play scale) were collected in both studies . TEIQue (short version) 30 items , 7 point scale
• 9.
  Heuristics for designing enjoyableuser interfaces: Lessons from computer games, Malone (1982) Such as challenge (goal, uncertain outcome), fantasy, curiosity (audiovisual effect, new information when previous knowledge is not adequate).
• 10.
  Motivations for MMORPGs Bartle’s4 player types Bartle analysing MMORPGs categorised gamers into: 1. killers (gamers who provoke or impose on others) 2. achievers (competitive gamers) 3. explorers (exploring the game world and game mechanics) 4. socialisers (being interested in relationships and communication)
• 11.
  Yee’s motivation scale (basedon Bartle’s player types 1996) Achievement Social Immersion Advancement Socializing Discovery Mechanics Relationship Role-Playing Competition Teamwork Customization Escapism
• 12.
  Study 1 :small scale survey N=114: gamers who play multiple genres: 73.7% playing more than one type of games including action/adventure, strategy, role-playing, and casual/arcade games (e.g., Grand Theft Auto, Fifa, Diablo, Minecraft, Sims, WoW, Angry Birds, Solitaire) 72.8% were European and 23% North American 54% male; 46% female Mean age=30.8, SD=12.3 Data on game preferences: frequently played games, location, frequency and duration of gaming, and reasons for gaming
• 13.
  Results: Study 1 •correlational analysis indicated that gamers with higher trait EI tended to game less hours per week (r=-.311, p<.001). • the older the gamers, the less hours spent on gaming (r=-.310, p<.001). • no gender differences in trait EI (t=-.89, df=111, p=.370, NS) • In terms of the location of gaming, most participants prefer to game at home (83% of male and 69% of female; 27% of female game either on-the-go or both home and on-the-go).
• 14.
  Male and Femalegamers display similar patterns • Both involved in a variety of games • play frequently and persistently • both at home and on-the-go, and • have similar emotion-related characteristics. • game less frequently as they grow up and prefer easily implemented, flexible, challenging games that integrate storyline elements and promote thinking skills. • Similar patterns of gaming between male and female gamers as found elsewhere (L. McLean et al., 2013) • Reasons for playing games: perception of gaming as being integrated in everyday life, as an escape from reality, and social interaction and enjoyment.
• 15.
  Study 2: Largescale survey N=1042 American (N=545, Male: 515) and European (N=497, Male: 487), 16-25 years old, high-end gamers of World of Warcraft. Why high-end ? By being systematically involved in gaming, high-end gamers can illuminate the key design principles underlying long-term involvement in gaming and inform the design of games that reinforce persistent use. All game daily, 3 to 5 hours a day. Game preferences referred to in-game choices as measured by Yee’s Motivation of Play scale
• 16.
  Results Study 2:comparisons between US and European samples • No SD in game frequency and duration of gaming between European and American gamers. • SD were found in trait EI; American trait EI scores (t=4.19. df= 1040, p <0.001) (M=4.92, SD=.85) were higher than European (M= 4.70, SD=.79). • In terms of game preferences as measured by Yee’s Motivation of Play scale, American gamers with greater interest in achievement practices were found to have lower scores on global trait EI (r = - .149, p <.001), well-being (r = -.115, p<.001), self-control (r =-.173, p<.001) and emotionality (r =-.162, p<.001). • No correlations for sociability (r = -.006, p<.001. NS). • American gamers with greater interest in social practices presented higher scores in global trait EI (r = .185, p<.001), well- being (r =.189, p<.001), emotionality (r =.224, p<.001) and sociability (r =.142, p<.001).
• 17.
  Results from study2: cultural differences Nationality: SD in trait EI and game preferences were found between Americans and Europeans. Gamers’ preferences for play were found to be culturally bound; American gamers were more interested in achievement practices (competition and in-game advancement). In contrast European gamers were found to be more interested in social practices, including socializing, group work and the creation of emotional bonds. Immersive practices including role-playing, exploration, discovery and escapism are practices of general interest to gamers.
• 18.
  Further results fromstudy 2 individuals with higher emotional self-perceptions spend less time gaming (and more social practices). Americans with lower scores on trait EI were more interested in achievement practices. (not Europeans) Americans were found to perceive themselves as having higher trait EI scores compared to Europeans. The within-groups analysis of trait EI scores confirmed previous studies on the role of trait EI in gaming indicating that gamers’ emotional characteristics should be considered when designing games.
• 19.
  This paper addsinsight to gamers’ taxonomies derived by Bartle and Yee. Specifically, Bartle’s and Yee’s ‘socialisers’ are described as individuals who score high in emotional intelligence; they are emotionally and socially aware and look for game experiences where they can express these personality characteristics. Bartle’s killers and achievers (Yee’s achievers) are described as less emotionally and socially aware individuals who look for less social game experiences such as imposing and competing others.
• 20.
  Conclusions Findings suggest thatgames should adapt to gamers’ personality orientation by providing gameplay choices that satisfy both socially- oriented and achievement-oriented gamers The socio-emotional aspects of human behaviour should not be neglected in usability and playability procedures: gamers are more likely to become immersed in gameplay when it presents features that align well with their emotional characteristics and game preferences.
• 21.
  In sum Our paperstresses the need to bring to the forefront the social and emotional aspects of usability as a means to design enjoyable player- centered game experiences. This work questions the validity of those HCI approaches generalizing usability principles and heuristics to the universe of gamers assuming that they comprise a homogenous population’. Our findings strongly support the consideration of specific individual characteristics to the design of player- centred game experiences.